Jacksons & intervention claims (Read post#22 letter by Katherine & others DENYING interventions)

Re: Jacksons & intervention claims (Read post#22 letter by Katherine & others DENYING interventions)

Even though she sued him she did seem to care about him. I don't think that she would've just stood around and watched MJ suffer.



Lots of people in his vicinity cared for him, but for his money the most. Bain was no exception, her greed was beyond the outrageous standards, and all the innuendo she used in her lawsuit. The added stress that Michael felt on his shoulders due to this irrational lawsuit must have weighed so hard. ... So, her words subsequent to Michael's death are not worth so much in the great scheme of things. Nice of her that she said what she did, but she's still a gold-digger, sadly..
 
Last edited:
Re: Jacksons & intervention claims (Read post#22 letter by Katherine & others DENYING interventions)

Bain comes to MJ's defense because she was his spokesperson! She was around him so when people say he was on drugs, that directly makes her look bad cause she was someone that would have known how is demeanor was being around him and him telling her what to share with the public as his spokesperson and seeing him fine and coherent!

So it makes sense to me why she would be saying hell no that was not the case (him on drugs) while she was working for him! So for that at least I'ma be grateful to her for the truth on that one!
 
Re: Jacksons & intervention claims (Read post#22 letter by Katherine & others DENYING interventions)

I have a feeling Ms. Bain would have been all up in Murray's grill, if he spoke to her like he spoke to Kenny Ortega.

She does "appear" to be a tough cookie, who would not allow anybody to push her around.

Exactly. Remember how Raymone got Diane Dimond and Nancy Grace told off on Larry King. Raymone was good for Michael. She didn't take any s.hi.t. She would have seen throught the lying, incompent MURDERER, Conrad Murray.
 
Re: Jacksons & intervention claims (Read post#22 letter by Katherine & others DENYING interventions)

Michael needed a tough person, even during the 1995 Sawyer interview Liar Marie appeared to be the taugh cookie..
 
Re: Jacksons & intervention claims (Read post#22 letter by Katherine & others DENYING interventions)

I read the complete court transcript from Jesus Salas testimony during the trial.


"28 Q. BY MR. MESEREAU: During the year 2002, were 4763

1 you aware -- excuse me. During the year 2002, did

2 you know whether or not Mr. Jackson was taking

3 medications for a broken leg?

4 A. Yes.

5 Q. During the year 2002, did you know whether

6 or not Mr. Jackson was taking medications for a foot

7 problem?

8 A. Yes."


"19 Q. Did you ever see Mr. Jackson where he

20 appeared to have been drinking a great deal, that he

21 appeared to be drunk?

22 A. Yes."


"3 Q. BY MR. AUCHINCLOSS: Mr. Salas, when you saw

4 Mr. Jackson when he was drunk, did you ever see him

5 in the presence -- in that condition, in the

6 presence of his children?

7 A. Yes, I did.

8 Q. On more than one occasion?

9 A. Yes."

u need to post the rest where salas says different things.and were mez contridicts him regarding appearing to be drunk. he wasnt deemed as a credible witness at all. even more so when mj went to such lengths to hide alcohol from the kids that were around him. and didnt want them to see him drinking yet according to this witness he was drunk all over the place. yet no one else saw it
 
Re: Jacksons & intervention claims (Read post#22 letter by Katherine & others DENYING interventions)

u need to post the rest where salas says different things.and were mez contridicts him regarding appearing to be drunk. he wasnt deemed as a credible witness at all. even more so when mj went to such lengths to hide alcohol from the kids that were around him. and didnt want them to see him drinking yet according to this witness he was drunk all over the place. yet no one else saw it

If Mike would have been really drunk or drugged, from here to demonstrate that maybe he was that way in presence of children, just a step... So it would have been easier for for them to convict at least on one of those 4 counts.... you know what I mean....

