[ Pretrial Discussion Closed ] AEG files summary judgment motion to dismiss Katherine's lawsuit

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: [General Discussion] AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine's lawsu

I'm I missing something, or is Ms. Opri just another ill-informed contributor who has no idea what she's talking about?

I mean, isn't it Mother's side who got Michael's children involved in this drama. With Alan Duke being the one who is spreading the news that Prince WILL in fact testify for his Grandmother's side.

It's not the first time these so called reporters are talking out of their arses.
Obviously she thinks AEG calls kids to testify, thanks to certain people in media who willingly takes sides and reports one sided stories.

I had to add that I did a little search on Ms Opri and she is not reporter, but lawyer:)
She once used to represent Katherine and Joe, and Jermaine so she might be a bit bias:)
 
Last edited:
Re: [General Discussion] AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine's lawsu

Children are on both lists. We will wait and see who calls them - if they call them at all. Katherine - the plaintiffs - will go first. So we will see if Katherine calls the kids to the stand or not. and then if not, we will see if AEG calls them.
 
Michael Jackson wrongful death trial begins

Jury selection starts today in the suit by the pop superstar’s mother against tour promoter AEG Live. Katharine Jackson is claiming they placed profit above Michael Jackson’s health and well-being, resulting in his death. NBC’s Diana Alvear reports.

[video]http://www.today.com/video/today/51402209#51402209[/video]
 
Last edited:
Re: [General Discussion] AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine's lawsu

I had to add that I did a little search on Ms Opri and she is not reporter, but lawyer:)
She once used to represent Katherine and Joe, and Jermaine so she might be a bit bias:)

Oh I remember Ms. Opri VERY well.

Supposedly she was hired by Joe and Mother so that she could explain what was going on in Michael's trial. Never really understood that, but that "apparently" was Opri's job.

Does anybody have her email address, I'd love to drop her a line and tell her if she's going to report on the case, at least have the decency to report the facts and if she doesn't know the facts, then she should do a little research before she opens her mouth.
 
Re: [General Discussion] AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine's lawsu

I wouldn't pay too much of attention talking heads such as Ms Opri.
If you want to contact on give out to someone, Alan Duke deserves some grilling.
"AEG Live to put Michael Jackson on trial in own death"
He knows damn well that CNN posts are picked up internationally and copied all over.
If you clicked the link to his post, have a look at the photo he chose to be first - grieving mother.
Whats next, photos of kids crying from memorial?
 
Re: [General Discussion] AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine's lawsu

Children are on both lists. We will wait and see who calls them - if they call them at all. Katherine - the plaintiffs - will go first. So we will see if Katherine calls the kids to the stand or not. and then if not, we will see if AEG calls them.

Oooops typo, the word 'also' is missing.

*******
Yeah Opri was hired to be Joe's eyes and ears during the trial, I think she was hired when Oxman got the elbow (I smiled when I typed that)
 
Re: [General Discussion] AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine's lawsu

It's not the first time these so called reporters are talking out of their arses.
Obviously she thinks AEG calls kids to testify, thanks to certain people in media who willingly takes sides and reports one sided stories.

I had to add that I did a little search on Ms Opri and she is not reporter, but lawyer:)
She once used to represent Katherine and Joe, and Jermaine so she might be a bit bias:)

Debra Opri was one of those hanger-ons from Michael's trial that always tried to be in the thick of things and know everything. She had no connection with Michael himself. I never quite trusted her.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>HEADS UP: Starting tomorrow, we'll be live tweeting the Jackson lawsuit against promoter AEG in the death of Michael Jackson</p>&mdash; ABC7 Court News (@ABC7Courts) <a href="https://twitter.com/ABC7Courts/status/318862288088072192">April 1, 2013</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: [General Discussion] AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine's lawsu

Does anyone know what happened to Michael McParland? He used to report CM trial and I found his reporting good.
 
Re: [General Discussion] AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine's lawsu

The judge will hear arguments for television cameras in the Los Angeles courtroom just before jury selection starts Tuesday morning. While the Jackson lawyers are expected to support CNN's request to televise the trial, AEG lawyers say they are worried it could create a fan "frenzy" outside the courthouse.

