Open General discussion - Katherine Jackson vs AEG

Status
Not open for further replies.
Remember when Thome Thome came out of the blue, after Michael died and said he was holding on to $5 million, so that Michael could buy a house? I'm bringing this up about how Michael Jackson talked AEG Live into paying his bills. The weekend before Michael Jackson died, we read how Michael was asking Randy Phillips for $1 million.

It seems Michael had a way of getting other's to help him financially, when he himself was capable of doing it himself. Michael Jackson had $5 million dollars and he didn't want to use it, so he asked AEG Live to advance him another $1 million to pay his staff and whatever else he needed. Then Kai Chase says Michael Jackson's refrigerator is empty when she returns, but that his credit card is declined when she goes to the grocery store to purchase food items. And now we know why AEG Live is being sued by Katherine Jackson. She wants a free ride!
 
Let's see - today is June 24th.

Mr. Panish said that he would be wrapping up his case on Monday, July 8th. That gives him TEN DAYS to tie everything together. (Thursday, July 4th is Independence Day, a national holiday in America. Courts will be dark on that day.)

Where I'm sitting, he needs to spend that time, TYING EVERYTHING TOGETHER. In my opinion, everything is sort of scattered right now. He still has a lot of witness on his witness list, he definitely will not be able to get them all on, and if he puts up any more expert witnesses, they eat up the majority of his remaining presentation.

Although Michael's siblings are on Mr. Panish's witness list, I bet he NEVER planned to use them. LOL!

What to do, what to do! Times a wasting!

I think they said "week of july 8th" so that gives them 10 to 14 days. for a total of 10-11 weeks. We know Matheson is testifying, Karen Faye will be back and they plan to play depositions of Leiweke and Dr. Finkelstein. I agree that they need to bring this together. As of now, it seems way to unorganized.

Also interestingly it's been reported they expect this case to end by the end of August and some reports even said early August. So if true AEG is only expecting a defense of 6 - 8 weeks.

It is interesting that when an expert attempts to tie some of the symptoms Michael exhibited to sleep deprivation, it is considered questionable and skeptical while the attempts to tie those same symptoms simply to substance abuse seems to be more readily acceptable.

I agree with you about the lack of reaction to what Dr Earley said (Michael definitely addicted to demerol and "no proof from reading the records" that Michael was addicted to benzos and/or propofol).
Only 2 posters reacted to that, and then after realising he is an AEG expert, deafening silence. I find that a bit incredible, what he said is far worse and way more inaccurate than what Czeisler said. .

This sounds a little bit unfair and I'll explain why.

- Personally I'm confused as why Dr. Earley's deposition is played by Jacksons.

- It felt incomplete - and it's incomplete. It seemed like "we have 20 minutes till the end of day so let us play you this thing" and it was never completed. I'm not sure where Dr. Earley or more importantly Jackson lawyers are going with it.

- Given the logic "Jackson experts say stuff to help Jacksons and AEG experts say stuff to help AEG", it's not even a little bit surprising to see an AEG expert trying to blame Demerol / Klein and remove responsibility from Murray and hence AEG. It is the same Murray defense argument that wasn't allowed during criminal trial by Judge Pastor and now being used as a factor in Murray's appeal.

- To be clear Michael did not die from Demerol, it wasn't a direct cause and everyone agrees with it. However it's interactions with Propofol was what Murray tried to bring in during criminal trial and what Dr. Earley said.

- I checked drugs database to see interactions between demerol and propofol and it is listed as an moderate interaction with most common interaction being "breathing difficulty" at 26%. So breathing is more likely to stop when you take Demerol + Propofol than when you take Propofol alone. This could have been a factor that caused Michael to have respiratory arrest. The recommended solution is to "monitor" so as you can see even if Demerol contributed to the respiratory arrest , it was still Murray's fault that he wasn't monitoring Michael properly.

- Also fans have been suspicious of Klein for a long long time - yes even dating back to criminal trial - long before this AEG expert came along. The Demerol dosage was within maximum daily limits but on the high side. We cannot determine if there was an addiction or not, but it was suspicious.

- A lot of people - not only AEG execs- have said they saw Michael not quite right after his visits to Klein. Those people included not only the bodyguards but also the follower fans. We cannot determine if there was an addiction or not but there were visible signs to show he was somehow affected.

