Here is the differences, Michael had a TRIAL. This chic is sick in the head. I guess that chic who claimed to be Billie Jean will coming out and claiming MJ raped her and those three kids she had was MJ. People can see through this mess.Forget Wade. What about Chandler, Francia and Arvizo? They're doing just fine so why didn't she realise all the way back in 1993 or 2005 that she wouldn't be harmed or go to jail if she went public with her allegations? For a woman in her 30s to believe this requires serious and persistent brainwashing, she wouldn't be able to function in a normal manner. Yet somehow she expects us to believe that up until a month ago she didn't even make the connection between her psychological issues and the years of childhood sexual abuse by the most famous man in the world.
Also...
Why would Michael send her cheques that can easily be traced (and of which she has copies herself) if he wanted to keep this a secret - and why didn't he do this with any other 'victim'?
How was Michael able to transfer almost a million dollars in cheques to a teenage girl, part of it in October 1993, without the FBI or the girl's parents noticing anything?
Why on earth would she keep notes from her abuser for three decades? It's not like they prove anything and some of them weren't even written by Michael himself.
None of this makes any sense. Just another pathetic and obvious money grab. The fact that Wade sought out these unscrupulous lawyers to represent him speaks volumes for me.
Looks like they're trying the Trump tactic. You know Trump denied on national TV that he had ever assaulted a woman and soon after a flood of women (a dozen within days) came out and said "actually, he did assault me" - many of them with numerous corroborating witnesses and such. But that's not what happened here, so far this "Jane Doe" is the only female victim to come forward despite weeks of desperate fishing by these lawyers.
I guess this is the "shocking revelation" Finaldi was talking about in that radio interview a few weeks back.
No. I just heard it on a ONE radio show today talking about this and they thought this was tabloid bull and more nonsense on MJ and they moved on quick. That is when I came on her to see. Hardly no one is talking about this mess and I listen to the radio and news all day. people know this is bull and do not care.Is this shit all over the US media?
I saw it on ABC7's website.
debunk what? MJ giving someone money? giving someone money does not mean pay off for anything.. He helped Ryan Whites family, Arvizo family, you know how many checks he's written to financially help people? It's famously known that Michael spent a lot of money and was not stingy when it comes to others!
A kid was killed in Compton and MJ gave the mother a check to bury the kid. A girl was mauled by a dog in Washington D C and MJ paid for her medical. I can go on and on. This story seems o be only covered by the same old tabloid sites and NO legit news outlet. People are tired of this crap. These fools are not hurting MJ. MJ was just given the MOST dead celeb who made the most money alive/dead. This is going to be viewed no more than a with hunt from money hungry folks. Again, Michael had a TRIAL that the DA left no rock unturned and MJ was given NO special treatment.debunk what? MJ giving someone money? giving someone money does not mean pay off for anything.. He helped Ryan Whites family, Arvizo family, you know how many checks he's written to financially help people? It's famously known that Michael spent a lot of money and was not stingy when it comes to others!
I was thinking the same thing.Remember the so called pictures from radaronline. And when MJ was under investigation, his bank accounts, computers, phones, etc all were investigated.I'm not saying he did anything to her. It could be that she faked those checks. You can't trust those ''people'', I wouldn't surprised if the checks were faked as well.
MJresearcher;4171956 said:LOL, really Finaldi? That's the ****ing stupidest thing I've read all day. This whole thing is stupid.
I wonder how MJ haters are taking this... The ones who love so much the thought of MJ being interested only in boys...
Anyway, that's a cute picture of Michael.
Or a lady saying she was stuck hostage while being wined dined, and out getting her nails done on someone's dime.. Wait! that happened.. Janet Arvizo
LOL, really Finaldi? That's the ****ing stupidest thing I've read all day. This whole thing is stupid.
This mess is not going to stop the sell of Thriller or any celebration of thriller. The video was played last night on one of the MTV programs.
They are only making themselves look stupid.Yuuuuup but timing is everything with these opportunists.
Well, I was disappointed to see that an article about it (and that picture) was on our ABC local affiliate web site here in Houston all day long. But I watched the live news all day and tonight and there wasn't a word. I suppose it was there since ABC7 in CA is in their family of stations.
.
No, it was just a copy from the ABC7 story-I did read the comments and more than half felt like it was bogus and a money grab.And I bet they didn't question anything about this absurd story right?
They never do when it comes to MJ.
Well, I was disappointed to see that an article about it (and that picture) was on our ABC local affiliate web site here in Houston all day long. But I watched the live news all day and tonight and there wasn't a word. I suppose it was there since ABC7 in CA is in their family of stations.
And I can't believe this story broke a day and a half ago, and no one has figured out who this girl is yet. With all the pictures people share of Michael, I'm shocked that no one can find it. I just hope it's not a girl that we all know and like.
And I can't believe this story broke a day and a half ago, and no one has figured out who this girl is yet. With all the pictures people share of Michael, I'm shocked that no one can find it. I just hope it's not a girl that we all know and like.
Can someone tell me what the word is before crazy?
Look like elm but that makes no sense.
No, it was just a copy from the ABC7 story-I did read the comments and more than half felt like it was bogus and a money grab.
It's looking like it's a private photograph.
Guys, PLEASE, COMMENT ARTICLES AND LET THE PEOPLE KNOW THE FACTS.
We can not ignore this bs.
People out there... I guess..., believe in some hush money for unidentified what? They think of a crime by paying for something... beforehand thinking rationally of circumstances surrounding the bs allegation.
we have to believe that MJs companies or the Estate can show the payments and have the saved documentaries and files aboot these transactions.
