Exclusive: The Inside Story Behind Michael Jackson's Controversial New Song and Album

bluesky

Proud Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2009
Messages
1,146
Points
38
EXCLUSIVE: The Inside Story Behind Michael Jackson's Controversial New Song and Album

Since Michael Jackson's untimely death in June of 2009, speculation has run rampant about the music he left behind. How much is there? How finished are the songs? What is the quality of the material? And how and when will it be released?

Over the course of writing and researching my forthcoming book, Man in the Music: The Creative Life and Work of Michael Jackson (Sterling 2011), I was fortunate enough to take an in-depth look at Jackson's entire catalog--including the work he was engaged in during his final years. My sources worked closely with the King of Pop throughout his life and have been trustworthy and dependable throughout the five-year process of the book; therefore I feel confident with what I have learned about the material poised to appear on his forthcoming album, Michael.

A notorious perfectionist, Jackson always over-recorded. There are at least one hundred songs over the course of his solo career that did not make it onto his major albums. Some of those have already appeared on special editions and collections; others have leaked online in various forms; and many others have never been heard.

At midnight on November 8th, MichaelJackson.com streamed the first official song from the archives (excluding the early-Eighties demo, "This Is It," which was included as part of the companion album to the film of the same name). Even before its release, however, controversy surrounded "Breaking News" and the other so-called "Cascio tracks." The conversation has only intensified since then.

Predictably, little of that conversation has been about the content of the new track: the exceptionally ominous strings in the intro, its "Off the Wall"-esque chorus, or its signature Jackson indictment of a media that feeds on "breaking news" (read: scandals) with obsessive compulsion ("No matter what/ You just want to read it again"). Nor has much attention been given to the work of talented producer and longtime-Jackson friend, Teddy Riley, who gives the song a fresh but faithful sheen.

The irony, of course, is this is how Jackson's music has been received for decades, the substance overlooked in favor of sensationalism and distracting controversy. Yet part of it would no doubt bring a knowing smile to the man who once claimed he wanted to make his whole life "the greatest show on earth." Long before Lady Gaga, Michael Jackson was engaging artistically with both the monstrosity and allure of fame.

In "Breaking News," Jackson not only delivers his message, but anticipates the way it will be received. In one verse, he lashes out at those anxious to "write his obituary." In the chorus, he asks his listening audience, as he did throughout his career, who they project him to be: Is he the "boogieman" (a constructed monstrous figure) we're thinking of?

Certainly, by 2007 (the year in which "Breaking News" was recorded), he had learned how vicious and entrapping a lifetime in the spotlight could be. The previous two years he had been living as a vagabond, traveling from the Middle Eastern-island of Bahrain to the countryside of Ireland to a private chateau in Las Vegas. In the fall of 2007, he showed up with his children at the doorstep of his longtime friends, the Cascios, in Franklin Lakes, New Jersey. Jackson had been close to the Cascio family for nearly twenty years. During that time, they never once betrayed him for tabloid money (in spite of many offers), but showed him loyalty and allowed him a sense of normalcy he couldn't often enjoy. In the program at Jackson's funeral they are referred to as "the First Family of Love."

Jackson stayed with the Cascios for nearly four months and, along with Frank Cascio, Eddie (Angel) Cascio, and singer James Porte (aka Bobby Ewing), engaged in some of his most sustained recording since before his 2005 trial. Three songs created during these sessions are expected to appear on Jackson's new album, including "Breaking News," "Keep Your Head Up" and "Monster," all of which Jackson co-wrote. During his time in New Jersey, Jackson also recorded vocals for Thriller 25, which was released in 2008.

Beyond the Cascios, several people close to Jackson were familiar with his work in New Jersey. He mentioned to these people that he was "excited" about the work he and the Cascios had generated. According to Jackson's longtime friend and manager, Frank Dileo, Jackson planned to have recording equipment brought to London during his 02 concert series so he could finalize some of his latest music.

The first of the Cascio tracks to be heard--"Breaking News"--obviously isn't a perfect realization of Jackson's abilities. Receiving the most critical attention are Jackson's vocals, the veracity of which even some family and fans are questioning. There are understandable reasons for this. This certainly isn't a "typical" Jackson recording: there weren't extensive warm ups with longtime vocal coach Seth Riggs, no layering and polishing by Jackson himself, no Bruce Swedien and world-class studio technology to capture the original vocal. This was a guide demo, supplemented by the supporting vocals of James Porte (for which he is credited), and produced nearly four years later by Teddy Riley.

Riley, who first began working with Jackson in the early Nineties, found it emotionally difficult to complete the unfinished work of his late friend. To tap into his inspiration, Riley had photographer Harrington Funk surround him with pictures of the singer. "That was the only thing to keep me sane, and not go crazy while I'm working," said Riley. "Because, you know, it would come out on the music if you hear me banging on the keyboards with tears coming out of my eyes."

Riley said his fundamental motivation was to extend the legacy of a friend. He approached the tracks, therefore, not attempting to overly embellish, but simply to fill in the best he could. His guiding thought was: "What would Michael want?" He even brought sounds Jackson had him record from previous sessions. The final product, of course, is an approximation. But for Riley it was a labor of love.

It wasn't until Riley submitted his work, and three of the songs were accepted by Sony for the album, that the controversy began. Certain individuals--some with noble intentions, some less so--began expressing concerns about the authenticity of the vocals. These concerns were taken seriously by Jackson's Estate. Attorney Howard Weitzman was asked by estate co-executors John Branca and John McClain to conduct a thorough investigation of the authenticity of the Cascio tracks. The Estate, after all, had a lot to lose if the tracks were fraudulent. Since Jackson's death, by all accounts, it had done a masterful job of preserving and enhancing the artist's legacy, including the release of the highest-grossing concert documentary film of all time (This Is It), a new music video collection (Michael Jackson's Vision), a Jackson-themed video game (Michael Jackson: The Experience), a groundbreaking show with Cirque du Soliel ("Michael Jackson: The Immortal World Tour"), and the biggest recording contract in popular music history.

Perhaps just as important, the Estate had passed on numerous deals, selecting only a handful of projects it felt were worthy of Jackson's name. Risking the substantial credibility it had established amongst both fans and critics for a handful of questionable tracks would have been reckless at best (for Sony as well, who had invested over $200 million dollars on the singer's posthumous projects).

In spite of Jackson's close relationship with the Cascios, therefore, the Estate certainly didn't accept them on blind faith. The Estate invited four of Jackson's primary engineers over the past thirty years, three producers who had worked with Jackson (including Teddy Riley), and spoke to one of the musicians that had worked with Michael over the years and who had also contributed to one of the Cascio tracks. Each of them listened to the a cappella version of the vocals on the Cascio tracks without any musical accompaniment so that they could give an opinion as to whether or not the lead vocals on the Cascio tracks were sung by Jackson. To a person they all confirmed that the vocal was definitely Michael Jackson. These engineers, producers and musicians are all people Jackson trusted and whose names would be very familiar to Jackson's fans.

In addition, at the request of John Branca and John McClain, Howard Weitzman retained one of the best known forensic musicologists in the nation to listen to the a cappella vocals and compare them with a cappella vocals from previously known Jackson songs. This expert performed waveform analysis, an objective scientific procedure, and found that all of the vocals were the voice of Michael Jackson.

Sony Music conducted its own investigation by hiring a second well-respected forensic musicologist who also compared the raw vocals from the Cascio tracks against known vocals of Jackson's and found that it was Jackson's voice on both sets of the compared vocals.
The Cascio tracks were also played for two of the most significant people in the music industry who played crucial roles in Jackson's career. Both of these individuals believe that the vocals are those of Michael Jackson.

It was also specifically verified that the vocals did not belong to well-known Jackson impersonator, Jason Malachi.

The results of this exhaustive investigation confirmed Sony's belief that the songs submitted by the Estate all contained authentic Michael Jackson vocals. The decision was therefore made to include three of the Cascio tracks on Michael. Other tracks will likely be included on future albums of unreleased material.

While these are not perfectly realized tracks--as no posthumous material can be--there is certainly much to appreciate. The Cascio tracks represent, after all, some of the last work Jackson ever wrote and recorded. It wasn't ready to be released, but then, Jackson wasn't ready to die.

"Breaking News," "Monster," "Hold My Hand" and the rest of the tracks that comprise Michael are, similar to the This Is It documentary, fragments of an unfinished vision. They aren't all the polished, perfectionist-Michael Jackson people are accustomed to, but they are him, and what some of his closest friends and collaborators felt his fans deserved to hear.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/joe-vogel/exclusive-the-inside-stor_b_781364.html
 
Re: EXCLUSIVE: The Inside Story Behind Michael Jackson's Controversial New Song and Album

Calchic, did you write this? I'm a little confused about where this came from and who the author is.

This is a very slanted piece of journalism though. There's many missing holes in the story and the intent is very clearly to convince people that "everything is okay and it's definately Michael". There are some glaringly obvious errors in some key facts here too.

One thing in this article that stood out to me the most was trying to say that Michael's vocals WOULD sound this much different because Seth Riggs didn't warm him up? That's the silliest thing I've heard yet :p . Michael sang a capella at random times without "warm ups" by his voice coach.. but he didn't suddenly sound like a different person lol.
 
Re: EXCLUSIVE: The Inside Story Behind Michael Jackson's Controversial New Song and Album

I found on Huffington post . see the link at the bottom.
 
Re: EXCLUSIVE: The Inside Story Behind Michael Jackson's Controversial New Song and Album

The lack of naming names of "trusted" figures tells me there's a rat in the soup here.
 
Re: EXCLUSIVE: The Inside Story Behind Michael Jackson's Controversial New Song and Album

Still, LISTEN to the song and it's not Michael Jackson. No amount of words and quotes and "research" can debunk the thousands of Jackson-fan-ears who recognize this is NOT MJ!
 
Re: EXCLUSIVE: The Inside Story Behind Michael Jackson's Controversial New Song and Album

they should name the names of those experts...
 
Re: EXCLUSIVE: The Inside Story Behind Michael Jackson's Controversial New Song and Album

Still, LISTEN to the song and it's not Michael Jackson. No amount of words and quotes and "research" can debunk the thousands of Jackson-fan-ears who recognize this is NOT MJ!
Exactly. This article belittles fans' and tries to dupe and confuse them to think they aren't capable to understand how vocals are tracked and recorded

It doesn't take forensics and all that bull to know that's not Michael Jackson on that song. All you need are ears and common sense
 
Re: EXCLUSIVE: The Inside Story Behind Michael Jackson's Controversial New Song and Album

do they think we're dumb? 20yrs of listening 2this man and watching this man and seein this man...do they think we're dumb?! idgaf about research and sources. I can spot an impersonater a MILE AWAY from physical 2 vocal, they aint foolin nobody.
 
Re: EXCLUSIVE: The Inside Story Behind Michael Jackson's Controversial New Song and Album

It's just Sony's version of the events, now making its rounds in the media. I'm still not convinced, sorry.

Best would be if they took off the Cascio tracks from the album. They can use them if they want on a later album IF it gets a definite proof that they are authentic. Or without the impersonator they used to mix with MJ's voice.
 
Re: EXCLUSIVE: The Inside Story Behind Michael Jackson's Controversial New Song and Album

... In addition, at the request of John Branca and John McClain, Howard Weitzman retained one of the best known forensic musicologists in the nation to listen to the a cappella vocals and compare them with a cappella vocals from previously known Jackson songs. This expert performed waveform analysis, an objective scientific procedure, and found that all of the vocals were the voice of Michael Jackson.
...
BTW, the sound of each individual's voice is completely unique just like fingeprints. With objective, scientific procedure forensic musicologist can prove that certain voice is product of certain person.
In Breaking News I hear Michael Jackson's voice. Yes, Michael's vocal is very processed but it's him.
 
Since Michael Jackson's untimely death in June of 2009, speculation has run rampant about the music he left behind. How much is there? How finished are the songs? What is the quality of the material? And how and when will it be released?