- Also for anyone that knows addiction or even giving up alcohol or smoking knows Klein's high dose Demerol doesn't make sense for Michael with known pain killer addiction history. Even after getting clean / stopping , there's a real good chance of relapse and people avoid those things totally. You don't see an alcoholic for example say "I can drink a small glass" or you don't see a person who stopped smoking say "1 cigarette , it'll be fine". Even those minimal exposure can cause a relapse. So addiction or not, Klein was playing a very dangerous game with those high levels of Demerol.

Didn't AEG pay some advance money to MJ? I've been wondering why did Michael Amir Williams call Gongaware asking him to offer 150K to Murray? Did MJ directed his assistant to call Gongaware to deal with that stuff? Why didn't MJ made the offer himself or directed MAW to his own lawyer? Or did MAW just himself decided to call PG for that not knowing what to do?

PG's claim is that he was asked to do such stuff for Michael - even firing Grace. He said he was given her contact information and an already prepared text and told to fire her.
 
PG's claim is that he was asked to do such stuff for Michael - even firing Grace. He said he was given her contact information and an already prepared text and told to fire her.

Thanks Ivy. So it seems it was MJ (or someone from his staff) directing PG to deal with all the hiring/firing stuff. Yea it was a messy situation.
 
- To be clear Michael did not die from Demerol, it wasn't a direct cause and everyone agrees with it. However it's interactions with Propofol was what Murray tried to bring in during criminal trial and what Dr. Earley said.

- I checked drugs database to see interactions between demerol and propofol and it is listed as an moderate interaction with most common interaction being "breathing difficulty" at 26%. So breathing is more likely to stop when you take Demerol + Propofol than when you take Propofol alone. This could have been a factor that caused Michael to have respiratory arrest. The recommended solution is to "monitor" so as you can see even if Demerol contributed to the respiratory arrest , it was still Murray's fault that he wasn't monitoring Michael properly.

?What interaction did mj have with demerol and prop on 25 june. He hadn't been to klein for a few days and no demerol was found in mj's body.

Also fans have been suspicious of Klein for a long long time - yes even dating back to criminal trial - long before this AEG expert came along. The Demerol dosage was within maximum daily limits but on the high side. We cannot determine if there was an addiction or not, but it was suspicious.
I really didn't think fans found it suspicious - i thought rather that we agreed with walgren's cross exam of waldman, the rather ludicrous addiction expert, that based on klein's records mj wasn't addicted to demoral. An addiction that mj cd only satisfy by going to klein's office in full glare of the paps at irregular intervals seems rather an unusual addiction and not one that i would have thought fans would consider a particularly effective argument in court.

- Given the logic "Jackson experts say stuff to help Jacksons and AEG experts say stuff to help AEG", it's not even a little bit surprising to see an AEG expert trying to blame Demerol / Klein and remove responsibility from Murray and hence AEG. It is the same Murray defense argument that wasn't allowed during criminal trial by Judge Pastor and now being used as a factor in Murray's appeal.
I agree it's probably not surprising aeg are using these arguments to bolster their case, but what i do find surprising is that fans are suddenly seeing merit in them after rubbishing the same arguments when used by chernoff during the murray trial.
 
Last edited:
?What interaction did mj have with demerol and prop on 25 june. He hadn't been to klein for a few days and no demerol was found in mj's body.

true but we don't know if half life of demerol and so on can cause any issues. that's why I said we don't know where Dr. Earley is going with this or how can he make a claim. It's just interaction between demerol and Propofol have been tried to argue but couldn't. So I don't know if there's some possibility there or if it is just BS.


I really didn't think fans found it suspicious - i thought rather that we agreed with walgren's cross exam of waldman, the rather ludicrous addiction expert, that based on klein's records mj wasn't addicted to demoral. An addiction that mj cd only satisfy by going to klein's office in full glare of the paps at irregular intervals seems rather an unusual addiction and not one that i would have thought fans would consider a particularly effective argument in court.

no one can determine if Michael was addicted to Demerol or not. It's impossible.


