Does Quincy Jones confirm Michael's voice on 'Breaking News'? No. He doesn't.
Let's not forget the vast number of people who think that Quincy Jones wrote all of MJ's material and that "Michael wouldn't be anything without Quincy." That is a very common perception amongst casual fans and non-fans.
Q was already making paradigm-shifting records when Michael was only six years old. Have some respect!
Does he confirm Michael's voice is not on Breakind News? No he doesn't do that either.
With "the family didn't thank me" I tend to think he believes this as well at least to a degree
i'm sure sony shares the same sentiment. lol. he's a loose cannon. got fired by his own company. he's not good at working for anyone but himself. so if he tries to ally himself with someone, most likely, his enemy will rejoice. Michael couldn't ask for anything better, cus freidman is too sloppy.He also didn't say it wasn't him on BN. So... RF should just try to stay neutral and write on his scoops. He's taking this way too personally.
Does he confirm Michael's voice is not on Breakind News? No he doesn't do that either.
Interesting...
L.o.v.e.
Romi
And therein lies the problem. It shouldn't be hard. Michael Jackson has one of the most distinctive voices around. It doesn't matter if he's doing an angry song while making a personal or political statement, or singing with his trademark tenor or falsetto in a midtempo groove or ballad. There is only one Michael Jackson... and many of us are open to believing he's on the track, we just don't like tracks where we have to guess who we're listening to, or take someone's word, or hunt and peck for vocals.
well he's breaking pattern, here. he prides himself in his opinions, whether he is right or wrong. this time, he doesn't have one. that doesn't bode well for the cascios. plus, he's on camera, freidman is being pushy to a sloppy degree, and i would think Jones wants to put his best foot forward, in the face of leading questions.
My personal opinion is there should be no doubts when it comes to the music of Michael Jackson.
jones didn't have an answer. the right answer is you either feel it or don't. it wasn't like this in the past and it should't be like this now. this wasn't done to elvis or anybody else. like i said earlier i had a copy of the credits that was taken down, and i know that those who support this fraud would be gung ho to bring them up if they supported it, not. so this argument is being kept up for argument's sake. but you go ahead and support what you want. all i know is...in most cases we are taught fool me once.....but is there really a problem with what he said here?
If you think that there is at least some vocals of MJ on the Breaking News song then the right answer would be something in the middle - just like Quincy said.
^^Yes I forgot the part about him being accused of being too trusting. Thanks for reminding me of that. Quincy is hedging and that is telling. He cannot say yes or no because he is not sure, and I commend him for this. Others might say "yes" because they feel that other producers have said "yest it is Michael." Obviously, he can think for himself, and I like that. He knows his artistic reputation is on the line here.
Quincy Jones lost the plot a long time ago. He's a shadow of the man we used to know - 'senile' some might say.
This is a guy who refuses to believe - despite all ther medical evidence - that MJ had Vitiligo. He thinks Michael hated being black and used to sit in a bath of bleach each evening - how stupid do you have to be to believe that sh**!?
Quincy did ok before MJ - the odd Grammy they used to dish out to 'Black' people to try and make out the award were not racist - but MJ made him the big name him later became. After MJ, what did Quincy ever do that was worthwhile? Nothing I can think of.
Ask the general public what Quincy Jones did before or after working with MJ. Would they be able to tell you one thing? Doubt it.
Ask the general public who made the mega selling albums 'Dangerous', and most of them will be able to tell you.
Although Quincy, through jealousy and old age, has tried to make out he was the force behind MJ's success, it's bullsh**. Qunicy needed MJ more than MJ needed Quincy. MJ was a huge talent before he ever set eyes on Quincy.
Stop taking the ramblings of an old man as 'gospel' - just because it suits you - unless you want to accept all the other sh** Quincy has dished out against MJ. Otherwise you just look like hypocrites.
And neither did Michael. And your point is?
quincy is also responsible for mess called we are the world 25 .so i am not going to listen to him when he dissed new album.
quincy is also responsible for mess called we are the world 25 .so i am not going to listen to him when he dissed new album.
saleswise? Dangerous sold more than Bad...so your point again???
Will you listen to him if Quincy praised the new album?
Anyway, did he diss the new album? He just expressed his opinion. He said he could not hear Michael because the vocals are stack. He said he didn't think it's a good idea to release materials because Michael is not here to provide his finishing touch. These are his opinions. Thus far, he didn't say anything negative regarding the album.
It's okay for people to be excited and supportive of the new album. I will buy the album myself. Still, there is nothing wrong for people to not support the album. Both will.i.am and Quincy Jones worked with Michael in the studio. They have first hand knowledge of how Michael was like as a musician. Both of them found it uneasy to release materials without Michael's approval, which, im my opinion, is totally understandable.
Michael respected Quincy Jones and other artists himself. Yet, some fans can't wait to trash him or other artists if those artists have different opinions from their own.
It's also worth mentioning: How much of what MJ learned in the studio with Bruce, Rod, Quincy and other musicians/songwriters did he use when taking control of his later albums? Probably a lot.