^That's alan duke reporting so it's probably accurate as he's close to the jackson side. Unbelievable. In that video of his posted upthread his whole spiel was that this trial was going to be a 'spectacle' and the highlight that he mentioned was that prince and paris were going to testify. I just can't believe that there is a prospect of prince/paris going up on a witness stand and being cross examined about their dad's drug use or if they can remember what his behaviour was like during the child molestation trial and it being televised live and the clip broadcast on every primetime news prog in the world. I think pace or someone asked if there were procedures in place for minor children in these typeof cases, but i read in that motion by cnn to allow tv cameras,

To the extent mj's children are called to testify, no privacy concerns are implicated, given that they have been interviewed many times and have discussed publically the impact of their father's death and other personal matters.

To support it the motion includes the children's twitter accounts, tab articles about them out and about and all the chatshows that they've been on talking about mj. I'm sure there'll be no attempt by the jacksons to shield ppb from this ordeal if the tv broadcast in allowed as they seem to be their star witnesses for the jury and in any case their efforts to turn the children into mini celebrities has taken away their right to privacy for ever.
 
Re: [General Discussion] AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine's lawsu

Think he still works for sky and tweets. he was talking about murrays appeal not long back on twitter whether he does civil suits i dunno.
 
Michael Jackson's children sue concert promoter for £26 billion over singer’s death


2 April 2013



A bitter war of words erupted between concert promoter AEG and Michael Jackson’s family today ahead of a $40billion (£26billion) trial over who is to blame for the pop star’s death.

The late singer’s children Prince, 16, Paris, 14, and Blanket, 10, and mother Katherine, 82, are seeking record damages in a wrongful death lawsuit claiming AEG was guilty of negligence which contributed to Jackson’s death.
Jurors were due to be sworn in today in Los Angeles for a case set to reveal new details of Jackson’s final days, with Prince and Paris both due to testify.
The Jacksons are seeking £6.6&#8201;billion for lost future earnings and £19.8&#8201; billion in damages, claiming the organisers of his abortive comeback tour failed to carry out proper checks in hiring or supervising Dr Conrad Murray.
Jackson’s personal doctor is serving four years after he was found guilty of involuntary manslaughter in 2011. Murray administered the sedatives which caused the singer’s death.
The singer died aged 50 in June 2009, shortly before he was due to begin the This Is It tour, a sold-out series of 50 concerts at the O2 Arena.

Lawyers for AEG are set to argue that Jackson was responsible for his own death because of his addiction to prescription drugs and his penchant for “doctor shopping” to find medics who would prescribe what he wanted. They will seek to prove Murray was hired by Jackson himself.

The civil trial, expected to last two to three months, was due to start with an application for the proceedings to be televised.
AEG’s lawyers have argued it could create a fan “frenzy” outside the courthouse.

Marvin Putnam has already criticised the decision to call Prince and Paris to testify saying it was being done for the “emotional response”.

He said: “They may want to try to make the world believe AEG Live is doing something inappropriate as to these children, but I’d ask the world to pause for a moment and look at what’s actually happening here. They’re the ones bringing this lawsuit and they’re the ones who are saying they’re going to put these children on the stand, something that I’m relatively certain their father would never, ever want.”

Allegations of child abuse against the singer are due to be raised as part of the promoter’s case that Jackson was mentally unstable.

In a documentary to be screened on CNN on Friday, Mr Putnam says: “I don’t know how you can’t look to Mr Jackson’s responsibility there. ”

He said the 2005 child molestation trial, in which Jackson was acquitted, “resulted in an incredible increase in his drug intake”.

Jackson lawyer Kevin Boyle said: “The truth about what happened to Michael, which AEG has tried to keep hidden from the public since the day Michael died, is finally emerging. We look forward to the trial where the rest of the story will come to light.”

http://www.standard.co.uk/showbiz/c...or-26-billion-over-singers-death-8556943.html

Strong words indeed.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>Covering the jury selection for Katherine Jackson suing AEG for Michael's death <a href="http://t.co/vRGJIgtITm" title="http://4sq.com/10lRCug">4sq.com/10lRCug</a></p>&mdash; Edward Lawrence (@EdwardLawrence) <a href="https://twitter.com/EdwardLawrence/status/319088192403935232">April 2, 2013</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

For CBS News
 
I notice that most news agencies are obtaining their quotes from that documentary and that piece from DD.

