Katherine Jackson: Statement About Attorney

I would hate to see Katherine lose custody, but if those kids are in an unhealthy environment, and Katherine is always going to act in the interest of her own kids, instead of MJ's, then maybe losing custody wouldn't be such a bad thing. I hate to say that, but I don't think those kids are in the best of environments!

But I can't see them with Debbie either, because she doesn't seem interested in raising children. :scratch:


They would not dare do anything to Katherine the world is watching them. If MJ mother "loses" her grandchildren to that Rowe woman or they "stop her inheritance" the world would tune in. Instant world headlines.

They(murderers) do not want this.


Keep pushing and fighting Katherine; we all know the will is a forgery.

John Branca's days are numbered. She also needs to hire a food taster ASAP. They would love her to 'die" and the media would be right there to tell you all it was a "Heart attack/ drug addiction/stress/natural death with no foul play.

Many are watching this beyond this forum.

th_SONYKILLS.gif


Argue with the man holding the sign.
He told us all how it would end.
 
They would not dare do anything to Katherine the world is watching them. If MJ mother "loses" her grandchildren to that Rowe woman or they "stop her inheritance" the world would tune in. Instant world headlines.

They(murderers) do not want this.


Keep pushing and fighting Katherine; we all know the will is a forgery.

John Branca's days are numbered. She also needs to hire a food taster ASAP. They would love her to 'die" and the media would be right there to tell you all it was a "Heart attack/ drug addiction/stress/natural death with no foul play.

Many are watching this beyond this forum.

th_SONYKILLS.gif


Argue with the man holding the sign.
He told us all how it would end.
...The animation sums it all up :angel:.
 
pshhhhhhhhh that rowe woman gave michael something no one else did....children and a family of his own. u care so much about mj and his babies yet it's okay to let others around them that could do harm?
 
chill people chill, it will all come out in the wash.

MJs will reflects his wishes, so we should respect that. It isn't a fake. It was witnessed so thats all we need to know.
 
Sorry but Michael is HER CHILD. She should do whatever she thinks is right. WE ARE NOT THERE and WE DO NOT KNOW THE SITUATION.


Oh , finally... a great post... thank you for being "logical".. lots of fan in here keeps on forgetting that... as IF michael's kids would be left without money...... pppp-lleaaaaseee

Reminding you all that Elvis had left ONLY $5 million dollar, and he keeps generating over 100 million A YEAR! ok?

Does that says enough to you all???? that's for the ones that keep thinking small or does not know better......
 
Oh , finally... a great post... thank you for being "logical".. lots of fan in here keeps on forgetting that... as IF michael's kids would be left without money...... pppp-lleaaaaseee

Reminding you all that Elvis had left ONLY $5 million dollar, and he keeps generating over 100 million A YEAR! ok?

Does that says enough to you all???? that's for the ones that keep thinking small or does not know better......
Well...This just can't register through to some people. Don't know why it seems so difficult to understand though...:mello:
 
so what are you trying to say that there is enough money for every one ? guess what not every one here is fond of socialisim .
 
Oh , finally... a great post... thank you for being "logical".. lots of fan in here keeps on forgetting that... as IF michael's kids would be left without money...... pppp-lleaaaaseee

Reminding you all that Elvis had left ONLY $5 million dollar, and he keeps generating over 100 million A YEAR! ok?

Does that says enough to you all???? that's for the ones that keep thinking small or does not know better......
wasn't it less than a million? and it wasn't his mother who helped make him the king of rock and roll. it was his exwife who went in there, took out loans, and made him into a goldmine...

HIS EX WIFE.........
 
pshhhhhhhhh that rowe woman gave michael something no one else did....children and a family of his own.
I agree. Whatever her motives were, she certainly gave MJ something that made him more happy than anything... those children. Well, two of them at least.
 