This thing family DOES NOT understand. To keep their mouths shuts about this, because it was already proven in court Mike was not on alcohol, was not a junkie for years, like they implied.
This is so so basic, yet they just don't get it.... :doh:
 
Last edited:
Re: Jacksons & intervention claims (Read post#22 letter by Katherine & others DENYING interventions)

Like this Jesus Salas is supposed to be a reliable source. By his accounts, his personal perception, he was just another one to wanna dig the ditch for Jackson during the trial, he was helping that fraud of a prosecution, and made it seem like Jackson is not fit a parent. And that was never the case. The One thing all his perpetrators (not direct accusers, like Arvizo and other false witnesses) and disgruntled employees, acquaintances or whatever agreed on was that Jackson was a great, wonderful parent. All of them are saying that, not that I cared anyway, but that's something they just couldn't lie about, as it was that strong and that obvious. That in itself speaks volumes.
 
Re: Jacksons & intervention claims (Read post#22 letter by Katherine & others DENYING interventions)

I read the complete court transcript from Jesus Salas testimony during the trial.


"28 Q. BY MR. MESEREAU: During the year 2002, were 4763

1 you aware -- excuse me. During the year 2002, did

2 you know whether or not Mr. Jackson was taking

3 medications for a broken leg?

4 A. Yes.

5 Q. During the year 2002, did you know whether

6 or not Mr. Jackson was taking medications for a foot

7 problem?

8 A. Yes."


"19 Q. Did you ever see Mr. Jackson where he

20 appeared to have been drinking a great deal, that he

21 appeared to be drunk?

22 A. Yes."


"3 Q. BY MR. AUCHINCLOSS: Mr. Salas, when you saw

4 Mr. Jackson when he was drunk, did you ever see him

5 in the presence -- in that condition, in the

6 presence of his children?

7 A. Yes, I did.

8 Q. On more than one occasion?

9 A. Yes."


you are so transparent...

What about posting the rest of his testimony?? FAIL
 
Re: Jacksons & intervention claims (Read post#22 letter by Katherine & others DENYING interventions)

I believe this Jesus Salas also said he kept MJ children away from MJ when he was allegedly drunk! o_O Like MJ would actually let this guy keep him from his kids?! SMH He wasn't even a nanny! lol His Job had nothing to do with MJ kids!
 
Re: Jacksons & intervention claims (Read post#22 letter by Katherine & others DENYING interventions)

So Neff-U said in that video (where he, Lenny Kravitz, 50cent, Eddie Cascio, Akon talks about how they made the new album ) that Michael flew him out to Barry Gibbs studio in Miami. I asked when MJ and Neff-U first met and when Mike went down to Miami and one poster said.. "I think the first mentionings of Neff-U working on the new album was 2007, the same year HT was reworked."

So if this can be confirmed, then we also know that Mike were in Miami at some point in 2007 together with Neff-U and Barry Gibb
 
Re: Jacksons & intervention claims (Read post#22 letter by Katherine & others DENYING interventions)

I have been in touch with Matt Semino a journalist from Huffington.

Here is what he replied;

Hi xxxx - I hope you are doing great! Thanks again for reading and sharing my most recent piece on the Dr. Murray Trial on the HuffPost. You have brought up some excellent points which I will definitely incorporate as I continue to write about this subject! Thank you very much...I appreciate that.


As a supporter of MJ, I wanted to share with you the surprising news of Martin Bashir's return to to MSNBC on Feb. 28th. People are quite fired up about it!


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/02/18/martin-bashir-msnbc-show-_n_825412.html?ref=fb&src=sp


Also, I had the opportunity to speak with Bill Clinton, Dan Rather and civil rights leader Andrew Young (people who are doing highly positive things for the world) at an intimate event recently where we discussed civil rights and the influence of social media on the Egyptian Revolution. Thought you might like my piece about that which appeared this week in the HuffPost as well... Feel free to share with others...


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/matt-semino/bill-clinton-a-civil-righ_b_822698.html


Thank you again for your continued support and I look forward to being in touch.


All the best,


Matt Semino
NYC

I have had it with some Jackson members. Enough is enough.
 
Re: Jacksons & intervention claims (Read post#22 letter by Katherine & others DENYING interventions)

I really wish some journalist would investigate that family to determine when these alleged interventions took place
 
Re: Jacksons & intervention claims (Read post#22 letter by Katherine & others DENYING interventions)

I really wish some journalist would investigate that family to determine when these alleged interventions took place
Journalists are not interested in the family nor is the majority of this planet's population.
 
