MJ Estate Sues Tohme Tohme / Tohme Countersues / Tohme's Complaint [Merged]

Re: MJ Estate sues Tohme Tohme / Tohme countersues / Tohme's complaint @pg 14

^^It seems that is a problem a lot of them have--once they begin to work with Michael, they begin to think they own him and his property. When Michael find out their true natures he gets rid of them, but unfortunately by then they have done irrevocable damage.
 
Re: MJ Estate sues Tohme Tohme / Tohme countersues / Tohme's complaint @pg 14

11/21/2012 Request (RESPONDENT TOHME R. TOHME'S REQUEST FOR EXTENSION ON ACCTNG. )
Filed by Attorney for Respondent
 
Re: MJ Estate sues Tohme Tohme / Tohme countersues / Tohme's complaint @pg 14

He wants more time to cook his books after all these years. he's still going to get caught.
 
Re: MJ Estate sues Tohme Tohme / Tohme countersues / Tohme's complaint @pg 14

Somehow I think we all knew this was coming. Don't they all ask for more time.... let's see what happens now.
 
Re: MJ Estate sues Tohme Tohme / Tohme countersues / Tohme's complaint @pg 14

Slowly but surely this case is processing.
@Passy, I'm sure there is going to be lots of cooking up these accountings.
 
Re: MJ Estate sues Tohme Tohme / Tohme countersues / Tohme's complaint @pg 14

The latest,
Probate Notes

Department LA 5 Court Convened at: 10:00:00 AM 1/30/2013

Honorable Mitchell L. Beckloff
M. Dewey , Deputy County Clerk M. Manskar , Deputy Sheriff
Linda Biche, CSR 3359 , Reporter

BP117321 305 JACKSON, MICHAEL JOSEPH - DECEDENT
Letters of Administr
WRONGFULLY TAKEN PROPERTY (PC 859)

Petitioner(s): Branca, John McClain, John

Attorney(s): Weitzman, Howard, Esq

Continuance Number: 10 Continuance From: Thursday, October 25, 2012

Last Date Changed: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 12:09:54 PM

Last Note Changed By: RWADA

To clear probate notes "filed documents" must be submitted to Rm 258, within time frames set forth in Rule 4.4(b) of LASC Rules. You may contact the Probate Attorney whose E-Mail address appears at the end of these notes, subject to compliance with all conditions governing the use of Interactive E-Mail. E-mail Rules are available in Rm 258 and on the Court's web site at www.LASuperiorCourt.org.

PRIOR ORDER: Cont to 1/30/13 ; 10/25/12 ; 10/17/12 ; 9/27/12 at 10:00 am ; 8/30/12 ; 8/1/12; 7/25/12 at 10:00 am; 6/7/12 at 10:00 am ; 4/30/12 ; 4/12/12
Filed 2/17/12

SUMMARY
Petnrs are co-extrs
ntc/copy to affected parties filed 2/28/12
spec ntc/copy filed 2/28/12

FACTS -
After being hired by Michael Jackson as his Personal Manager in early 2008, Respondent Tohme took control of virtually all of Jackson's personal and professional affairs, then did as he pleased. With no oversight or supervision, Tohme quickly set about to and did install a far-reaching and very lucrative financial package for himself obtained as a result of a manifest breach of his fiduciary duties. The package consisted of a series of agreements that were obtained without any arms length negotiations, and without Jackson having independent legal counsel or giving informed consent, and not surprisingly called for substantial and unfair financial compensation to Tohme. Left unchecked until he was terminated in or about March 2009 (but no later than April 14, 2009), Tohme used his powers as Jackson's fiduciary and agent to take possession of both money and valuable personal property belonging to Jackson that he never returned to Jackson or the Executors, or property accounted for. By this Petition, the Executors seek to undo the harm suffered by Jackson as a result of Tohme's breaches of fiduciary duty, obtain an accounting of all money, property and material entrusted to or taken by Tohme during his tenure and recover all money, property and other material belonging to the Estate. Alleges causes of action for wrongful taking, recission based on breach of fiduciary duty, unconscionability, undue influence, and for declaratory relief set forth below.

