[ Pretrial Discussion Closed ] AEG files summary judgment motion to dismiss Katherine's lawsuit

Status
Not open for further replies.
CherubimII;3748020 said:
Well said. I agree with you. :bow:

Michael's liver was strong, there was no scar tissue, if Michael were a heavy duty drug user, whether street drugs or painkillers, his liver would not have been strong, he would've needed a liver transplant to carry on in life.

About the time Michael died, Acetaminophen was in the News about causing so much liver damage that people were dying from taking too much Acetaminophen, as it is in so many products, i.e. cough syrup, headache medicine, sleep products, etc.

Steve Jobs, who was the owner of Apple Inc, had a liver transplant before he died. If Michael Jackson's liver was needed, at the time of his death, Steve Jobs could have used Michael's in his liver transplant. So...why do people continue saying Michael had a heavy duty drug use through the decades? He died from Murray being negligent with the Propofol usage (including the use of lidocaine in the IV of administering the Propofol drip to Michael's vein during the night- highly toxic, if you want to know why Michael seemed out of sorts at times near the time of his death).

Too much tomfoolery!


There is no pattern of any type of drug abuse.


How the Liver Works to Detox the Body

By Ryan Harrison, MA, BCIH

The liver is one of the body’s primary organs of detoxification. The second largest organ in the body, the liver is responsible for many different functions, including processing the body’s nutrients, manufacturing bile to help digest fats, synthesizing many important proteins, regulating blood clotting, and breaking down potentially toxic substances into harmless ones that the body can either use or excrete.

Liver Function

Of course, just because the liver is a prime filtration organ doesn’t mean that it is immune to the chemicals and toxins it encounters as it does its work. Most people know, for example, that alcohol can damage the liver, leading to dangerous levels of inflammation and hepatitis. Fortunately, the liver is remarkable in yet another way: it can regenerate or repair up to two-thirds of itself! Healthy liver cells “take over” the workload while the unhealthy cells heal. Because of the organ’s many important roles in the body, taking the time to cleanse the liver is a great idea for anyone pursuing optimal health.

Better Diet for Liver Health

What you eat and drink is the first concern. Fried and greasy foods, as well as alcohol and the wide gamut of artificial colors, preservatives, and other additives in today’s foods all challenge the liver, which has to interact with them. Eliminating, or at least drastically reducing, your intake of these foods and beverages will give your liver a break.

Avoiding certain foods is only part of the answer, however. It is just as important to feed yourself well. Eating organic, raw whole foods and herbs that are nourishing to your liver is the flip side of the coin and should be practiced all the time if possible, but especially during a Liver cleanse.

Liver Detox Programs

When looking for a liver detoxification program, be sure that it includes supplements that have liver-supporting nutrients. One of the chief ingredients should be milk thistle (also called silymarin). There is plenty of research showing the efficacy of milk thistle in supporting the liver by protecting liver cells, promoting their growth, and inhibiting their inflammation, and by fighting oxidation. Look for a product that contains a standardized extract of milk thistle to ensure potency.

Milk thistle

Herbs that Support Liver Health
There are several other herbs that have shown to be supportive of a healthy liver, as well, and a good liver detoxification program will include several of them. Look for these and other herbs to ensure that you’re getting herbal ingredients that aid in the healing and wellness of the liver:

Licorice Root:
Well known and loved throughout Asia, this herb is useful in supporting digestive and liver health. In Japan, a popular preparation composed of the active constituent of this herb has been used extensively to support a healthy liver.

Yellow Dock:
This herb affects the liver and other organs related to detoxification and metabolism, supporting their ability to strain and purify blood. In many countries, this herb is beloved for its blood-purifying effects. To this day, yellow dock is included in liver-cleansing preparations all over the world: European and North American countries, and China and India, all recognize and utilize this powerful herb.

Fenugreek:
Containing potent antioxidants that positively affect the liver, fenugreek has also been used historically to support digestive health. This combination makes it a powerful ally in any natural cleansing and liver detoxification program.

These herbs and many others can play an important role in boosting the effectiveness of your internal cleanse and liver detoxification program. Because herbs work synergistically – that is, better together than in single formulations – look for colon cleanse and detox products that combine a selection of health-promoting herbs. That way, you’ll reap the many rewards of herbal supplementation while augmenting your personal cleansing journey.
http://www.drnatura.com/detox/liver-detox/
 
Re: AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine Jackson lawsuit

In my opinion, Michael DID have an idea (some what) and it came from Nurse Lee (as per her sworn testimony).

She said that she explained the entire thing to Michael and expressed her concern directly to him. It's not like she said "tell Michael I said yada, yada, yada," she (per her testimony) explained everything to him face-to-face. She even went so far as to go home and research it further, so that she was accurate in her assessment. I believe she even said that she brought along a medical handbook to show Michael, which explained everything she was about to share with him.

Funny thing is that Michael called Nurse Lee to his home, because he wasn't feeling well. He trusted her enough to call her at that point, but, I guess, he didn't trust her enough to take heed of her warnings.

Bottomline, it would appear that he trusted Murray more then he trusted Nurse Lee.

