"Breaking News" All General Discussion Here [Merged]

[defdave]

Re: Do You Think "Breaking News" + other Cascio songs will be left out of MICHAEL due to controversy

they better! i already cancelled all 5 of my preorders until i hear that entire album in FULL!

God bless you, man. Thank you.

I hope they'll come up with some evidence that it is MJ singing the songs instead of removing them from the album...

They won't because they're not. Sorry. I'm not trying to be mean here George. I too would love to believe the vocals are completely authentic but they aren't.

 

[Lorraine]

Re: "Breaking News" All Discussion Here [Merged]

Guys, I know this is a very hard time for us all right now.
But please, Attacking one another is not going to help things.

 

[mjjesamor]

Re: "Breaking News" All Discussion Here [Merged]

I agree phereinice. It's just dishonest.

 

[deano]

Re: "Breaking News" All Discussion Here [Merged]

Let me see if I understand the 'Boycott Michael Brigade!" (from here on in to be known as 'BMB's;

If the album is released and it has ANY tracks that YOU CONSIDER are not 100% Michael Jackson vocals, you will boycott the album - and encourage all others to do so?

In that case the album could be 75%, 80%, 90% Michaels own; vision, creation, inspiration, craft, and art, but the 'BMB's will still throw all of Michael's hard work away for their own principles, and two or three tracks the MIGHT not have 100% MJ vocals on?

Is this what the 'BMB's are telling us we should do?

I'm not prepared to discount an album with Michael's name on the cover, and help make it a flop, just because a gang of bullies want me to - due to their own unproven alllegations and agendas.#

I did not let them bully me out of watching 'TII'.
I did not let them bully me out of getting the 'TII' album.
I won't let them dictate to me this time.

Even if this album flops, and Michael is ridiculed for it in the press across the world - which he will be - I will be able to look in the mirror and know I wasn't part of it.

WILL YOU?

 

[MoonWalkinYiddo]

Re: "Breaking News" All Discussion Here [Merged]

Thing is, NOONE will ever know if it really is MJ or not unless there is proof that comes out proving or disproving. So noone can claim to know either way

 

[OnirMJ]

Re: "Breaking News" All Discussion Here [Merged]

''This was a guide demo, supplemented by the supporting vocals of James Porte (for which he is credited).''

http://mjstar.co.uk/?p=3760

If it is guide demo then should not be on the album, there are better songs than this "Cascio tracks"

 

[Misayko]

Re: "Breaking News" All Discussion Here [Merged]

Let me see if I understand the 'Boycott Michael Brigade!" (from here on in to be known as 'BMB's;

If the album is released and it has ANY tracks that YOU CONSIDER are not 100% Michael Jackson vocals, you will boycott the album - and encourage all others to do so?

In that case the album could be 75%, 80%, 90% Michaels own; vision, creation, inspiration, craft, and art, but the 'BMB's will still throw all of Michael's hard work away for their own principles, and two or three tracks the MIGHT not have 100% MJ vocals on?

Is this what the 'BMB's are telling us we should do?

I'm not prepared to discount an album with Michael's name on the cover, and help make it a flop, just because a gang of bullies want me to - due to their own unproven alllegations and agendas.#

I did not let them bully me out of watching 'TII'.
I did not let them bully me out of getting the 'TII' album.
I won't let them dictate to me this time.

Even if this album flops, and Michael is ridiculed for it in the press across the world - which he will be - I will be able to look in the mirror and know I wasn't part of it.

WILL YOU?

why has this thank you button gone?

 

[SIDEWALK]

Re: "Breaking News" All Discussion Here [Merged]

Let me see if I understand the 'Boycott Michael Brigade!" (from here on in to be known as 'BMB's;

If the album is released and it has ANY tracks that YOU CONSIDER are not 100% Michael Jackson vocals, you will boycott the album - and encourage all others to do so?

In that case the album could be 75%, 80%, 90% Michaels own; vision, creation, inspiration, craft, and art, but the 'BMB's will still throw all of Michael's hard work away for their own principles, and two or three tracks the MIGHT not have 100% MJ vocals on?