I agree it's probably not surprising aeg are using these arguments to bolster their case, but what i do find surprising is that fans are suddenly seeing merit in them after rubbishing murray's defence during his trial.

well I can say personally I don't see "merit" in those per se (and how can anyone determine merit from a partial deposition?), I just need to hear the whole argument to determine if it has merit or not. So I would rather classify myself as confused and intrigued.

As I said MJ did not die of Demerol, even if we assume that Demerol had caused an interaction, still the blame is on Murray for not monitoring. So it doesn't take even a little bit of responsibility from Murray. So that is in sync with the criminal trial.

I'm just curious to hear what people think about Klein's demerol treatment.
 
Ah, I thought you meant they were forcing things/people on Michael.

I don't know to be honest, on one hand I see what you mean but on the other hand there were indications that all was not well so, yes, they did need to talk with the doctor, and he was supposed to be on hand whilst Michael was performing and he stated he was already treating Michael so really he should be at rehearsals.

No I don't think they imposed Murray, or anyone, except maybe the person Karen mentionned who was in Michael's dressing room (was it the food person or the physio, or both ?). This person was on his way to Michael's home on june 25th.
I have my doubts about how they made the deal with Michael (I mean, not taking care of the insurance themselves is weird to me, and doesn't sound very fair , as they were totally relying on Michael's assets), and hearing what we have been hearing I have doubts about the 19 extra shows now.
What I meant is that they imposed themselves on Murray.

Question: Was Michael STILL in the room when Murray got in Mr. Ortega's face and basically told him to "mind his own business?"

If you listen to what Kenny says, yes. That was the 1st thing that was said or almost, and both Kenny and Murray turned to Michael for clarification, not necessarily at the same time. Listen to it for yourself, my impression was that Kenny was implying (he did not actually say it), that it is possible Michael lied to Murray about what had happened the night before. You've got to wonder why, if that was so. Things are getting clearer, for me anyway.

2-Maybe it's just me, but comparing a doctor (Murray) to the household HELP (Kia Chase) is a stretch, to say the least.

3-Two things, in my opinion, AEG didn't have an opportunity to "have done something," because of timing. I mean, June 19th, June 20th - were there meetings on those 2 days? In my opinion, between let's say June 19th and when Michael actually died, was a very short period of time to SUGGEST something to the Artist, especially when the Artist said "I'm fine."


I'm comparing because Kai Chase did not have a contract with AEG, she was paid as an advance to Michael, she was not in the production costs, etc..

IMO, by june 15th, they had reasons to wonder why Murray was so incompetent, by june 20th, Phillips knew and saw enough to fire him (Murray) , IMO.

- To be clear Michael did not die from Demerol, it wasn't a direct cause and everyone agrees with it. However it's interactions with Propofol was what Murray tried to bring in during criminal trial and what Dr. Earley said.

- I checked drugs database to see interactions between demerol and propofol and it is listed as an moderate interaction with most common interaction being "breathing difficulty" at 26%. So breathing is more likely to stop when you take Demerol + Propofol than when you take Propofol alone. This could have been a factor that caused Michael to have respiratory arrest. The recommended solution is to "monitor" so as you can see even if Demerol contributed to the respiratory arrest , it was still Murray's fault that he wasn't monitoring Michael properly.

- Also fans have been suspicious of Klein for a long long time - yes even dating back to criminal trial - long before this AEG expert came along. The Demerol dosage was within maximum daily limits but on the high side. We cannot determine if there was an addiction or not, but it was suspicious.

- A lot of people - not only AEG execs- have said they saw Michael not quite right after his visits to Klein. Those people included not only the bodyguards but also the follower fans. We cannot determine if there was an addiction or not but there were visible signs to show he was somehow affected.

- Also for anyone that knows addiction or even giving up alcohol or smoking knows Klein's high dose Demerol doesn't make sense for Michael with known pain killer addiction history. Even after getting clean / stopping , there's a real good chance of relapse and people avoid those things totally. You don't see an alcoholic for example say "I can drink a small glass" or you don't see a person who stopped smoking say "1 cigarette , it'll be fine". Even those minimal exposure can cause a relapse. So addiction or not, Klein was playing a very dangerous game with those high levels of Demerol.

Re demerol : it was very clear after Waldman's testimony in CM's trial, that there was no addiction to demerol, he was not able to confirm it in spite of trying very hard. All he could say is that there was a tolerance, which is different, and that was the reason for the relatively high doses.