MATTERS TO BE CLEARED - N/A

********************************************
OBJECTIONS FILED 3/21/12
OBJECTOR: Tohme R. Tohme
ATTORNEY: Paul S. Malingagio
********************************************
SUMMARY-OBJS
Objector is creditor/claimant
svd 3/21/12

FACTS-OBJS
With Tohme's application for abatement and for an extension of time in which to respond to the Petition pending and is set to be heard on March 28, Tohme will reserve any further response to the Petition until after the court considers and rules on his application for an extension of time to respond to the Petition and/or his motion for abatement of the Petition pursuant to Probate Code Section 854. Tohme expressly reserves his right and ability to seek abatement of the Petition and, if ultimately necessary, to substantively respond to the Petition with a demurrer, a denial or other appropriate responsive pleading. Before this Petition was filed, prior to 9:00 a.m. on 2/17/12,
Tohme filed a complaint in the Superior Court against the Jackson Estate, asserting claims for breach of contract and declaratory relief regarding the very same contracts which are the subject of the Jackson Estate's Petition herein. Among other things, Tohme's Civil Action alleges that he is entitled to compensation pursuant to a Finder's Agreement for his services in locating financing to prevent the foreclosure of Michael Jackson's Neverland Ranch real property and Michael Jackson's personal property. In addition, Tohme's Civil Action seeks compensation pursuant to a Services Agreement with Michael Jackson through which Tohme provided services as Michael Jackson's manager for a period of more than one year. Tohme was forced to file the Civil Action because the Jackson Estate refused to pay him, or even offer to pay him, any of the amounts to which he is entitled under these agreements. The Jackson Estate's Petition in this court clearly was filed as a "defensive" measure to the claims asserted in Tohme's Civil Action. The Petition alleges, inter alia, that the Finder's Agreement and Services Agreement are not enforceable, and that Tohme is not entitled to any compensation whatsoever for his work and services, for a variety of reasons, including that Michael Jackson allegedly "did not know what he was signing." The Petition is meritless and nothing more than an attempt by the Jackson Estate to further delay payment of the sums to which Tohme is rightfully entitled.

MATTERS TO BE CLEARED-OBJS - N/A

RELIEF
1. JTD order compelling Tohme to account for all monies and other property of Jackson's in his possession and control at any time, all monies and property of Jackson's misappropriated by Tohme, and all actions and transactions taken by Tohme with respect to Jackson's assets
2. JTD order directing Tohme to transfer, convey and deliver to the Executors all monies and other property belonging to Jackson or the Estate which he has in his possession or control
3. JTD for an award against Tohme in favor of the Estate in the amount of twice the value of all property wrongfully taken by Tohme
4. JTD for damages in an amount to be determined at trial, according to proof and for punitive damages
5. JTD for rescission of the Services Agreement, Finder Agreement and Indemnity Agreement and of any obligation thereunder to pay money to Tohme and for an order of restitution of any money or thing owing
6. JTD for rescission of the Services Agreement, Finder Agreement and Indemnity Agreement and of any obligation thereunder to pay money to Tohme and for an order of restitution of any money or thing owing
7. JTD for rescission of the Services Agreement, Finder Agreement and Indemnity Agreement and of any obligation thereunder to pay money to Tohme and for an order of restitution of any money or thing owing
8. JTD (a) Tohme is not entitled to commission any monies "received by" Jackson after Tohme was terminated (and certainly not on monies received after Jackson's death), (b) Tohme's "Services Agreement" is void or otherwise entitles him to no additional money, and (c) The Finder's Agreement entitles him to no further compensation and is void.
9. JTD for damages
10. JTD for interest on all amounts at the maximum legal rate,
11. JTD for an order imposing a constructive trust on all property wrongfully taken, concealed or disposed of by Tohme and all property traceable to property wrongfully taken, concealed or disposed of by Tohme
12. JTD for attorneys' fees and costs of suit incurred herein
13. JTD OBJECTIONS - Tohme will reserve any further response to the Petition until after the court considers and rules on his
application for an extension of time to respond to the Petition and/or his motion for abatement of the Petition pursuant to Probate Code Section 854. Tohme expressly reserves his right and ability to seek abatement of the Petition and, if ultimately necessary, to substantively respond to the Petition with a demurrer, a denial or other appropriate responsive pleading.

