arXter
Proud Member
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2011
- Messages
- 3,134
- Points
- 63
all the MJ compare-and-contrast arguments are flawed for quite an obvious reason, so i'm ignoring those.
what's legally wrong here wouldn't be on behalf of the jurors but the investigators/prosecutors or whoever may have "framed" him. but looking at the bigger picture, i'd call it corruption for the greater good. after all, corruption makes the world go 'round and around.it doesnt really matter if its a single or a double murder...what i'm saying is that its WRONG for jurers to convict him by the old case.