[Discussion] Sexual Abuse Claims Against MJ Estate - Robson/ Safechuck/ Doe

Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

What's the date for Safechuck 's hearing again? It's not dependent on the Robson cases, is it?
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

I know i am panicing alittle bit

I think a part of the reason people panic is they don't know or follow the other cases and consider them as examples. As I mentioned before while judge giving them a chance to amend their complaint is disappointing, it's not out of the ordinary. Demann and Michael Amir Williams had 3-4 chances to amend their complaints.

So it makes it harder to answer your question. This was fist round, now we are waiting for the second round. Hard to say how many revisions will be?

What's the date for Safechuck 's hearing again? It's not dependent on the Robson cases, is it?

November 19 and no.

edited to add

right now the dates are

November 6th for Wade
November 19th for Safechuck

We'll see if there would be any extension requests
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

I think a part of the reason people panic is they don't know or follow the other cases and consider them as examples. As I mentioned before while judge giving them a chance to amend their complaint is disappointing, it's not out of the ordinary. Demann and Michael Amir Williams had 3-4 chances to amend their complaints.

So it makes it harder to answer your question. This was fist round, now we are waiting for the second round. Hard to say how many revisions will be?



November 19 and no.

edited to add

right now the dates are

November 6th for Wade
November 19th for Safechuck

We'll see if there would be any extension requests
Thanks Ivy. I think people are panicking (like me) are crushed that this has even happened and we don't want Michael destroyed again.
I try to keep a level head and read the info calmly and objectively but it can be hard.
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

I think a part of the reason people panic is they don't know or follow the other cases and consider them as examples. As I mentioned before while judge giving them a chance to amend their complaint is disappointing, it's not out of the ordinary. Demann and Michael Amir Williams had 3-4 chances to amend their complaints.

So it makes it harder to answer your question. This was fist round, now we are waiting for the second round. Hard to say how many revisions will be?



November 19 and no.

edited to add

right now the dates are

November 6th for Wade
November 19th for Safechuck

We'll see if there would be any extension requests


So what you are saying Ivy is that this can take a long time the judge can tell Wade and his lawyers to go back again where does the law take effect. I really don't believe Wade and his lawyers have anything to push this case threw that is imo. I know you mention in the others cases it took 3-4 times before it was dismiss how long will this judge go before he say this is it we are done?






Thanks Ivy. I think people are panicking (like me) are crushed that this has even happened and we don't want Michael destroyed again.
I try to keep a level head and read the info calmly and objectively but it can be hard.



This is how i feel too i am trying to be calm too but it is hard i don't want to see Michael name destroy again either. The law said that the statute of limitations have ran out on Wade to file but somehow Wade and his lawyers have gotting around that to keep this case going and it is wrong imo.
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

I think that's a part of my rage this time around as well. Not only because of the particular players in the case are well known to all of us (and for years ) but something like this should have happened (if it was going to happen at all) within a few months of Michael's death.
That's when those "supposed flood gates " should have opened. When all those crazy Billie Jean mothers and crazy surrogate Sperm donors fathers and will nay sayers were crowding creditors court.
Not years later.
This is just so flat out, cut and dried beyond the statues and despite that it keeps dragging on, that it makes me physically ill.
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

It is making me more then ill this is just plain crazy unreal we have so much of the laws in this thread and i feel like the statute of limitations has gone out the widow i just can't believe that this judge is even dealing with this case but these are the steps to see if Wade does have enough for this case to move forward.

Maybe there is alittle hope that we can see here and that is the judge is given Wade every chance to prove his case before the judge makes his finale decision and the reason is so Wade and his lawyers can't appeal or say that their were not given every change to prove their case. We are in for a long wait and that is the part that really is bother me.

We just have to wait and see what happen on Nov 6th
 
Last edited:
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

Does the Estate need to turn over to Wade and his lawyers infor or discovery of who was in charge of MJ companies at the time of this so call abuse their feel this will help their case because their are trying to prove that the companies are negligence that their knew and did nothing about it Wade lawyer mention this.
 
Last edited:
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

"I tell you that the quality of lawyering in this case is superb. It is such a pleasure to read your papers and it - - and you know, it has less to do with, you know, Michael Jackson international celebrity who is fascinating in and of himself......."