PROB ATTY COMMENTS: see PRIOR ORDERS o/w contested matters
Rwada@lasuperiorcourt.org
RW (3/22) (4/5) dgh 10/15/12
RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION:
RELATED ITEMS: 306, 307

Order to be Prepared By Clerk: Attorney:

Department LA 5 Court Convened at: 10:00:00 AM 1/30/2013

Honorable Mitchell L. Beckloff
M. Dewey , Deputy County Clerk M. Manskar , Deputy Sheriff
Linda Biche, CSR 3359 , Reporter

BP117321 306 JACKSON, MICHAEL JOSEPH - DECEDENT
Letters of Administr
MOTION-DISMISS

Petitioner(s): Tohme, Tohme R., Dr.

Attorney(s): Curry, James. E., Esq. Price, Dylan J.

Continuance Number: Continuance From:

Last Date Changed: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 12:09:56 PM

Last Note Changed By: RWADA

To clear probate notes "filed documents" must be submitted to Rm 258, within time frames set forth in Rule 4.4(b) of LASC Rules. You may contact the Probate Attorney whose E-Mail address appears at the end of these notes, subject to compliance with all conditions governing the use of Interactive E-Mail. E-mail Rules are available in Rm 258 and on the Court's web site at www.LASuperiorCourt.org.
RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION:
RELATED ITEMS: 305, 307

Order to be Prepared By Clerk: Attorney:

Department LA 5 Court Convened at: 10:00:00 AM 1/30/2013

Honorable Mitchell L. Beckloff
M. Dewey , Deputy County Clerk M. Manskar , Deputy Sheriff
Linda Biche, CSR 3359 , Reporter

BP117321 307 JACKSON, MICHAEL JOSEPH - DECEDENT
Letters of Administr
MOTION - SEAL COURT RECORDS

Petitioner(s): Tohme, Tohme R., Dr.

Attorney(s): Curry, James. E., Esq.

Continuance Number: Continuance From:

Last Date Changed: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 12:09:59 PM
 
Re: MJ Estate sues Tohme Tohme / Tohme countersues / Tohme's complaint @pg 14

Ivy,
Am I reading this right?
Tohme is looking into motion-dismiss (I don't know what he wants to dismiss?)
and he also wants to seal court records?

"With Tohme's application for abatement and for an extension of time in which to respond to the Petition pending and is set to be heard on March 28, Tohme will reserve any further response to the Petition until after the court considers and rules on his application for an extension of time to respond to the Petition and/or his motion for abatement of the Petition pursuant to Probate Code Section 854. Tohme expressly reserves his right and ability to seek abatement of the Petition and, if ultimately necessary, to substantively respond to the Petition with a demurrer, a denial or other appropriate responsive pleading. Before this Petition was filed, prior to 9:00 a.m. on 2/17/12,"

I used translator for that, but it is no help if legal mumbo jumbo is not familiar, so if you could put this is common language, I might understand what that part means:blush:
 
Re: MJ Estate sues Tohme Tohme / Tohme countersues / Tohme's complaint @pg 14

some parts are not properly copied so I'll copy from probate notes too.

The facts and relief sections are the summaries of what every party files with the court.

