dangerous_88
Proud Member
I don't like the picture but at all. Oh well, you can't always have great pictures
You guys are doing my head in. Really. I think it's the very same people that make such a big deal out of comments like "this person looks asian".... that are making it IMPOSSIBLE to rid this world of racism. You create it, even when it's not there or not intended.
Okay...............so if I say:
"Gee, Madonna looks like an Asian woman here"
How is that offensive? It's the same thing.
You yourself should check that word. It's sad on these boards there's day after day less and less uneduacted people. Racism is prejudice and if you say someone looks like something even if he/she clearly doesn't that's prejudice and racism. Genetics is only one small part of racism. And this has nothing to do with religions or anything, I don't understand why you brought that up...
Ah, they are trying to look like someone else! Forgive me, I had forgotten that Michael went out everyday with that gold thing around his shoulders, being himself totally..No, it's not. :lol: Madonna is intentionally trying to look like someone else! That's compared to the role charachter.. Just like Lady Gaga is trying to look like someone (or something) else it doesn't matter what you think or say about her look..
It's not a judgement, it's an observation...To quote what you said....'you judge one's look then.' simple as that, eh? ok, so if I 'JUDGE' someone's look by saying they're beautiful, or they LOOK beautiful, does that mean I'm racist??
I didn't think so......
I don't see any evidence of racism in this entire thread, but what I do see is a lot of ignorance...
No, it's not. :lol: Madonna is intentionally trying to look like someone else! That's compared to the role charachter.. Just like Lady Gaga is trying to look like someone (or something) else it doesn't matter what you think or say about her look..
Ah, they are trying to look like someone else! Forgive me, I had forgotten that Michael went out everyday with that gold thing around his shoulders, being himself totally..
I don't get why we are even talking about this because the thread is about the Sphinx pic.. Now let's talk about that.
Asedora;3012942 said:I like the idea of Mike being "Sphinx" for Invincible too. :lol: For the most of fans I see this picture is shocking because of "bad photoshop", "bad taste", "does not look like Mike" etc., you name it.
This picture shows a specific character and this is what important. This is the whole point and the idea imo. Fans used to see Michael as such a sweet person, smiling, giving hugs etc. This is absolutely different concept.
Art sometimes has to be shocking for general public. I do not mean “bad taste “ art. This picture does not fit “bad taste” category in my opinion.
Like I said before . Some artists put butterflies on their album covers. So what?
doesn't look like michael?
@mirror_stage SONY did not like them either. MJ showed me the original un retouched contact sheets. MJ requested MLB&I to be @ the shoot. 11 minutes ago via Twitterrific in reply to mirror_stage
Michael didn't like the photos, that is why he never released them. Now you will understand why. It was not how he envisioned himself. about 1 hour ago via Twitterrific As an art piece, it is cool. Michael would appreciate the "artwork" also. BUT as a true photograph, not so much. Do you understand? about 1 hour ago via Twitterrific I do find this sad. Because this image will be taken incorrectly by many. about 1 hour ago via Twitterrific @DonnaMB73 I am SURE Michael would not have appreciated this remodeling of his image.The photog wished to see him feminized & fantasized. about 1 hour ago via Twitterrific in reply to DonnaMB73 @DonnaMB73 TOLD YOU they were photoshopped to death!!!! about 1 hour ago via Twitterrific in reply to DonnaMB73
It doesn't mean the pic is bad if Michael or Sony did not like it...
It doesn't mean the pic is bad if Michael or Sony did not like it...
Michael didnt like it, Sony didnt like it, practically every person who has posted in this thread doesnt like it. Come on, its not a good picture at all.
:agree:
Just thinking and we will never know for sure,but... I wonder what Michael himself would think of all his fans comments on this thus far...
Agree. Michael didn't like it. Sony didn't like it. It didn't get used, and now it's being peddled. Whether it's a "bad" or "good" photograph is really a matter of individual taste.
Who told you that Michael did not like it? Karen told you? She changes he mind all the time.
One day she says one thing and another day she said this: As an art piece, it is cool. Michael would appreciate the "artwork" also. BUT as a true photograph, not so much. Do you understand?"
Michael didnt like it, Sony didnt like it, practically every person who has posted in this thread doesnt like it. Come on, its not a good picture at all.
Michael didnt like it, Sony didnt like it, practically every person who has posted in this thread doesnt like it. Come on, its not a good picture at all.
Well for me personally I don't take Karen Faye as 'The Source' For me The Source is Michael. If you read those tweets it says
"As an art piece, it is cool. Michael would appreciate the "artwork" also. BUT as a true photograph, not so much. Do you understand?" about 1 hour ago via Twitterrific
"I do find this sad. Because this image will be taken incorrectly by many". about 1 hour ago via Twitterrific @DonnaMB73
Karen Faye dosen't know it all.
He'd tell Topflux to GTFO....