Latest on MJJC

Michael - The Great Album Debate

Re: Michael - The Great Album Debate (Cascio Controversy Thread)

Garden said:
OK, from many posts I learn that you like to say "WE hear", so how can YOU hear through all that many ears? YOU have 1 pair of ears, don't you?
Each of us has their OWN pair of ears :).
:) I'll stop it, this becomes too silly.

Don't be mad now... I think we just are SO different. I for me, I can hardly judge what my OWN ears hear... I can't speak for other persons ears.
Or am I joking? Well, this does make me feel silly but with a sence of humour :)!

Gorgeous new avatar anyway! (You rock MJ and you're BAD!!
Click to expand...
 
Re: Michael - The Great Album Debate (Cascio Controversy Thread)

Garden said:
OK, from many posts I learn that you like to say "WE hear", so how can YOU hear through all that many ears? YOU have 1 pair of ears, don't you?
Each of us has their OWN pair of ears :).
:) I'll stop it, this becomes too silly.

Don't be mad now... I think we just are SO different. I for me, I can hardly judge what my OWN ears hear... I can't speak for other persons ears.
Or am I joking? Well, this does make me feel silly but with a sence of humour :)!

Gorgeous new avatar anyway! (You rock MJ and you're BAD!!
Click to expand...
 
Re: Michael - The Great Album Debate (Cascio Controversy Thread)

samhabib said:
According to the MJJC poll it is.
Click to expand...

Hm a poll as an exact instrument for measuring auditive and objective evaluative capacity... okay! (I get language problems here :) )

But no problem with that poll, it has been amusing and it is fine for me.

You can count upon that poll, it has been working very well, that's for sure.

That's what it makes so amusing :)
 
Re: Michael - The Great Album Debate (Cascio Controversy Thread)

love is magical said:
Lol... it's okay.. bumper is very charming!
Click to expand...
funny-monkey-1.jpg
 
Re: Michael - The Great Album Debate (Cascio Controversy Thread)

BUMPER SNIPPET said:
You are playing with words Garden. You know very well that I never said that I can hear through other people's ears. You know exactly what I mean when I say :"we don't hear".

Shall I translate for you and say "I don't hear, as many of us who have witnessed on this board according to each of our respective pair of ears". ---> In other words "We don't hear". quod erat demonstrandum
Click to expand...

Not yet what I meant. This seems to you like playing with words isn't it?
Whatever it is, I personnally will not easily say "WE" hear (or don't hear), because I only hear with my own ears.
But I get your meaning Bumper, don't worry...
What I did... was just an other way of reading a text.
 
Re: Michael - The Great Album Debate (Cascio Controversy Thread)

^^ Oh, SNAP!! :lol:
 
Re: Michael - The Great Album Debate (Cascio Controversy Thread)

Garden said:
Not yet what I meant. This seems to you like playing with words isn't it?
Whatever it is, I personnally will not easily say "WE" hear (or don't hear), because I only hear with my own ears.
But I get your meaning Bumper, don't worry...
What I did... was just an other way of reading a text.
Click to expand...

you remind me so much of how i act toward my crush. i'd do something on purpose to poke him. :ph34r:

told ya! bumper is very charming! :tease:
 
Re: Michael - The Great Album Debate (Cascio Controversy Thread)

Garden said:
Hm a poll as an exact instrument for measuring auditive and objective evaluative capacity... okay!
Click to expand...

I never said it was. You tried to challenge my claim that the majority believe the tracks are dubious.

Garden said:
Well that's fine if it is true!
Click to expand...

It's true.
 
Re: Michael - The Great Album Debate (Cascio Controversy Thread)

samhabib said:
I never said it was. You tried to challenge my claim that the majority believe the tracks are dubious.



It's true.
Click to expand...

Dubious, yes I can see that.

But no I only questionned whether such a poll is valid and for measuring what exactly.
Samhabib I am just speaking about a method, an instrument (poll) here, that's all.
 
Re: Michael - The Great Album Debate (Cascio Controversy Thread)

Garden said:
Dubious, yes I can see that.

But no I only questionned whether such a poll is valid and for measuring what exactly.
Samhabib I am just speaking about a method, an instrument (poll) here, that's all.
Click to expand...

I said the majority believe the songs are dubious. You questioned that. I then gave you the basis for my claim.

You can't change the parameters as we speak.
 
Re: Michael - The Great Album Debate (Cascio Controversy Thread)

samhabib said:
I said the majority believe the songs are dubious. You questioned that. I then gave you the basis for my claim.

You can't change the parameters as we speak.
Click to expand...

OK YOU SAY THE MAJORITY BELIEVE THE SONGS ARE DUBIOUS.

THAT'S FINE!

What I questionned is the Poll and I thought you said that your conclusion (here above) is based upon that Poll.
It's the method of such a Poll that I question.
 
Re: Michael - The Great Album Debate (Cascio Controversy Thread)

^^^^

In order to avoid this kind of discussion, that's why I didn't use the word "majority", I used "many". While the "majority" can be questioned, we certainly cannot deny that "many" of us don't hear Michael. That was my point anyway. No need for a debate about the instruments such as polls.
 