Is this what the 'BMB's are telling us we should do?

I'm not prepared to discount an album with Michael's name on the cover, and help make it a flop, just because a gang of bullies want me to - due to their own unproven alllegations and agendas.#

I did not let them bully me out of watching 'TII'.
I did not let them bully me out of getting the 'TII' album.
I won't let them dictate to me this time.

Even if this album flops, and Michael is ridiculed for it in the press across the world - which he will be - I will be able to look in the mirror and know I wasn't part of it.

WILL YOU?

i've only see 4 or 5 people out how many thousand on this site say they may/or won't be buying this album. so stop being such a drama queen with this Boycott Michael Brigade! nosense, its so very childish.

 

[bluemoonchild]

Re: "Breaking News" All Discussion Here [Merged]

Well, i must add something -- after listening to the song again and again, and after listening to the artist who tries to sing like Michael -- i believe that Michael has sung 50 Percent or so of the song. But still I like it.

But there is one thing that I am really worried about:

Do this: take this song and play it in your list of MJ songs.

and then you can might feel, just like me -- worries expressed by some, of a "flopping Michael-Album" are justified.

take care,
Betty

P.S. and i will buy the album btw ;-)

 

[bowen9999]

I'm seriously thinking about sending this out....

To Sony, the Michael Jackson Estate and the Jackson family

I sit here with a broken heart. My hero, Michael Jackson, spent half of his short life being ridiculed and abused by the media; he went through 2 trials for crimes he didn’t commit and finally he died at the hands of another. Is it not enough that the fans have gone through all of this with our hero, been emotionally drained time & time again and grieved for someone we could never say goodbye too? Now, when we finally get some good news about some new, never before heard music, it is shrouded in controversy. Fans are already cancelling their pre-orders and vowing not to buy the album. They are confused, angry and sad.

The track Breaking News (and other Cascio tracks) are clearly causing division between the family, the Estate, Sony and the fans – did Michael sing these songs or didn’t he? The answer, quite frankly, is irrelevant. The tracks should be omitted from this album regardless of whether or not they are authentic so the drama can cease. I am begging you to stop this from going any further. Michael reportedly left 100’s of songs for you to pick from… choose 3 others. It’s quite simple. Check the fan forums to see what they want. They’re the people that will (or won’t) be buying the music. Please, please, think about what you’re doing and reconsider.

The fans do not deserve this after all they’ve been through.


I honestly feel completely worn out & heart broken right now.

 

[OnirMJ]

Re: "Breaking News" All Discussion Here [Merged]

Let me see if I understand the 'Boycott Michael Brigade!" (from here on in to be known as 'BMB's;

If the album is released and it has ANY tracks that YOU CONSIDER are not 100% Michael Jackson vocals, you will boycott the album - and encourage all others to do so?

In that case the album could be 75%, 80%, 90% Michaels own; vision, creation, inspiration, craft, and art, but the 'BMB's will still throw all of Michael's hard work away for their own principles, and two or three tracks the MIGHT not have 100% MJ vocals on?

Is this what the 'BMB's are telling us we should do?

I'm not prepared to discount an album with Michael's name on the cover, and help make it a flop, just because a gang of bullies want me to - due to their own unproven alllegations and agendas.#

I did not let them bully me out of watching 'TII'.
I did not let them bully me out of getting the 'TII' album.
I won't let them dictate to me this time.

Even if this album flops, and Michael is ridiculed for it in the press across the world - which he will be - I will be able to look in the mirror and know I wasn't part of it.

WILL YOU?

You still don't get it. On Hold My Hand it is less than 50% Michael but it is Michael Jackson song. These Cascio tracks are fakes and they won't admit it. We are fighting just against these 4 songs. And I am definitively for boycott if these songs are on the album.

 

[Superstition]

Re: "Breaking News" All Discussion Here [Merged]

Let me see if I understand the 'Boycott Michael Brigade!" (from here on in to be known as 'BMB's;

If the album is released and it has ANY tracks that YOU CONSIDER are not 100% Michael Jackson vocals, you will boycott the album - and encourage all others to do so?