"I don&#8217;t know how you can&#8217;t look to Mr. JACKSON&#8217;s responsibility there," AEG lawyer MARVIN PUTNAM told the station. "He was a grown man."
PUTNAM was interviewed for a CNN documentary that will air FRIDAY, APRIL 5th at 10p, and told the report, "Mr. JACKSON is a person who was known to doctor shop. He was known to be someone who would tell one doctor one thing and another doctor something else." PUTNAM added the child molestation trial is relevant because it "resulted in an incredible increase in his drug intake.

http://www.allaccess.com/net-news/archive/story/116987/jackson-v-aeg-live-trial-opens-in-l-a-today
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>@<a href="https://twitter.com/sattapaal">sattapaal</a> @<a href="https://twitter.com/tmz">tmz</a> Prince and Paris Jackson's lawyer called out TMZ as one of AEG's 'go to media'. Ouch! <a href="https://twitter.com/search/%23exposed">#exposed</a> <a href="http://t.co/3PZKX5F4KA" title="http://twitter.com/TheMJAP/status/319088876570435587/photo/1">twitter.com/TheMJAP/status…</a></p>&mdash; TheMJAP (@TheMJAP) <a href="https://twitter.com/TheMJAP/status/319088876570435587">April 2, 2013</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: [General Discussion] AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine's lawsu

^^^^ I love how some fans like to twist everything, I'm sure I read all those emails and AEG lawyers called out Boyle first for running to the tabloids.
 
Re: [General Discussion] AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine's lawsu

I don't know who's side the "tabloids" will be on, but Mother apparently has CNN's Alan Duke on her side, so what's the beef with Kevin R. Boyle, Esq.?
 
Re: [General Discussion] AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine's lawsu

MICHAEL JACKSON
DRUG ADDICT ON TRIAL
EXCLUSIVE DETAILS
Michael Jackson's intense and decades-long addiction to powerful prescription drugs will be front and center in his family's wrongful death trial ... which kicks off today.

Katherine Jackson and Michael's 3 kids are suing AEG Live, claiming the company negligently hired and supervised Dr. Conrad Murray ... who killed MJ with a massive overdose of Propofol.

TMZ broke numerous stories after MJ's death ... revealing how Jackson had at least 19 aliases to score Rx drugs from various doctors. It was well known in L.A. and Beverly Hills medical circles that MJ would doctor shop to find professionals who would open their surgery centers to give him Propofol. The doctors -- and dentists -- would justify the drug by saying they needed to put him under for minor procedures, such as acne removal.

We reported in one case ... a famed doctor used a gynecologist's office -- run by a doc who specialized in vaginal rejuvenation -- to perform a minor acne treatment under full anesthesia.

The Jackson family will argue AEG Live had a duty to monitor Murray. The problem is ... Jackson's the one who found Murray in the first place and that Murray administered Propofol long before the doc signed on to the "This Is It" tour.

AEG has a slew of doctors on its witness list ... to make the case that Jackson's addiction was in full bloom long before it entered the picture.

Katherine and the kids are asking for more than $40 BILLION in damages.


Read more: http://www.tmz.com/2013/04/02/micha...murray-aliases-doctor-shopping/#ixzz2PJhHFArA
Visit the TMZ Store: http://tmzstore.com
 
Re: [General Discussion] AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine's lawsu

Muzic wrote a 2nd article and interview with Stacey a month later called ...

