nope. same way I haven't bought the doc.you'll get it.
Well, thats your loss since the BAD25 doc is awesome. I'm not going to derail this thread while trying to understand your strange objections to Jacksons Family. Keep in mind if it wasn't for his father/brothers their would be NO MICHAEL JACKSON THE KING OF POP. Why so much hate on the family? They ALL Loved and cared for Michael, especially Katherine. lol I don't think we will ever agree, but don't say that the whole family was against Michael. In a recent 2013 interview with the Jacksons they were severely emotional when they mentioned Michaels death. Love is stronger than hate.nope. same way I haven't bought the doc.
Ok tomorrow Thursday Aug 8 we will launch (1) MJJC members Submit your messages to the MJ Estate/MJ Online Team. thread. Then once we get a few submissions in that thread, we will post the connection thread (2)MJJC Official Connection for the MJ Online Team.
Well, thats your loss since the BAD25 doc is awesome. I'm not going to derail this thread while trying to understand your strange objections to Jacksons Family. Keep in mind if it wasn't for his father/brothers their would be NO MICHAEL JACKSON THE KING OF POP. Why so much hate on the family? They ALL Loved and cared for Michael, especially Katherine. lol I don't think we will ever agree, but don't say that the whole family was against Michael. In a recent 2013 interview with the Jacksons they were severely emotional when they mentioned Michaels death. Love is stronger than hate.
B) You CLEARLY have not seen Michael's true opinion on this family, so my "strange objection" was also Michael's. They loved and cared for him when they could make money out of him. Elizabeth Taylor cared for Michael more than they did, and that was clearly obvious by the events of 1993. But yeah, "strange objection".
I don't know what does that have to do with releases though. You'd rather not see a Victory tour release than have them not earn a couple of bucks for releasing it (it's like a drop of water in the ocean for them anyway) ? Why do you care? I don't honestly care who gets what as long as I get to see the concert. They are wealthy folk anyway.
I think we are starting to drift a bit off-topic. Whoever gets money and what have they done or not done to Michael in past is not exactly the point of this thread. Let's focus solely on releases and stay on topic.
100% Michael would be more favored to me, Dangerous tour preferably.
I agree with this.
If we do get another Dangerous Tour show then it needs to be one of the shows that include Bad and The Way You Make Me Feel in the setlist.
What's with fans obsession with Wembley? A far as i'm concerned Any Michael Jackson concert is worthy of a release (Except Munich 1997).
He had much energy at Wembley and BOW was partly live in one of the dates.
I'd choose anything from the early first concerts except Munich. Wembley and Tokyo would be nice too. No 1993 please.
He wasn't on top of his game. Only 93 show that looks ok is Taipei. But check this; it doesn't even compare, the 1992 shows were just so much better.Why not?? From the snippets I've seen from the Buenos Aires show, it looked GOOD.
He had much energy at Wembley and BOW was partly live in one of the dates.
I'd choose anything from the early first concerts except Munich. Wembley and Tokyo would be nice too. No 1993 please.
Why not?? From the snippets I've seen from the Buenos Aires show, it looked GOOD.
Munich 1992 was great! It has one of the best Billie Jean performances of all time and Bad and The Way You Make Me Feel is in the setlist. Munich 1997 is the show that should never be released