You can see that the Estate asked for

"1. JTD order compelling Tohme to account for all monies and other property of Jackson's in his possession and control at any time, all monies and property of Jackson's misappropriated by Tohme, and all actions and transactions taken by Tohme with respect to Jackson's assets "

at previous orders you can see judge's orders and see that how the matter has been going on several hearings.

the last one says

Tohme's accounting to be filed by 11/21/12 and set for hearing on 1/3013 at 10:00 am. As previously ordered Ms. Tohme's account is to be filed NLT 11/21/12 and set for 1/30/13 at 10:00am; Mr. Malingagio to be IRS and isto provide proof of noticegiven to IRS that the records were provided with the court. counsel ordered to lodge with the court under seal correspondence provided to IRS re: Michael Jackson . Mr. Tohme is to account from time managrement agreements were signed going forward and is to file a motion to seal

so as we can see the current development is that the probate judge is wanting to see the accounting of Tohme in regards to Michael.

Pay attention to the last line above

file a motion to seal

court says Tohme to file a motion to seal, so that means the court will seal Tohme's accounting.

Motion to dismiss is not clear, perhaps they can update that in the following week. But given that it's filed by Tohme I will think that it's a motion to dismiss either accounting filling or Estate's total complaint.
 
Re: MJ Estate sues Tohme Tohme / Tohme countersues / Tohme's complaint @pg 14

Motion to seal means we won't be seeing anything or get access what was sealed re: Tohme's accounting?
How disappointing, I'm sure we would have found lots of things from his accounting.

Anyway, as long as executors (or Weitzman who is the man in this case) sees what they need to see, then I'm ok.

Seemingly the estate lawyer filed this one:
01/16/2013 Opposition Document (TO MOTION TO DISMISS )
Filed by Attorney for Petitioner
 
Last edited:
Re: MJ Estate sues Tohme Tohme / Tohme countersues / Tohme's complaint @pg 14

yes motion to seal means that it won't be available to public. I was waiting to get the document but unfortunately we won't.

Also if you check the documents filed list, it doesn't show the accounting file. Either it's not listed or not filed. So motion to dismiss could be about accounting or the whole case and that's why he didn't file the accounting.
 
Re: MJ Estate sues Tohme Tohme / Tohme countersues / Tohme's complaint @pg 14

:bugeyed

I hope judge doesn't allow dismiss the whole case nor accounting.
 
Re: MJ Estate sues Tohme Tohme / Tohme countersues / Tohme's complaint @pg 14

There is a motion about an accounting filed the same day that the motion to seal

01/04/2013
Approval of Account Current

01/04/2013 MOTION - SEAL COURT RECORDS
Filed by Attorney for Respondent
 
Re: MJ Estate sues Tohme Tohme / Tohme countersues / Tohme's complaint @pg 14

no that "account current" is Estate's accounting I believe. Court has approved second accounting. They refer to estate accounting as "account current". They are referring to Tohme as "Tohme's accounting".
 
Re: MJ Estate sues Tohme Tohme / Tohme countersues / Tohme's complaint @pg 14

so Tohme does not want to file his accounting and therefore seeking a dismissal after previously asking for an extension. that's because he knows there are holes in his accounting.

trying to be smart but it won't work.
 
Last edited:
Re: MJ Estate sues Tohme Tohme / Tohme countersues / Tohme's complaint @pg 14

01/23/2013 Reply/Response (RESPONDENT TOHME R. TOHME'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS PETITION )
Filed by Attorney for Respondent

01/23/2013 Amended Complaint (2nd amended )
Filed by Petitioner in Pro Per

01/16/2013 Opposition Document (TO MOTION TO DISMISS )
Filed by Attorney for Petitioner

01/07/2013 MOTION - DISMISS
Filed by Attorney for Respondent

Tohme wanting to dismiss, Estate against it. I hope next week we learn more about it.
 
Re: MJ Estate sues Tohme Tohme / Tohme countersues / Tohme's complaint @pg 14

That accounting is important to the case, so I guess it makes sense for Thome to try to hide it. Doubt this will be dismissed.
 
