OnOurWay
Proud Member
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2011
- Messages
- 494
- Points
- 0
Straw Man LOL wow I'll ignore the immature comment because I'm above that. Instead of calling out names why dont you try backing up your posts with facts instead of saying outlandish crap. So please explain to me how "Put a ring on it" or "Freakum Dress" any better? Its the same pathetic crap and its not even worth discussing anymore. Why dont you turn off the radio and exactly find other artists more creative artists to listen to such as Erykah Badu, Jill Scott, India Arie, Donnell Jones, etc and then your realize how dumb you were sounding. LOL Everybody knows what Beyonce does which is nothing. There was an article recently talking about how she write her name on the credits for songwriter credit when she doesnt write any of her music. Because she doesnt. She doesnt have any creative input. She is just a commercial puppet who dances around half naked and sings pop tunes. She is overrated and you agreed. So why are u still trying to debate something we agree with? Regardless if you like her music or not we both agree that she is overrated because she is and thats all the original thread question was asking.
It's clear you have no clue what "Straw Man" is. SMH.
http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/straw-man.html
You just showed your true colors here. I can see you're one of those ppl who think those neo-soul artists are underrated and make "real music", as if thee is ANY CONCRETE definition as to what "real music" is. I've learned debating/discussing anything with "you people" has proven to be superfluous, so I wont indulge. I LOL @ your personal attacks calling me dumb. Don't you know that ad hominem attacks in an argument invalidate your argument? It's clear you don't know that. Poor you. And for the record, I don't listen to the radio at all, and I listen to all of the artists you mentioned. Major fail on your behalf. See what happens when you make such uniformed ASSumptions?
Why dont you SLOW down and READ my posts instead of glancing over them. For the SECOND time, I stated that the industry was DIFFERENT for Michael and for Mariah when they were in there peaks. They were up against more competive artists and awards exactly gave out awards for artists that deserved them. During the new years 00's the industry had completely changed so therefore awards and the standards are going to change. Michael was well out of his peak in the new milenimum so I dont know what was the point in bringing him up. She has more grammys because she is popular and the Grammys standards have dropped to the point where they give out awards. Record labels now nominate albums by certain artists. Its not something "earned" The Grammys use to be a award show that was voted by the artists peers but who knows how its done foreal in todays industry. I know for one thing however, its not fair and its full of politics.
And you don't think there's competition now? As if Maxwell, Taylor Swift, Gaga, Kings of Leon, etc didn't have good material nominated. You sound so ignorant it's beyond laughable, and quite disturbing. Again, if the Grammys are based on popularity, why didn't Mike win any music Grammys for Bad or Dangerous? Janet was the biggest artist of 1990. She only won 1 Grammy for Rhythm Nation. The same can be said for Madonna during her Ray of Light days. Again, I predict you'll answer this question irrelevantly as you've done with others.
You saying that Michael, Aretha and Marvin opening the doors for Beyonce to win 6 grammys is ridiculous because they were legends that changed music and her winning has nothing to do with that because she did not earn her awards like they did. They worked hard for there success. She didnt have to because the industry is different. They give out awards.
I see the point sailed clear over your head. Those artists broke barriers so that artists of today, that are mainly Black, can get on the Grammy stage and sweep the awards....hence making it easier for them to get recognized for their work.
Nothing playing on the radio is original. But if you turn off the radio you will find alot of artists that are original some artists that I mentioned already. Hollywood is never going to give its due to the real artists. Only the commercial artists.
Oh girl you are just so lost it's becoming disgusting. Hollywood is never going to give due to the real artists...only commercial artists? It's these kinds of statements that cause insanity. You mean to tell me Madonna, Mike, Janet, Stevie Wonder, Alanis Morrisette, Christina Aguilera, and others aren't REAL artists? :mello: No offense, but you SOUND really stupid right now.
Laurn Hills album is classic COMPARED to Beyonces trash. Its been over a decade since it was released. Her album still inspires alot of hip hop artists and has impacted that genre. She won 5 grammys and she exactly deserved them. WHY DONT YOU LISTEN TO THE ALBUM FOR YOURSELF. Listen to the LYRICS. Look at the song writing credits you will see she wrote the songs herself. She plays an instrument and she produced her music. Beyonce hasnt realeased any classic material. ALL her music garbage.
You keep contradicting yourself and its really not worth discussing with you anymore.
I don't need to listen to the album toots, I HAVE IT ON CD. And I love how you ducked and dodged my point. NO ALBUM IS CONSIDERED CLASSIC THE MOMENT IT COMES OUT!.
Last edited: