Moromete
Proud Member
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2012
- Messages
- 422
- Points
- 28
YesSorry, but do you still have the source material of your uploads? You had quite some stuff I could never find anywhere else.
YesSorry, but do you still have the source material of your uploads? You had quite some stuff I could never find anywhere else.
It sounds super good, but it's just a remake
No it's a remake/reconstruction, he updated the title of the videoThis person claims to have the full 5:17 version, which is great!!
Ewww. Hater. Go awayNot the most flattering picture of Michael I have to say. The early 2000s was a weird stage.
It's on the worksCan someone use AI of any kind to improve the quality of this leak?
Michael's look during Invincible era was one of his best! You can cry, hate me, but you can't change the truth. Michael looked cool, brutal and adorable during Invincible era. And his looks during this era was better than during Thriller era!Not the most flattering picture of Michael I have to say. The early 2000s was a weird stage.
That is just YOUR opinion. People on these forums need to understand that opinions may vary and that should be respected. Thus, there's absolutely no need for you to start an off-topic discussion on why "Michael's look during Invincible era was one of his best".Michael's look during Invincible era was one of his best! You can cry, hate me, but you can't change the truth. Michael looked cool, brutal and adorable during Invincible era. And his looks during this era was better than during Thriller era!
I agree with you, you are actually pretty right. But, you can't deny that fact, that Michael's look during Invincible era was one of the best. Not the best (we all know why), but still better than Bad, Thriller and History. In my opinion, MJ look was at it's peak during BOTDF era! You can clearly see that in BOTDF video and Ghosts film. He looked just perfect. Then goes Dangerous Michael. He looked cool too, almost perfect. And 3d place takes Invincible Michael. He looked worse thatn Dangerous, but still pretty cool.With full respect to Michael, the plastic surgery went off the rails during the Invincible era. Up until then he looked great, but it was a dramatic and shocking change moving forward.
He was a handsome man. One of the saddest elements of his life (in my opinion) was that he either didn’t see or didn’t believe that.
That's not my opinion, that's a fact. Many celebrities were saying that Michael looked adorable... Only mass-media abused him for his look. If you are on tabloid's side - that's you choice. But the truth is that tabloids always lied. That's why I don't see any reason to judge Michael for his appearance. That's totally pointless...That is just YOUR opinion. People on these forums need to understand that opinions may vary and that should be respected. Thus, there's absolutely no need for you to start an off-topic discussion on why "Michael's look during Invincible era was one of his best".
Tbf MJ probably would not have been big on that outfit himself. Also he would probably see the funny side of it as well looking back , believe it or not MJ had a very good sense of humour as well. It just is a bit different with the bouffant hair and to be fair it is not hating to think it is a funny pic. People need to lighten up , as i say MJ would probably laugh his a$$ off at the pic tooThat's not my opinion, that's a fact. Many celebrities were saying that Michael looked adorable... Only mass-media abused him for his look. If you are on tabloid's side - that's you choice. But the truth is that tabloids always lied. That's why I don't see any reason to judge Michael for his appearance. That's totally pointless...
Sorry but how am I a hater?Ewww. Hater. Go away
It's not a demo. I swear I don't know what some MJ fans think a demo is. There probably is a demo though: the version that the Darkchild team presented to MJ with one of them singing the lyrics.Ultimately it's only a demo.
I agree with this completely - I feel the same about a lot of the songs on Invincible.The vocals are great, but it's just a bit busy and mechanical sounding, which is what I'm not fond of on some of the songs on Invincible.
that's not true. Michael was really insecure, when people was judging his look. Accident in the bathroom (when MJ was screaming and breaking everything) before YRMW shooting is a good exmaple of that. People who abuse Michael's appearance during Invincible era - are monsters, because they don't care about his feelingsTbf MJ probably would not have been big on that outfit himself. Also he would probably see the funny side of it as well looking back , believe it or not MJ had a very good sense of humour as well. It just is a bit different with the bouffant hair and to be fair it is not hating to think it is a funny pic. People need to lighten up , as i say MJ would probably laugh his a$$ off at the pic too
No apology needed. This guy's comments are very strange. No one in their right mind would think MJ looked best during InvinciblePlease forgive me for what I'm about to say and I do apologise if it is out of order but I find some of your comments and other posts that I've seen as verging on low key racism.
I hate to say that but I kinda get that impression.
Seems like it's a bit of a hot take to say on this community but I totally agree lol, MJ did not look good for most of the 2000's. He did get a glow-up in 2007 and a bigger glow-up after he brought back the curls in 2009 though.