I would like to seriously query when it is that someone that has the authority to do so, will put an end to this cyclic effort to malign "the Jackson Family"; especially its Matriarch, Ms. Katherine. The trend is becoming both dispicable and unbearable. Everyone is entitled to opinions galore, but the fact remains that circumstances are at play which I'm sure few are privvy to.This thread and others constantly read like the "Hard Copies" and "Inside Editions" of yester-year. Very much unbecoming of this forum, which has continued to remain dignified even when other "communities" chose to turn their backs on Mr. Jackson. They preferred fanning the flames of tabloid fodder, while this one chose respect and dignity.Now it could be understood, due to these differing opinions ,that questions are abound to be raised over a whole host of issues. But sensitivities to certain subject matters must remain paramount. Specifically the constant raising or insinuations of Ms. Jackson's "exit". How would you feel if someone kept hinting towards such a scenario about YOUR Mother. Unbelievable and very much idiotic if you try to dignify it.

This must stop!

Her honor shall be defended AGRESSIVELY. I refuse to allow Mother Jackson to be continuously disrespected at a place Mr. Jackson personally complimented on.

Deflecting attention from prior archived statements regarding this topic and attempting to build cases by malicously defaming Michael Jackson's Brothers and Sisters or other bloodline does nothing to solidify your position. It just emits a vibe of cold-hearted callousness.

If I may, the issue appears to revolve around money. I ask anyone to consider the situation from this simple premise.

(f) denotes family

Dianne Dimond or Sister Latoya(f)

Dieter Weisner or Brother Jermaine(f)

MJJCommunity(f) or TMZ

Conrad Mur[derer] (the taker of life) or Mother Katherine ((f)--the bearer of life).

If a choice HAS to be made on who can or should benefit financially from bloodline after they are physically no more--regardless of other nitpicky details--would it be family or outsiders?

Please, Enlighten me!

Keep WATCHIN'.......

...........................................................................



I fully agree with you !! :yes:

I think kathrine is doing things fine and for the best... and i trust she knows what she is doing ! :)
Why can ppl dont just trust that Kathrine and the rest of Michael Jacksons family knows what they are doing... :angel:
If they shall listen to and do as 10 million ppl says.. i think they would be a little bit stressed... :eek:
 
Yes every body has their own opinions of debbie thanks to the fucking media when the truth gets out like i said before every body will look down. She loves her kids but sadly I don't see her getting close to them as of right now the Jackson are focus on Justice for Michael. At the end of the day YES she can snatch her kids any time but off the strength Michael and the way things went down she has respect for Mrs.Jackson so it is what it is people are watching and talking I wish they could handle their business behind close doors cause the media having a field day. Katherine only doing what she feels is right for her son that's understandable but her kids needs to fall back and let their mother handle it. The truth is so serious that's all i'm saying for now u all will see

------------------------------------------------------------------



I agree.... I cant wait for the truth... And i trus that Kathrine can handle the situation !

:angel:
 
They better take VERY!!!! good care of those kids...................................

My heart akes so terribly much if MONEY is going to ruin their innocent little lives!!!!!!
I will do ANYTHING in my power to help them if I could..

I hope the family think about the kids before they think about the honor of Michael and themselves! These kids are strong - yes, but that doesent meen that they should be handled with less care than anyone else. They are also very weak, because they are the children of Michael Jackson, everyones eyes are on them. They are used to live a very protecte life, right next to the hand of their father.

Oh how I would wish that I could do something for them..
:boohoo:
 
Last edited:
The audacity of any Individual labeling themselves a fan who loves Michael Jackson
and so concerned about his children welfare but lack to extend absolute respect to the one woman who has been devoted loving and nuturing to him all his life on earth and now In spirit Is outrageous! That woman is and always has been his ( Beloved Mother Mrs.katherine Jackson )...
Michael Is her child who she tragically lost and her pain must be Great ,so why would any Michael Jackson fan give the Impression of adding on to her grief by erroneously questioning her motives concerning her own son's (finances,estate) and the well-being of her grandchildren ' prince ,paris ,Blanket '...

