Exactly. But whatever she makes up now how does her 2005 testimony looks like now that Wade claims to have been molested? For example, in that she says she never asked Wade, not even after the Chandler allegations, she just trusted Michael and let Wade sleep in his room. Compare that to the Cascios who were asked by Oprah whether they ever asked their kids about it. And Dominic said naturally they sat down with them, talked to them and asked them after the first allegations. That's how every normal parent would react. It's not a bad thing, it's not something against Michael to ask your children in that situation. It's just what a parent has to do. So IF it goes to court it will be inevitable that Joy would be called and that her testimony from 2005 would come up. And now that Wade claims to have been molested, it would only make her look very, very bad. No matter what, there's no getting around that for them. And if she now will claim she actually did notice "signs" or suspicious things then that will only make her look even worse for not even asking Wade about it. Just turning a blind eye on those "signs"? For what? Money? Career? That's exactly the narrative the prosecution was trying to push about these parents. How happy is Joy to embrace that portrayal of a pimp now? Because that's what she will have to embrace now if they claim this.