Re: Jacksons & intervention claims (Read post#22 letter by Katherine & others DENYING interventions)

http://www.contactmusic.com/news.ns...dismisses-family-intervention-reports_1109305

Michael Jackson - Jackson's Former Publicist Dismisses Family Intervention Reports
10 July 2009 08:06

MICHAEL JACKSON's former publicist RAYMONE BAIN has broken her silence to dismiss reports JANET JACKSON and her siblings were planning an intervention to urge the King of Pop to seek help for his drug use.

New rumours suggest the Rhythm Nation singer led a family initiative to help her troubled brother in 2007 and again earlier this year (09) - but their efforts failed because the pop superstar refused to see them, and locked them out of his home.

But Bain, who has been Jackson's personal publicist for many years, insists the story is "not true".

She also refutes claims that her former boss stopped taking calls from his mother when she grew increasingly concerned about his drug use.

Bain tells U.S. news show Access Hollywood, "I don't know of a time when Michael Jackson did not have access to his mother under my watch."

And the publicist insists the King of Pop was "healthy" and "not abusing drugs" during the years she was his mouthpiece.

She says, "I'm not gonna hear it."
 
Re: Jacksons & intervention claims (Read post#22 letter by Katherine & others DENYING interventions)

Update: No good news..sadly.

We tried reaching out to a former MJJ Prod. employee but we haven't been able to convince her to open that can of worms.

As for the journalist, we got in touch with her the same week the michael Jr. Paris & Prince's interview with GMA aired. We obviously pushed the kids' story over the addiction, because it was such an explosive story on that day...she was to look into it and get back to me.

Then Charlie Sheen happened... ::rolls eyes::

It's been a week..so will try to contact her again mid week. If there's no interest we will move on to someone else.
 
Last edited:
Re: Jacksons & intervention claims (Read post#22 letter by Katherine & others DENYING interventions)

Strange. Maybe the serious medias and tabloids, just wait the big crash of the Jackson family to speak about all their lies and shit business involving the MJ kids.

Because just the MJ board spoke about this mess of the Jackson family. So just the fans in fact. Nobody else.

Strange...
 
Re: Jacksons & intervention claims (Read post#22 letter by Katherine & others DENYING interventions)

Update: No good news..sadly.

We tried reaching out to a for MJJ Prod. employee but we haven't been able to convince her to open that can of worms.

As for the journalist, we got in touch with her the same week the michael Jr. Paris & Prince's interview with GMA aired. We obviously pushed the kids' story over the addiction, because it was such an explosive story on that day...she was to look into it and get back to me.

Then Charlie Sheen happened... ::rolls eyes::

It's been a week..so will try to contact her again mid week. If there's no interest we will move on to someone else.

Memefan,

I appreciate the efforts.. I think a journalist really needs to prove the Jacksons to be liars. Janet and company lied about an intervention and they need to be shown as the liars they are.
 
Re: Jacksons & intervention claims (Read post#22 letter by Katherine & others DENYING interventions)

Update: No good news..sadly.

We tried reaching out to a for MJJ Prod. employee but we haven't been able to convince her to open that can of worms.

As for the journalist, we got in touch with her the same week the michael Jr. Paris & Prince's interview with GMA aired. We obviously pushed the kids' story over the addiction, because it was such an explosive story on that day...she was to look into it and get back to me.

Then Charlie Sheen happened... ::rolls eyes::

It's been a week..so will try to contact her again mid week. If there's no interest we will move on to someone else.



whats that about?

you are so transparent...

What about posting the rest of his testimony?? FAIL
yeah exactly. nothing like selective reporting lol
 
Re: Jacksons & intervention claims (Read post#22 letter by Katherine & others DENYING interventions)

If only Renee Elizondo could crawl under the rock and update us on these interventions.
 
Re: Jacksons & intervention claims (Read post#22 letter by Katherine & others DENYING interventions)

If only Renee Elizondo could crawl under the rock and update us on these interventions.

what would he know about them?
 
Re: Jacksons & intervention claims (Read post#22 letter by Katherine & others DENYING interventions)

Update: No good news..sadly.