In that case the album could be 75%, 80%, 90% Michaels own; vision, creation, inspiration, craft, and art, but the 'BMB's will still throw all of Michael's hard work away for their own principles, and two or three tracks the MIGHT not have 100% MJ vocals on?

Is this what the 'BMB's are telling us we should do?

I'm not prepared to discount an album with Michael's name on the cover, and help make it a flop, just because a gang of bullies want me to - due to their own unproven alllegations and agendas.#

I did not let them bully me out of watching 'TII'.
I did not let them bully me out of getting the 'TII' album.
I won't let them dictate to me this time.

Even if this album flops, and Michael is ridiculed for it in the press across the world - which he will be - I will be able to look in the mirror and know I wasn't part of it.

WILL YOU?

Nope. I'll do it on my own free will. I watched This Is It. I thought the rumors were garbage. I bought the album, I thought "This Is It" was a fine track, albeit a bit poorly promoted.

But if these Cascio tracks are on the album, I'll buy the other tracks through iTunes or Amazon and let those who enjoy the others buy the album. Not everyone is into conspiracies and all that. I don't like Breaking News, and Monster sounds terrible to me. Mike or not - I'm not buying an album with those tracks on them.

 

[barok232]

Re: "Breaking News" All Discussion Here [Merged]

Let me see if I understand the 'Boycott Michael Brigade!" (from here on in to be known as 'BMB's;

If the album is released and it has ANY tracks that YOU CONSIDER are not 100% Michael Jackson vocals, you will boycott the album - and encourage all others to do so?

In that case the album could be 75%, 80%, 90% Michaels own; vision, creation, inspiration, craft, and art, but the 'BMB's will still throw all of Michael's hard work away for their own principles, and two or three tracks the MIGHT not have 100% MJ vocals on?

Is this what the 'BMB's are telling us we should do?

I'm not prepared to discount an album with Michael's name on the cover, and help make it a flop, just because a gang of bullies want me to - due to their own unproven alllegations and agendas.#

I did not let them bully me out of watching 'TII'.
I did not let them bully me out of getting the 'TII' album.
I won't let them dictate to me this time.

Even if this album flops, and Michael is ridiculed for it in the press across the world - which he will be - I will be able to look in the mirror and know I wasn't part of it.

WILL YOU?

You have a thing with percentages so I will put it this way:

Unless it is a duet, I do not want anyone else singing the lead vocals but Michael, even if it is 99% him and 1% someone else. Do you understand?

I have followed your posts and I am especially annoyed by you because of this:

Others believe it is Michael 100% and of course it is their opinion. YOU are convinced it is Michael the most (you think) plus someone else and YOU ARE OK WITH IT!!!!

 

[Kikuchiyo]

Re: "Breaking News" All Discussion Here [Merged]

I read MJJCOMMUNITY for years but as a member I am new here. Anyway, I am very sad because there are so much argumentum ad hominem attacks regarding "Breaking News" song here.
Also, I think that is not fair that some older forum members belittle new ones or members with small amonut of posts only because some of us have different opinion regarding BN song. I'll repeat what I wrote in other topic... The sound of each individual's voice is completely unique just like fingeprints. Hearing is very subjective but with objective, scientific procedure forensic musicologist can prove that certain voice is product of certain person.

In Breaking News I hear Michael Jackson's voice. Yes, Michael's vocal is very processed but IMO it's him. As I said hearing is very subjective but according to many reliable sources expert performed waveform analysis and found that vocals were the voice of Michael Jackson.

 

[Laura_Jo]

Re: "Breaking News" All Discussion Here [Merged]

Let me see if I understand the 'Boycott Michael Brigade!" (from here on in to be known as 'BMB's;

If the album is released and it has ANY tracks that YOU CONSIDER are not 100% Michael Jackson vocals, you will boycott the album - and encourage all others to do so?

In that case the album could be 75%, 80%, 90% Michaels own; vision, creation, inspiration, craft, and art, but the 'BMB's will still throw all of Michael's hard work away for their own principles, and two or three tracks the MIGHT not have 100% MJ vocals on?