No hun..I think you misunderstood my post...I agree Michael KNEW the risks from propofol...what he DIDN'T know was that Murray was leaving him unattended while he was under the propofol...and if he did it THAT night...Lord knows how many other nights that he did it that Michael was ok. Murray deceived Michael by NOT saying to him.."Hey Michael I don't stay here and monitor you while you are under". He could of been on the phone other nights too and not paid attention to Michael..we don't know...and just by the grace of God Michael woke up the other times. And Michael couldn't take the chance of haveing video camera's in his room because Heaven forbid the vids ever got leaked..then the WORLD would of known how Michael Jackson was using propofol to sleep at night. Unfortunately the world knows anyway because he died BECAUSE of it..and that is all Murray's fault.
 
Re: AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine Jackson lawsuit

I just hate Murray and reading all the posts on how he didn't care about Michael at all makes me ill. This is why the Jacksons should have done everything they could to stop him from making money off of what he did. They had the chance and threw it away for this case. AEG are no saints but what Murray did was wrong not only as a doctor but just as a human being. You should value someone's life and not be so careless like he was. He got only 4 years for this but Michael is gone forever. If anybody did something like that to someone in my family I would want to make sure they felt like they were still living in a prison even after they got out.


The Jacksons chose the wrong fight in my opinion and for the wrong reasons.
 
Re: AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine Jackson lawsuit

Like i said if mj felt the need to film him then i very much doubt he would have him in the house doing what he did. thats before u get into all the security issues.Why would mj feel the need to to film someone he obviously trusted and he had no reason not to trust him. u have to look at things from a perspective of being back then not looking back now with hindsight. theres so much we dont know and never will know so imo theres really no point going around in circles with ifs and buts

Agree 100%

Michael didnt have cameras in his bedroom in order to protect his privacy. Not even at neverland. I also dont think he would ever film Murray sedating him either. If That ever got in the wrong hands it could cause him unwanted scruteny. Im sure He learned from his experience at Neverland that nothing is sacred and everything could be confiscated from his home and used against him. That experience devastated him and cause him to leave his home never to return :(

EXACTLY!!!! Thank You Great post. :clapping:
 
Re: AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine Jackson lawsuit

I remember in the trial it being mentioned that Murray had admitted he left MJ unattended more then once before June 25th? Of course without MJ knowing! Am I right?! :unsure:
 
Re: AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine Jackson lawsuit

jamba said:
The response was to have a meeting on the 20th of June at Michael's home with KO, RP, CM, Dileo. Murray as we know told them Michael was fine and Michael said the same. However, if you look at KO's description of Michael's state, it is serious and required a real intervention IMO. KO says Michael needs "immediate physical nurturing." I think there were some days off from rehearsals after that meeting. On the 21st Michael has his aides call Nurse Lee about the hot and cold sensations. On the nights of the 22nd-23rd and 23rd-24th he does not have the propofol to sleep, b/c CM decided to 'wean him off of it" thinking he had become addicted. Duh! Instead he gave him (I think) Valium and lorazepam to sleep and it worked. Michael had 2 great rehearsals. Then on the night 24th-25th Murray starts with the same substitutes for the propofol but they don't work this time, so he adds the propofol (a deadly combination of drugs) and leaves the room.
how do you know these two days Murray didnt give Michael propofol? Just because Murray said so. Every words he said had been the proven lies in court. Murray's whole police interview is self serving, nothing but lies and more lies. he knew propofol killed Michael, in order to get away from charges, he had to play the concern caring doctor and paint michael as the propofol addict. so what he did is to try to wean off a propofol addict but the desperate patient gave himself the fetal dose that killed himself. The prosecutor in court said from the amount of propofol Murray ordered and continued to order, there is no such so called wean off. Also On the night michael dead, the begging part is also the proven lie. First of all, Murray hanged the whole bottle of propofol in the IV bag, which is clearly the way he used to give Michael propofol every night. It just happened 6/25 his reckless finally killed Michael. Secondly, the prosecutor put the timeline of Murray's phone usage. He was busy on the phones the whole night, talking with his different baby mama, stripper girlfriend ect when the alleged "Michael was awake and begged him for propofol" took place. He can talk on the phones all night flirting with his many girlfriends because he knocked michael off with propofol the whole night. No offense but the bold part are just the bullshit from Conrad Murray.

The experts in trial testified the combination of the drugs, the choice of drugs, the dosage Murray gave Michael is strange. benzo unlike propofol can make people physically addicted. IMO the bad days Michael had is likely the combination of drugs murray experimented on Michael went wrong. Michael's reaction seemed like Benzo's side effect to me.
 
Last edited:
Re: AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine Jackson lawsuit

Just to clear the air...


NANNY CAMS TO PROTECT WHAT MATTERS MOST

Nanny cameras are critical tools for every parent or caregiver who needs to know their family is safe. Usually placed in the home, nanny cams provide protection against the unknown. We've all heard the stories of young children suffering abuse at the hands of their babysitter. Setting up a nanny camera will put your mind at ease. You'll know for sure what's happening when you can't be there. Check out BrickHouse Security's extensive selection of affordable hidden cameras and nanny cams today. Because nothing is more important than your family's safety.

http://www.brickhousesecurity.com/category/hidden+cameras/nanny+cams.do

This is what I was referencing, not invading Michael's privacy, but a checks and balance on Murray's actions.

