This Is It
Proud Member
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2011
- Messages
- 1,330
- Points
- 0
Re: The Official New Album Thread - Discussion Only
The album's called x?!!?!??!??
Source?!??!?!
The album's called x?!!?!??!??
Source?!??!?!
that Michael Jackson's brand new "x" single will hit radio in just 3 days time and then iTunes and music stores 4 days later! The single is the first to be released in promotion of his brand new "x" album!
If they announced today that ... a new single called "x" and then another 3 weeks later the album called "x"
My post is not related to the way the album should be promoted, but to the fact that MJ gave us so much and that despite all he gave and his death, people are still demanding new things as if MJ owed us. And as I said on top of that people demand from a dead man to hit the charts. Will this man ever have rest, either from journalists or from the fans?
Basically, as far as I am concerned, I am not interested in promotion at all. I am interested in discovering and enjoying music if it is released. If not, I have plenty of already released tracks to re-listen to. I say, why not taking the time to appreciate all the music he has already given, and welcoming all the upcoming unreleased songs as a special gift to us? Let's enjoy whatever and whenever is released. If you love something who cares about the charts or big promotion? Do we listen to the music because we love it or because it is played all over the places? I f you like it because of this latter, all the unreleased stuff risks to be heavily altered in order to fit the general tendency of the moment without Michael being here to agree or disagree.
As far as the radios are concerned, no I did not change my mind. From the commercial point of view I still think it is one of the best strategy to promote it along with all other means of media of course. I never said that songs should be played only on the radios.
I remember back in the 80s when Michael dominated not only or necessarily the charts, but people's subconscious as the best singer ever. Everybody was saying --even non fans-- that he was the best (and still is). Many movies still today contain lines about Michael Jackson or his dance moves or his music, such an icon he has been. For example:
-Beverly Hills Cop I
-Goonies
-Back To The Future II & III
-The Simpsons
-Rush Hour I, II, III
-Robots (animation)
-Shrek (animation)
etc., etc the list is extremely long
I also remember listening to the BAD album and said to myself, how will Michael ever be able to create anything better in the future --as far as melodies are concerned. With that ten-song album he, for me back then, couldn't be able to make such good melodies afterwards. I was of course wrong, because when Dangerous and later History came out, I understood that his magical power of creating melodies were unlimited. So, still back in the 80s, I said to myself, I need to hear other songs, any songs.
With Internet leaks it became easier to get hold of unreleased songs such as Niteline, Trouble, etc. For an impatient and hype fan, those songs are weak and without interest. But for a real fan, hearing MJ's voice in an unreleased song is a real blessing, regardless the promotions or the charts.
It sadness me when I hear some fans disappointed with "This Is It" song. It is not a club banger, but they forget that Michael didn't only sing or write radio friendly music. Why some people don't stop a little bit, take a breath, sit down on your sofa, forget the hype, put sometimes Destiny album and listen to it. One of the songs on it called "Bless his soul" sounds like "This is it". It is a beautiful song. "This is it" is also a beautiful song. Instead of being thankful to get the chance to have at least one unheard song, people complain.
Now, when the new album comes out remember my words, instead of being happy and enjoying the MJ's unheard music, some fans will start being frustrated because there are not enough slows, others that there are not enough fast songs. No matter what you give to people, they're never satisfied.
Lol Tony, youre good value. Now all the members who don't read posts properly will think that's what it's going to be called. Haha
Well, the logic would lean towards the fact that the more songs you like, the bigger fan you are. There might be some exceptions to this logic of course.
As far as songs are concerned, of course you can't like all the songs the same way. And of course there are probably some songs from other artists that you like better than some MJ's songs. It's completely normal.