Over the course of writing and researching my forthcoming book, Man in the Music: The Creative Life and Work of Michael Jackson (Sterling 2011), I was fortunate enough to take an in-depth look at Jackson's entire catalog--including the work he was engaged in during his final years. My sources worked closely with the King of Pop throughout his life and have been trustworthy and dependable throughout the five-year process of the book. Therefore, I feel confident with what I have learned about the material poised to appear on his forthcoming album, Michael.

A notorious perfectionist, Jackson always over-recorded. There are at least one hundred songs over the course of his solo career that did not make it onto his major albums. Some of those have already appeared on special editions and collections; others have leaked online in various forms; and many others have never been heard.

At midnight on November 8th, MichaelJackson.com streamed the first official song from the archives (excluding the early-Eighties demo, "This Is It," which was included as part of the companion album to the film of the same name). Even before its release, however, controversy surrounded "Breaking News" and the other so-called "Cascio tracks." The conversation has only intensified since then.

Predictably, little of that conversation has been about the content of the new track: the exceptionally ominous strings in the intro, its "Off the Wall"-esque chorus, or its signature Jackson indictment of a media that feeds on "breaking news" (read: scandals) with obsessive compulsion ("No matter what/ You just want to read it again"). Nor has much attention been given to the work of talented producer and longtime-Jackson friend, Teddy Riley, who gives the song a fresh but faithful sheen.

The irony, of course, is this is how Jackson's music has been received for decades, the substance overlooked in favor of sensationalism and distracting controversy. Yet part of it would no doubt bring a knowing smile to the man who once claimed he wanted to make his whole life "the greatest show on earth." Long before Lady Gaga, Michael Jackson was engaging artistically with both the monstrosity and allure of fame.

In "Breaking News," Jackson not only delivers his message, but anticipates the way it will be received. In one verse, he lashes out at those anxious to "write his obituary." In the chorus, he asks his listening audience, as he did throughout his career, who they project him to be: Is he the "boogieman" (a constructed monstrous figure) we're thinking of?

Certainly, by 2007 (the year in which "Breaking News" was recorded), he had learned how vicious and entrapping a lifetime in the spotlight could be. The previous two years he had been living as a vagabond, traveling from the Middle Eastern-island of Bahrain to the countryside of Ireland to a private chateau in Las Vegas. In the fall of 2007, he showed up with his children at the doorstep of his longtime friends, the Cascios, in Franklin Lakes, New Jersey. Jackson had been close to the Cascio family for nearly twenty years. During that time, they never once betrayed him for tabloid money (in spite of many offers), but showed him loyalty and allowed him a sense of normalcy he couldn't often enjoy. In the program at Jackson's funeral they are referred to as "the First Family of Love."

Jackson stayed with the Cascios for nearly four months and, along with Frank Cascio, Eddie (Angel) Cascio, and singer James Porte (aka Bobby Ewing), engaged in some of his most sustained recording since before his 2005 trial. Three songs created during these sessions--"Breaking News," "Keep Your Head Up" and "Monster"--are expected to appear on Jackson's new album, all of which Jackson co-wrote. During his time in New Jersey, Jackson also recorded vocals for Thriller 25, which was released in 2008.

Beyond the Cascios, several people close to Jackson were familiar with his work in New Jersey. He mentioned to these people that he was "excited" about the work he and the Cascios had generated. According to Jackson's longtime friend and manager, Frank Dileo, Jackson planned to have recording equipment brought to London during his 02 concert series so he could finalize some of his latest music.

The first of the Cascio tracks to be heard--"Breaking News"--obviously isn't a perfect realization of Jackson's abilities. Receiving the most critical attention are Jackson's vocals, the veracity of which even some family and fans are questioning. There are understandable reasons for this. This certainly isn't a "typical" Jackson recording: there weren't extensive warm ups with longtime vocal coach Seth Riggs, no layering and polishing by Jackson himself, no Bruce Swedien and world-class studio technology to capture the original vocal. This was a guide demo, supplemented by the supporting vocals of James Porte (for which he is credited), and produced nearly four years later by Teddy Riley.

Riley, who first began working with Jackson in the early Nineties, found it emotionally difficult to complete the unfinished work of his late friend. To tap into his inspiration, Riley had photographer Harrington Funk surround him with pictures of the singer. "That was the only thing to keep me sane, and not go crazy while I'm working," said Riley. "Because, you know, it would come out on the music if you hear me banging on the keyboards with tears coming out of my eyes."

