Muumi
Proud Member
Sony has rights to anything recorded before 2004.
Since Another Day was recorded for Invincible, Sony has rights to it
True but if Sony indirectly released the song to, say pressure... the estate to release MJs music under Sony label (even though the estate might be in a good position to use another label to distribute MJs songs with a better deal say after 2011) then that is a bit questionable. Surely there are something in the contracts preventing Sony to do this directly or indirectly even...
I would like to know who would benefit from the leak...I also think there are not that many people who would have access to the song and I do think there is someone inside Sony who is not exactly too loyal to the company or its artists....
I would also like to get more info on the legal conditions that needs to be fulfilled in order to release and distribute a song. This is because if Sony has some exclusive rights to distribute "Another Day"..does it mean that when they get a copyright, they can control the use of the right as well...that makes me think about the role of publishing in all this...would they be able to decide on that as well. Using this "logic" would they get publishing royalties as well...instead of Mijac? Again, I am just trying to think the reasons for the leak. Sony, even if they leaked the song indirectly, would have to benefit from that somehow. They are claiming copyright for a reason...one, just to exert their power in the industry and pressure or two because thei seriously think the song belongs to them which brings me to another question, if they claim to have exclusive rights to the song...why the song was leaked in the first place...was it just a mistake?
...but we could talk about this forever and without seeing the paperwork I think it is quite impossible to know...MJs business ain't the most easiest to understand.
But Seriously, Sony Music's reputation is not getting any better.