I understand that this may have ruffled feather's, but my intent was not to invade Michael's privacy, it was to protect him as to what Conrad Murray was doing while Michael was under his care, because there seems to be no other alternative, because Michael didn't check up on Murray by the use of a Nanny Cam and all Michael could do was trust Murray, unfortunately!

rszgirl.jpg
 
Re: AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine Jackson lawsuit

Alicat, about those nanny cams, I watched Graham Norton show few weeks ago, Cuba Gooding Jr was quest in it.
He said he had one of those installed for his home if something happens to kids while they visiting to his kids. If something had happened, he had video camera on his side. I was thinking that there is so much blackmail cases going on (Travolta being the latest), he might have thought of MJ case and had cameras installed for security measure against loony parents.
It might have been wise from MJ to install those cameras 93 and keep them rolling.



But, then again, to install cameras to check how your doctor is treating you? I'm one of those naive people that think your doctor knows everything (at least until I got to know there are doctors like Murray) and never question if my doc knows what she/he is doing, and I think Michael was trusting too. Doctors are supposed to do what is best for you, right?
If Michael trusted to Murray, he had no reason to even think about such a thing, it would have required him being suspicious of Murray, and obviously he wasn't.
 
Last edited:
Re: AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine Jackson lawsuit

And I do believe the rehab in London was for BOTH painkillers and sleep-aids. Michael had a well-known long-lasting issue of dependency on painkillers and sleep-aids, so that was nothing new to anyone, including AEG.
--------------------------------------------------

why do u believe it included sleep aids in 93. is there any evidence or are you just pesuming as we need to stick to the facts as we have them. mj had an issue with painkillers in 93 he also stated he had issues with them in the early 00's but theres no evidence he had problems with them at any other time including upto june 09. members of his own family claimed they knew nothing about his insomnia so why would you expect AEG to know.
 
Re: AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine Jackson lawsuit

how do you know these two days Murray didnt give Michael propofol? Just because Murray said so. Every words he said had been the proven lies in court. Murray's whole police interview is self serving, nothing but lies and more lies. he knew propofol killed Michael, in order to get away from charges, he had to play the concern caring doctor and paint michael as the propofol addict. so what he did is to try to wean off a propofol addict but the desperate patient gave himself the fetal dose that killed himself. The prosecutor in court said from the amount of propofol Murray ordered and continued to order, there is no such so called wean off. Also On the night michael dead, the begging part is also the proven lie. First of all, Murray hanged the whole bottle of propofol in the IV bag, which is clearly the way he used to give Michael propofol every night. It just happened 6/25 his reckless finally killed Michael. Secondly, the prosecutor put the timeline of Murray's phone usage. He was busy on the phones the whole night, talking with his different baby mama, stripper girlfriend ect when the alleged "Michael was awake and begged him for propofol" took place. He can talk on the phones all night flirting with his many girlfriends because he knocked michael off with propofol the whole night. No offense but the bold part are just the bullshit from Conrad Murray.

The experts in trial testified the combination of the drugs, the choice of drugs, the dosage Murray gave Michael is strange. benzo unlike propofol can make people physically addicted. IMO the bad days Michael had is likely the combination of drugs murray experimented on Michael went wrong. Michael's reaction seemed like Benzo's side effect to me.
--------------------------------------------------------

totally agree. jamba seems to be creating a theory based on their opinion not based on the facts shown in court..its also been shown AEG did not want to hire murray did not want to pay him what he wanted. and that it was mj who picked his staff and insisted on murray being hired instead of a dr in the uk.

the bottom line is mj showed up in a state on the 19th and concern was shown. i could understand ppl wondering why wasnt more done if he had turned up day after day week after week like that but it happened on that one date. kenny was concerned and a meeting was held were murray had a go at him and said mj was fine.mj said he fine and then they had a couple of days off and at the next rehearsals mj was in great form. so that was it and there were no other issues. if mj had turned up on the 23rd and 24th in a state then yes ppl can say something should have been done but the fact also is that the 25th happened. so everything happened in a short space of time. we dont know what might have happened if he had tunred up in a state on the 23 24 25 26th rehearsals etc. but the fact is he turned up in that state once and a meeting was held and then after a couple of days off at the next 2 rehearsals mj was in great form so any issue kenny thought he had on the 19th he obviously saw how great he was on the 23-24 and prob thought it was a one off he seems ok now and that was it.
 
Re: AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine Jackson lawsuit

RE the Nanny Cams, as far as we know Michael didn't set up any cameras even when his children were younger, so really it's unlikely he would think about it for Murray. Also as to whether it would have made a difference, we will never know, we don't even know if that night was the first and only time Murray left Michael or if he made a habit of it. And remember Michael would only have been looking at the tape the next day so if by some small chance that was the only time he was left it would have been too late anyway.

For whatever reason Michael trusted Murray, and my personal opinion is that AEG also trusted Murray, we know Murray is very good at selling his loving and caring services (in other words BS), and we have said many times, hindsight is a wonderful thing!
 
Re: AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine Jackson lawsuit

The point to me is that when Michael showed up at the rehearsal and K. Ortega had to feed him, cover him with a blanket, and reassure him and then send him home that that was a major wake-up call for the tour organizers to do what Ortega recommended, which was to get professional help. K. O. recommended a psychiatrist, I think. He said Michael was not himself, was acting 'lost' and was scared that the tour would be cancelled. Then they have the meeting and then Murray decides to take Michael off the propofol b/c he (Murray) was scared and maybe had some dim realization that what he was doing was creating havoc in Michael's system. And b/c Michael finally got off the propofol for 2 days and got some relatively natural sleep (although he was using sleep meds) he gave some good rehearsals. At that point things seemed to be back on track for everyone. But the problem was that Michael did not sleep with the alternate sleep meds on the 24th, and Murray mixed them with profofol and left him alone.