Riley said his fundamental motivation was to extend the legacy of a friend. He approached the tracks, therefore, not attempting to overly embellish, but simply to fill in the best he could. His guiding thought was: "What would Michael want?" He even brought sounds Jackson had him record from previous sessions. The final product, of course, is an approximation. But for Riley it was a labor of love.

It wasn't until Riley submitted his work, and three of the songs were accepted by Sony for the album, that the controversy began. Certain individuals--some with noble intentions, some less so--began expressing concerns about the authenticity of the vocals. These concerns were taken seriously by Jackson's Estate. Attorney Howard Weitzman was asked by estate co-executors John Branca and John McClain to conduct a thorough investigation of the authenticity of the Cascio tracks. The Estate, after all, had a lot to lose if the tracks were fraudulent. Since Jackson's death, by all accounts, it had done a masterful job of preserving and enhancing the artist's legacy, including the release of the highest-grossing concert documentary film of all time (This Is It), a new music video collection (Michael Jackson's Vision), a Jackson-themed video game (Michael Jackson: The Experience), a groundbreaking show with Cirque du Soliel ("Michael Jackson: The Immortal World Tour"), and the biggest recording contract in popular music history.

Perhaps just as important, the Estate had passed on numerous deals, selecting only a handful of projects it felt were worthy of Jackson's name. Risking the substantial credibility it had established amongst both fans and critics for a handful of questionable tracks would have been reckless at best (for Sony as well, who had invested over $200 million dollars on the singer's posthumous projects).

In spite of Jackson's close relationship with the Cascios, therefore, the Estate certainly didn't accept them on blind faith. The Estate invited four of Jackson's primary engineers over the past thirty years, three producers who had worked with Jackson (including Teddy Riley), and spoke to one of the musicians that had worked with Michael over the years and who had also contributed to one of the Cascio tracks. Each of them listened to the a cappella version of the vocals on the Cascio tracks without any musical accompaniment so that they could give an opinion as to whether or not the lead vocals on the Cascio tracks were sung by Jackson. To a person they all confirmed that the vocal was definitely Michael Jackson. These engineers, producers and musicians are all people Jackson trusted and whose names would be very familiar to Jackson's fans.

In addition, at the request of John Branca and John McClain, Howard Weitzman retained one of the best known forensic musicologists in the nation to listen to the a cappella vocals and compare them with a cappella vocals from previously known Jackson songs. This expert performed waveform analysis, an objective scientific procedure, and found that all of the vocals were the voice of Michael Jackson.

Sony Music conducted its own investigation by hiring a second well-respected forensic musicologist who also compared the raw vocals from the Cascio tracks against known vocals of Jackson's and found that it was Jackson's voice on both sets of the compared vocals.
The Cascio tracks were also played for two of the most significant people in the music industry who played crucial roles in Jackson's career. Both of these individuals believe that the vocals are those of Michael Jackson.

It was also specifically verified that the vocals did not belong to well-known Jackson impersonator, Jason Malachi.

The results of this exhaustive investigation confirmed Sony's belief that the songs submitted by the Estate all contained authentic Michael Jackson vocals. The decision was therefore made to include three of the Cascio tracks on Michael. Other tracks will likely be included on future albums of unreleased material.

While these are not perfectly realized tracks--as no posthumous material can be--there is certainly much to appreciate. The Cascio tracks represent, after all, some of the last work Jackson ever wrote and recorded. It wasn't ready to be released, but then, Jackson wasn't ready to die.

"Breaking News," "Monster," "Hold My Hand" and the rest of the tracks that comprise Michael are, similar to the This Is It documentary, fragments of an unfinished vision. They aren't all the polished, perfectionist-Michael Jackson people are accustomed to, but they are him, and what some of his closest friends and collaborators felt his fans deserved to hear.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/joe-vogel/exclusive-the-inside-stor_b_781364.html
 
Love your site and you're a great guy, Gaz. But after reading this earlier in another thread, it just comes off to me as spin and damage control.
 