Re: MJ Estate sues Tohme Tohme / Tohme countersues / Tohme's complaint @pg 14

Important hearing today :

01/30/2013 at 10:00 am in department 5 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
MOTION - SEAL COURT RECORDS

01/30/2013 at 10:00 am in department 5 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
ACCOUNT CURRENT (OBJECTIONS FILED 1/29/13OBJECTORS: JOHN BRANCA AND JOHN MCCLAINATTORNEY: JERYLL S. COHEN)

01/30/2013 at 10:00 am in department 5 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
MOTION-DISMISS

01/30/2013 at 10:00 am in department 5 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
WRONGFULLY TAKEN PROPERTY (PC 859) (MR. TOHME'S ACCTG TO BE FILED NLT11/21/12 AND SET FOR HRG ON1/30/13 AT 10:00 A.M.)




so, Tohme filed an accounting and the estate objected.





In another note, an other interesting hearing about assets' ownership


03/06/2013 at 08:30 am in department 5 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
DETERMINE OWNERSHIP (PC 850)
 
Re: MJ Estate sues Tohme Tohme / Tohme countersues / Tohme's complaint @pg 14

In another note, an other interesting hearing about assets' ownership

[/FONT][/COLOR]
03/06/2013 at 08:30 am in department 5 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
DETERMINE OWNERSHIP (PC 850)

I wonder if that is about the paintings Tohme gave to Livingstrong-Strong, it wasn't up to him to give Michael's painting to anyone?
Seemingly they already had hearing about ownership: 01/28/2013 Determine Ownership (PC 850)


01/30/2013 at 10:00 am in department 5 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
ACCOUNT CURRENT (OBJECTIONS FILED 1/29/13OBJECTORS: JOHN BRANCA AND JOHN MCCLAINATTORNEY: JERYLL S. COHEN)

I wonder why Tohme is objecting account current?
I thought Weitzman represents the estate in this case?
Cohen is mentioned there and no Weitzman at all.



Hopefully todays hearing will be beneficial to the estate, keeping my thumbs up for the estate.
 
Last edited:
Re: MJ Estate sues Tohme Tohme / Tohme countersues / Tohme's complaint @pg 14

No, it's the estate who is objecting to Tohme's account current
 
Re: MJ Estate sues Tohme Tohme / Tohme countersues / Tohme's complaint @pg 14

Oh, I see.
Thanks.
 
Re: MJ Estate sues Tohme Tohme / Tohme countersues / Tohme's complaint @pg 14

No news of this case?
 
Re: MJ Estate sues Tohme Tohme / Tohme countersues / Tohme's complaint @pg 14

This is a case that's heard on the probate court, so no documents are available - unless we make a in person request. Media hasn't reported about it. We only get an idea about the developments when the next hearing is about to happen and we look to the probate notes.
 
Re: MJ Estate sues Tohme Tohme / Tohme countersues / Tohme's complaint @pg 14

This is a case that's heard on the probate court, so no documents are available - unless we make a in person request. Media hasn't reported about it. We only get an idea about the developments when the next hearing is about to happen and we look to the probate notes.

Can we do that bolded part:)

I think the estate should report all the details, at least from this case to us, so we can do some mullin' over and perhaps we can help them too - well Ivy can and I lend my support:bow:
I'm ready to start pulling out my hair if nothing happens:scratch:

Anyway, thanks very much Ivy for your updates and patience with me.

One more question. You mentioned that media hasn't reported anything, but how media gets the information if docs are not available?
 
Last edited:
Re: MJ Estate sues Tohme Tohme / Tohme countersues / Tohme's complaint @pg 14

Maybe the media make an in-person request?
 
Re: MJ Estate sues Tohme Tohme / Tohme countersues / Tohme's complaint @pg 14

Okay :) let me explain this a little more. :)

every court has a clerk's office. the job of the clerk's office to to accept and file the documents. So these are the hard copies.

many courts also has an online system - mainly PACER (public access to court electronic records) or a similar system. For this system the court clerk scans the document and puts it to the online system.

