SarahJ
Proud Member
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2014
- Messages
- 2,034
- Points
- 0
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson / James Safechuck file claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate
Using the word "May" is wishful thinking on their part and they know it. I notice in coverage of the '05 trial that word was used alot and.."he may get convicted of", "they may testify to" etc..And 99.9% of the time whatever they referred to never happened.
You are so right. There is no better venue for him to have spoken out than a court of law. The fact he consistently refuses to testify under oath speaks volumes.
I think all these things just come from tabloid speculation. One of the tabloids said "MJs first accuser now may publicly speak out for the first time." Obviously this was based on that letter by Robson's lawyers that they wanted the Estate to release former accusers from Confidentiality Agreements. I doubt Jordan would actually want anything to do with it. He never did. And he was given plenty of opportunities to speak out in court if he had wanted. These lawyers try to make it look like these accusers were somehow forced into silence when in fact it was their own choice. There is not a more proper platform to speak out than a court. It is more proper than tabloid articles. Jordan always declined every opportunity to tell his allegations in a court. In fact, when the prosecution tried to make him in 2005 he threatened them with legal action.
Using the word "May" is wishful thinking on their part and they know it. I notice in coverage of the '05 trial that word was used alot and.."he may get convicted of", "they may testify to" etc..And 99.9% of the time whatever they referred to never happened.
You are so right. There is no better venue for him to have spoken out than a court of law. The fact he consistently refuses to testify under oath speaks volumes.