Is this what the 'BMB's are telling us we should do?

I'm not prepared to discount an album with Michael's name on the cover, and help make it a flop, just because a gang of bullies want me to - due to their own unproven alllegations and agendas.#

I did not let them bully me out of watching 'TII'.
I did not let them bully me out of getting the 'TII' album.
I won't let them dictate to me this time.

Even if this album flops, and Michael is ridiculed for it in the press across the world - which he will be - I will be able to look in the mirror and know I wasn't part of it.

WILL YOU?

An artist can't be ridiculed for the failure of an album he had nothing to do with. You are confusing the issue.

Sony is counting on fans like you who'll buy the album 'under any circumstances'. You do whatever you need to do, just let us deal with the real issue at hand - namely verifying the legitimacy of suspected album tracks and protesting if they are fakes. You don't have to concern yourself with it if you don't believe in it.

 

[deano]

Re: "Breaking News" All Discussion Here [Merged]

Me too. Some people are completely missing the point. They're worried about this album flopping - history is going to see this album viewed as a JOKE - they should be worrying about that! I can already see the Wiki entry...

''Michael' - released in 2010, the year after Michael Jackson's death. Subsequently panned due to the inclusion of sub-par material later proven to be sung by an impostor.'

But yeah, let's all just be quiet and let the record company release it anyway - at least then we will have new (fake) songs to listen to on our shiny new ipods that our mummies and daddies get us for Christmas! :doh:

Why would the rest of the world think the album is a joke? The only ones trying to make a joke of it are the 'fans' as far as I can see. So this is your alternative history is it?;



"Michael' - the much anticipated album that became one of the biggest flops in history, leading to Sony ditching any other attempts at releasing new songs from Michael Jackson (who was a big star in the 1980's).

Rumours at the time of release, still unproven, were that the album was only 90% Michael jackson vocals - hardly surprising since the ex-superstar died 18 months before the album's release - and this led to his own fans boycotting the album and holding "Sony is the Devil" gatherings at various locations across the world for the next 25 years"

Some music experts, at the time and since, have stated that they thought many of the tracks were Michael's best work in over a decade. Unfortunately this did not stiop the tracks from falling into obscurity, due to the massive negative campaigns waged by the 'fans. (did we mention that Michael Jackson was big in the 1980's?)'"



If that's your idea of a "history" for Michael and his album - I want no part of it thanks!

 

[Tom]

Re: "Breaking News" All Discussion Here [Merged]

Let me see if I understand the 'Boycott Michael Brigade!" (from here on in to be known as 'BMB's;

If the album is released and it has ANY tracks that YOU CONSIDER are not 100% Michael Jackson vocals, you will boycott the album - and encourage all others to do so?

In that case the album could be 75%, 80%, 90% Michaels own; vision, creation, inspiration, craft, and art, but the 'BMB's will still throw all of Michael's hard work away for their own principles, and two or three tracks the MIGHT not have 100% MJ vocals on?

Is this what the 'BMB's are telling us we should do?

I'm not prepared to discount an album with Michael's name on the cover, and help make it a flop, just because a gang of bullies want me to - due to their own unproven alllegations and agendas.#

I did not let them bully me out of watching 'TII'.
I did not let them bully me out of getting the 'TII' album.
I won't let them dictate to me this time.

Even if this album flops, and Michael is ridiculed for it in the press across the world - which he will be - I will be able to look in the mirror and know I wasn't part of it.

WILL YOU?

Do you still think Breaking News is Michael? :smilerolleyes:

 

[GeorgeDK]

Re: Do You Think "Breaking News" + other Cascio songs will be left out of MICHAEL due to controversy

They won't because they're not. Sorry. I'm not trying to be mean here George. I too would love to believe the vocals are completely authentic but they aren't.

Well I'm personally sure that the vocals are at least partly MJ, and do we have any clue how the songs are going to be presented on the album?? not impossible that some songs will be MJ featuring ???