What a bizarre thing to say from judge!
It sounds like:
1 He thinks MJ is still alive (re international celebrity comment)
2 He has a case in hand that "international celebrity" has been dead for 5 year and now have been accused posthumously abusing some crook, and he is delighted by the lawyering from both sides:no:
3 This has everything to do with "international celebrity" - wth is he thinking?

Maybe I'm over reacting by his comment as this judge is still overseeing all of the probate cases and find those cases interesting?

Bubs I think this has something to do with the fact that judges/lawyers do find their cases interesting. This may sound crazy, but even though the case is a serious matter, involving the possibility that the client/defendant might end up in jail, the lawyers/judge can find the whole experience very interesting. I had this experience with a lawyer way back when I was 24 who found the case very interesting and said so with a smile, even though the person owed me money and had no means to pay it back.

----

How about that Marzano's comment that they want to know what else is out there that is relevant to their case so they can do depositions? I get she wants to show an MO, but how is showing that going to prove that Michael molested Wade? Is this MO going to be their most important evidence to show that Wade was molested?
 
Last edited:
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

Ivy i second that you have kept us updated and you have explain to us what will happen next and Respect77 you are on it too thank you to both of you.

I know i am panicing alittle bit but this case is just so nervous right now i am just hope that this judge will dismiss this and i am glad he is not given Wade and his lawyers more time to look through the discovery just like the judge said it really doesn't matter because their don't even know what their are looking for just like it was mention their are just fishing.


I hope so. Thanks Ivy and Respect77. I know I've had my opinions about this judge. But I hope he dismisses this case. Michael was dragged through the mud long enough years ago, even years before he died. This needs to stop. Period.
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

How about that Marzano's comment that they want to know what else is out there that is relevant to their case so they can do depositions? I get she wants to show an MO, but how is showing that going to prove that Michael molested Wade? Is this MO going to be their most important evidence to show that Wade was molested?

What they have to prove now is that they are within statutes of limitations. They can achieve that if they manage to find support for CCP 340.1 (B)2 in their case, ie. this:

if the person or entity knew
or had reason to know, or was otherwise on notice, of any unlawful
sexual conduct by an employee, volunteer, representative, or agent,
and failed to take reasonable steps, and to implement reasonable
safeguards, to avoid acts of unlawful sexual conduct in the future by
that person, including, but not limited to, preventing or avoiding
placement of that person in a function or environment in which
contact with children is an inherent part of that function or
environment.

Or if they can invoke equitable estoppel. For example that the reason why Wade did not come out earlier was that MJ threatened him and that threat had such an effect on Wade that it reasonably lasted until 2012. He is trying that with the "we both go to jail" claim. So like we discussed here before he could try to bring in Jordan's interview with Dr. Richard Gardner where Jordan claimed MJ threatened him similarly. Wade could say this proves a modus operandi. In actuality, it would not prove that - that interview is well accessible to anyone since 2003, so Wade could simply model his allegations after it, but the Judge does not have to weigh credibility. He simply has to weigh whether that supports Wade's argument for equitable estoppel. I don't know how it would. Because what Wade's needs to prove is that such a threat had such a profound effect on him that he reasonably believed it until he was 30 years old in 2012. And what Jordan said actually weakens that argument:

"By the way, going back, did he say, 'It's a secret.'"

"Michael?"

"Yeah. In terms of did he make any threats?"

"I think he may have said, like, if you tell - - if people say 'Don't worry, just tell us, Michael
will go to jail and nothing will happen to me you.' He said that wasn't true, and I could, like,
go to juvenile hall or something."

"That he could go to jail but you'd go to juvenile hall?"

"Something like that."

"That he himself could go to jail?"

"I don't specifically remember. I'm almost positive though, that he said about juvenile hall.
I'm almost positive he said that, but I do indeed remember that he said that he would go to
jail, and that, like, I wouldn't get off Scott free."

"Did you believe that?"

"Well, I didn't really believe it at the time, and I definitely don't now. But at the time I didn't
really believe it but I said, okay, whatever, and just went along with it."