We tried reaching out to a former MJJ Prod. employee but we haven't been able to convince her to open that can of worms.

As for the journalist, we got in touch with her the same week the michael Jr. Paris & Prince's interview with GMA aired. We obviously pushed the kids' story over the addiction, because it was such an explosive story on that day...she was to look into it and get back to me.

Then Charlie Sheen happened... ::rolls eyes::

It's been a week..so will try to contact her again mid week. If there's no interest we will move on to someone else.

Hi Memefan,

Thanks for the update and I appreciate your dedication to what you believe in. I have a suggestion and I readily admit that it's unconventional and maybe ill advised but why not contact tabloid reporter Roger Friedman? If you want to expose the devil, sometimes its necessary to go to his house. All of the intervention stories began in the tabloid press and were later picked up by mainstream outlets. Roger seems to be a sounding board used to push an agenda by some any many of the addiction stories began with Roger. As shady and unreliable as he is, even Roger exposed Joe and Leonard Rowe's plans to insert themselves in the TII concerts and he wrote an article in which he described Katherine Jackson as "pimping out" MJ's kids to GMA. I think it will be an uphill battle trying to convince a respected journalist to investigate this. Besides, what better way to expose a lie than to use the same person who spread it? Roger can reveal who gave him these stories, if he investigated any of the claims prior to reporting them and the motivation behind the claims. The only problem is, can we trust Roger about anything because he is a known liar, lol.
 
Re: Jacksons & intervention claims (Read post#22 letter by Katherine & others DENYING interventions)

This is just further proof that Michael's family never cared for him!!!!!!


They are just a bunch of liars!!!!!!
 
Re: Jacksons & intervention claims (Read post#22 letter by Katherine & others DENYING interventions)

If only Renee Elizondo could crawl under the rock and update us on these interventions.

i doubt he would know anything seeing as he was out of his head on crack most of the time anyway
 
Re: Jacksons & intervention claims (Read post#22 letter by Katherine & others DENYING interventions)

There was interventions guys....since 1985....and it was always about the same thing....

Every 6 months, thanks to Jermaine who spoke publicly about these interventions, which always finish with the same answer from Mike :

NO! I DON'T WANT TO DO YOUR FUCKING CONCERTS JACKON 5! LEAVE ME ALOOOOOOOOOOOOOONE!



:lol:
 
Re: Jacksons & intervention claims (Read post#22 letter by Katherine & others DENYING interventions)

There was interventions guys....since 1985....and it was always about the same thing....

Every 6 months, thanks to Jermaine who spoke publicly about these interventions, which always finish with the same answer from Mike :

NO! I DON'T WANT TO DO YOUR FUCKING CONCERTS JACKON 5! LEAVE ME ALOOOOOOOOOOOOOONE!



:lol:

:hysterical:
 
Re: Jacksons & intervention claims (Read post#22 letter by Katherine & others DENYING interventions)

There was interventions guys....since 1985....and it was always about the same thing....

Every 6 months, thanks to Jermaine who spoke publicly about these interventions, which always finish with the same answer from Mike :

NO! I DON'T WANT TO DO YOUR FUCKING CONCERTS JACKON 5! LEAVE ME ALOOOOOOOOOOOOOONE!



:lol:

Thanks for the good laughter. :lol:
 
Re: Jacksons & intervention claims (Read post#22 letter by Katherine & others DENYING interventions)


NO! I DON'T WANT TO DO YOUR FUCKING CONCERTS JACKON 5! LEAVE ME ALOOOOOOOOOOOOOONE!



:lol:


...With love: L.O.V.E.
 
Re: Jacksons & intervention claims (Read post#22 letter by Katherine & others DENYING interventions)

i doubt he would know anything seeing as he was out of his head on crack most of the time anyway


I write that with sarcasm, what l would what him is to shed a light of why Janet is back peddling on these intenventions.
 
Re: Jacksons & intervention claims (Read post#22 letter by Katherine & others DENYING interventions)

I write that with sarcasm, what l would what him is to shed a light of why Janet is back peddling on these intenventions.

is she back peddling now?
 
Back
Top