If Michael had been addicted to opioids, his visits to Klein would not have been enough, since that same expert, Waldman, said withdrawal started after 24 hours. He had no opioids whatsoever in his home, not even non opioids pain killers , like paracetamol or ibuprofen.

From memory , in June his visits to klein were early june , 9th june, 16th june 22nd june. So totally inconsistant with addiction, so also inconsistent with withdrawal, and inconsistant with interactions with propofol on june 24th/25th.

If there had been interactions with propofol , the coroner would have mentionned it.

That was part of Murray's defense, and it was blown at his trial.

I am also surprised to read this here after we talked it over and over during Murray's trial. Michael WAS clean before april 09.
 
true but we don't know if half life of demerol and so on can cause any issues. that's why I said we don't know where Dr. Earley is going with this or how can he make a claim. It's just interaction between demerol and Propofol have been tried to argue but couldn't. So I don't know if there's some possibility there or if it is just BS.


no one can determine if Michael was addicted to Demerol or not. It's impossible.




well I can say personally I don't see "merit" in those per se, I just need to hear the whole argument to determine if it has merit or not.

As I said MJ did not die of Demerol, even if we assume that Demerol had caused an interaction, still the blame is on Murray for not monitoring. So it doesn't take even a little bit of responsibility from Murray. So that is in sync with the criminal trial.

I'm just curious to hear what people think about Klein's demerol treatment.

I think you can take kliens medical records with a grain of salt. What he wrote down for dosage and what he actually gave MJ my bet are totally different things. Klien is a scumbag. My take all along would be. MJ took Demerol during touring/rehearsals. Why for pain and energy. It seems the propofol and the Demerol go hand and hand. MJ used propofol while touring to make sleep or in my opinion to counter act the Demerol. Meaning he got high and pumped up for the shows by using Demerol or some sort of pain med. truth is pain meds make you feel good and give you energy. Mixed with alcohol you will feel even better. So then comes the propofol. Can't sleep to much pain meds so MJ found away to bring himself down or knocked out. This is my opinion and not far fetched I don't think. Many will disagree but I believe MJ loved the pain meds and that's how he functioned.
 
true but we don't know if half life of demerol and so on can cause any issues. that's why I said we don't know where Dr. Earley is going with this or how can he make a claim. It's just interaction between demerol and Propofol have been tried to argue but couldn't. So I don't know if there's some possibility there or if it is just BS.

...well I can say personally I don't see "merit" in those per se (and how can anyone determine merit from a partial deposition?), I just need to hear the whole argument to determine if it has merit or not. So I would rather classify myself as confused and intrigued.

I've got to say i'm surprised you feel this need to hear the whole argument about the link between demerol and prop. Did you disagree with judge pastor's ruling to disallow all evidence relating to klein and his treatments during the murray trial into mj's death? You seem to be agreeing with murray's appeal arguments.

no one can determine if Michael was addicted to Demerol or not. It's impossible.
I'm not sure why it is impossible. They certainly made an attempt at determination during the murray trial. Based on the klien records waldman, the defence expert witness, had to concede under x examination that mj didn't appear to be an addict.

bouee said:
That was part of Murray's defense, and it was blown at his trial.

I am also surprised to read this here after we talked it over and over during Murray's trial.
Me too.
 
Last edited:
Didn't AEG pay some advance money to MJ? I've been wondering why did Michael Amir Williams call Gongaware asking him to offer 150K to Murray? Did MJ directed his assistant to call Gongaware to deal with that stuff? Why didn't MJ made the offer himself or directed MAW to his own lawyer? Or did MAW just himself decided to call PG for that not knowing what to do?

AEG's lawyers should have directed Murray to MJ and his lawyers. It seems the situation was a huge mess with all those people being hired and fired all over the place and MJ not having a stable team.

Everybody was going through MAW when they wanted to talk to Michael.
Contracts with Murray were "drafted" from june 15th to 24th, Michael did have a lawyer then.
 
Last edited:
a few days ago in private convo someone said to me that there was a trend between Klein visits and bad days / episodes. For example Michael sees Klein on June 10 and he misses a rehearsal 3 days later ( June 14 email - saying MJ's doctor did not allow him to rehearse yesteday). He sees Klein on June 16 and has a bad day on June 19. He sees Klein June 22 and dies June 25th. I'm just intrigued.

