All of this is hearsay at best. There is no proof that Jennifer ever called Mj guilty. She has only ever done the exact opposite in public. Anything she may or may not have said to a fan is irrelevent. It could have been taken out of context or misheard. This lynching of anyone who may have once possibly said something negative is getting disturbing.
Now can we move back on to talking about the dvd?
All of this is hearsay at best. There is no proof that Jennifer ever called Mj guilty. She has only ever done the exact opposite in public. Anything she may or may not have said to a fan is irrelevent. It could have been taken out of context or misheard. This lynching of anyone who may have once possibly said something negative is getting disturbing.
Now can we move back on to talking about the dvd?
I have a feeling that what band member saw as "fantastic quality" might come out "not-so-fantastic" for some people who are not ready to set for anything less when HQ. I am going to take it for what it is - the show I have wanted to see for years finally being released. Cannot wait.
This. And this again. If somebody can explain me why we discuss on the several pages in Bad25 DVD quality tread some staff that Jennifer supposedly said at some workshop (no link, no video, no audio, no PROOF whatsoever), I would be forever grateful.
Back to the topic - I have a feeling that what band member saw as "fantastic quality" might come out "not-so-fantastic" for some people who are not ready to set for anything less when HQ. I am going to take it for what it is - the show I have wanted to see for years finally being released. Cannot wait.
It is just pathetic that people her won't believe their fellow members on this board. I'm just saying it is the way it is. That workshop was for members only, photos, videos, etc. were not allowed. Simple as that.
What would I gain if I lied? Think it through please.
Damn.
I will answer that given you quoted me. I personally neither believe nor disbelieve you. I don't take hearsay into consideration on principle. Hearsay is not a lie and is not a negative term per se. Hearsay simply means "unverified information heard or received from another". Your story cannot be verified. It, frankly, contradicts staff that Jennifer says on record (e.g. in interviews). That said, I don't imply that you are lying. But you story simply cannot be verified by somebody else, thus it is a hearsay.
If other people on this forum take your story as truth, it is their absolute right. It disregard it because (a) it is not confirmed and (b) it is totally off-topic.
Can we drop the conversation, please? I won't reply again because the topic is derailed enough as is it, you can have the last word if you wish.
yes let's watch this - http://www.t3licensing.com/video/clip/2B1101BEE_s01.do
yes let's watch this - http://www.t3licensing.com/video/clip/2B1101BEE_s01.do
Maybe I just like this way of singing. it is just different. More mature. And oh my god, he dances with so much energy.
Really would die to see the whole show.
Won't. Luckily enough this link was posted on FB by some dude lol. There ain't no more of this footage for free preview in that site.
to correct something : hearsay
hearsay is actually when the person has no direct experience and repeating something they heard.
For example if I go to another forum and write Jennifer Batten said this and that, it would be hearsay because I did not directly heard it from her.
However IMWhizzle is the person that had the conversation and telling you his story, so it's not hearsay, it's a first person account of an event.
of course still his perception, bias and credibility is an issue to whether to believe the story or not.
-----------------------------------
Looking to the pictures again, doesn't it look like they were at a movie theater? And watched it on a really big screen? If that's the case if the quality wasn't okay wouldn't it be really obvious?
Undoubtedly unsurpassable until this day.In my opinion Michael becomes really great when he gets tired because he still tries to impress the public and he totally does! His moves then become slightly more slowly, but still precize and unique.
I'll take a tired Michael over a fresh anyone else anytime!!!
In my opinion Michael becomes really great when he gets tired because he still tries to impress the public and he totally does! His moves then become slightly more slowly, but still precize and unique. I'll take a tired Michael over a fresh anyone else anytime!!!
This will shock you.
Like I said I've met Jennifer just weeks before the announcement of the THIS IS IT concert tour by Michael. I asked her if she would play with Michael again if he would ask her. She answered that she thought that he is too busy 'playing' with kids that and that a tour would be highly unlikely. But if he would call her she would agree because THE MONEY IS good.
That were her exact words. Right then and there my respect for her just went downhill.
That woman only thinks about money. She wasn't a friend of Michael's.
Just wanted to let you guys know.
Remember Michael was getting older.THIS. This is a direct reason why i love the Bad and Dangerous tours the best. Even when Michael started getting tired, he still pushed and pushed. However, in the HIStory and 30th anniversary concerts, Michael just kind of stopped when he got winded.
Remember Michael was getting older.
Whhaaaa? Michael Jackson aged?
THIS. This is a direct reason why i love the Bad and Dangerous tours the best. Even when Michael started getting tired, he still pushed and pushed. However, in the HIStory and 30th anniversary concerts, Michael just kind of stopped when he got winded.
Remember Michael was getting older.
Also remember he got older. He did not have the same young power in 1997 and 2001 as he had in 1987 and 1992.
I think the moves are more sophisticated during HIStory tour - but I like BAD tour the most. - So much energy and most are sung live!
I've said it before, I'd take an aging Michael Jackson agains anyone half his age anytime anywhere! Sadly in my opinion he hasn't reached the age where he really would be "an aging star", changing yes, with less energy than during the Bad era yes, BUT Michael Jacksondidn't really HAVE to have this high level of energy anymore. He had the mastership of an old maestro, he had the knowledge, the aura, he still had the dance moves, even though they might not have been as sharp as in this incredible video we've seen today. He didn't have to move at the speed of light anymore to thrill and mesmerize his public. A simple proof of what I'm saying was the TII performance of Billie Jean - clearly not showing everything he could, but if you really open your eyes you'll see that every bone in his body was dancing in that performance.
An aging genius doesn't stop being a genius - an aging genius is just getting older.
Back to the topic now - I'd really like to see a DVD or BR with the quality of that video that I haven't been able to get out of my head all day long!!! Em, Estate?
michael may not of had the engergy he had back in the bad/dangerous era but he was still a matchless performer and no-one has close to equalling his talent