I get the documents from the online systems. I have an account, pay for the document and I can download a pdf (scanned copy of the court document). However probate documents aren't posted on the online system - mainly because it's about a decedent's estate and aren't necessarily seen as a public interest topic.

So the only way to get probate documents is that someone has to go the LA superior court in person, make a request, pay for it, wait for it and get the document - of course if it's not sealed. We did this with the second accounting. Windy09 went to the court - twice- and got the accounting documents and then we later scanned it ourselves.

We can do it for Tohme documents too but it'll be hard work and given that there's a motion to seal most of it will be under seal and not accessible to us. So that's why we aren't doing an effort for it. Furthermore this was an oral hearing - meaning the judge listened to both sides - that doesn't mean he made a decision on the spot. he could have taken it under consideration and will spend some time thinking about it.

As for the media - yes media in LA can get the hard copies from the clerk's office. Actually for example TMZ has staff that waits at the clerk's office and report about the lawsuits about celebrities almost instantly - they get copies as they are submitted to the clerk's office. They can also be quicker to report as they get the hard copies from the clerk's office and do not need to wait for the documents to be scanned and uploaded to an online system - if there's one.

As for the basics of this case we know it - although we might not know the specifics : Estate filed a complaint (we have it), judge after several months arranging logistics ordered Tohme to file his accounting under seal, there's a motion to dismiss -either the accounting filing or the whole estate complaint, and estate is opposing to this dismissal request.
 
Re: MJ Estate sues Tohme Tohme / Tohme countersues / Tohme's complaint @pg 14

Thanks Ivy. Thank goodness there is an opportunity for certain information to be sealed, because with people collecting the documents immediately a lot of private information will be all over the media.
 
Re: MJ Estate sues Tohme Tohme / Tohme countersues / Tohme's complaint @pg 14

Thanks Ivy.


As for the basics of this case we know it - although we might not know the specifics : Estate filed a complaint (we have it), judge after several months arranging logistics ordered Tohme to file his accounting under seal, there's a motion to dismiss -either the accounting filing or the whole estate complaint, and estate is opposing to this dismissal request.

So he already gave his "accounting" and asked it to be put under the seal, and now he could be asking it dismissal for it?
For some reason I don't think he is asking dismissal the whole estate complaint, so it is for accounting.
I would really really want to see his accounting as he seems to be hell bent over it, even thou I don't think he was honest doing it. There was some cooking up while him and his lawyers were making it.
 
Re: MJ Estate sues Tohme Tohme / Tohme countersues / Tohme's complaint @pg 14

I thought this was a good post about Tohme and should be posted here so we can do some mullin' over

Three Agreements between Michael Jackson and Tohme

Just about a year ago, both the Estate of Michael Jackson and Tohme Tohme filed lawsuits against each other. As the lawsuits near trial, it's important that all Michael Jackson fans, and those interested in the lawsuit, understand three key components to the Estate's claims against Tohme. There are three main claims; the Finder's Agreement, the Services Agreement and the Indemnity Agreement. So let's take a look at what the Estate claims on each one of these agreements between Michael Jackson and Tohme. You can read the court documents for yourself, here.

Finder's Agreement

1. In early 2008, Jackson started looking for someone to refinance the loan on Neverland Ranch. While acting as a consultant for Colony Capital AND as Jackson's business advisor, Tohme and Jackson entered an agreement in which Tohme would receive a 10% finder's fee for locating a company to refinance Neverland. In addition, the agreement stated that Jackson would pay 10% of the gross proceeds to Tohme if Jackson sold any interest in Neverland. Lastly, the agreement stated that Tohme would receive 10% of any future profit through any transaction brought to Michael by Colony Capital. The Estate's claim states "the services Tohme performed for this excessive compensation were simply to introduce Jackson to Colony."