 

[aprilshack]

Re: "Breaking News" All Discussion Here [Merged]

I think a few people need to chill out.Day 3 & still the arguing continues. At the end of the day there is no conclusive proof either way. I suggest to keep an open mind.Everyone is entitled to an opinion but I find some members are being argumentitive, aggressive & trying to force their opinions on others.

If people can't respect each other & the tone continues, I hope this thread is locked for a day or two. This board is being ripped apart at the moment & that is even more upsetting than what is going on with the music.

Let's see what the estate has to say (if there is an announcement) & anything else the family & Sony say before things get worse around here.

I understand we are fighting for the same cause here, the truth, but at the cost of destroying ourselves?

 

[Laura_Jo]

Re: "Breaking News" All Discussion Here [Merged]

Why would the rest of the world think the album is a joke? The only ones trying to make a joke of it are the 'fans' as far as I can see. So this is your alternative history is it?;



"Michael' - the much anticipated album that became one of the biggest flops in history, leading to Sony ditching any other attempts at releasing new songs from Michael Jackson (who was a big star in the 1980's).

Rumours at the time of release, still unproven, were that the album was only 90% Michael jackson vocals - hardly surprising since the ex-superstar died 18 months before the album's release - and this led to his own fans boycotting the album and holding "Sony is the Devil" gatherings at various locations across the world for the next 25 years"

Some music experts, at the time and since, have stated that they thought many of the tracks were Michael's best work in over a decade. Unfortunately this did not stiop the tracks from falling into obscurity, due to the massive negative campaigns waged by the 'fans. (did we mention that Michael Jackson was big in the 1980's?)'"



If that's your idea of a "history" for Michael and his album - I want no part of it thanks!

I find your thinking simplistic and childish. If you think that the record company will stop releasing MJ albums on the basis of this album's reception then you need not worry. They will drain every less syllable he recorded (and add plenty that he didn't!)

You really need to consider the concept of 'quality over quantity'. We all want to hear all of Michael's stuff. However, if we don't make a stand over the standards that we expect - ie MICHAEL SINGING LEAD VOCALS rather than an impostor then the quality of what we receive will be poor from the start and go down from there.

 

[Misayko]

Re: "Breaking News" All Discussion Here [Merged]

do i understand you right that you wont buy the album if the tracks wont be removed? i dont think this is a good idea

and has there been an official statement that its not MJ on BN?
just asking. i personally dont like the song anyway..

 

[deano]

Re: "Breaking News" All Discussion Here [Merged]

You have a thing with percentages so I will put it this way:

Unless it is a duet, I do not want anyone else singing the lead vocals but Michael, even if it is 99% him and 1% someone else. Do you understand?

I have followed your posts and I am especially annoyed by you because of this:

Others believe it is Michael 100% and of course it is their opinion. YOU are convinced it is Michael the most (you think) plus someone else and YOU ARE OK WITH IT!!!!

As you well know, Michael is dead. There will never be another Michael jackson release - that people have not already heard & stolen from the web 9well done you lot by the way! - that will contain 100% Michael Jackson vocals. He's not bloody well here to finish them!

Is this what people want?

No future Michael Jackson singles - even if he wrote them, demo recorded them, sang 50% vocals on them, and Sony managed to give us a great finished product - as they are not 100% Michael? Not even 99%!!??

But we can have half finished demo tracks - like some of those given to us as 'out-takes' on recent albums - where Michael sings only some of the vocals, mumbling half way through, because he didn't even finish them?

Oh yes. An album like that, 100% Michael but with demo tracks only 40% finshed, is going to sell like 'hot-cakes on a cold day' isn't it!? The public would piss them selves laughing, but a few thousand 'hard-core' MJ 'fans' would be happy!

90% of the people who would have bought this album would not have cared thet the songs were 'finished' by Sony. As long as they could hear and 'feel' Michael Jackson in them, and they were good/great songs, they would have bought it in the millions.

Some of you don't want 99% MJ though do you? So you start your stupid campaigns and try and ruin the event for everybody.