Confirmed Jermaine Jackson did write a disparging book about Michael
http://muzikfactorytwo.blogspot.com/...did-write.html

The 2nd interview completly debunked the first interview ..
as if anything stacy says confirms anything one way or another - NOT

Muzik said she interviewed him a month later because she didn't trust all he said in the first interview. The 2nd interview he tells a complete different story. Stacy contradicted himself several times and then stated Jermain himself changed the content of the book to negative things. first he said MJ did then he said Lawanda did then he said Jermaine did. He would say one thing and then contradict it the very next question she asked. It was very weird. I don't trust anything Stacey says one way or another.. You can't because he isn't consistent. I think he just makes it up as he goes along. So we cant use either interview or article for proof of anything. The man lies though his teeth. How can we know when he is telling the truth .. We cant _he is a compulsive Liar

If Jermaine had written it then Stacy wouldn't need to contradict and change his stories and toss in every other random person to accuse them of new things in every new sentence, he could just very simply say "Jermaine wrote it", but he knows he can't.

Stacy does lie in every other sentence, so I assume naturally that he is also again lying when he makes a claim he can't back up (if tapes like this existed everyone in the world would have heard Jermaine's voice speaking them), has changed his version of events numerous times, and now refuses to back it up in court. I believe Jermaine's side of the story in this very easily, he hasn't changed his story two thousand times and isn't the one who tries to claim his ex girlfriend and Rebbie's husband were the ones really responsible for it, as well as claiming that MJ sabotaged it.
 
Re: [General Discussion] AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine's lawsu

If we learned anything from Michael's trial, it's how "newsworthy" he is, and how the media "reports" have little or nothing to do with reality. The usual suspects will come out of the woodwork as "experts," but are actually people who didn't know Michael except in passing. ... . if at all. I guess we can expect to see Stacey Brown, and Yuri Gellar, and Deepak Chopra (who jumped the gun right after Michael's death and said, "NARCOTICS OVERDOSE," when it wasn't), and all the rest of that crew of vermin. . . .

Careers have been launched by trashing Michael (with false "information," i.e. remember Maureen Orth and the "bathing in cow's blood" atrocious reporting?) Souls have been sold, and we know "to whom". . . and there is nothing we can really do about it but endure it. I see nothing good that can come out of this trial, at all, and certainly not the well-being of those children, who must still be trying to heal.

With that said, one thing that is of interest is the total absence of. . .Tohme. It was actually Tohme who negotiated the contract with AEG (the unredacted version of the contract is now online for anyone to read.) Randy Philips and Tohme had a discussion with Michael in Las Vegas, urging him to do the shows. There is an interview with Tohme (don't know if it's still online, though) where he says he had the contract vetted by HIS attorney (i.e. Michael did not have independent counsel look it over?), and so on. We don't have to take anyone's "word for it," or "opinion," to know that AEG was fronting Michael enormous amounts of money. It's there, in the contract. And that remains the murky area in terms of "who hired Murray." If AEG was paying Michael's rent (and they were), and staff (and they were), then it's reasonable to think they intended to pay Murray, too (but ran out of time). But, these payments were ADVANCES (as the contract states), and were going to eventually come out of Michael's proceeds from the concerts. So that is the area of most importance in this trial, and not much of anything else. . .

This trial is actually about the contractual information, but even so, Michael's name will be dragged through the mud yet again, at the great emotional expense of his children (those children who already have enough MONEY for several lifetimes). So, it seems that their so-called guardian really has not much interest in the emotional health of those kids. Again, it's all about the MONEY. I don't see how AEG can legitimately bring up anything about the accusations and trial, or drug-use (alleged). Didn't they say that Michael had a physical for insurance purposes? That physical surely would have included drug-testing, which then would have been a red-flag. But, no drugs were found! And, the autopsy showed no sign of drug-use, and it was not an overdose of narcotics that killed Michael. It was MURRAY, and the propofol. So again, it cycles back to "who hired Murray?" Anything else seems irrelevant in terms of FACTS for this trial. At this point, I wish that KJ would come to her senses and spare those children the horrors of the trial. But, she probably will NOT. .
 
Re: [General Discussion] AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine's lawsu

I recently watched "High School Musical" and "Cheetah Girls 2," both directed by Kenny Ortega, and could see why Michael Jackson waited for Kenny Ortega to be his Director for "This Is It." Besides directing both movies, Kenny Ortega even choreographed the two movies. I know these are not the only projects that Kenny Ortega has directed, but these two movies gave me a basic understanding of why Michael Jackson waited for Kenny to come on board. These movies were directed at the younger generation and a nice story was weaved in between the well-choreographed dance number's and song's.