So 13-year-old Jordan says he did not believe such a threat as a 13-year-old, while Wade wants to tell us that he believed it until he was 30, despite of seeing that no other accusers of MJ ever went to jail in 1993 or 2005.
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

What they have to prove now is that they are within statutes of limitations. They can achieve that if they manage to find support for CCP 340.1 (B)2 in their case, ie. this:



if the person or entity knew
or had reason to know, or was otherwise on notice, of any unlawful
sexual conduct by an employee, volunteer, representative, or agent,
and failed to take reasonable steps, and to implement reasonable
safeguards, to avoid acts of unlawful sexual conduct in the future by
that person, including, but not limited to, preventing or avoiding
placement of that person in a function or environment in which
contact with children is an inherent part of that function or
environment.​



Or if they can invoke equitable estoppel. For example that the reason why Wade did not come out earlier was that MJ threatened him and that threat had such an effect on Wade that it reasonably lasted until 2012. He is trying that with the "we both go to jail" claim. So like we discussed here before he could try to bring in Jordan's interview with Dr. Richard Gardner where Jordan claimed MJ threatened him similarly. Wade could say this proves a modus operandi. In actuality, it would not prove that - that interview is well accessible to anyone since 2003, so Wade could simply model his allegations after it, but the Judge does not have to weigh credibility. He simply has to weigh whether that supports Wade's argument for equitable estoppel. I don't know how it would. Because what Wade's needs to prove is that such a threat had such a profound effect on him that he reasonably believed it until he was 30 years old in 2012. And what Jordan said actually weakens that argument:


"By the way, going back, did he say, 'It's a secret.'"

"Michael?"

"Yeah. In terms of did he make any threats?"

"I think he may have said, like, if you tell - - if people say 'Don't worry, just tell us, Michael
will go to jail and nothing will happen to me you.' He said that wasn't true, and I could, like,
go to juvenile hall or something."

"That he could go to jail but you'd go to juvenile hall?"

"Something like that."

"That he himself could go to jail?"

"I don't specifically remember. I'm almost positive though, that he said about juvenile hall.
I'm almost positive he said that, but I do indeed remember that he said that he would go to
jail, and that, like, I wouldn't get off Scott free."

"Did you believe that?"

"Well, I didn't really believe it at the time, and I definitely don't now. But at the time I didn't
really believe it but I said, okay, whatever, and just went along with it."





So 13-year-old Jordan says he did not believe such a threat as a 13-year-old, while Wade wants to tell us that he believed it until he was 30, despite of
seeing that no other accusers of MJ ever went to jail in 1993 or 2005.


Which their can't prove




Does Wade think the judge is going to believe this that Michael threat him until 2012 come on he knew in 2012 and he still didn't file he didn't file until 2013 he still miss the statute of limitations by rights he has no reason why he didn't file. Using Chandler interview i agree with the doctor will not help either.


So if Wade and his lawyers are thinking their can use these to get around the statute of limitations i don't believe their have a chance and seeing that no others like you mention has went to jail in 1993 or 2005 because of this so call threat that Michael control him with then what Wade is saying is all a lie so like i said there is no reason why he couldn't file this so call abuse that he claim Michael did to him.



So as you look at it

1. Not in the statute of limitations that has pass
2. Will not be able imo to prove that someone in MJ companies knew that Wade was being abuse by Michael end of case
 
Last edited:
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

Wade and his lawyers are coming up with some crazy stories. I just hope that the judge looks at the laws and see that Wade doesn't have a case and dismiss it.
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

On Nov 6th will the judge also be looking to see if Wade and his lawyers have meet the needs to move the case forward and if their have not will this be dismiss?
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

I hope this case is dismissed - and then the Estate should sue the hell out of Wade - to stop others from making such stupid accusations against MJ!!

The Estate needs to show that there are consequenses to do such things!! It has to stop !!
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

I hope this case is dismissed - and then the Estate should sue the hell out of Wade - to stop others from making such stupid accusations against MJ!!

The Estate needs to show that there are consequenses to do such things!! It has to stop !!



I agree with you.

That is what this is stupid accusations that are a waste of the court time.
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

He shouldn't have been your "god" in the first place shows how mental you are. You are a real effing sod doing this to Michael:( You really have no respect. When you look back on all your pictures, all your memories. Got a Conscience? Sleep easy do ya? Nice friend aren't you.

02.jpg
 
Last edited:
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

I hope this case is dismissed - and then the Estate should sue the hell out of Wade - to stop others from making such stupid accusations against MJ!!