I myself got dependent on sleep meds (ambien) and although you might not realize it, they are very addictive and you get to the point where you can't sleep without them and they are very hard to get off of. This is what happened to Michael in 93 when he went to rehab in London. You go through a withdrawal period where you just can't sleep even though you are exhausted. Finally, you do start to sleep a few hours without the meds and then you are in the clear. It is very hard to withdraw from those meds once you get dependent. You are only supposed to take ambien for 3 weeks straight. I took it for years. Michael needed a major detox a la what he went through in London to get off the meds and sleep naturally. It would have delayed the tour but ultimately saved his life and the tour in the long run.

But we do not know the circumstances and withdrawal symptoms of Michael's stay in rehab. You are writing ^^that withdrawal from sleep aid led to his stay in rehab in 93. You state things as though you really have the facts from the facility. You talk about your withdrawal from that sleeping aid, which is OK, but that cannot be applied to Michael because we do not know the extent to which he was affected by drugs with certainty. We have rumors and speculations. No doctors who treated Michael at the facility ever came out and said what Michael system had in it, the nature of the treatment, and the extent of the dependency, to my knowledge. You say he needed major detoxing, but how can that be if he stayed in the facility for such a short time, and again you do not know he needed major detoxing for certainty.

The next thing is that we speculate that Muarry did not give him the drug on the 24. We are not sure, because Muarry lies. Maybe he did not give it to him, or it could be he gave him much much less--we do not know with certainty, so we cannot say Muarry did not give it to him and that is why he performed well. However, it was not only 2 days that Michael performed well during that rehearsal period. Then, if as you said Muarry got scared and took away the drug because he knew it was doing havoc with Michael's system, then why would Muarry give him back the drug that fatal night and leave him unattended. You see something is not adding up here.

Finally, if we really look at the situation another way, prof did not kill Micahel but it was the negligent way in which it was administered that caused Michael's death. Muarry was tried for negligence. That is one of the reasons why Dr. Shaffer did not want a review of the drug where you would need extra paper work to use it in the hospital. According to Shaffer this is a good drug that allows patients to wake up without that groggy feeling and is safe when used correctly. I think we should start pushing that negligence killed Michael. In that way we turn the focus back to Muarry where it belongs and not to the victim as causation.
 
Re: AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine Jackson lawsuit

As for the nanny cams - Michael was trusting Murray with his life everyday, he was letting him to drug him and he was in a vulnerable state. I don't think in his mind he had any reason to put hidden cameras. Also don't forget that this was a bedroom that he at times were naked and he was lying with a condom catheter. I don't think he would ever record himself in that situation being given drugs. It just wouldn't happen. It's not realistic to expect it.

Now to some other stuff. Propofol is safe when given properly. Michael knew this to - as we can see from Nurse Lee's testimony in criminal trial. I think we are looking to Murray's negligence and ego here. We have seen and heard Murray's explanations at the trial and his documentary. He has a really big ego, kinda narcissistic and never apologetic. Also recently Michael's kids have confirmed that Michael was saying positive things about Murray. So it's possible for Murray to fool everyone - from Michael to Randy Phillips- to believe that he was more than a capable doctor in every regard.

As for a 911 call or taking Michael to ER or an intervention and so on, all of these are hard to do when you are dealing with an adult. You can call 911 but they cannot give medical care if the person is rejecting such care. so unless Michael was unconscious or unless he was a threat to others (so that cops can do a 5150 hold) it might have been impossible. Obviously Michael would not be that willing to go to ER as well due to negative publicity and he also had his own private doctor - Murray - who could have told him not to worry and it's nothing.

As for Gongaware , I think he might have seen some stuff at the previous tours but it doesn't necessarily mean that he was aware. For example we have Michael's kids saying that they saw IV stuff but thought it was for nutrition, we have read Frank Cascio write that he only learned Propofol and what it is after Michael's death.
 
Re: AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine Jackson lawsuit

I don't want to be harsh, but I think some of us should look at more factual data and credible sources, when we are looking for medical/drug use habits of Michael. I mean utube can be useful, but please look at the source when you go there for knowledge. If I did not know better, from reading some of the posts I would think that Michael was a toddler, who needed looking after by Ortega, AEG staff, his mamma and needed the protection of a video camera; he was also a raving painkiller and drug junkie who miraculously died with undamaged organs, especially the liver.

Ivy about how soon are we expecting a response from Katherine's group? Have any legal buffs commented on the strength of AEG's last arguments ^^ in that summary judgment? Is there some points that AEG did not consider that the defense could use to help keep the case going.
 
@Petrarose "But we do not know the circumstances and withdrawal symptoms of Michael's stay in rehab. You are writing ^^that withdrawal from sleep aid led to his stay in rehab in 93. You state things as though you really have the facts from the facility. You talk about your withdrawal from that sleeping aid, which is OK, but that cannot be applied to Michael because we do not know the extent to which he was affected by drugs with certainty. We have rumors and speculations. No doctors who treated Michael at the facility ever came out and said what Michael system had in it, the nature of the treatment, and the extent of the dependency, to my knowledge. You say he needed major detoxing, but how can that be if he stayed in the facility for such a short time, and again you do not know he needed major detoxing for certainty."

