michaeljojacksonfan
Proud Member
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2011
- Messages
- 1,398
- Points
- 0
Not sure if this has been posted..
Can somebody please give us some hint on what this man is saying?
I can't hardly understand a thing with all the food he's got in his mouth (sorry, but that is so disgusting to me... not his fault, but mines... I guess uke.
objectively speaking, no matter what we think of quincy, he had great talent, and he can't feel breaking news, according to that video, which is in stark contrast to what sony/cascios and 'forensic musicologists said that quincy said. at the same time quincy acknowledges that Michael was a great songwriter and artist, who believed in quincy, when nobody else would on the off the wall and thriller projects. it's astounding what people won't believe, despite the fact that the evidence is in front of their faces.
Jones does eat elegantly, imo. lol. he's showing his wealth and appreciation of fine cuisine mixed with his roots.
not word by word only Quincy
- I heard about them somebody asked me ... to identify them
- yeah they played that for me
- how can you tell though sounds stacked up.
- hi -himm
- ... I can't tell there's too many stacks on. It could be I don't know.
- when you stack a voice that much it's hard to tell ....
- his family doesn't have a clue what we did in the studio ...
- he's a liar
- I take the fifth. what do you think of him?
- nothing much to think. not once the family thank me for doing what I did ... not once nobody
- of course. Michael knows what happened though
-
will update as I listen
- he's a liar
now he says that after doggin him in 05 and after his death and havin nerve 2say mike wasnt that talented...bullshit. he can eat it. And after WATW25 and this new PYT we all KNOW the driving force and talents behind Otw-BAD and it aint QJ
my keyword was 'was'. i don't know that quincy has it anymore. i know Michael had a genius talent for being a producer's producer..able to bring out the best in everyone, including jones. hell..MJ brought out the best in gordy, without writing a note, and he was just a little boy. MJ said, when he was a boy, that he knew what sounded good, and he was right. here, jones doesn't approve of Michael's father. indeed Michael was the golden child. able to eat the fish and throw away the bones, and bring out the magic, concerning everyone in his life. when he left the room, so did the magic.
who is a liar?
Thanks for the post, Ivy. Who did Quincy say was lying and what is it that he wants to be thanked for now?
I thought RF stuff wasn't suppose to be posted here?
Quincy says he can't tell. That says it all for me...
he can't feel breaking news, according to that video, which is in stark contrast to what sony/cascios and 'forensic musicologists said that quincy said.
I don't remember Quincy's name being mentioned on the estate statement plus to me he sounds like he listened to the online version (as he says stacked) and not the raw vocal tracks.
So, Quincy was one of the people that was asked to identify the authenticity of the tracks. Hence, why the Cascios mentioned him. But since he "couldn't tell", his view was left out of the official statement from the estate as well.
And, is it just me, or is Roger Friedman really trying to convince Quincy that Michael is on the tracks? Continually emphasising of how Michaelish the controversial song sounds, pointing out signature melodies and such? Quite surprising, coming from RF.
he says somebody, it could be a fan. I even emailed and asked Bruce Swedien.
and I also checked with one of my musician friend and apparently I was right about "stacked". My friend told me that stacked means the mixing of the vocals with lower and higher notes and in some instances even doubling them to make it sound richer. Stacked means that there are several vocal - background vocal tracks and harmonies mixed together. It's not the acapella that he listened.
Thanks again, Ivy, for the posting.
People shouldn't be reading too much into QJ's statement about the song because he said he couldn't tell but also why he couldn't tell; in other words he didn't flat out say that those are not Michael's vocals so people shouldn't take it as such.
The family never thanked him? Why should the family thank him? Did Frank Sinatra's family thank him? Is there anyone who worked with Michael who isn't whining that they didn't get enough money or recognition?
And, is it just me, or is Roger Friedman really trying to convince Quincy that Michael is on the tracks? Continually emphasising of how Michaelish the controversial song sounds, pointing out signature melodies and such? Quite surprising, coming from RF.