Latest on MJJC

FT article: Michael Jackson estate says accuser is trying to extract $213mn

The fact that it's the cascio family pisses me off something shocking and also the fact that branca paid them before angers me even more
 
AlwaysThere said:
Over the years, I’ve remarked how accusations have dropped on years ending in 3—the Chandlers in 1993, the Arvizos in 2003, and Robson in 2013. Just the other day I was remarking to a mutual how great it was that we broke the curse in 2023. And now here we are.

I do wonder if the estate dropped this news to call the family’s bluff.
Click to expand...
Ummm it's 2024...
 
AlwaysThere said:
The Estate screwed themselves over when they agreed to pay $20mil in 2020. Nothing they do now will distract from that—It will be the main takeaway for every article.
Click to expand...
They screwed themselves over the excat same way mike did in 1993 thinking paying up would help
 
innuendo141 said:
Unless, what the article/Estate is REALLY trying to say is that they can't go to media but can still go to authorities - which I'm assuming they haven't done. You can't gag a crime. Hopefully that is the angle they were trying to come from?
Click to expand...
Ummm what's the point of going to.the authorities...mike is dead
 
kelley said:
HE REPORTED TO AUTHORITIES.

You can not legally prevent someone from reporting a crime to the authorities.

Please learn how the law works people.
Click to expand...
The most important post of the thread.
 
innuendo141 said:
Did the Cascios threaten to go public with X, Y or Z hence the Estate allowing 3 undeniably fake songs to be allowed on an official release? Or, did the relationship only sour when the Estate said they could not proceed with any more of their material
Click to expand...
BINGO!!!
 
But what I wanna know what can.the authorities do??
 
8701girl said:
The fact that it's the cascio family pisses me off something shocking and also the fact that branca paid them before angers me even more
Click to expand...
I think we need to watch the way we word this.

They did not pay them to stay quiet.

They paid them for the rights to the 5 siblings life story, and part of the agreement is that they would not slander Michael. This is a normal and pretty standard agreement in any kind of deal. It was an NDA or a non disparage agreement, similar to what they had with HBO.


That's what really happened. So please stop saying they paid them off cause that's not what really happened.

Also it's possible they bought the rights to Franks book which is pro-mj and he defends him in it.

Frank was trying to sell it to be turned into a miniseries in 2018, a year before the family flipped and turned to extortion. It;s likely that frank got bit with the greedy bug and realized he could make a lot more money selling lies after LN came out.

When the estate approached them and asked them to help defend Michael, they probably took advantaged of LN mess and demanded money for helping. The estate said no, and so they flipped to the other side and started making threats

Also this twitter user is right on the money when with her theory of what happened when they turned.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1837395081591996917
 
People are using it to drag Michael though, I'm seeing his kids, skin disease and the allegations coming up so sadly he can't escape it
 
kelley said:
HE REPORTED TO AUTHORITIES.

You can not legally prevent someone from reporting a crime to the authorities.

Please learn how the law works people.
Click to expand...
Yes he reported. And then literally gave an interview about it to the media.
 
OnirMJ said:
Yes he reported. And then literally gave an interview about it to the media.
Click to expand...
Doesn't matter because the liar already told the estate that he was breaking the nda when he demanded more money, so he broke it first.

Also theres no proof yet that branca spoke to anyone. We have a story from shady stacy brown
 
It's Frank. Re-read the article again. It says that he spoke to Oprah and Wendy Williams. And that he wrote in his book..

Also there is 5 Cascio children. And they did similar thing in the past with the recording and selling the fake songs to the Estate.
 
The whole Janet thing overshadowed the new "allegations" but I also see people saying that somehow it's bringing MJ into it for some weird reason.
https://www.reddit.com/r/MJInnocent/comments/1fmd0zm
I read that her words were twisted anyway, I can't imagine her saying those things in a malicious way as the tabloids are painting it as.
These new "allegations" and this whole media hoopla must be a lot for the grieving family.
 
whyyouwannatrip said:
The whole Janet thing overshadowed the new "allegations" but I also see people saying that somehow it's bringing MJ into it for some weird reason.
https://www.reddit.com/r/MJInnocent/comments/1fmd0zm
I read that her words were twisted anyway, I can't imagine her saying those things in a malicious way as the tabloids are painting it as.
These new "allegations" and this whole media hoopla must be a lot for the grieving family.
Click to expand...
I'd rather have him be in the news & discussed all of the time on social media then never being discussed at all and forgotten like Elvis. For all of the shenanigans we have twice as many viral videos or comments praising him. It comes with being a fan
 


Justice for The Falsely Accused
@JuliaBerkowitz1
·
Sep 20

BTW, he is still selling MJ items on Gotta Have Rock and Roll. Some of these items seem pretty dubious to me as they don't even look like MJ's style. How many fake stuff did he sell under MJ's name using their connection?https://gottahaverockandroll.com/catalog.aspx?searchby=3&searchvalue=Cascio…

https://x.com/JuliaBerkowitz1/status/1837235922326237318/analytics





Justice for The Falsely Accused
@JuliaBerkowitz1
·
Sep 20

Still describing himself as a close personal friend of MJ's...
Image

https://x.com/JuliaBerkowitz1/status/1837236396823605714/analytics
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top