Sound to me like these fools say this because they know it will get to you. Believe me, if Mj was alive and he would walk in the door, these would be the first fools in line to see him. heck, they will beat you to him (and you are the one who love him and been loyal). Pay them no mind.
T me, this is ok. But at least you learn better and was willing to listen and change your view.I am kind of ashamed to say this,but for a while I did not know what to believe. My mom was never a Michael Jackson fan and believed the lies (she still does even though I try and tell her the truth all the time) so when I was little and used to sing his song she would always say things like "he makes good songs but he is a sick man." So I pretty much grew up with that thought in my head.
I do remember watching Living with Michael Jackson and actually thinking that he didnt seem like someone who was sick, he seemed like someone really nice caring. I remember telling people that I didnt think he was a pedophile because he seemed way to sweet to do anything like that. But people just laughed at me so after that I kind of kept it to myself. The way the media and others talked about him it definitely made me question his innocence, but I blame the naivety on being 13 or 14 at the time. Now I am older and have actually looked into the case and realize how clear it is that he is NOT a pedophile. I feel so dumb but ever thinking otherwise and hate the fact that I wasnt there for Micahel
What proof does your brother have on Mj? See, right there shows your brother is a nut (sorry but no offense). Again, when I hear stuff like that, to me, it shows the stupidity of that person and I would break them down. Once, I break you down, I am finished with it. Like is said, often times, these kinds of people say it in order to get to you because they know you love Michael. It like the someone who want to be difficult. If you say blue, they will say it is green just because they think it will tick you off.
My case too, even in the trial times common people, i would hear what they would say if i was alone at times ( at public places
h34r when i was at one place many people would discuse the trail and i was just happy people would think it was all for the money, people would end up saying, sadly he changed his skin (WRONG!) they would end up talking about him, his life, not the allegations, but on the net and media it was a different story
The thing is Michael had to go on with his life, that whole lie was already a BIG scandal and it was not good for him (his body) nor his image, he had a tour, he had the musical life, and he did RIGHT, that was a lie, and Chandler was a super smart man, he woulndt stop with his lie until he got what he wanted which was MONEY, i dont know what part of this statement the "hater" doent understand ( i think that person you are arguing is on COMPLETE DENIAL...), Michael settled, he had to go on, and it was all done this way, he settled, Michael realize this man Evan Chandler wouldnt back off with his lie, with his plan, i mean Evan did everything with a purpose he would not back off, that man was just a great opportunist and as if that was not enough he was smart as hell, and he did what he needed to do, he had his beloved MONEY, ( and to be real Michael could have all this hidden if he (Michael) would have agreed EARLIER TO THAT SETTLEMENT, but as we all know, Michaal was stubborn and he at first DIDNT wanted to pay, but of course he did then) it was not that much money i you realize you are talking Michael Jackson in 1993..., but an insurance company paid that anyway... and it was that or a trial which would have done what it did to him in 2004, Michael would have died in the 1990... im sure, he was too sensitive, he would have ended bad earlier... we wouldnt have HIStory or Blood On The Dancefloor or Invincible.
MJ did stop with the sleepovers after 1993. There is no one after the '93 allegations that claim they slept in his bed with him. According to Frank Cascio, he made sure he was never in the room alone with any of the Arvizo children. The Arvizos say the same thing in the DCFS memo.I agree, he could have and should have and I think the reason why he didn't was his stubbornness. He wanted to show they can't tell him what to do, what not to do and if people think it's sexual it's their dirty minds. But he lost this game, he should have been less stubborn and see why he exposes himself to unneccesary attacks that way.
EXACTLY, they could have done the criminal trial BUT THEY DIDNT, so they just got what they wanted in an easier way. F*ck them! they are and will always be leeches liars, and that would never change.
That is a lame arguement from idoits like that. If your child was really abuse, you will fight to end. And what was worst, His daddy tried to sue MJ again and lost in 1998. See he did not mind going to court for money but not for criminal. That is what is telling more than anything and anyone who can not see that is a fool.
I think the way he is celebrated that most people do not believe he abused no child (even before death MJ was back popular). I think sometimes we let the media take a FEW idoits and make you think everyone is doing it. Even on the internet, often time it is the same people on board talking mess (and some are the same people who change their font).