I Thank God Above for Momma Katherine she was a guideing force In Michael's life and now her grand babies...
besides his children no one loved michael greater than his Mother.
 
we question her motives because she has 8 other children who she loves equally as MJ and because she has always expressed her feelings that MJ should have done more with his siblings and her discomfort that he had a lot of money and they had nothing .

Katherine does not think giving Randy a piece of MJ's wealth is stealing from young kids , she believes MJ should have shared his money with his other siblings and they should have been listed to get something of his estate.

we question her motives when she send Rowe , Randy and Oxman to represent her against the estate .

Frankly , I no longer think Katherine has any idea about Business and what Randy's plan is , he keep feeding her lies and fabrications . I don't believe Randy is explaining to Katherine the whole picture . katherine is only familiar with Randy's side of events and that's why she is agreeing with him on everything .
 
Yes, Kathriene Loved Michael but Michael made all the decisions in the earlier years for the family. She loves all her children not only Michael and she might listen to the others. Brainwashing is slow. I hope she can say no to the others as Prince,Paris and Blanket needs someone strong like Michael to guide and protect them.
 
we question her motives because she has 8 other children who she loves equally as MJ and because she has always expressed her feelings that MJ should have done more with his siblings and her discomfort that he had a lot of money and they had nothing .

Katherine does not think giving Randy a piece of MJ's wealth is stealing from young kids , she believes MJ should have shared his money with his other siblings and they should have been listed to get something of his estate.

we question her motives when she send Rowe , Randy and Oxman to represent her against the estate .

Frankly , I no longer think Katherine has any idea about Business and what Randy's plan is , he keep feeding her lies and fabrications . I don't believe Randy is explaining to Katherine the whole picture . katherine is only familiar with Randy's side of events and that's why she is agreeing with him on everything .
katherine has a lawyer they tell her the legal aspect of her case randy is not her lawyer, randy and his mother katherine and the rest of the family has a right to stand up for michael and his estate, what rowe, oxman know it should be brought to court, all you seem to think about is the jackson family is only after the money, that is not the case the information they have that points to foul play amoung the people that are handling his estate and the connection to aeg and sony etc. there are many fans that believe there is foul play envolved and we want the real truth to come out.
 
The audacity of any Individual labeling themselves a fan who loves Michael Jackson
and so concerned about his children welfare but lack to extend absolute respect to the one woman who has been devoted loving and nuturing to him all his life on earth and now In spirit Is outrageous! That woman is and always has been his ( Beloved Mother Mrs.katherine Jackson )...
Michael Is her child who she tragically lost and her pain must be Great ,so why would any Michael Jackson fan give the Impression of adding on to her grief by erroneously questioning her motives concerning her own son's (finances,estate) and the well-being of her grandchildren ' prince ,paris ,Blanket '...

I Thank God Above for Momma Katherine she was a guideing force In Michael's life and now her grand babies...
besides his children no one loved michael greater than his Mother.

i agree .
 
it's a terrible terrible unwarranted indictment that is totally uncalled for, to label a fan as hating Katherine Jackson, for being a supporter of MJ's wishes. it's a low down guilt trip attack. fan may very well love love Katherine Jackson, and is able to seperate that from wanting to believe that MJ has his mother's best wishes at heart. it's almost as if saying that MJ didn't love his mother, to suggest that anything that MJ does is not a sound decision. it's between him and his mother. that's all. but i wish people would stop intentionally twisting things, just to induce guilt trips. if you're going to make a statement, don't berate the mother. but at the same time, don't berate the fan that is supporting what appears to be Michael's wishes. make the separation. make the discernment. but don't attack, just for the sake of attacking. if anything, i'm wishing this thread wasn't posted. it's slippery, and it's a time bomb. it's a family matter. but it's posted. so i wish people would make a true discernment before speaking, on any aspect of the matter. and above all..it's all appearances. so we are all speculating.
 