However, I don't know if some of you tried to change the perspective of listening to some songs. For example I remember when for the first time I heard "The Lady In My Life". I was very young and didn't really like the song. The sam for "Baby Be Mine". It is difficult to understand how come that we adore an artist such as Michael Jackson and we dislike very much some songs. I said to myself, if my favorite artist sang those songs and chose to put them on the album, it's because there must be a good reson. I re-listened "The Lady In My Life", but I wasn't listening to Michael the artist any more this ime, I was listening to Michael the interpreter of the feelings. It is only then that I felt embraced by the warmth of the chorus "now is the time" and the sweetness and softness of the melodious poem interpreted by Michael. Today it's one of my best songs ever.
For "Baby Be Mine" I again heard the interpreter, not the singer, when he shouts out with time after time broken voice "you're everything this world could mean to me, c'mon babe, baby be mine,..."
So, these two example are not club bangers or radio friendly songs, but they're damn good to listen to. And there are so many other jewels to re-discover if only we take the time to get carried away by the flow of Michael the interpreter, and not always by Michael the singer. Anyone can sing, but not anyone can interpret. I can't imagine the interpretation of the song BAD by Paul McCarteny for example even though he is in his own category a good singer. But I could easily imagine interpret Michael any Paul's song. That is what I call magic that Michael had.
So far we have the confirmation (from Damien Shields) that the new single is coming out in 3 days and the album in 4. The info has been corroborated by SmoothCriminal05 that indeed, the album is coming out in November, confirming Mastermoonwalker's theory that the album is out in March.
Thanks to Damien, we know that the album's title is "X", which is also the title of the first single.
According to 144 000 and myself we agreed that the album won't need any promotion, neither on radio nor on any other media support, because simply we are talking about Michael Jackson here who actually doesn't need any promotion, hence no official announcement whatsoever. What some might consider as a chaos surrouding the campaign for the new album, others are confident that it will outsell 10 million units in a heartbeat --judging on the serious survey carried out within the MJJCommunity's thinktanks memebers presence on the forum, and especially in this particlar thread.
I had to go sifting through the last couple of pages of this thread to discover that this entire post is sarcastic. Easy on the in-jokes guys!
So far we have the confirmation (from Damien Shields) that the new single is coming out in 3 days and the album in 4. The info has been corroborated by SmoothCriminal05 that indeed, the album is coming out in November, confirming Mastermoonwalker's theory that the album is out in March.
Thanks to Damien, we know that the album's title is "X", which is also the title of the first single.
According to 144 000 and myself we agreed that the album won't need any promotion, neither on radio nor on any other media support, because simply we are talking about Michael Jackson here who actually doesn't need any promotion, hence no official announcement whatsoever. What some might consider as a chaos surrouding the campaign for the new album, others are confident that it will outsell 10 million units in a heartbeat --judging on the serious survey carried out within the MJJCommunity's thinktanks memebers presence on the forum, and especially in this particlar thread.
so...that means Bumper Snippet changed his/her mind about Michael not having to depend on radio, as much as other artists? cus if so...i agree. again...not that i am saying that bug spray should be applied to the idea of MJ being on radio..
Lame post.....*confused*
Now that's funny lol.
Did you also read back the locked thread about the new album? There are only around 5000 posts.
It was actually a post that was about MJ himself and how much he gave to us and we should be grateful. It was quite good and long. You should find the original post and read it. :cheeky:
So far we have the confirmation (from Damien Shields) that the new single is coming out in 3 days and the album in 4. The info has been corroborated by SmoothCriminal05 that indeed, the album is coming out in November, confirming Mastermoonwalker's theory that the album is out in March.
Thanks to Damien, we know that the album's title is "X", which is also the title of the first single.
According to 144 000 and myself we agreed that the album won't need any promotion, neither on radio nor on any other media support, because simply we are talking about Michael Jackson here who actually doesn't need any promotion, hence no official announcement whatsoever. What some might consider as a chaos surrouding the campaign for the new album, others are confident that it will outsell 10 million units in a heartbeat --judging on the serious survey carried out within the MJJCommunity's thinktanks memebers presence on the forum, and especially in this particlar thread.
Lame post.....*confused*
Lame post.....*confused*
Rude person.....*confused*