Latest on MJJC

What's better? Yokohama 1987 or Bucharest 1992?

What's better? Yokohama or Bucharest?

  • Yokohama, 1987

    Votes: 158 46.2%

  • Bucharest, 1992

    Votes: 184 53.8%
  • Total voters
    342
Are you all mad! BAD Tour was Michael's tour of tours, live vocals, fast paced dancing, I saw
both tours at Wembley. Michael was on top of his game during BAD tour. Bucharest was good, but does not come close to Yokohama.
 
Memia said:
No doubt whatsoever BAD TOUR owns everything.
Click to expand...

I agree here!
The Victory and BAD tours are the very bests for me! There's no other concert like them with such power and great performance and all! I know, his performance for the Dangerous tour in bucharest is also very nice and incredible but for me nothing can top the BAD tour, especially the one in Yokohama we are talkin' about!
 
Love both!

But I voted Yokohama.
Because he sings everything live!
 
Bad tour.Yokohama is 100% live.I don't really like the stage for the 87 leg though.The vocals are great.
 
azza said:
Bad tour.Yokohama is 100% live.I don't really like the stage for the 87 leg though.The vocals are great.
Click to expand...

Yepp, that's true!
The stage is very boring!...
Just compare it with the one from THIS IS IT, how it should be! :D (just kiddin')
 
I finally watched Yokohama, I really can't make a choice because it was two different types of MJ's.

Both concerts were incredible.
 
I love Yokohama !!

Because he sang all songs live ♪
 
I love and have both concerts. But I voted for Yokohama because one of my most favorite performances of Michael's is on that concert. Which is the Shake Your Body performance. I so love that performance especially the whole thats nasty scene. I so love the look on Michael's face as he was watching that guy. Doing I don't know what.
 
In terms of live singing and dancing I prefer Yokohama but Bucharest is the overall better show so I go for that :)
 
I really love Yokohama...Live vocals, stunning, electrifying dancing....But Bucharest is all around a better show, much more exciting, the crowd is more responsive, I find. Therefore, its get me much more pumped!
 
Bucharest, 1992. It was the first concert which I have looked, and I will not have not enough words to transfer all those emotions which have overflowed me when I have seen representation Billie Jean. Michael has amazed me with the beauty, force, artistry at this concert . This representation is filled by the biggest power, boldness.
 
I found this actually quite hard.
To me, Yokohama because he's singing like, 99% of the time. But Bucharest was were his dancing was at it's best.
But I chose Yokohama because um, that's pure sexiness right there ;)
 
I Vote For Bucharest 1992 They Edit to Perfect concert
that concert Not Bucharest in All they use munich Wembley and Other dangerous tour to combine it.

Bad tour 1987 weren't very good When compare 1988-89

I actually like Bad Tour Second Leg most of all!!
 
I voted Yokohama. I love both concerts, but the thing that bugs me about Bucharest is cutting to the audience too much, and not all of it is concert footage from Bucharest either.
 
It's so not a fair comparison. That leg of the BAD Tour was not 'up to par' yet. The leg of The Dangerous Tour was. So I can't vote.

:wub:
souldreamer7
 
This is tough because they are both great shows! Just wish Yokohama had actually more songs from the Bad album but that's because it was in the beginning of the tour. But man I don't know...I love them BOTH hehehe! : )
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top