My favorite era based on looks would be the Thriller era, he looked so fucking cool with the Jheri curls and the royalty-like outfits he'd wear.
Gotta disagree. I think he looked borderline abysmal in the early 2000s. The nose jobs, the odd choices of hairstyles, the fact that he perpetually looked/acted as though he was under the influence… He was in rough shape and seemed like he was speed-running surgeries. Like @ChanceToDance said, I think he rebounded by the late 2000s (he looked especially great in 2007-08), but I just can’t look at Invincible-era MJ and think anything other than, “What the hell happened here?”I agree with you, you are actually pretty right. But, you can't deny that fact, that Michael's look during Invincible era was one of the best. Not the best (we all know why), but still better than Bad, Thriller and History. In my opinion, MJ look was at it's peak during BOTDF era! You can clearly see that in BOTDF video and Ghosts film. He looked just perfect. Then goes Dangerous Michael. He looked cool too, almost perfect. And 3d place takes Invincible Michael. He looked worse thatn Dangerous, but still pretty cool.
The point is, that you judge Michael's look according to mount of plastic surgeries. You think, the more plastic surgery he made, the worse he looked. And I judge his look, according just on his look! Impartially! I don't care about surgeries. This little scheme will help you
Nope. Michael's look was at it's sex peak during 1996-1998Sorry but how am I a hater?
Michael's physical peak was when he was in his late 20s aka around the BAD era.
He was considered a very sexy man during this period.
I'd rather say, that you ara kinda racist. Because in your every comment, you debase "white" Michael's apperance during Invincible era. You praising Thriller black Mike and abusing Invincible Michael. Moreover, you think that Invincible Michael's songs are worse that Thriller songs. While I say, that every Michael looked adorable, but Invincible Michael has his advantages, comparing to Thriller MichaelPlease forgive me for what I'm about to say and I do apologise if it is out of order but I find some of your comments and other posts that I've seen as verging on low key racism.
That's not "a fact". To judge someone's appearance and decide whether or not they look beautiful is an opinion. Therefore, your statement is only based on your personal preferences. Also, I'm still having a hard time figuring out why did you decide to transform a song discussion into a useless debate about Michael Jackson's appearance.That's not my opinion, that's a fact. Many celebrities were saying that Michael looked adorable... Only mass-media abused him for his look. If you are on tabloid's side - that's you choice. But the truth is that tabloids always lied. That's why I don't see any reason to judge Michael for his appearance. That's totally pointless...
I have bad memories of Michael during the early to mid 2000sGotta disagree. I think he looked borderline abysmal in the early 2000s. The nose jobs, the odd choices of hairstyles, the fact that he perpetually looked/acted as though he was under the influence… He was in rough shape and seemed like he was speed-running surgeries. Like @ChanceToDance said, I think he rebounded by the late 2000s (he looked especially great in 2007-08), but I just can’t look at Invincible-era MJ and think anything other than, “What the hell happened here?”
I personally think Bad and HIStory were his best eras. Great style, and the year-to-year changes were minimal.
That's @Blues_Away2023, who started to abuse Michael's look, not me, palThat's not "a fact". To judge someone's appearance and decide whether or not they look beautiful is an opinion. Therefore, your statement is only based on your personal preferences. Also, I'm still having a hard time figuring out why did you decide to transform a song discussion into a useless debate about Michael Jackson's appearance.
Michael Jackson from Invincible era looked better than from 2009. You can clearly see that on regular pics.I have bad memories of Michael during the early to mid 2000s
He was the butt of all jokes , the freak, stereotypical with the long straight hair and red shirt. Portrayed in films like scary movie as this creep.
I also agree that he looked so much better by 2007 and apart from his weight, his 2009 appearance was the best he had looked in years! especially with the curls back. That's Michael Jackson to me.
Huh? I said that the picture was not the most flattering and then a few of us had a little light hearted moment before you started with the hater comment.That's @Blues_Away2023, who started to abuse Michael's look, not me, pal
I'm not hater. You are!Huh? I said that the picture was not the most flattering and then a few of us had a little light hearted moment before you started with the hater comment.
You've literally picked the worst pic you could find from 2009 to prove your point.Michael Jackson from Invincible era looked better than from 2009. You can clearly see that on regular pics.
Hahahahaha. With glassesYou've literally picked the worst pic you could find from 2009 to prove your point.
He looked fabulous at the o2 announcement.