cinzia,
Autopsy, tatoo, etc. If the ambulance driver lied who else did? Why is the defence saying the prosecution eliminated all twelve of their professional witnesses? Why did they never hand over addresses to the defence? Why the secrecy? Know what I watched yesterday? A brief news clip on how there are corrupt police officers who party together, beat up on eachother and committed a crimes against others. They even had their own gang name tatooed on the back of their knecks. Do I trust police officers and attorneys working for the D.A.'s office? No. I believe good and evil is everywhere and there are some good officers and some evil but I trust no one- considering even when I say I'm gonna go on a diet I often eat things I say I wont.
Why did the D.A.'s office not handcuff Murray? Why did they let him check in at the airport courthouse and fly away? Why the leniency? Ask yourself- are they trying to help Murray? Is it a payoff?
As for the memorial the words appeared on the overhead I stared at them in shock, wondering if I was imagining things.
See, this is where it always falls apart. Here, with the autopsy. No matter how anyone looks at this 'theory' there is never a good, logical, realistic explanation for the autopsy question. Your comparison between what an ambulance driver says and the findings of the coroner's office is, well, forgive me for saying this, ludicrous. It is no explanation at all. You are willing to believe that a coroner with probably an assistant performed an autopsy on...no one?? Or on someone looking like but not Michael?? And the private autopsy hired by the family? That was a fraud also? So that means what...the family is in on this too??
You cannot expect any reasonable individual to believe this.
When I first started reading what you were saying, I thought it was to do with events directly impacting murray and what he did that night and morning. This is far from that.
What you have so far revealed is, imo, either totally unbelievable, vide above, or explainable in other less fantastic ways. Eg., the ambulance driver might have been protecting patient privacy as has already been suggested.
The idea that Michael was being isolated and deprived of phoning anyone, is, to me, even less plausible. He was at rehearsals surrounded by scores of people. If he wanted to make a call, don't you think there were phones all over the place?
And truthfully, if you were in the place of Michael's family, having buried your loved one, having touched him, having seen him in the hospital, having seen him in his coffin, and you received a letter such as you have written, what would you think? Honestly now.
And what makes you think that they have any obligation to grant you any time with anyone to satisfy yourself? Doesn't that seem just a bit selfish? After all, to the family, who are you? A stranger with disturbing ideas. I would keep you at arm's length.