Last edited:
'clever' article but it's not gunna work. MJ's music was never ill received by fans. it was ill received by media. this, however is being lauded by media, even before it's release and after. and now, there is guilt tripping going on in this article. i was born at night, huffington post...but not last night.

i hate the 'song', breaking news, and the whole disingenuous dispicable moves of sony. it's a terrible song. and the lyrical sentiment is self aggrandizing, and MJ never put that across in his lyrics.

and why do these book writers have so much know it all about what goes on in MJ's catalogue, finances, and such. this guy, speaking in this article wants to sell a book.

the guy, trying to sell the book makes clear who is doing the reacting to past musics of MJ while MJ was still here, but purposely waits to see initial fan reaction, to 'breaking news', which includes fan confusion, and then, the guy, putting out the book doesn't make a clear reference, about who is doing the reacting to 'breaking news', and then, they guy, putting out the book, writes language designed to guilt trip.
 
Last edited:
It is annoying that media is loving MJ now but, couldn't stand him then! Loving this questionable work but, diss the real stuff from yrs ago! EH? Make no sense! Fishy, Fishy, Fishy!
 
I do think the fans are flying off the handle with this.

The first time I heard Breaking News I thought it sounded odd, but that doesn't mean for certain that it's a fake. The power of suggestion is strong and there has been so much hysteria on this board lately, it's easy to get swept up in it.

Yesterday was ridiculous, when a 15 second clip of Monster appeared on Youtube which featured a woman talking all over it.... you could barely hear a thing and people were screaming "fake" left, right and centre.

I'm going to opt for sanity, and reserve judgement until I've actually heard the songs.
 
Huffington is a blog site...any one can write and add articles...

and though is this one is good, it doesn't give names

"The Estate invited four of Jackson's primary engineers over the past thirty years, three producers who had worked with Jackson (including Teddy Riley), and spoke to one of the musicians that had worked with Michael over the years and who had also contributed to one of the Cascio tracks. Each of them listened to the a cappella version of the vocals on the Cascio tracks without any musical accompaniment so that they could give an opinion as to whether or not the lead vocals on the Cascio tracks were sung by Jackson. To a person they all confirmed that the vocal was definitely Michael Jackson. These engineers, producers and musicians are all people Jackson trusted and whose names would be very familiar to Jackson's fans."


Names who would be very familiar to the fans...but none listed? :blink:


Also...


My sources worked closely with the King of Pop throughout his life and have been trustworthy and dependable throughout the five-year process of the book.

How much do you wanna bet the some of those "sources" are none other than the Cascios themselves....

I still refuse to support this project if ANY of the Cascios songs are apart of it.
 
I suppose the good thing about all of this is, we know which tracks are the supposed "fakes" and will stand out like dogs balls when they're thrown amongst the rest.

Even when comparing the Breaking News and Do You Know Where Your Children Are tracks it's almost night and day when it comes to the quality of song.

One is Michael, another is "Michael" on a very off day, possibly hung over WITH the flu, getting over tonsillitis, with a strained voice from yelling at the previous days football game, while the Cascio's recorded his voice through a cup-and-string connected to a recording console, loaded up with a dodgy failing hard drive.

Conveniently all other takes were disposed of. Maybe a basket of magnets fell from a shelf and hit the hard drive, resulting in the corruption of files. Michael then had to re-sing the song, which he wasn't happy about doing (explains the lack of "normal" effort on his behalf).

Hey but in the end, you hear what you want to hear.
 
I suppose the good thing about all of this is, we know which tracks are the supposed "fakes" and will stand out like dogs balls when they're thrown amongst the rest.

Even when comparing the Breaking News and Do You Know Where Your Children Are tracks it's almost night and day when it comes to the quality of song.

One is Michael, another is "Michael" on a very off day, possibly hung over WITH the flu, getting over tonsillitis, with a strained voice from yelling at the previous days football game, while the Cascio's recorded his voice through a cup-and-string connected to a recording console, loaded up with a dodgy failing hard drive.

Conveniently all other takes were disposed of. Maybe a basket of magnets fell from a shelf and hit the hard drive, resulting in the corruption of files. Michael then had to re-sing the song, which he wasn't happy about doing (explains the lack of "normal" effort on his behalf).