I understand about the money behind AEG Live and why the Jackson's want to go after them, as Katherine's husband and children will continue living the standard that they became accustomed to because of the Income Michael's income generated for them, but I truly believe Kenny did the best that he could to help Michael realize his Vision, performing again a Concert fit for a King.

Kenny Ortega's reputation, through the two movies I mention, was associated with the Disney Corporation. Michael has always been about family values and that was the direction Michael and Kenny were taking this new adventure. It's just sad to think it has boiled down to this that Katherine, at the helm, with Joe Jackson quietly lurking in the shadows, will do more damage than good with Michael's legacy and all us fan's can do is just sit and watch the fallout, shake our heads and carry on with life!
 
Re: [General Discussion] AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine's lawsu

tmz broke numerous stories after mj's death ... Revealing how jackson had at least 19 aliases to score rx drugs from various doctors. It was well known in l.a. And beverly hills medical circles that mj would doctor shop to find professionals who would open their surgery centers to give him propofol. The doctors -- and dentists -- would justify the drug by saying they needed to put him under for minor procedures, such as acne removal.

THANK YOU MRS. JACKSON!

I'm sure TMZ is more than happy now that they have an opportunity to RE-HASH all of their MJ "drug" stories. Harvey Levin must be giddy with delight!
 
Re: [General Discussion] AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine's lawsu

well if the doctors were putting MJ under for minor procedures isn't that their fault?
 
Re: [General Discussion] AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine's lawsu

I don't bother pasting the whole post here as we have read it already, but this bit is interesting:

The rumored $40 billion at stake in this case, a number reported by TMZ, may not be the actual figure awarded, according to Ford. "Lawyers will throw out big numbers to start with for a couple of reasons: one, because they can negotiate their way down and still be acceptable, sometimes they do it just to get attention," Ford said. "We're talking about the fact that it's $40 billion. If it was a $10 million lawsuit, you might not talk about that. A lot of that is strategy and tactics."
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505270_162-57577437/michael-jacksons-mom-heads-to-court-in-reported-$40b-suit-against-concert-promoter/

I agree with that lawyer, 40 billion is mentioned because Jackson's side wants world-wide attention to this case.
The more attention to this case, the more pressure for AEG to settle.
 
Re: [General Discussion] AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine's lawsu

Can smell TMZ coming a mile away
 
Re: [General Discussion] AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine's lawsu

I agree with that lawyer, 40 billion is mentioned because Jackson's side wants world-wide attention to this case.
The more attention to this case, the more pressure for AEG to settle.
I disagree with the attorney.

This case would have gotten world-wide attention regardless. All it needs is the name MICHAEL JACKSON, and attention will follow.

In my opinion, the 40 BILLION DOLLARS does nothing but make the Jacksons look like money-hungry vultures and that's "probably" why Alan Duke was trying to down play that number the other day.
 
LastTear;3799965 Jackson lawyer Kevin Boyle said: “The truth about what happened to Michael said:
If AEG offers a settlement for few million to Jackson + lawyers costs, the "truth" about what happened to MJ remain "hidden" as Jackson are not in this for the truth, but for the money. 40 billion is proof of what they are after, hefty settlement from AEG, and that is supposed to bring out the truth about MJ's death.
 
Re: [General Discussion] AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine's lawsu

Before we saw the documents that said $40 billion damages, there were 2 news stories and quoted "jacksons sources" that mentioned $500 Million and $ 1 billion as the amount of money / settlement they expected / hoped to get from AEG.

It's my opinion they came up with the $40 billion number in the hopes to scare AEG and get them settle for around $500 M to $1 billion. That way Jacksons would have gotten a nice payday and AEG would think "oh good we only had to pay 1/40th or 1/80th of what they asked".

I'm thinking it was a tactic to force a settlement.
 
Re: [General Discussion] AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine's lawsu

@Ivy what time is this all kicking off?(I feel sick to my stomach) And do you happen to know if the judge is hearing arguments for the TV coverage prior to starting jury selection?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top