KingMikeJ
Proud Member
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2010
- Messages
- 2,721
- Points
- 0
This makes me sick. This photo might encourage some of Paris' "fans" to buy this stuff.
Dont tell me thats the perfume man! Using the kids to promote it
Thank you for saying this out loud!Wait, I do.
Nobody should come here and defend the actions of Joe Jackson. NO-ONE. Because this is shameful and disgraceful and VULGAR. This would turn Michael's stomach.
This is part of the pattern that I spoke of earlier. Let us add a tick next to this event as ANOTHER example of those children being used to sell something. Something that they will never benefit from.
Diana Ross is no longer in the picture. The children do not revert Back to Diana
In the will Katherine or Dianna would take custody. But once they take custody they have full legal custody
Diana was only a alternate if Katherine was not alive or not able to. Now Katherine has full legal guardianship
and controll over who she wants to care for the children should anything happen where she cant fullfill that duty
This makes me sick. This photo might encourage some of Paris' "fans" to buy this stuff.
....and how, exactly DID Michael Jackson see his family, since you have such clearity on the matter? Surely you have spoken to Michael on the subject? I often wonder , if had given the chance, would you , and others that shares your views, would have expressed such concerns & judgement to Michael Jackson's face about his family? Sure some things got out of hand within the family, some that I can only commend Michael on for forgiving them BUT he did and since he did, why can't you?....Well atleast enough not to insult Michaels.... or would you prefer PPBs family. Iam sure you read and heard interviews where Michael expressed how important family was to him....or is that the ONE AND ONLY time you choose not to believe in what Michael was saying? Thank God some of us can only express our anger/dislikes on a MB.
Look I'm not defending some of Michael's family members & actions but for a moment take a look at the things you are saying and ask yourself, by saying this am I disrespecting Michael, his decisions and his children?.................. (Minus Joe, who cares). And for what its worth....if the children were under the guardianship of any other, a non family member, things could have been so different beyond compared.....
P.S. hoping that when the kids turn 40 there will not be a tell all on how horrible their family treated them.
Poor girl. She doesn't realize she's working against her father's estate.
All of this makes me sick.
joe will do anything to promote his products and companies and he is exploting Mjs kids.
Somebody should post a message to Paris via Twitter!!!!
Be interactive and let her know about it!
We always seem to go in circles in this debate.
There are times when emotions run high and we speak in hyperbole and say things that are mean and cruel. The moderators are in place to pull us back from that. I say us because there are times when I am guilty of this as well. So I agree we have to be vigilant about how we say what we want to say.
There are members who are vigilant about that stuff and they call us out. Fine. But things always devolve from there to Jacksons Haters vs Jacksons Lovers and things get ugly from there.
This is my attempt at a truce.
Let us acknowledge:
[1] Not everyone who criticises the Jacksons hates them. It is understandable that you could come into a thread and read alot of negative posts. It can give the impression that it is all about bashing the family. But most of the people here are intelligent and rational and if they have taken issue with a particular incident there must be a reason.
[2] Not everyone who asks us to dial it back a bit is a Jacksons Lover. Some fans feel that is important that the forum honour Michael's family, or at least be respectful to them but it does not mean that they are defending the actions of the Jacksons.
[3] This is a discussion board and such we can discuss, analyse and dissect, once we keep it respectful. We should posts carefully and acknowledge valid points. We can be a bit more gracious in our dealings with each other.
ETA: So far we have been reasonably good in this thread. Let us keep it that way. Above is just something I wanted to say.
u hit the nail she is not a solution to this problem she (her attitude) is a part of the problem,^^^ actually Katherine Jackson was sitting on a chair just a few Meyers away when it was happening. So she is not a solution to this problem. She fully supports all this.