Last edited:
Au contraire.....
This is NOT...a case of "guilt-tripping". It is a case of dispicable innuendo being camoflauged with "concerns" over "perceived" wishes of Michael Jackson.

everything is perceived. everything is disguised..on both sides, if we are going to assume what the other fans are thinking and decide to say that someone is not a fan. and if you are assuming what another fan is thinking with this premise, you are guilt tripping for it's own sake.

the bottom line is..an assumption can be made. MJ's mother raised him to be responsible. He became responsible. he made a big time responsible decision, here. he was an adult, when he made it. seperated from the home. on his own. both facts should be respected, if those perceptions are fact. since we are splitting hairs, here.
 
Last edited:
Au contraire.....
This is NOT...a case of "guilt-tripping". It is a case of dispicable innuendo being camoflauged with "concerns" over "perceived" wishes of Michael Jackson.

making sense and stepping on toes... the army of love marches on
 
Au contraire.....

This is NOT...a case of "guilt-tripping". It is a case of dispicable innuendo being camoflauged with "concerns" over "perceived" wishes of Michael Jackson. Mother Katherine IS an indisputable Trustee for one reason---Brother Michael trusted her. The veiled slights towards Ms. Jackson have been focused squarely on monetary gain by either family members or perimeter sharks. And in these reprehensible escapades, there have been too numerous to mention occassions where assumptions about "when she passes" have been cast. Unacceptable---sure! Guilt tripping---absolutely not. I shall repeat myself to help anyone not yet in the mindset of understanding the breadth of some of this propaganda being leveled against this family, especially Mother Katherine, to open your heart and try imagining her burden. Multiply your hurt as a fan by an indeterminate factor. After you do so, see if you are content with continuing this campaign of damn near blasphemy, when you don't know what's NOT known. If you can---your heart is cold.

Have you ever heard that saying " Mother knows BEST"?

It was coined for a reason, for they are----> Words to live by!

Keep WATCHIN'.......

this thread is a complete catch 22. you are pitting mother knows best(raising MJ to be responsible) vs. son being responsible.

did not Katherine raise a responsible son? was he not responsible?

you cannot win by arguing against either side. arguing is futile.

are you suggesting that the son had no knowledge?

would you rather MJ be under his mother's wing for life, and never make any decisions?

the one thing you got right here, is we are all speculating. this is a subject that should have been left alone. yet the thread is still here. so....people should spend time discerning...not indicting, since we insist on continuing on something, on which we are only speculating.

you are making a judgement call with evidence you do not have. that is guilt tripping. you cannot read minds. no one here can.

however...what i will give you is, that anyone making an assumption about any of the family members that is negative is not disguising anything. it's out there. and it's a blatant attack. that's uncalled for, also.
 
Last edited:
Im a mom too.... so i have and idea that i know what she is going through....
Im sure she do her best ! :)
 
what's tragic about this whole debate is, that everyone knows that governments spend time and money, and all that is truly respectable to put into law that people should write a will. this is a truly difficult moment on one's life. everyone here would call MJ an irresponsible human being, if he never wrote a will. the money would go to probate. and everyone here would have a field day against Michael Jackson. it's a favorite sport...having a field day against Michael Jackson. apparently, he made the most difficult decision of his life. it was either that, or probate. probate would maan a free for all, with a financial empire. Michael made a decision that all the governments of the world would approve of. a will is to be respected. otherwise, the government has wasted it's time in suggesting it.

Michael made that decision. and, therefore, it shouldn't be up for debate. i'm at a loss as to why this is not understood, by some. it has absolutely nothing to do with hating on any family members. i'm at a loss why that is not understood, either. why make wills, then? why should they exist, then? why should they have existed for hundreds of years, then?

i would be horrified, as a parent, if my son didn't leave a will.

