Sorry I disagree. The logic is simple. After MJ died obviously there would be no more new families in his life, therefore no more "new" accusations. The only accusations that could occur after MJ died would be from previous boys that stayed at neverland, which because of the media attention, we all knew who they are. ie Barnes, Culkin, Carter, Safechuck, Spence, Cascios, robson etc,. Since the majority defended MJ at trial and in the media, it narrowed it down even more. No one saw Robsons claim coming. I believed there would be no more accusations because of the fact that these people defended MJ consistently and therefore would have to be mental to now say otherwise. Simple Logic. I also disagree with the belief that this differs from the cases in UK and catholic church. There are plenty of victims in those cases that never came forward until after the passing of their abusers. Do you honestly believe that the facts in all those cases are the same? They differ from case to case. Some victims stayed quiet, some didn't, some were hushed up, some committed suicide. Its not as black and white or as straight forward to say that you cant compare them. Again, our opinions will not influence the court of public opinion. The media will. Before Saville died, public perception was of a popular TV presenter, fondly remembered for my generations Kids programs and also his charity work. Now, public perception is of a monster. It didn't take long for it to turn. I was at the Bad tour in 88. Saw how the public recognized MJ's talent. Sure a lot believed he was weird, but even those couldn't deny the fact that he was the best entertainer on the planet and probably ever. But at the History Tour, I recognized a difference, an easing off, hard to describe but there none the less. The chandler accusations had done that. Attendances were down, the hysteria was no where near the Bad tour or Thriller era. You would be very mistaken to believe that Robsons accusations aren't potentially Legacy destroying.