About the 1993 rehab, what Michael's rehab doc talked about was 'analgesic abuse.' Michael himself spoke about 'painkillers' and referred to the Pepsi burn. However, Michael was known as someone who often had problems with insomnia pretty much throughout his life. We have heard from many people who received phone calls at 3 am from him. LMP confirmed to Oprah in her interview after his death that he had trouble sleeping and that he was like "a little gnome" running around the bedroom. So given that Michael cancelled the Dangerous Tour when he was under great stress, I am thinking he was having trouble sleeping. In fact, it seems pretty obvious that he would when he was facing allegations of child abuse. He also made it clear that when he was on tour he had trouble sleeping after the extreme energy of the performance and the exhilaration of it; he called it being at "the zenith." (a peak experience)

Here are some quotes I found to support 1) that Michael had chronic insomnia 2) that in 93 he was very stressed about the allegations 3) that he treated the insomnia with medications that were anti-anxiety.

As a teen, Cascio was on tour with Jackson with Mexico City in 1993 when Jackson was swept off to rehab by his good friend, screen legend Elizabeth Taylor.
"Elizabeth takes us aside and says to us, 'We're going to get him out of the country after the show. He's going to go to London,'" Cascio remembered.
Jackson would later release a videotaped statement to his fans, announcing he had undergone "treatment for a dependency on pain medications."
Years later, Cascio began working for Jackson. He said he would keep Jackson's stashes of the anti-anxiety drug Xanax, the narcotic painkiller Percocet or the sedative Valium out of Jackson's reach at night.
"I wanted to always make sure I had them with me and not have anything in his room where he didn't wake up and say, 'I can't sleep tonight,' and not realize what he's taking. I was trying to think 10 steps ahead," Cascio said.
http://abcnews.go.com/US/Conrad_Mur...secret-world-doctors-hospital-grade-sedatives

WEDNESDAY, JULY 1, 2009
Michael Jackson’s Struggle with Insomnia


The Associated Press reports today that Michael Jackson struggled with severe and chronic insomnia. A nurse told the AP that he wanted to obtain the drug propofol - also known as Diprivan - to help him sleep.

Diprivan is a powerful sedative that is injected into a vein. It is given to patients before an operation or medical test.



Jackson’s insomnia may have had a variety of causes.

The AP reports that the 50-year-old singer was rehearsing hard for his upcoming “This Is It” tour. This may have caused adjustment insomnia. This type of insomnia results from a source of stress.

His concern about being unable to sleep may have developed into psychophysiological insomnia. People with this sleep disorder worry too much about insomnia and about being tired the next day. As a result, they learn to become tense and anxious as bedtime approaches.

The AP article notes that Jackson would sleep with a computer on the bed. This is a sign that he may have developed bad habits that prevented him from sleeping well. This is called inadequate sleep hygiene.

The AP also reports that Jackson often was in pain. Painful medical problems often cause insomnia due to medical condition.

Jackson may have been taking a variety of prescription medications. Many medications can suppress or disrupt sleep. Insomnia due to drug or substance may result.

His insomnia also may have been related to a mental health problem. The AASM reports that insomnia due to mental disorder is the most common disorder in people who seek help from a sleep center for ongoing insomnia. Often it is related to depression or anxiety.

Do you struggle with insomnia? You can get help at an AASM-accredited sleep center near you.
http://sleepeducation.blogspot.com/2009/07/michael-jacksons-struggle-with-insomnia.html


Ratner confirmed that Jackson suffered from a massive sleep disorder, but refused to comment on any of the other allegations.
http://articles.nydailynews.com/200...iption-drugs-michael-jackson-anesthesiologist
[neil ratner]

This Is It' Choreographer Overlooked Michael Jackson's Insomnia

By Amber James Posted Oct 23rd 2009 01:55PM

To the world, Michael Jackson was a musical genius. But behind closed doors, Jackson suffered from bouts of insomnia as he focused on conjuring enough energy to practice for his tour. Although Jackson's 3 a.m. phone calls to 'This Is It' choreographer Travis Payne may have been a warning sign, Payne told PopEater that he and director Kenny Ortega suffer from insomnia too, so they overlooked Jackson's symptoms. The seriousness of Jackson's health was made clear when the music icon died unexpectedly at age 50 from an acute intoxication of the anesthetic propofol, which allegedly helped him sleep.


"A lot of times, Michael would call at 3 or 4 in the morning, and we would just continue working. That was when we'd be able to get a lot of things done because the phones weren't ringing, and we didn't have a schedule... We wanted everything to be perfect. We would have our days off... but while we were working, we were immersed in the process and burning the midnight oil. It was normal," Payne said.

Payne knew Jackson was taking pain killers, but he thought it was due to the pain he still suffered from his hair catching on fire during the 1984 Pepsi commercial. "The only thing we were aware of was the insomnia," he said.
http://www.popeater.com/2009/10/23/this-is-it-michael-jackson/

There’s a kind of twisted irony for me in the story of how Michael Jackson died. As skeptics, we’re used to stories about people choosing alt-med over science-based medicine and the bad consequences for their health that results. In Jackson’s case, that scenario seems to be turned on its head. One of the witnesses in the trial of Conrad Murray, now found guilty of the singer’s manslaughter, told how she suggested to Jackson that he try “sleepy tea” as a cure for his insomnia. Jackson responded that he had tried the tea and it didn’t work. As it turned out, Jackson’s autopsy revealed that he had taken five different sedatives in the time leading up to his death, including both lorazepam and diazepam as well as the now notorious propofol: the anaesthetic which eventually killed him. I’m no medic, but I’m pretty sure that no one has yet died from an overdose of chamomile tea.
http://skeptoid.com/blog/2011/11/08/how-insomnia-killed-michael-jackson/

Jackson struggled with insomnia for much of his adult life.