But people discussing the articles posed as judges, as usual, knowing that some checks are the proof of anything, but till these days, nobody knows what exactly for.
The allegations are not about graphic details, but the checks or payments.
We should comment the articles and let people know the facts.
I really want to know who this woman is. Something tells me it will say a lot.
In the 'Other correspondence' are these notes:
http://
http://
Which I think may relate to this film:
Boys Town (Wiki)
Boys Town is a 1938 biographical drama film based on Father Edward J. Flanagan's work with a group of underprivileged and delinquent boys in a home that he founded and named "Boys Town". It stars Spencer Tracy as Father Edward J. Flanagan, and Mickey Rooney with Henry Hull, Leslie Fenton, and Gene Reynolds
A convicted murderer asks to make his confession on the day of his execution. He is visited by an old friend, Father Flanagan (Spencer Tracy) who runs a home for indigent men in Omaha, Nebraska. When the prison officials suggest that the condemned man owes the state a debt, Father Flanagan witnesses the condemned man's diatribe to prison officials and a reporter that describes his awful plight as a homeless and friendless boy who was a ward in state institutions. After the convicted man asks the officials to leave, Father Flanagan provides some comfort and wisdom. On the train back to Omaha, Father Flanagan is transformed in his humanitarian mission by revelations (echoed in the words) imparted by the condemned man's litany of hardships experienced as a child without friends or family as a ward of the state.
Father Flanagan believes there is no such thing as a bad boy and spends his life attempting to prove it. He battles indifference, the legal system, and often the boys themselves, to build a sanctuary which he calls Boys Town. The boys have their own government, make their own rules, and dish out their own punishment. One boy, Whitey Marsh (Mickey Rooney) is as much as anyone can handle. Whitey's older brother, in prison for murder, asks Father Flanagan to take Whitey (himself a poolroom shark and tough talking hoodlum) to Boys Town. Whitey's older brother escapes custody during transfer to federal prison. After thinking he has caused the death of a younger boy, Whitey leaves the un-fenced Boys Town and wanders the streets of town. Whitey is accused of bank robbery and murder on circumstantial evidence. Popular sentiment (stirred by sensationalized media reports headed by an unsympathetic newspaper owner) turns against Boys Town, and it seems likely the home will be permanently closed. Whitey joins his brother, but Father Flanagan rescues Whitey and helps capture the gang in the act of robbery. Whitey and Father Flanagan return to Boys Town
(The highlighted part is interesting...especially as MJ's notes pre-date 1993)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Also its pretty obvious that both Shana and Murray's books has probably given them ideas with this new media smear campaign
No need to go to tabloid websites and comment and give them traffic. That's exactly how fans help such things blow big. So far the story has fallen flat. I haven't seen it reported by many, only by some tabloids. So some tabloid readers believe it? It's not like those people are typically the sharpest, those who believe anything they read in their tabloids. Actually I have seen some of the most hard core MJ haters on another forum say they don't believe it because it is a girl. LOL. It's a general forum that is always big sex abuse scandals but this thread has fallen flat and hardly created any traffic - and most commenting in it were fans and the couple of haters said they didn't believe it because it was a girl.
Agree. It will be very telling. Which is why they hide her identity IMO.
That's interesting. I am pretty sure they were doing something together, I mean maybe some charity work, or he encouraged the girl for it. Maybe something to do with charity through entertainment something like that or entertaining ill kids. And the money was probably for that.
MJ supposedly paid her for her silence about sexual abuse but these letters from 1990 are when the payments already started so why still the jovial, friendly tone between them if there were already payments going on "for injury"? Also the signed photo is early 90s, so why still sending her such (or why is she still asking him for such) while he was supposedly "paying her off for sexual abuse"?
I don't think it has to do with Shana or Murray. It simply has to do with who they managed to convince to be a false witness. I am sure they would have been happier with a male accuser but they are using her anyway on the basis of "better than nothing".
Like Robson. Safechuck she likes to keep his molester's pictures, letters, taped interviews,
clothes. All three behaves like typical rape victims.
That photograph is from the Man In The Mirror single promo shoot, so she'd of gotten it in the 80's I imagine.
Indeed.
Oh ok. But some of the letters' date after the first supposed "pay off".
I don't think it has to do with Shana or Murray. It simply has to do with who they managed to convince to be a false witness. I am sure they would have been happier with a male accuser but they are using her anyway on the basis of "better than nothing".
redfrog;4172102 said:I wonder how they found her and how they convinced her.
If they just call anyone and everyone who knew MJ when they were kids they risk being exposed
as victim shoppers. Those who refuse to join the witch-hunt could report that
these lawyers tried to convince them to be MJ "victim". Some may even record the phone calls.
I doubt that would want to leave such incriminating evidence behind.
The phone calls revealed
Some recipients of the phone calls from Manly's employee say the calls left them "infuriated and disgusted." Nowicki reports:"[One recipient said] she was given the 'strong impression' that if she said her son, now 32, was interested in filing a lawsuit, 'they would have jumped all over that. They were going to find something (against Kelly), regardless if there was any cause for action.'"And another:"[Another woman] tried to tell [the caller] that she has known Kelly for three decades and described his positive influence on her sons. 'She told me she has found 10 more victims … She was going on and on and tried to convince me that I was stupid and didn't realize this was going on. I finally had to hang up on her.'"
It's possible that Robson or Safechuck know this woman and trusted her enough to try to
convince her. But if they tried to get a male accuser first I wonder who they asked
and what their reaction was I'd like them to speak up to expose these bastards.
Actually there were already claims against them in another case of unethical victim shopping. Some felt they were trying to convince them to say things against a priest even when nothing happened.