The Estate also claims that "the final terms imposed on Jackson contained newly created restraints in connection with Jackson's use and control of the Ranch, along with financial terms disproportionately favorable to Colony and inferior to those Jackson would have been able to obtain had he been represented in negotiations at the outside by an independent advisor without any financial interest in the transaction." The Estate claims that by being a consultant to Colony Capital, while simultaneously representing Jackson as a business advisor AND in agreement with Jackson for a finder's fee, this is a conflict of interest, and therefore should be found legally void. The Estate also claims that there were other options that were open to Jackson regarding the refinancing of Neverland, yet Tohme utilized his connections with Colony Capital to gain his finder's fee.


?
?
2. Services Agreement

Jackson and Tohme entered into a Services Agreement on July 2, 2008. The terms of the services agreement stated that Tohme was guaranteed to be paid $35,000 a month, plus expenses regardless of whether Michael made money or not. In addition, Tohme would receive "15% of all gross compensation received by (Jackson) including live performances, merchandising, electronic arts, recorded and live telecasts, motion pictures and animated projects." The Estate claims this agreement far exceeds the normal and customary fees charged by a business advisor.

3. Indemnity Agreement

The Estate also claims that Michael signed 2 power of attorney documents to Tohme in August 2008, which were, like the finder's agreement and the services agreement, disporportitionately favorable to Tohme and inferior to Jackson. The Estate also claims that Tohme had Jackson sign an indemnity agreement on August 6,2008, which gave Tohme broad indemnities which were beyond customary.

The Estate gives the example of Tohme giving Michael's artwork to Brett Livingstone Strong as an example. "Tohme asserts that he had the power to make the gifts pursuant to the Power of Attorney that were allegedly executed by Jackson." The Estate claims Tohme has no Power of Attorney to give gifts of Michael's property to third parties, and that the Estate owns all of Jackson's property, not Tohme.

Other Claims

1. The Estate claims that within the AEG agreement for the This Is It (TII) tour and concerts, Tohme is given, on top of the services agreement fee, $100,000 a month. This fee is advanced to Tohme by AEG, but would have been recouped by Jackson had he lived.

2. The Estate claims that Tohme is still in possession of Jackson's money and property. The estate claims not only does Tohme have some of Jackson's money ("in the millions"), but that Tohme comingled Jackson's money with his own. The Estate also claims that Tohme is still in possession of Jackson's property; and that he may have disposed of some of the property (like Michael's artwork) without having the authority to do so.

So if we look at Tohme's compensation agreements prior to Michael's death, here's what we have:

Finder's Fee: 10% profit of the sale of Neverland
10% of gross proceeds if MJ ever sold any interest in Neverland
10% of any profit MJ earned through Colony Capital
Services Fee: $35,000 per month
All expenses paid
15% compensation for any work done by MJ
Power of Attorney: Power to do what he pleased with regard to Michael's work
or property

AEG Agreement: $100,000 per month

This is, like the Estate has claimed, extraordinarly outrageous and not the customary fee. The Estate claims that because there was no independent counsel involved in any of these agreements, that they should be declared null and void, and that Tohme should in some instances, pay back double what the Estate has lost.

Regardless of whether you as a fan, support the Estate or not, STAND UP AGAINST TOHME, who took advantage of Michael Jackson when he was vulnerable. #MJFansAgainstTohme

http://mjandjustice4some.blogspot.ie/2013/02/three-agreements-between-michael.html


Hopefully the estate wins this case, as many issues will resolve as result of it.
Neverland deal, was it valid? Will Neverland belong to the estate of MJ if Tohme agreements are nullified?
MJ's art work, he should not have given it to Livingstone-Strong so those need to get back to MJ estate.
Plus what else he have but not given back?
 
Re: MJ Estate sues Tohme Tohme / Tohme countersues / Tohme's complaint @pg 14

That man is scary. How did he get Michael to sign all those papers? I can't believe Michael or anyone will give someone the right to make decisions on all his assets. I wonder if Michael really signed those papers or if someone else did it for him.
 
Back
Top