If you don't agree with it, don't buy it. But why all the effort to get other people to join your cause? Is there something much deeper than you are telling us? Some over-riding hatred bubbling up in you that you can not control? Or are you all just control freeks, who have to have everybody following what you do?

 

[That Other Fan]

Re: "Breaking News" All Discussion Here [Merged]

Let me see if I understand the 'Boycott Michael Brigade!" (from here on in to be known as 'BMB's;

If the album is released and it has ANY tracks that YOU CONSIDER are not 100% Michael Jackson vocals, you will boycott the album - and encourage all others to do so?

In that case the album could be 75%, 80%, 90% Michaels own; vision, creation, inspiration, craft, and art, but the 'BMB's will still throw all of Michael's hard work away for their own principles, and two or three tracks the MIGHT not have 100% MJ vocals on?

Is this what the 'BMB's are telling us we should do?

I'm not prepared to discount an album with Michael's name on the cover, and help make it a flop, just because a gang of bullies want me to - due to their own unproven alllegations and agendas.#

I did not let them bully me out of watching 'TII'.
I did not let them bully me out of getting the 'TII' album.
I won't let them dictate to me this time.

Even if this album flops, and Michael is ridiculed for it in the press across the world - which he will be - I will be able to look in the mirror and know I wasn't part of it.

WILL YOU?

Do you even understand what the issue is?

The issue is LEAD VOCALS...

The lead vocal is the track in which you will find the artist singing solo. Now that lead vocal track might be comprised of many different takes, but in the end it should be a solo vocal...

There is no excuse for this vocal not to be 100% Michael.

Background vocals, harmonies, etc...are totally different subject. Michael usually recorded and stacked his own harmonies and background vocals, but he did use other singers for these purposes.

Unless the track is a duet, the LEAD VOCAL should always be 100% Michael. If it isn't, that means you listening to someone INTENTIONALLY imitate Michael's voice...to make you think he's singing that particular line in the song.

I will not support a project that features someone else imitating Mike's voice (again on the LEAD VOCAL)...and neither should you. That is deception. That is greed.

Michael's legacy is important to us all...and it should not entangled with greed of others to make money off of Michael's name at any cost (which in this case, is presenting fans with tracks with LEAD VOCALS that don't belong to Michael Jackson)

 

[OnirMJ]

Re: "Breaking News" All Discussion Here [Merged]

do i understand you right that you wont buy the album if the tracks wont be removed? i dont think this is a good idea

and has there been an official statement that its not MJ on BN?
just asking. i personally dont like the song anyway..

Yes, I will not buy the album if fake Cascio tracks are on the album. I have in my collection around 50 Michael Jackson/The Jackson 5/The Jacksons releases (studio albums, compilations, singles, dvds). So it is not about 10$ for me, it is about moral. They are lying to us and they are destroying Michael's Legacy. I don't need Bobby Ewing or Jason Malachi in my collection.

There has not been any official statement but I have ears and I am not deaf. I liesten his voice every day for last 15 years and I know how he sounds.

 

[Tom]

Re: "Breaking News" All Discussion Here [Merged]

As you well know, Michael is dead. There will never be another Michael jackson release - that people have not already heard & stolen from the web 9well done you lot by the way! - that will contain 100% Michael Jackson vocals. He's not bloody well here to finish them!

Is this what people want?

No future Michael Jackson singles - even if he wrote them, demo recorded them, sang 50% vocals on them, and Sony managed to give us a great finished product - as they are not 100% Michael? Not even 99%!!??

But we can have half finished demo tracks - like some of those given to us as 'out-takes' on recent albums - where Michael sings only some of the vocals, mumbling half way through, because he didn't even finish them?

Oh yes. An album like that, 100% Michael but with demo tracks only 40% finshed, is going to sell like 'hot-cakes on a cold day' isn't it!? The public would piss them selves laughing, but a few thousand 'hard-core' MJ 'fans' would be happy!

90% of the people who would have bought this album would not have cared thet the songs were 'finished' by Sony. As long as they could hear and 'feel' Michael Jackson in them, and they were good/great songs, they would have bought it in the millions.