MJ left a will.

that fact should be separated from all the other things we are debating or arguing about.

it's black and white.

either you are insanely stupid because you did not leave a will...or....you are responsible because you did leave a will. and that will...whatever it is...should be respected.

perhaps we don't know what is in that will. and everybody is popping off, based on what they think is in that will.

but whatever is in that will...it should be respected.

or else..the will shouldn't have been written.

and yes....you see how silly that sounds..the idea that the will should not have been written?

so...it was written. and whatever is in it, should be respected. or else..screw what the government said.

i keep repeating here, because it seems so silly that this should be explained, at this point. but apparently..it should be explained.
 
katherine raised a responsible son yeah sure , but what about her other "responsible" sons ? she knows best right? well, did she tell Randy , Jermaine , Tito that when you bring a child to this world you should cater for him/her , or she told them go on with your lives , your brother mike has alot of money and I'll call him asking for some tonight he better pay or the family will try to do an intervention ........ Oxman "mj is totally drugged up and he refused to speak with his mother , Katherine is devastated because mj refuses to return her phone calls " , very familiar ahh?

whenever mj refused to answer them, the family would have become concerned about his state of mind and rumours of intervention and drugged up 24/7 surefaced everywhere .

Katherine history in business "victory tour" says alot about her "knows better" thing.

she get $80.000 a month yet she wants more because $80.000 are not enough to pay electricity bills . and you want her to be in charge of a 2 billion dollar estate . she will sell everything the very next day and distribute the money to her 8 other children .that's her understanding of "family & business". the one who worked his whole life and paid dearly should share his money with the other siblings who have a history of hiding their income to avoid paying child support .


Her lawyers did not object to the movie deal with AEG and sony , but they did not want AEG to do the memorabilia tour , not because the offer made by AEG was not a good deal , but because the siblings made a deal with a starting up company from the middle east , which did not even offer the same benefits AEG did regardless they wanted the estate to agree and choose that particular company instead of AEG . It is a family business for katherine, Randy and jermanie broking deals and getting a percentage even thoughthey were not the best deal offered is none of branca business , her sons are not taking money from Branca, it is mj's money and his siblings have right to get that money . that is katherine's mentality . she is FRUSTRATED because Branca is not allowing her sons to "get their rightful " money from the estate . what she thinks is their rightful share corresponds to STEALING from three innocent kids .
 
Let me suggest that you not profess to "know" what it is I do or don't know. Clear?

The points itterated in my former post must have been illegible or hard to comprehend for they are totally ignored in the above response. Deflection is the word of the moment.this tactic of deflecting and drubbing up the subject of "responsibility" does nothing towards the necessary goal of rectifying this bolierplate issue. You see, if the focus is squarely placed on the matter of responsibility, the first thing that needs to happen is 100% refutation throughout this board of this classless defamatory campaiign against this FAMILY. That would be the responsible thing.

But, I digress. My intention is to do whatever possible to end this "stealth" campaign designed to confuse legitimate fans into participating in meritless attacks, especially leveled towards Ms. Katherine Jackson.

The issue/discussion of responsibility--regarding how Michael was raised-has no bearing on this matter. That's a whole other topic.

Keep WATCHIN'.......

are you suggesting that i am mounting a stealth campaign against the family? because, if you are..
you are professing to know what is in my mind. and you don't. CLEAR?

you have no right to determine who is a legit fan. you don't know.

i have nothing to do with any attacks occuring against MJ's family.

i am talking about one thing, and one thing only. the responsibility, and respectability of a will. that is all. if you are going to lash out with accusations...quote the fans that you are referring to, so they can have an opportunity to defend themelves.
 
back , we are fans of MJ whetehr you like it or not . and we are CONCERNED about mj'e legacy and his kids . we have the RIGHT to be concerned . I'm still waiting for Katherine to address Klien, Lester , Oxman , Latoya claims that those kids are not MJ's kids .

I'm still waiting for her to say that Oxman lied when he quoted her as saying " I know a jackson by looking and Blanket ain't no jackson"

instead of defending mj , Oxman gave a statement to the press in which he completely supported Lesters claims and the very next week Lester told the media he was still very friendly with Randy and the family has no ill feelings toward him .

I'm still waiting her to address Ian Haleprin claims .

instead of spending a fortune on lawyers to fight for more money to be distributed to her , she should have hired lawyers to go after those people who are making these claims against mj .
 
Back
Top