What Jackson’s death does illustrate is that making bad choices about how to treat your body isn’t just the preserve of those who trust in the power of apples to cure cancer. Jackson wasn’t sold a quack cure by a charlatan – he was being treated by a qualified doctor. At the time of his death he was in better than average health for a person of his age. All that was wrong with him was that he found it difficult to sleep for more than five hours at a time and like many people who suffer from chronic insomnia, he desperately wanted a cure for his condition. But the psychology behind Jackson’s decision to fill himself (or allow himself to be filled) with an assortment of medications which would fell the average bull elephant, isn’t so different from that of the person who has a cupboard full of vitamins to treat the chronic fatigue caused by stress. Like many of the complaints which throng the appointment books of the alt-med community, insomnia is common, distressing and stubbornly resistant to conventional therapies. Benzodiazepines (which include lorazepam and diazepam) are sometimes used as a short term treatment for insomnia, but taken long term can make the problem worse – as appeared to happen in Jackson’s case. The best treatment for sleep disorders is cognitive therapy along with the teaching of relaxation techniques. No one has ever died from trying these either, but they take patience and the willingness to commit to lifestyle changes. When a sleep diary was suggested to Jackson, he said he didn’t have the time and it strikes me that there’s a straight line here between that and the back pain sufferer who prefers acupuncture to exercise, or those of us who buy diet books instead of eating less. Sometimes the answer to what ails us exists, but is harder work than we would like.

In the handwritten note, Jackson says: "I truly need this rest. I haven't slept litterally (sic) in 4 days and I need to be away from phones and business people. I just take care of my health first. Im' (sic) crazy for you."
He signs the scribbled note, "Love, Turd," an apparent nickname of his.
Letter to lmp, auction pulled

On Friday, November 12, 1993, Michael Jackson cancelled the remaining concerts of his tour, informing his fans through a taped statement about his addiction to prescribed medication:
”My friends and doctors advised me to seek professional guidance immediately in order to eliminate what has become an addiction. It is time for me to acknowledge my need for treatment in order to regain my health. I realize that completing the tour is no longer possible and I must cancel the remaining dates. I know I can overcome the problem and will be stronger from the experience. As I left on this tour, I had been the target of an extortion attempt, and shortly thereafter was accused of horrifying and outrageous conduct. I was humiliated, embarrassed, hurt and suffering great pain in my heart. The pressure resulting from these false allegations coupled with the incredible energy necessary for me to perform caused so much distress that is left me physically and emotionally exhausted. I became increasingly more dependent on the painkillers to get me through the days of the tour. Elizabeth Taylor, my close friend, has been a source of strength and counsel as this crisis came about. I shall never forget her unconditional love and encouragement in helping me through this period”. Vmj april 20, 2011

Jackson’s personal physician, David Forecast, had provided a sworn declaration backing up the statement that the singer was under treatment for drug addiction (filed on November 23, 1993 for case no SC 026225). Another declaration was filed the same day from lawyer Eve Wagner for the same case, who said that while he was deposed in Mexico for the copyright case, he was glassy eyed, could hardly stay awake, had slurred speech, and was unable to focus on the issues. Bert Fields said that the singer “was barely able to function adequately on an intellectual level”, a statement that Michael didn’t like because it made his fans sad. The video of Jackson’s deposition in Mexico for a copyright case (which he won) proved that he was incoherent and under medication. (from vindiatemj, April20, 2011)

As far as what drugs Conrad Murray gave Michael and whether it's true he did NOT give him propofol, as he claimed, on the 2 nights before the final night, I can only say that the drugs found in Michael's body at the autopsy included drugs other than propofol, and these are drugs that Murray also says he gave Michael. So it would seem obvious that CM did give Michael other drugs, either in addition to propofol, or, if you believe him, on 2 nights, as a substitute for propofol.

Dr. Conrad Murray was the doctor in attendance that night. He was trying to alleviate Jackson’s insomnia. He told detectives what occurred that night before the propofol was administered. First he gave 10 mg of Valium at 1:30 am, followed by an injection of 2 mg of Ativan at 2 am. At 3 am, Murray gave Jackson 2 mg of Versed, which is a sedative. Valium and Ativan are antianxiety medications, but are often given for insomnia as they are more gentle than some sleeping medications.
At 7:30 am, Murray gave Jackson more Versed, and finally gave him propofol at 10:40 am. After 10 minutes, Michael Jackson was asleep and so the doctor left his side to go to the restroom for just a moment. When he came back, Jackson was no longer breathing.

http://www.emaxhealth.com/1272/46/33067/insomnia-contributed-michael-jackson’s-death.html

As far as Michael being a 'toddler' who needs looking after by Ortega, I did not say that. If you are referring to me when you talk about 'some of us' who need better factual sources, I am doing my best here even if it is not up to your high standards.
 