Some of you don't want 99% MJ though do you? So you start your stupid campaigns and try and ruin the event for everybody.

If you don't agree with it, don't buy it. But why all the effort to get other people to join your cause? Is there something much deeper than you are telling us? Some over-riding hatred bubbling up in you that you can not control? Or are you all just control freeks, who have to have everybody following what you do?

Breaking News isn't a "great finished product". It's poorly written and overproduced. To the fans, a song that's 50% Michael isn't Michael. If he wrote a song, and did nothing else, I wouldn't say the song was by Michael. Even if he did write Breaking News, he most likely performed very little of it. I can't class that as a Michael Jackson song.

Yes. At least we then know that Sony or anyone else has done anything to them. Breaking News, Michael or not is a prime example of how an original piece has had the majority of it's features edited or completely remade.

That's the problem. Not many people would buy a new Michael Jackson album without hearing plenty of his classics. In that way, it makes everybody equal when it comes to him - once you feel Michael in his songs, you KNOW it's him. He's that distinct. Fans and non-fans will be able to tell when it is and isn't him, just by listening to his other works.

These things aren't campaigns, and they aren't stupid. As a fan, you naturally want as close to the original as you can. When Sony have plenty of REAL Michael to release (which they do), we question why they threw together Breaking News. Fans of his music want him. And personally, if they HAD to do something like Breaking News, I'd like to be told that it isn't Michael from the start rather than have something like this happen. Sony or whoever lied by claiming it's Michael when from listening you can easily tell it isn't. Who wants that? It's like if I went to see a new Robert DeNiro film and they used a different actor - still crediting him as DeNiro. Who wants that?

 

[LoveMJackson]

Re: "Breaking News" All Discussion Here [Merged]

still no official statement? I'm sick and tired of this s***.
Michael is being treated the same as he was alive, maybe worse..this is just disgusting. At the moment I don't know if I'm going to buy the album, I already canceled the pre-order. They have to remove the fake tracks..its really a disgrace! I cant do this to Michael, I'll not disrespect him like this by buying album with fake tracks and his name on them. Its the KING OF POP that we are talking about here. If sony is reading posts here, please remove the fake Cascio tracks!! The fans are not fools and not deaf either.

 

[DarkMJ]

Re: "Breaking News" All Discussion Here [Merged]

date of 2009? ok
Here's proof Sony & co are a liar

Compared with the song "Breaking News"

 

[ScrEAm.Jack5on]

The people who said it's not MJ voice its your word againts the word of

Teddy Rilley
Frank Dileo
Humberto Gatica
and Sony

I don´t want to sound rude, but they are the experts, not u guys

Can someone show me evidence of Frank Dileo saying this. Please. I've searched all through this thread and find nothing.

:bugeyed​

We cried? Or we laugh about this? :scratch:

Where's Kermit?

He is the best representative of this whole situation:

*big sigh*

It's funny how when I looked at Kermit before Breaking News released he looked ridiculously excited, yet now, even with the exact same clip he looks extremely confused and frustrated.

 

[BUMPER SNIPPET]

Re: "Breaking News" All Discussion Here [Merged]

I think that what DEANO does not understand is that fans are not boycotting Michael. The fans want simply to know if it is really Michael or not, because it sounds unprecedently unusual.

If they prove it is Michael then fine. Many fans say here that the song is not necessarily bad. That is not the issue. It is a good and modern song. The only issue is is it Michael? That's all we want to know, but with some objective facts. This has nothing to do with conspiracy theory, but simply with what we hear.

If Michael indeed wanted to sound unprecedently unrecognizable on purpose, then we fans are fine with it. However, just beacause Michael is not there with us any more to confirm this, it is completely legitimate for us fans to question the authencity of this unrecognizable voice to our ears.

 

[fxfan]

Re: "Breaking News" All Discussion Here [Merged]

REALLY IMPORTANT BIG NEWS

Here is the article that I mentioned before of frank Dileo

http://www.undercover.fm/news/12696-michael-jackson-breaking-news-confirmed-as-authentic

YOU really have to see this!!!!