Hey but in the end, you hear what you want to hear.

:hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
 
I suppose the good thing about all of this is, we know which tracks are the supposed "fakes" and will stand out like dogs balls when they're thrown amongst the rest.

Even when comparing the Breaking News and Do You Know Where Your Children Are tracks it's almost night and day when it comes to the quality of song.

One is Michael, another is "Michael" on a very off day, possibly hung over WITH the flu, getting over tonsillitis, with a strained voice from yelling at the previous days football game, while the Cascio's recorded his voice through a cup-and-string connected to a recording console, loaded up with a dodgy failing hard drive.

Conveniently all other takes were disposed of. Maybe a basket of magnets fell from a shelf and hit the hard drive, resulting in the corruption of files. Michael then had to re-sing the song, which he wasn't happy about doing (explains the lack of "normal" effort on his behalf).

Hey but in the end, you hear what you want to hear.

:agree:

And The rest of what u said is hilarious!:rofl:

If these questionable songs were home demos at somebodies home studio (The Cascios) and that's the reason why people are saying he sounded off? :smilerolleyes:

Then how do people explain MJ sounding like himself when he had demos on a tape recorders only!? For example at his 93 Mexico deposition they played demos that MJ did on a tape recorder and it sounded just fine no second guessing was needed to know it was him! And those tapes were from the 80's and it was still clear it was him!

Yea, I know his voice matured threw the yrs but, BN was just way off in comparison to a tape recorder that would be less then a home studio demo! Maybe I'm wrong but, that's my opinion!

I have yes, and they are well aware of the outcry that is happening right now.

They have been having some urgent meetings regarding this and as soon as I have anything to share I will let you all know.

I can assure you all however the Estate are concerned regarding the response they have got re this song, its not a matter of tough its Michael now live with it.

I am in hope that they will communicate with me soon something that might just ease this situation

Thank u GAZ! May this be resolved soon and be a positive outcome!? *PRAYING*
 
Last edited:
If there are so many close friends and producers who know Michael recorded those songs and who have heard the a cappellas and are sure it's Michael's voice, why don't they step up? Why don't they come out with their own names and stand behind their words?

I'd certainly like to hear who these "engineers, producers and musicians that Jackson trusted and whose names would be very familiar to Jackson's fans" are.

Granted, I'm not an expert. But I've listened to a cappella versions of Michael's songs countless times, and come to a completely different conclusion than these experts. And I'm sorry, but it takes more than a vague blog post to convince me to go against my own ears.
 
I have yes, and they are well aware of the outcry that is happening right now.

They have been having some urgent meetings regarding this and as soon as I have anything to share I will let you all know.

I can assure you all however the Estate are concerned regarding the response they have got re this song, its not a matter of tough its Michael now live with it.

I am in hope that they will communicate with me soon something that might just ease this situation.


Thank you...

First and foremost, I hope they remove the Cascios tracks. Other than that, I hope they form a plan to handle this matter delicately. Alot of people are highly upset by what has happened....
 
let me go write an article and claim to have heard from sources, yet fail to name them...smh.
 
I have yes, and they are well aware of the outcry that is happening right now.

They have been having some urgent meetings regarding this and as soon as I have anything to share I will let you all know.

I can assure you all however the Estate are concerned regarding the response they have got re this song, its not a matter of tough its Michael now live with it.

I am in hope that they will communicate with me soon something that might just ease this situation.


thank you Gaz. although I don't understand this part of your post

its not a matter of tough its Michael now live with it.
it's not a matter of what? and should there be a comma after "tough" so it can be read "it's Michael, now live with it"?

sorry, english is not my first language and it's important so I want to understand everything correctly.
 
thank you Gaz. although I don't understand this part of your post

it's not a matter of what? and should there be a comma after "tough" so it can be read "it's Michael, now live with it"?

sorry, english is not my first language and it's important so I want to understand everything correctly.

He meant that they are NOT saying it's Michael, so to bad for us and that we should take it or leave it!

That's what I understood it to mean!?
 
Back
Top