I believe I was clear when I said Demerol wasn't a cause of death and no Demerol argument can take away any responsibility from Murray.

I'm just curious about how - if any - Demerol can contribute to bad days and how would any Dr. claim / explain a Demerol effect. That's all. After we hear the full thing I can think it's a total BS, I just wonder what the argument is.
 
Demerol withdrawal symptoms, I guess this is where AEG's addiction specialist comes into it.

Chills
Fever
Headache
Nausea
Vomiting
Insomnia
Anxiety
Muscle Aches

ETA Do we have a list of all the days Michael attended rehearsals?
 
I've got to say i'm surprised you feel this need to hear the whole argument about the link between demerol and prop. Did you disagree with judge pastor's ruling to disallow all evidence relating to klein and his treatments during the murray trial into mj's death? You seem to be agreeing with murray's appeal arguments..

absolutely false and let me repost what I wrote before

- To be clear Michael did not die from Demerol, it wasn't a direct cause and everyone agrees with it. However it's interactions with Propofol was what Murray tried to bring in during criminal trial and what Dr. Earley said.

- I checked drugs database to see interactions between demerol and propofol and it is listed as an moderate interaction with most common interaction being "breathing difficulty" at 26%. So breathing is more likely to stop when you take Demerol + Propofol than when you take Propofol alone. This could have been a factor that caused Michael to have respiratory arrest. The recommended solution is to "monitor" so as you can see even if Demerol contributed to the respiratory arrest , it was still Murray's fault that he wasn't monitoring Michael properly.

So as you can see I have clearly stated Michael did not die from Demerol and even if we believe a Demerol interaction it was still Murray's fault for not monitoring Michael.

So can you tell me how I disagree with Judge Pastor's ruling and how I agree with Murray's appeal? Because I clearly don't. Murray is saying "not my fault" when I still blame and put the fault on Murray.

Honestly I'm confused - is it me that is not clear or is there a constant misunderstanding going on?

ps : I also have to add I did not know it was unacceptable to say "hmm tell me more before I make up my mind", I did not know we had to reject arguments without even listening to them. I though we rejected Waldman because he seemed unreliable and did not make sense, not because we decided to automatically reject everything he dared to say. I would have never guessed in a million years wanting to listen to the whole deposition was a bad thing.
 
I think you can take kliens medical records with a grain of salt. What he wrote down for dosage and what he actually gave MJ my bet are totally different things. Klien is a scumbag. My take all along would be. MJ took Demerol during touring/rehearsals. Why for pain and energy. It seems the propofol and the Demerol go hand and hand. MJ used propofol while touring to make sleep or in my opinion to counter act the Demerol. Meaning he got high and pumped up for the shows by using Demerol or some sort of pain med. truth is pain meds make you feel good and give you energy. Mixed with alcohol you will feel even better. So then comes the propofol. Can't sleep to much pain meds so MJ found away to bring himself down or knocked out. This is my opinion and not far fetched I don't think. Many will disagree but I believe MJ loved the pain meds and that's how he functioned.

Demerol makes you sleepy and out of it, so no way he could have taken it to rehearse, it would have shown as it showed when he came back from Klein's.

I don't think Klein falsified his records, they were not flattering to him as they were. Wasn't he reprimanded by the medical board ? i'm not sure if it was about that, though. he has sent his bill to Michael's lawyers before Michael died, the bill was almost the same as the one that he filed after Michael died, and the records were consitent with his invoice.

And Michael had no demerol or any other opioids in his home.


Michael was just trying to sleep, not to get high. He was trying to be in shape for the shows.
 
Demerol withdrawal symptoms, I guess this is where AEG's addiction specialist comes into it.

Chills
Fever
Headache
Nausea
Vomiting
Insomnia
Anxiety
Muscle Aches

ETA Do we have a list of all the days Michael attended rehearsals?

we're getting on a slippery road again here....trying to be doctors .

Dr Shafer said those symptoms are the same as withdrawal from benzos, and side effects from propofol, and there are the same as the flu and lack of sleep.
 