The Estate needs to show that there are consequenses to do such things!! It has to stop !!

i would love to see this happen. what are the chances? i dont know if the estate would want to get tangled up in another lawsuit involving allegations. but it would be so great.
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

If i was the Estate i would not it is time to move on.
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

But at the time I didn't
really believe it but I said, okay, whatever, and just went along with it."

Rather casual approach isn't it? 'Yeah, well whatever"
 
SarahJ;4052958 said:
But at the time I didn't
really believe it but I said, okay, whatever, and just went along with it."

Rather casual approach isn't it? 'Yeah, well whatever"

I know, right?

Through the whole interview Jordan is totally unable to emotionally relate to whatever he alleges happened to him. Moreover he sounds totally reharsed to the point of using the exact same words and expressions and logic as what his father used in the taped phone convo with David Schwartz. There is an article that summarizes that, but since I'm not sure if links are allowed here I copy that part:

Jordan Chandler never repeated his allegations in a court and was never cross-examined about them. The interview he gave to Dr. Gardner contains remarkably similar trains of thought to that of Evan Chandler’s in the taped phone conversation he had with David Schwartz on July 8, 1993. For example, in that conversation Evan says:
“MR. CHANDLER: But it could have been used to advantage, and in some ways Michael is using his age and experience and his money and his power to great advantage to Jordy.“[8]
and
“MR. CHANDLER: It was the saddest thing I [tape irregularity]. I mean, how do you do that? 13 years old. There’s no — you know, and a [tape irregularity] just come into it? I ask you this: If Michael Jackson were just some 34-year-old person, would this be happening? No. He’s got power, he’s got money, he’s got seduction. [tape irregularity] happening [tape irregularity] they’ve been seduced away from the family by power and by money.[8]
and
“MR. CHANDLER: He could be the same person without the power and the money, and they wouldn’t even be talking to him. You know it and I know it. So for power and money and his image, June and Jordy have broken up the family, and even though [tape irregularity] a lot better, because I’ve sat down and talked to him, and I’ve told him long before it came down to going this far –“ [8]
From the Dr. Gardner interview with Jordan:
“You still wanted to go on the tour?”
Yes, at the time.”

“Why is that?”
“Because I was having fun. At the time, the things Michael was doing to me, they didn’t affect me. Like, I didn’t think anything was totally wrong with what he was doing since he was my friend, and he kept on telling me that he would never hurt me. But presently I see that he was obviously lying.”

“You’re saying you didn’t realize it could hurt you? Is that what you’re – - “

“I didn’t see anything wrong with it.”
“Do you see the wrong in it now?”
“Of course.”
“What is wrong as you see it?”
Because he’s a grown-up and he’s using his experience, of his age in manipulating and coercing younger people who don’t have as much experience as him, and don’t have the ability to say no to someone powerful like that. He’s using his power, his experience, his age – his overwhelmingness – to get what he wants.” [4]
When asked what, in his opinion, was wrong with what allegedly was done to him, Jordan was unable to relate to the alleged experience emotionally:
“When you say it could have hurt you, how could it have hurt you?”
“Everybody thinks what he was doing could hurt, otherwise it wouldn’t be a crime.”

“Okay, how could it hurt? As you see it, how could it hurt you?”
“Because – that’s a touchy subject, I guess. It separates you from any other people.”
“How?”
“I don’t know.”

“Just your own guess.”

“It could make me depressed or something, I don’t know.”

