10 Undeniable Facts About the Michael Jackson Sexual-Abuse Allegations
The author, who spent more than a decade covering the scandal for V.F., shares the key revelations and insights that viewers of the new HBO documentary Leaving Neverland need to know.www.vanityfair.com
This article is constantly parroted by critics, particularly on reddit. Even today.
Branca wasn't the one arguing in court. It was a different lawyer for the Estate, and by all accounts he seems to have done a great job so far. Like I said earlier him and whoever else is involved needs to bring everything they got and everyone they can get to the trial if it gets there.
Yeah... I worry that feelings will win over facts and to many, especially the media, that will be "close enough" to a guilty verdict for them... and then it'll be all over.I have a horrible feeling about these parasites. They are the least credible 'victims' to date but its 2023 and anything is possible.
It often feels like the justice system will do whatever it takes to finally convict him of a crime, especially with the man long gone.
Poor MJ
Sure, the fans will always be around to point out the facts, and his music will likely still be played in some capacity, but it'll never be the same.My only problem with appealing is that it will further delay things, and may not even be worth it in the end. If it goes to a trial as planned--and this is just me having odd ideas about things--my hope is that it goes to trial at the same time as the Trump trial. That way, the media can very easily focus on that instead of this horseshit.
And despite the arguments made against it, people simply don't listen to them. Fuck Vanity Fair (and Variety too; they deliberately censored pro-Michael comments back when LN came out).10 Undeniable Facts About the Michael Jackson Sexual-Abuse Allegations
The author, who spent more than a decade covering the scandal for V.F., shares the key revelations and insights that viewers of the new HBO documentary Leaving Neverland need to know.
This article is constantly parroted by critics, particularly on reddit. Even today.
Why oh why oh WHY can't they ever fucking get this fucking shit right arrghhhhhh.
I will support you here. The values of society and what is <normal> reflect the state of this society. It is considered weird only because there is fear of sexual connotation. Even if it is not. This is exactly what MJ has told - people are judging it because people think <sex>. I also understand all the <hanging out> was with the parental permission. They obviously did not think it was weird if they allowed it..
Reddit is basically the harbinger for those weirdos. R/LeavingNeverLandHBO, 8K of them, they explicitly target and bridge against MJ. They want an anonymous home base. Who are they? Regular people? Newscasters and people in the media, business men, people with connections to Epstein, Weinstein, Reed, Diamond. Who knows. It's insane.
I actually haven't seen anything about this on the Reddit front page at all over the last few days. Maybe I just didn't view at the right time, or didn't scroll far enough, but it wasn't in the first 20 threads I saw, so maybe it's not making a big impact there?
Oh well that's good. That's on me then, searching his name and browsing through the trashy gossip spots. It's not really something that comes up much. The MJ Subreddit itself just be kinda desolate.
This is the bit that worries me about it being a civil case and the way it hinges (apparently) on the 'preponderance' of evidence. I just can't get it out of my head that it leaves too much room for people's emotional responses to kick in. I'm not saying criminal trials are perfect, I'm not saying juries always get it right or can't be swayed or whatever. But the requirement for 'beyond all reasonable doubt' is fairly rigourous, I think. This civil case arrangement feels much less so to me with my non-legal brain. Unless and until I can understand more about how a civil case works I'm going to be anxious about this aspect of the whole thing.Yeah... I worry that feelings will win over facts and to many, especially the media, that will be "close enough" to a guilty verdict for them... and then it'll be all over.
Exactly. I'm not even thinking about it. I trust MJE legal team to make the right call on this. They are the only ones who can really properly assess the advantages and disadvantages of appealing or not appealing.
I do hate this almost more than any other aspect of this whole sh*t show. Almost. My concern isn't whether a specific journalist believes Michael to be guilty, that's on them. What gets me is, er, journalistic accuracy? Professional standards? Fact checking? Knowing how to do the research? Maintaining a neutral and professional stance on a story that you're writing? I mean, I could go on and on. The point is, Michael's fans have done all the hard work. The info is out there, easy to access, easy to understand. A journalist is completely free to believe that Michael is guilty but they do not have the right to publish inaccurate sh*t. Unacceptable. Report the facts, please, or just don't bother writing about this at all. Go and write sh*t about the Kardashians or whatever.
10 Undeniable Facts About the Michael Jackson Sexual-Abuse Allegations
The author, who spent more than a decade covering the scandal for V.F., shares the key revelations and insights that viewers of the new HBO documentary Leaving Neverland need to know.
This article is constantly parroted by critics, particularly on reddit. Even today.
Problem is, Staffie, that not everyone who encounters that article will bother to go into the comments so they won't necessarily see the rebuttals from Michael's fans. I hardly ever go into online comments and I can't be the only one. Michael's fans are tireless in their efforts to challenge inaccurate nonsense but it doesn't automatically follow that everyone will see that stuff.
Poor Britney. She's got quite enough on her plate. A divorce is upcoming, her publisher is having kittens, apparently, bc it means her autobiography will be out of date before it's even been published and it seems it's too late to make changes to the text. I know this trial won't be happening for months but I wouldn't be looking to Britney as a potential witness for the defence if I was MJE legal. I wouldn't want to do that to her. I'm not sure she'll ever be in a calm enough place to be able to do stuff like that. I hope I'm wrong but there always seems to be too much chaos in her life.
yeh i dont think britney will be called as a witness for the case shes too unstable at the moment
Allegedly but I still think it would be unreasonable to try to get Britney involved. She has her own stuff to deal with. I don't think she needs to be drawn into this. It most likely wouldn't be healthy for her.
It was just a kiss nothing more
The legislation was changed regarding the statute of limitations for csa cases, that's how they were able to keep going.
Maybe if we spread this around the mj estate will see this and ask this person to be a witness if they are speaking the truth
No wonder she feels rough poor girl -
This is going to be so harsh on us all