I think we need to separate the criminal trial of Murray and this trial, we are looking and discussing the accusations of the Jacksons and in turn discussing AEG's defence. By my listing the effects of Demerol withdrawal does not mean that I believe that is what Michael was suffering with, just that is a likely defence for AEG to counter the insomnia side effects as put by the Jacksons side.

ETA No not trying to be a doctor, just going with the flow of this trial. One thing I am certain of now is that with this trial we will be further away from any answers than we were before.
 
while I was at at it, I listed Michael's vists to Klein

According to Klein's bill
23 march
4 or 5 or 6 april
09th april
13 rh april
15th and/or 16th april
17th arpil
21st april
22nsd april
23rd april
25th april
27th paril
28th april
30th paril
4th and/or 5th/6th may
15th may
19th and/or 20th may
1st june
3rd/4th june
10th june
16th june
22nd june

from Murray trial, dates when Michael recieved demerol, according to Klein's records

12th march
17th march
6th april
9th april
13th april
17th april
21st april
22nd april
23rd april
27th april
30th april
4th may
5th may
6th may
19th may
20th may
21st may
1st june
4th june
9th june
16th june
22nd june

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bottom line : april > may>june.

the visits were decreasing in may and june.

from murray trial :
april : once 3 days in a row, 9 days altogether
may : twice 3 days in a row , 6 days altogether
june : 5 seperate days.

quoting myself, sorry.
Completely inconsitant with addiction, not necessarily related to Michael missing rehearsals : he didn't miss rehearsals in may.
 
I think we need to separate the criminal trial of Murray and this trial, we are looking and discussing the accusations of the Jacksons and in turn discussing AEG's defence. By my listing the effects of Demerol withdrawal does not mean that I believe that is what Michael was suffering with, just that is a likely defence for AEG to counter the insomnia side effects as put by the Jacksons side.

ETA No not trying to be a doctor, just going with the flow of this trial. One thing I am certain of now is that with this trial we will be further away from any answers than we were before.

Yes, i understand you are not trying to be a doctor, I'm sorry I put it this way quoting your post.

The CM trial experts were valid experts, IMO.

Don't be confused by AEG's defense, that's what they're going to do, it's been clear for some time : they are going to defend Murray. So brace yourself, we're going to hear stuff like this & more, over and over.
 
Last edited:
Yes, i understand you are not trying to be a doctor, I'm sorry I put it this way quoting your post.

The CM trial experts were valid experts, IMO.

Don't be confused by AEG's defense, that's what they're going to do, it's been clear for some time : they are going to defend Murray. So brace yourself, we're going to hear stuff like this over and over.

No that's ok, don't worry, our posts crossed so I just added that quickly. I honestly don't think there will be much positive from either side tbh. I thought that sleep specialist was misleading and I'm sure I will feel the same about other specialists as well. I actually feel sorry for the jury.

I'm not necessarily convinced they are defending Murray as such, as it actually doesn't matter the cause of Michaels ailments, Murray still did what he did.
 
Demerol withdrawal symptoms, I guess this is where AEG's addiction specialist comes into it.


ETA Do we have a list of all the days Michael attended rehearsals?

It's not clear, there is confusion about missed reharsals, and "late for rehearsals" ("the late for rehearsals" comes from Karen)

I think Sankey said 2-3 missed rehearsals 1st week of june, then there's one 13th, and june 19th.

i wouldn't be surprised to hear there were other problems around june 15th/16th, but that's not clear yet.
 
Last edited:
No that's ok, don't worry, our posts crossed so I just added that quickly. I honestly don't think there will be much positive from either side tbh. I thought that sleep specialist was misleading and I'm sure I will feel the same about other specialists as well. I actually feel sorry for the jury.

I'm not necessarily convinced they are defending Murray as such, as it actually doesn't matter the cause of Michaels ailments, Murray still did what he did.

thank you :)

Yes, i'm ready to bet (not much, I'm not rich at the moment) : Poooor Conrad Murray, Michael was seeing other doctors behind his back and lying to him, confusing the situation. Pooor Conrad Murray...
 
Why did the Jacksons lawyer played this AEG expert deposition anyway? I thought that was weird. And didn't the Jacksons side talk a lot about demerol in their opening statement? I'm totally confused......

Everybody was going through MAW when they wanted to talk to Michael.
Contracts with Murray were "drafted" from june 15th to 24th, Michael did have a lawyer then.