“Well, this is important. You say it’s a crime. Why is it a crime?”
Because, like I said before, he’s using his experience, power, age – -
“How could this have left you? If this had gone on and not been interrupted, how could you have ended up?”
“According to his pattern, I believe he would have left me and, sort of dumped me, I guess you could call it. And I would be, sort of, a vegetable.” [4]
Jordan’s idea that what allegedly happened to him is wrong because it “separates you from any other people” is suspiciously similar to his father’s opinion, as related to us in his brother’s book, All That Glitters, which quotes Evan as saying:
“And it wasn’t just the sex part. Everyone made a big deal about the sex – the press, the cops, the DA. That was important, sure, but it wasn’t the main thing for me. It was what Michael did to him to get to that point. He took over his mind and isolated him from his family and friends and everyone he cared for. He made him his own little slave. On the outside it looked like he was showing Jordie the time of his life, but on the inside he was robbing him of his individuality, his soul. That was the real crime, and that’s what I wanted Michael to pay for. [9; page 109]
or
“Even if there was no sex, Jordie’s personality had been seriously altered. As he morphed day by day into a pint-sized clone of Michael, he withdrew further and further from his family and friends.”[9; page 49]
Keep in mind in the same book, it is claimed that after Jordan “confessed” to his father on July 16 by answering with an almost inaudible “yes” to the question did Jackson touch his penis, they supposedly never talked about the allegations again, yet Jordan’s train of thought, opinions, choice of words in this interview are remarkably similar to those of his father’s.
It is also remarkable that Jordan talks about a “pattern”, when there was no pattern at all as there was no other accuser. However, literature by specialists on psychology/psychiatry and criminalistics often refer to patterns of criminals. The notion that Jackson dumped people after they grew up has no basis in reality. Jackson remained friends with many of the children he befriended after they grew up as well.
Continuing with the Dr. Gardner interview, Jordan goes on to say a couple of questions later the best thing that happened to him in his life was when he told his father what Jackson had allegedly done to him, “because once I told him, I knew that Michael would never be able to do that to me again. And when something horrible ends, it’s most likely the best thing in your life” [4]. Take note that just a couple of sentences before Jordan’s concern was that Jackson would have “left him” and “dumped” him. He also wanted to go on tour with Jackson and said that the alleged molestation did not affect him. In the interview Dr. Gardner asks Jordan if he ever had any homosexual attractions or feelings, but the boy firmly states he is only interested in girls and he does not seem to be confused about his sexuality. When asked by Dr. Gardner if he had a girlfriend, he is described as smiling and answers that he was “in the process of chasing after one” [4]. In All That Glitters it is even stated that Jordan at the time only cared about his girlfriend and that he seemed to be “the least affected” by the whole case. Ray Chandler quoted his brother, Evan telling his ex-wife, June:
“Jordie’s into his girlfriend. That’s all he cares about. I don’t even think about it day to day because it’s so speculative, you know, the news and their comments. I’m only interested in the facts and what actually happens. Quite frankly, I’m beginning to think that Jordie will be the least affected by all this. He seems very strong. He’ll be very scared if it goes to court, but that’s probably the main emotion he’ll feel.” [9; page 198-199]
Another part of the book talks about Jordan “running and laughing” and dating in October, 1993 – seemingly unaffected (and also unbothered by Michael Jackson fans or anyone), only a couple of months after his alleged molestation, while the investigation was still in full gear:
“By mid-October the Chandler’s could be reasonably assured of walking out of their front door without having a camera staring them in the face. Which meant that Jordie was able to play in the front yard or across the street at a friend’s house. To look at him, he seemed without a care, running and laughing like any other kid. But to those who knew him well, there was much inner conflict.
In Jordie’s small circle of friends there were boys and girls, but as of yet, la difference seemed to be of no interest to him. Then one day his friend’s eleven-year-old cousin came to play — a dark, slim beauty with big brown eyes. Jordie was smitten. And apparently the feeling was mutual. She returned the next day, and then the next, and soon they were spending much of their days together.
“He would do stuff,” Evan explained. “Like throw a stick to show her how macho he was. And then she’d remark how far he’d thrown it and act impressed. Sometimes they’d go off on their own, just a few houses away, and sit on the lawn and talk. The other kids would giggle and make fun of them. What a relief!”
“What do you think of her?” Evan asked his son, after watching the relationship blossom for several weeks. “I want to kiss her,” Jordie replied. But we might get in trouble with her mother. She’s too young.” And he was right. Not too young to kiss, perhaps, but too young to establish a more intimate bond — which I’m sure is what he had in mind.
Being the gentleman that he is, Jordie controlled his desires and learned an important lesson, for his patience was soon rewarded. A day or so later a new, older girl appeared on the block. “Hey, Pops,” Jordie exclaimed, “look at her, she’s beautiful!” And that she was. A sweet kid, too. They “dated” for over a year.” [9; page 188-189]
In the interview, Jordan claims he went along with the alleged sexual acts because he was overwhelmed by Jackson and he was under his spell. However, at another point in the interview he says he was not in awe of Jackson at all and that to him the star was “just like, a regular person” [4]. Dr. Gardner also asked Jordan if he had any fears. Perhaps not understanding that Dr. Gardner referred to the type of fear that is common in many children who suffered with sexual abuse, Jordan replied that he was only afraid of cross-examination.
“What about fears? Any fears of any kind?”
”No.”
“Sometimes people, after experiences of this kind, develop different kinds of fears. You have no fears?”
“Maybe of cross-examination but that’s all. I mean I have nothing to hide, it’s just the thought of it.” [4]
In the interview Dr. Garnder also asks Jordan about his relationship with his mother, June Chandler. The pyschiatrist tries to find out if Jordan feels resentment toward her for “facilitating” the alleged abuse. Jordan, however, says he does not feel resentment toward her and says his mother was under Jackson’s spell just like he was. Dr. Gardner pressed him further on the issue:
“What about trust of your mother? Do you think any trust of your mother has been affected?”
”Well, not because she, as people would say, she wanted to pimp me out. More because of maybe, I tried to tell her one time and she didn’t believe me.”
“When was that? Do you remember?”

