Okay, I'm going to start off by saying HELLO (I'm a noob).
.
Hello
& welcome to this board
like I said the cause and effect needs to be direct in negligent hiring claims. For example Joe being late to work and going to wrong houses etc. in other words being a crappy delivery guy does not mean you could reasonably foresee that he's going to beat a customer. Reasonably foresee is the key here.
Jacksons do not have a direct cause. however they are arguing given Michael's history with drugs and Murray's debts, AEG could have added 1 +1 to come to the conclusion that Michael would have asked for drugs and Murray would provide them because he needed the money.
It is direct. That's why I took the electrician example. Crappy electrecian = burnt house.
Beating up clients is not related to delivering stuff, anyone can beat up someone.
Translated into Michael's situation :
1) Electrician = issue directly related to the job
Murray killed Michael because of the way he gave propofol. He was playing russian roulette with him, other doctors would have given it properly , and nothing would have happened. Murray was crappy at his job , another dr would have been better. Murray was working as a doctor when he gave Michael propofol.
2) delivery guy beating up a client = not related to his job.
In this case, it would be Murray accidently hitting Michael with his car, and killing him. That would be Murray doing something NOT related to his job.
Example 1 = there were signs Murray was a crappy doctor.
Example 2 = impossible to foresee, could happen to anyone
I think I understand you point about hiring , my point would be : hiring was not complete. That's why there is a debate over "AEG hired him". They were still processing hiring, it was underway, an ongoing process. So it can be said that it was negligent because all these things happened, and AEG didn't stop the hiring process : they sent another contract on 24th june.
I partially agree with the Jacksons, about adding 1+1 together. I don't agree with everything they say, but some points do make sense. They constantly refer to painkillers, which is annoying IMO, to show how misguided AEG were, and keep it simple for the jury.
I don't like it, but it still is a better argument than Michael is 100% responsible and was lying to the whole world, when HE was lied to. We'll see how Panish connects the dots in his closing arguments.
Gongaware is unbelievable... "I sleep great". I believe you do - your conscience seems to be totally missing.
At this point I'm just waiting for the Jacksons to win. Which I hope they do! "Gonzo" as some are calling him lol was a joke on the stand today IMO. Mr. "I don't recall!" -_-
I agree he was a joke on the stand, as I said, I have this weird feeling he was covering up for his boss. Phillips was in the courtroom during some of the day.
He failed covering up for his boss, he was the Jackson's strongest witness so far. His remarks about how the doctor was not doing his job sounded sincere to me.
So far, I don't get why he is personnally sued, I don't see a reason, at least yet, other than his position during the tour. Maybe I will see a reason later.
Phillips is having a weird change of heart after june 20th meeting, now whe have this
Email on 6/20/09 from Phillips to LeiwekeComm and Kazoodi: This guy is really starting to concern me. Read his email and my response. Dr. Murray and I are meeting with MJ at 4pm today at The Forum. (ABC7) Phillips also expressed concerns about Ortega, writing to Gongaware's private email address, "This guy is really starting to concern me." Gongaware testified Wednesday that he wasn't sure who Phillips was referring to, and his boss may have been expressing concerns about Jackson or Murray. (AP)
Email response from Philips to Kenny urging him, and everyone else, not to become amateur psychiatrists or physicians on 6/20/09. Email: "You cannot imagine the harm and ramifications of stopping this show now" (ABC7)
Whoever the guy was, Michael, Kenny, or Murray, Phillips was concerned. Of course, it's not 100% clear, but what I was fearing seems to be slowly beginning to show. I really hope I'm wrong, but I have a bad feeling about Phillips. We'll see how it turns out. My feeling is that it is possible that he knowingly supported Murray. I'm not saying he knew exactly what Murray was doing, i'm saying it is possible that Phillips suspected Murray, knew Murray was doing something not right, without knowing what exactly, and decided to side with him against Ortega, for the sake of the show.