Andrew Ryan
Proud Member
Some of you in here......just thoughtless opinions. SMH.
Judging from you sig, your comment is very "rational" lolol!!!
Some of you in here......just thoughtless opinions. SMH.
when Michael was going through so much with the allegation and media attacks...I always felt that Janet was too busy playing the "media darling" ..and really did not come out strong to defend Michael...
but that 2004 Superbowl incident which made sure Robin skated over....really woke her up....
I consider Janet as one of those people Madonna said abandoned Michael... with this interview...she abandoned him again....she did not defend Michael ...she said what she said...it wasn't disrespectful..as someone said........BUT...she gave me a really cold feeling.
doesn't mean jack...
Wow. I knew you guys would be on fire over here. I love Janet. I wished she would have cleared up the time period of addiction. But we the fans may never know some things unfortunately.
doesn't mean jack...
EXACTLY! Thank you. Some of the fans on this forum have some nerve. You guys need to stop blaming other people for Michael's mistakes! Janet was extremely classy in the interview and didn't disrespect herself or the family not one time.
SO true. SO why are people tripping? I do not think anyone is going to think different who already got their own beliefs. I do not believe MJ was an addict but I do believe he had his moments (look at at the 30th Anniversary special and other outlets. SOmething was not right. And to use this drug as a sleep aid when there are other methods, sorry but something is not right; and to have a doctor willing to give it to MJ make it even worst; that is why I blame Murray overall. Murray knew better). Now having said that, I do not believe Michael was an addict addict (his organs would have been messed up if he was). I think what fans fear is the some people will put everything is one basket; however, I think good thing people know the difference.I really enjoyed the interview. Although the info about her youth, marriages and MJ's past addiction was not anything that had not been discussed before, her comments about their last day together and how she and the children and the rest of the family is coping was very poignant. I like the fact that she said her family was very strong.
She picked the right interviewer. Robin was very calm and respectful and not condescending like so many of the media types can be, especially on ABC. I'm looking forward to Janet's performance on the AMA's.
Yeah she did. But if you think back to your childhood, I'm sure the people around you said or did things that you take to heart even now. And what does her other brothers or sisters have to do with anything? We're talking about Janet and Mike and it's fact that he teased her. Hell we've all been teased at some point in our lives. It's not that serious. Get off your high horse!
Uh, WG5116, there is no need to use those huge fonts as if you are shouting.
Another thing, this is an MJ forum; just a teeny tiny reminder.
HUH? Are you serious? What does her HOME have to do with anything? How do you know she is not giving her father money? Do you live on the compound? Or do you think because you read TMZ daily you know what goes on in their personal lives?
Sorry but they have not damage nothing. MJ legacy is in tack. It has been intact even after the claims and all the other mess, sorry but this interview is not going to do nothing. And remember Janet talk about how silly and how much Michael LOVED.that's how she made me feel, cold. I don't expect the family would fight for michael's justice, but they really need to shut up. so far what the entire family did is just damage michael's legacy. I am so disappointed to this family.
Everyone keeps thinking that because he had no organ damage, he could not possibly have been taking pain or anxiety medication to excess. I don't know if he did or didn't, but just because he had no organ damage doesn't clear him of the other. By the way, the drugs that were found in his system were narcotics.
We tend to stray away from personal attacks at MJJC. Be careful what you say...
u didn't get the point.
she is /was fat because most of her family members are overweighted ...but because she is a star she wanted to find a reason to look like a victim and what is better than inserting Mj's name to promote the new album and book 'back then'
MJ said the he teased her but it was because he wanted her to be the best looking star as she is now.so he was not doing it out of hatred it was all for love.
it means u think michael is messed up to and all of the jackson kids. you can't just generalize people like that.
to the family mj meant alot, he meant millions maybe even billions , a commodity
Judging from you sig, your comment is very "rational" lolol!!!
I agree with this especially the liver which is the body's filter.oh really?
try taking ibuprofen for 6 weeks (maximum dosage) and go get a kidney test. let me know if your kidney functions are still perfect.
MJ had NO organ damage. no matter how you see it, if he was a drug addict, his organs would not function normally.
Sorry but they have not damage nothing. MJ legacy is in tack. It has been intact even after the claims and all the other mess, sorry but this interview is not going to do nothing. And remember Janet talk about how silly and how much Michael LOVED.
The thing is everyone apart from the mum has done something to betray MJ in the past...I mean isn't his will enough evidence for you? he had this huge family and then decides to spare them 0..that should tell you something..if not then you must be in denial. He didn't trust his own brothers/sisters...not all families are lovey dovy ones...just because you are part of a family, doesn't mean that you are like them...