Not really 'friends of his' then.....
I'm really curious as to why people are so 'invested' in MJ being guilty of the Robson and Safechuck allegations. What have they got to lose in looking into the facts that show the allegations are false? If this was an argument about a well-known celeb vs MJ, I could understand it....but who cares that Robson and Safechuck are liars? I think you have to really hate MJ, if you are not even willing to look at the evidence. And why would MJ be so hated by ordinary people who never knew him? (I can understand the press /media / HBO/ Channel 4 people being annoyed, but ordinary folk have nothing to lose in this argument. ) Is everyone suddenly so stupid that they think an accuser (for money) is the same as a victim? I really understand that women get upset because of 'Me too', but I'm not sure where (except for jealousy and hate) the male anger is coming from....
(I don't recall a great outpouring of 'oh, he was guilty anyway' after the 2005 court case....)