Re: Michael - The Great Album Debate (Cascio Controversy Thread)

BUMPER SNIPPET said:
^^^^

In order to avoid this kind of discussion, that's why I didn't use the word "majority", I used "many". While the "majority" can be questioned, we certainly cannot deny that "many" of us don't hear Michael. That was my point anyway. No need for a debate about the instruments such as polls.
Click to expand...

Okay, that's better already ^^!
 
Re: Michael - The Great Album Debate (Cascio Controversy Thread)

jaXXXon said:
What's your point exactly?
Click to expand...

My point is, no matter what comes out, minds are made up, and nothing can be done, to change that. People questioned for the longest time why Jason hadn't said anything regarding the matter, when his manager finally releases a statement on Jason's behalf, regarding the matter, and denying the claims, he was called a liar and accused of being in on it and covering for him by you and others in this thread.

Sam posted from Jason's website, that was being hacked, so I doubt it was really him, but he posted something from the website, someone who was supposedly Jason, saying "It's all Michael". When Sam was then questioned on his own post disputing his claim, his response was, "I don't need anyone to tell me it's Jason Malachi on these records". So no matter what's said, by anyone, you and others in this thread will refuse to believe it.
 
Re: Michael - The Great Album Debate (Cascio Controversy Thread)

Correctamundo, and that's why I'm done discussing this subject.
 
Re: Michael - The Great Album Debate (Cascio Controversy Thread)

Ok, but what makes thad's claim that his client had nothing to do with the tracks more believable than the JM facebook statement saying he sang on the cascio tracks?

For the record, i do believe JM's facebook was hacked, and i don't believe that was a real confession. but i'm just saying, his manager's statement isn't more or less believable than the JM facebook statement.

does that make sense . . . ? couldn't really articulate that as well as i wanted to.
 
Re: Michael - The Great Album Debate (Cascio Controversy Thread)

azsummergirl said:
Ok, but what makes thad's claim that his client had nothing to do with the tracks more believable than the JM facebook statement saying he sang on the cascio tracks?

For the record, i do believe JM's facebook was hacked, and i don't believe that was a real confession. but i'm just saying, his manager's statement isn't more or less believable than the JM facebook statement.

does that make sense . . . ? couldn't really articulate that as well as i wanted to.
Click to expand...

No, that makes complete sense :)
 
Re: Michael - The Great Album Debate (Cascio Controversy Thread)

AnnieRUOkay89 said:
Sam posted from Jason's website, that was being hacked, so I doubt it was really him, but he posted something from the website, someone who was supposedly Jason, saying "It's all Michael". When Sam was then questioned on his own post disputing his claim, his response was, "I don't need anyone to tell me it's Jason Malachi on these records". So no matter what's said, by anyone, you and others in this thread will refuse to believe it.
Click to expand...

Find me this quote of mine.
 
Re: Michael - The Great Album Debate (Cascio Controversy Thread)

azsummergirl said:
Ok, but what makes thad's claim that his client had nothing to do with the tracks more believable than the JM facebook statement saying he sang on the cascio tracks?

For the record, i do believe JM's facebook was hacked, and i don't believe that was a real confession. but i'm just saying, his manager's statement isn't more or less believable than the JM facebook statement.

does that make sense . . . ? couldn't really articulate that as well as i wanted to.
Click to expand...

Thad 'hanus' Nauden? That, right there, tells you the kind of people we're dealing with. 'Hanus'? It would be funny if it wasn't so damaging.
 
Re: Michael - The Great Album Debate (Cascio Controversy Thread)

edit
Dammit, summergirl, you edited it ! lol
 
Re: Michael - The Great Album Debate (Cascio Controversy Thread)

@samhabib Post #505, you said the exact words that Annie quoted.
 
Re: Michael - The Great Album Debate (Cascio Controversy Thread)

Jesta said:
@samhabib Post #505, you said the exact words that Annie quoted.
Click to expand...

Indeed, and it shows that Annie has COMPLETELY misquoted me and taken my words COMPLETELY out of context.

I posted this:

"It's all Michael Jackson! Believe that He is on the Michael album, all the way through Shoutout list Michael Jackson The Cascios Teddy Riley All the fans and haters MJJCommunity Max Jax and the rest of you! hey MJelboo, please shut up"

http://www.jasonmalachi.us/Michael.html

To which I was asked 'Are you going to believe that now?'

To which I responded:

"I don't need anyone to tell me it's Jason Malachi on those records."

So for Annie to claim that "Sam was then questioned on his own post disputing his claim" - that's completely incorrect. At no stage did I dispute any legitimate claim. I posted the hackers claim. And then posted my opinion.

A hacker posts a claim that Michael Jackson sings on the Cascio songs, a day or so after a hacker claims the songs are bogus. I didn't even comment on the claims.

My opinion has remained steadfast. And that is that the tracks are wholly bogus. REGARDLESS of what anyone else tells me. Why? Because I have complete conviction in my belief. If you, or anyone else doesn't, you should ask yourself why.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top