Re: AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine Jackson lawsuit

This is an account from one of Michael bodyguards (Steve Tarling) about the 1993 rehab in London.

http://www.fanpop.com/clubs/michael-jackson/articles/110337/title/michael-rehab-93

That is an amazing account of what happened...if it is true then I am thankful to this man for helping Michael when he need someone there. And Thank you Jamba for sharing this..I had never read it before.
 
Re: AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine Jackson lawsuit

JambaYes I know. People said this and a bodyguard said that, but we still do not have the facts from competent doctors who treated Michael for us to make those extensive analyses about his treatment and level of toxicity in rehab, so I would hope when we make judgments about Michael's medical treatment we do so cautiously. Well I better go back on topic.
 
Re: AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine Jackson lawsuit

So, while Michael was in rehab at Elton John's Manager's home, a John Reid, Michael was also conducting business. Here's an article from the New York Times dated November 25, 1993, which says to me that Michael was coherent enough to score such a deal:

THE MEDIA BUSINESS; EMI to Pay Michael Jackson $70 Million to Manage Music
By ANDREA ADELSON
Published: November 25, 1993

The pop singer Michael Jackson said through his lawyer yesterday that EMI Music Publishing would begin managing his 6,000-title music catalogue, which includes most early Beatles hits, in a deal being described as the most lucrative in music publishing.

Mr. Jackson will receive $70 million in advance against revenue that EMI expected to generate managing the publishing rights to ATV Music. The catalogue, acquired by Mr. Jackson in 1985 for $47.5 million, includes the classic Lennon-McCartney Beatles compositions, as well as songs from Little Richard, Elvis Presley and the Pointer Sisters.

Total revenue over the deal's five-year term is estimated to be $150 million, said Martin N. Bandier, president of EMI Music Publishing, which controls 900,000 songs in its own catalogues. Financing for Acquisitions

As part of the deal, EMI had agreed to provide financing for acquisitions of other music catalogues in a partnership arrangement, in which EMI and the singer would share future ownership.

Such an arrangement increased the value of the deal, making it the largest in music publishing, according to John Branca, Mr. Jackson's lawyer.

The deal comes at a difficult time for the singer. Mr. Jackson, who recently ended a world tour so he could be treated for addiction to pain-killers, is believed to be receiving medical treatment in London, according to British news reports. He is facing a lawsuit in California by a 13-year-old boy, who contends Mr. Jackson sexually molested him. Mr. Jackson has denied the charges. Criminal investigations into the allegations are being conducted, and the boy's civil suit has been set for trial on March 21.

"ATV's use and value is impervious to Michael's own success," Mr. Branca said.

ATV, along with Mijac Music, which controls rights to Mr. Jackson's own song writing, make Mr. Jackson one of the largest independent music publishers in the world, Mr. Branca said. Mijac Music is excluded from the EMI deal. 'Major Additions'

"We expect major additions in the next few years," he said, noting that a probable first target would be the Jobete catalogue of the Motown Records Corporation, owned by Barry Gordy. Several years ago, Mr. Gordy turned down a $175 million offer for Jobete, which then had half the revenue of ATV, Mr. Branca said. Last year, ATV had sales of $25 million.

Mr. Bandier of EMI said his company had managed ATV Music under its previous owner, Robert Holmes a Court, the late Australian financier. And EMI had outbid Mr. Jackson by $500,000 for the ATV catalogue in 1985. "But when Michael agreed to go to Perth to perform at a charity benefit I knew we were out of luck," Mr. Bandier recalled. "We can't moonwalk."

MCA, a unit of the Matsushita Electric Industrial Company, had managed the ATV catalogue under a three-year contract that will expire on Dec. 31.
http://www.nytimes.com/1993/11/25/b...chael-jackson-70-million-to-manage-music.html
 
Re: AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine Jackson lawsuit

I think this trial has no sense...I agree with these two things, I guess AEG has a point:

-Michael was a 50 year old intelligent and successful entertainer and he wasn't a child or a prisoner.

-Murray was a licensed doctor in multiple states and did not have any prior record of discipline.
 
Here's an excerpt from a People magazine article that states Michael was "a very bright man, and he performed well as a witness" in the Mexico deposition November 1993.

The reason for it was a copyright infringement suit he had to face along with Lionel Richie, Quincy Jones, Rod Temperton and Joseph Jackson. The lawsuit came after three songwriters alleged that the pop star and his fellow defendants had plagiarised the hits “The Girl Is Mine”, “Thriller” and “We Are the World”.

Following the testimony, a nine-member jury found the defendants innocent of plagiarism.


And just days before Jackson confessed to his drug problem, he also spent nine hours giving videotaped testimony in a copyright infringement lawsuit he is involved in. "That deposition was actually slopped," said Bert Fields during last week's press conference, "because [Jackson] couldn't go on." Not so, insists Howard Manning, a lawyer who flew to Mexico to question Jackson. "He's a very bright man, and he performed well as a witness."

http://www.people.com/people/archive/article/0,,20106832,00.html

[video=youtube;tZMNg00NHok]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tZMNg00NHok[/video]
 
Re: AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine Jackson lawsuit

I had previously said that

Oral arguments are set for February 13, 2013. After the oral arguments court would take some to come to a decision.

