We know the Daily Mail has these pics up that show the kids' faces and all that, but I was surprised about the article. They actually call him "Michael Jackson", "Michael" and "the Thriller singer" instead of "J****", "the self-proclaimed KoP" ... all that crap. That's progress, isn't it? But then they go and blow it with the pictures... ~sigh~
:wub:
We know the Daily Mail has these pics up that show the kids' faces and all that, but I was surprised about the article. They actually call him "Michael Jackson", "Michael" and "the Thriller singer" instead of "J****", "the self-proclaimed KoP" ... all that crap. That's progress, isn't it? But then they go and blow it with the pictures... ~sigh~
But Michael... oh, lookin' GOOD!!!!! :wub:
We know the Daily Mail has these pics up that show the kids' faces and all that, but I was surprised about the article. They actually call him "Michael Jackson", "Michael" and "the Thriller singer" instead of "J****", "the self-proclaimed KoP" ... all that crap. That's progress, isn't it? But then they go and blow it with the pictures... ~sigh~
But Michael... oh, lookin' GOOD!!!!! :wub:
I'm not used to tabloids being so nice to MJ. It's such a nice article that it even helped explain why his kids are covered. Not that I don't like them being nice to MJ but this is just weird. It makes me wonder why a sudden change in attitude? I'm curious.
I'm not used to tabloids being so nice to MJ. It's such a nice article that it even helped explain why his kids are covered. Not that I don't like them being nice to MJ but this is just weird. It makes me wonder why a sudden change in attitude? I'm curious.
*Prince is the most handsome 12-year-old I've ever seen
I'm not kidding.
It's odd, huh?! I noticed that about halfway through. I was like... wait a minute... they're not calling him unsavory names! What's going on?! I was just thinking about how many years ago I'd get so mad when someone would say or imply something mean about him in an article and how later it became soooo widespread that it's been unfortunately normal. We all just read past it, rolling our eyes and trying to ignore the negativity. Now, though, I'm almost waiting for someone working at the DailyMail to realize they were way too nice and go in and screw it all up, lol.I'm not used to tabloids being so nice to MJ. It's such a nice article that it even helped explain why his kids are covered. Not that I don't like them being nice to MJ but this is just weird. It makes me wonder why a sudden change in attitude? I'm curious.
But even the regular press usually includes at least one snide "former" or "self-proclaimed" comment in the first paragraph. Unfortunately, ugh. Let's hope this article becomes the rule rather than an anomaly! (Hey, we can have hopes, right? )i don't think i'd class the daily mail as a tabloid newspaper
i don't think i'd class the daily mail as a tabloid newspaper
Please do not post links to Michael's children that are unmasked.
Great pics. Although, I do think Michael should get Prince more 'macho' masks - now that he's getting bigger.
Perhaps a Kane mask:
Or a Jason mask:
Anything but that pink feather mask
Michael who?? I just LOOOVE Paris' pink-purple jacket!!! :lol:
We know the Daily Mail has these pics up that show the kids' faces and all that, but I was surprised about the article. They actually call him "Michael Jackson", "Michael" and "the Thriller singer" instead of "J****", "the self-proclaimed KoP" ... all that crap. That's progress, isn't it? But then they go and blow it with the pictures... ~sigh~
But Michael... oh, lookin' GOOD!!!!! :wub:
Did i do that? I didnt even realize the kids were that close to him..... I was so intent on posting that he was wearing boots and black that i didnt notice....If i did im sorry.