“No.”

“How do you feel about that?”
“I feel that if there’s any remote, itty-bitty thing in your mind that your kid may be getting hurt, you should put an army together, you know, if there’s a suspicion as strong as that, that my Dad had carried out this far. She should have at least listened to what I had to say.” [4]
(Keep in mind that Jordan was still under his father’s control when this interview was conducted.) Besides the strangeness of Jordan saying that his main problem with his mother was NOT that she allegedly tried to “pimp him out” (“as people would say”), but that she would not listen to him, this is yet another contradiction in the Chandler story. Here Jordan claims he tried to tell his mother about the alleged abuse, but she did not listen. However, in Ray Chandler’s book, All That Glitters we read that Jordan was very secretive about the alleged abuse and despite of repeated questions by his father or others (like Jackson’s private investigator, Anthony Pellicano on July 9, 1993 – see earlier in this article) he would not disclose it. This conversation between the boy and his father took place at the end of May, 1993, according to the book:
“I’ll be there in a minute,” Evan said, and as Jordie turned to leave, he added, “
Hey, Jordie, are you and Michael doin’ it?”

“That’s disgusting!” Jordie reacted. “I’m not into that.”
“Just kidding.”
Evan explained it this way. “It was crude, but I was so anxious, I decided on the spur of the moment to say it because I figured it would elicit an unplanned response.”
Jordie’s repulsion brought Evan great relief.” [9; page 46]
In our article entitled How Did The Allegations of the Chandlers Emerge? you can read in detail about the Chandlers’ version of how Jordan allegedly “confessed” about the abuse: his father basically threatened and blackmailed him into it, despite of Jordan denying any wrongdoing by Jackson initially. Even according to their own story it was not a voluntary disclosure by the boy or something he was eager to do – on the contrary.
As you can read in the above referenced article, according Ray Chandler’s book on August 6, 1993 – three weeks after his alleged “confession” to his father – Jordan was still unwilling to disclose his alleged abuse to his mother. In actuality, based on the same book, on August 10 June Chandler took out the boy to lunch and told him that if he would confirm Evan’s allegations against Jackson then she would help them punish him. Yet Jordan was still not willing to tell her that Jackson had allegedly molested him. The confirmation would finally come the next morning, according to the book, when Jordan called his mother and told her about his allegations on the phone – with Evan standing next to him. June then requested to talk to the boy alone, but Evan refused to let them. Before that the book portrays the boy as being firmly against telling it to his mother and it also claims that he did not want his father to tell it to her either.
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

So Jordan's mother wanted to speak to him on her own but Evan wouldn't allow it. Interesting huh? Gee, I wonder why that was... *cough*
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

So Jordan's mother wanted to speak to him on her own but Evan wouldn't allow it. Interesting huh? Gee, I wonder why that was... *cough*

Yep.

Not to excuse June in any way because she too knowingly went along with a lie and eventually chose money over integrity. But on the other hand she too was put between a rock and a hard place by Evan as soon as Evan managed to get Jordan say what he wanted him to say. I don't think June ever believed the allegations. She knew her ex-husband well. And remember when Dave Schwartz told Evan in a meeting in September, 1993 that "it's all about extortion anyway". Both Schwartz and June knew it was BS and Evan brainwashed Jordan into supporting him in these lies. But as soon as Jordan said what Evan told him to say, June had two choices: 1) staying on MJ's side and be accused together with him - and potrayed and attacked in the media as a horrible, horrible mother who is so star struck that she would rather believe MJ than her own son, 2) or go along with Evan's plot and she gets spared and even gets some money.
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