Katherine's lawyers have filed a request and moved the oral argument to February 25, 2013

(Note: You can see that Katherine's lawyers (plaintiff) had made a request that was objected (opposition document) by AEG (defendant) but the judge granted (order granting) their request and moved the hearing (continued) from Feb 13 to Feb 25)

01/03/2013 Ex-Parte Application ( TO CONT. MSJ HEARING )
Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner

01/03/2013 Order (GRANTING EX PARTE TO CONT. MSJ HEARINGS )
Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner

01/03/2013 Opposition Document ( TO PLTFS EX PARTE )
Filed by Attorney for Defendant/Respondent

01/03/2013 Declaration ( OF JESSICA STEBBINS )
Filed by Attorney for Defendant/Respondent

02/25/2013 at 08:45 am in department 28 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
Motion for Summary Judgment (CONT. FROM 2-13-132x)
 
Re: AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine Jackson lawsuit

thanks ivy. do u know the reasoning for the delay
 
Re: AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine Jackson lawsuit

Here we go again with the delays, and I notice the judges always grant them and it usually comes from the side that brought the suite in the first place. Why aren't they ready?
 
Re: AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine Jackson lawsuit

12 days delay is not a great thing.
 
Re: AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine Jackson lawsuit

The reason for delay is the ongoing and upcoming depositions.

In a more detailed fashion:

Timeline was

- AEG fills summary motion on November 30th
- Katherine fills her response on January 30th
- AEG may fill an optional response within a week
- Oral arguments on February 13
- March the last month before the trial which is filled with trial related motions, witness list, discovery cut off dates and so on.

So initially the dates were set so that hopefully the judge will render a decision within 2 weeks of February 13 oral arguments and before all the motions and final trial prep started. This way the parties would know which claims are still going to the trial and they can prepare accordingly.

Katherine's lawyers asked for a 2 week delay because they said they still needed to depose Phillips, Leiweke, Jorrie and Wooley (2nd. deposition) and they needed more time to prepare their response after they depose them.

AEG wasn't happy because

- well the delay meant that while they are waiting for the judge to decide they'll need to file all the final trial prep without knowing what claims the trial will consist. You know that for example if the judge drops one claim it would significantly change the amount of prep, they type of the argument and the witnesses required to rebut that claim. So AEG said it was to their disadvantage.

- AEG also claimed that these delays in depositions were due to Katherine's lawyers. You might remember that KJ's lawyers have served Gongaware and Phillips while they were testifying at Murray's trial.

And apparently based on Katherine's lawyers requests AEG set depositions for Woolley on June 12, 2012, Jorrie on June 25,26 2012, AEG's most knowledgeable on May 2, 2012, Phillips May 30,31 2012 and Leiweke July 16, 2012.

Katherine's lawyers deposed Woolley on June 12 but cancelled all the rest of the depositions (Jorrie, AEG MKP, Phillips, Leiweke and Gongaware) saying that they will do the depositions after they got all the documents. It seems AEG lawyers wasn't very happy with these cancellations as AEG top managers - Leiweke, Phillips and Gongaware - are busy executives and it was a hassle for them to empty full day(s) for depositions and then having it cancelled.

AEG then says Katherine's lawyers waited for months and they started to send deposition notices late November and December and the deposition dates they wanted were around holidays - Thanksgiving, Christmas, Hanukkah - and again it's hard for top executives to empty their full days. Also KJ's lawyers sent depositions for 14 other AEG employees.

It turns out AEG was able to arrange Gongaware's deposition on December 20 and 9 of the AEG employees in the months of November and December. They set dates for the 5 remaining AEG employees and Phillips, Leiweke, Jorrie and Wooley in January - last important deposition being on January 17.

So AEG in their opposition blamed Katherine's lawyers for any delay in doing the depositions and even they did the last deposition on January 17, it would give them enough time to submit their response on January 30th.


We see that judge has granted Katherine's motion for a 2 week delay because it's possible within the court rules. The rules state that the hearing should happen at the latest 30 days before the trial start and February 25 fits that rule.

Parties will be required to prepare for the trial as if all of it going to trial and then make changes if the judge dismisses parts or all of the lawsuit.

Also it means that the judge's decision will come real close to the trial. I have seen judge's making decisions in 2 weeks (of course could be shorter or longer) that might mean that the judge's decision about summary judgment might come just weeks / days before the trial start.
 
Re: AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine Jackson lawsuit

Yes I think it was most likely Ratner who brought about this 'miracle' sleep cure at a time when Michael was very vulnerable and stressed out.

I don't think it's clear that Ratner administered propofol to Michael in the History tour. I remember when asked about it in 2009, Ratner said he didn't want to talk about it at that moment. But I don't know if there's a more recent interview with him or if he confirmed he used propofol. The interviewer also said that from his research he didn't discover a specific medication, he just learned that Michael was traveling with a "mini clinic".

Frank Cascio also said that just after he watched the Murray trial, was when he realized that Michael could have been using propofol in the History tour. So Frank just assumed it was propofol, as the equipment that came up in the trial was similar to what he saw in the History tour, he isn't sure. The IV equipment used in the History tour could be for other things, maybe Ratner used other sedatives and not specifically propofol.
 
Re: AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine Jackson lawsuit

Nathy yes it began as speculation as to what was taken during the tour and ended up being being stated as a fact that Michael took prof during the tour without any proof.

About the depositions being conducted with AEG employees by Katherine's team, are they expecting to get from these employes information that AEG knowingly made Muarry give Michael propofol/hired Muarry & did not supervise him/dictated Michael's medical care? I am curious as to what information the 5 other employees that are being deposed can give to help this case.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top