Yea, I remember that. But my question still stands, why didn't MAW go to MJ's lawyer with the Murray offer?
 
yes it is, experts can , and already did.

I personally do not believe to any diagnosis done years after Michael's death by any expert who hasn't treated or even met with Michael . They can give their educated opinion but by no means it's an absolute diagnosis that we need to accept as a fact.

So Dr. Earley - an AEG paid expert - can say all he wants about Michael being addicted to Demerol. I see that as his opinion only and not a certain diagnosis.

Man I am not even allowed to disagree with an AEG expert. :)
 
I personally do not believe to any diagnosis done years after Michael's death by any expert who hasn't treated or even met with Michael . They can give their educated opinion but by no means it's an absolute diagnosis that we need to accept as a fact.

So Dr. Earley - an AEG paid expert - can say all he wants about Michael being addicted to Demerol. I see that as his opinion only and not a certain diagnosis.

Man I am not even allowed to disagree with an AEG expert. :)

Waldman explained why- he had to, Walgren made him.

Dr Early found a way to say that "based on the records, there is no way to say Michael was addicted to benzos or propofol". Based on what records ? I thought that ws funny.

I don't know how much he charges for "research" , but his bill must be awfully high if he "researched" Murray's records...

So, yes, you are more than welcome to disagree with such an expert. :)

I don't know why the Jacksons played his depo, maybe they were trying to impeach him before he takes the stand. ??
 
Who's on the stand today?

Any clue as to how the rest of the week is going to play out. I know Karen Faye will be back on the witness stand on Friday, but what's on the schedule between now and Friday?
 
Honestly I'm confused - is it me that is not clear or is there a constant misunderstanding going on?
I think there might be a misunderstanding, i did say i was surprised at your post. I wasn't sure why if murray's lack of monitoring of propofol was the key issue in mj's death, why the interaction of demerol with propofol is an argument that you think might have merit in this trial.

I'm just curious about how - if any - Demerol can contribute to bad days and how would any Dr. claim / explain a Demerol effect. That's all. After we hear the full thing I can think it's a total BS, I just wonder what the argument is.
I didn't know you were talking about demerol's effect on the rehearsal period, i thought you were referring to demerol's role in mj's death, as you did refer to how it could affect mj's respiratory arrest on 25 june.


ps : I also have to add I did not know it was unacceptable to say "hmm tell me more before I make up my mind", I did not know we had to reject arguments without even listening to them. I though we rejected Waldman because he seemed unreliable and did not make sense, not because we decided to automatically reject everything he dared to say. I would have never guessed in a million years wanting to listen to the whole deposition was a bad thing.
Speaking for myself, I rejected waldman because i don't believe mj was a demerol addict in 09. I doubt some expert witness from aeg - and as has already been pointed out re the jackson's sleep expert, these experts who have never met mj will say anything for $$ - is going to change my mind, but i accept that it might change other people's minds.
 
Why did the Jacksons lawyer played this AEG expert deposition anyway? I thought that was weird. And didn't the Jacksons side talk a lot about demerol in their opening statement? I'm totally confused......



Yea, I remember that. But my question still stands, why didn't MAW go to MJ's lawyer with the Murray offer?

He never got it. No one at AEG sent the contracts to Michael's camp. I suppose they meant to show him the contract later, since he was supposed to sign it. But that's one of the Jackson's argument.
 
- It felt incomplete - and it's incomplete. It seemed like "we have 20 minutes till the end of day so let us play you this thing"

That made me laugh. I enjoy the way you often word things...and this communicates your point well. :)
 
Speaking for myself, I rejected waldman because i don't believe mj was a demerol addict in 09. I doubt some expert witness from aeg - and as has already been pointed out re the jackson's sleep expert, these experts who have never met mj will say anything for $$ - is going to change my mind, but i accept that it might change other people's minds.

that will depend on how the jacksons deal with Earley.
I'm never going to believe an expert who says Michael was addicted to demerol in 09, basically because of Waldman's testimony. It was easy to pull apart, Walgren did not even need an expert to get him to say Michael was not addicted. So Earley should be very easy to impeach. It will depend on what the jacksons want to do.
Maybe that's what they were trying to do with his depo.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top