When she testified she made Evan or tried to not an important figure. She was on the one who took Jordan to the cops she was the who said it was strange Michael would not let her have her son back. Michael made her sign papers that Evan made her sign, Michael for forced his lawyers on her when in reality she asked him for help. I was so infuriated reading her testimony, I could not believe people could lie that much.
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

When she testified she made Evan or tried to not an important figure. She was on the one who took Jordan to the cops she was the who said it was strange Michael would not let her have her son back. Michael made her sign papers that Evan made her sign, Michael for forced his lawyers on her when in reality she asked him for help. I was so infuriated reading her testimony, I could not believe people could lie that much.

Yes, she did her bit during her testimony - embellishing and twisting and "not remembering". She's not innocent by any means and I did state I'm not excusing her.

She was on the one who took Jordan to the cops

During the whole of the allegations Jordan was under Evan's care. He took him on July 11 and never returned him to June after that. Evan was the one who took Jordan to Mathis Abrams who in turn reported the allegations to the police.
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

Oh I know but according to get she took him to the cops, not only that she took him in September 93. Well after the story had broken. I remember thinking to myself I wonder what Michael is thinking sitting there
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

I remember thinking to myself I wonder what Michael is thinking sitting there

Yes, and I thought about the same regarding Robson's allegation. Of course, it would crush him if he had to witness yet another betrayal of this scale. (Not that I think any of this would happen if he was still alive. Robson and Safechuck are too cowardly for that IMO.) And in a way it's good he is not here to witness it. However, on the other hand it makes me angry that he died thinking these people were his friends. In a way I think he would have the right to know what kind of people he mentored, helped and befriended and to know their true colors. If that makes any sense.
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

June's selective memory always amazes me. She can't remember meeting lawyers, can't remember documents she signed, gets the date of father's day wrong by months...but can remember what gifts Michael gave her, who owned the private jet they flew out of Vegas on, how much the gift certificate he gave her was etc...
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

Those who have read the book where Ms.Geraldine talk about the 1993 case was it true in the book that this doctor never saw Jorge the first time and he wrote this false report that Jorge was sexual abuse by Michael. The report had to come from a third party so this was the doctor. What my question is why Michael lawyers would not aware that this was a false report in the first place? and if their knew this case could have stop right there because what happen next is Evan was able to take Jorge to the doctor this time so he can make this report he kept Jorge before he return him back to June so what am i miss here does it matter. It was early in the case.

Evan and his lawyer would talking about this.
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

Yes, and I thought about the same regarding Robson's allegation. Of course, it would crush him if he had to witness yet another betrayal of this scale. (Not that I think any of this would happen if he was still alive. Robson and Safechuck are too cowardly for that IMO.) And in a way it's good he is not here to witness it. However, on the other hand it makes me angry that he died thinking these people were his friends. In a way I think he would have the right to know what kind of people he mentored, helped and befriended and to know their true colors. If that makes any sense.



I was thinking the same thing and i said in my mind that i was glad that Michael was not here to see this this would hurt him he couldn't take another betrayal you are right all that he has done for Wade and his mother help them to get a green card to come to the US and this is the thanks he get and Safechuck he got a chance of a lifetime he got the chance to travel with the King Of Pop what a honor that was i bet anybody would have want to trade places with him and look at what he is doing just break my heart.

Michael had alot of love in his heart for these young men he was willing to do anything to help them so why would Michael hurt them. That why my heart hurt right now because Michael believe these were his friends i need to stop here i am about to cry my heart is just so heavy right now.:(
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

Does anyone have the contact details for the MJ estate or whoever it is that deals with web domains the estate own?

I'm not sure if anyone here is still interested in discovering who the real MJfacts is, but if so - I have just heard that mjfacts has just come into possession of a website (mjfacts . com)previously owned by the MJ estate. Though the WHOIS website does not disclose the details of the new owner due to domainsbyproxy being used, it may be quite possible from what I have read about domain purchasing to still get mjfacts details. Sometimes when purchasing a website from someone, the details of the purchaser are usually passed on to the seller. So the estate might actually have the details, such as name, email, and location of the person who purchased it.
It would be interesting to contact the estate or whoever deals with that side of things and see if they will release any information on who MJfacts really is.
 
Back
Top