Latest on MJJC

What's better? Yokohama 1987 or Bucharest 1992?

What's better? Yokohama or Bucharest?

  • Yokohama, 1987

    Votes: 158 46.2%

  • Bucharest, 1992

    Votes: 184 53.8%
  • Total voters
    342
Yoko '87 for sure!!! The RWY and BJ performances alone blow away anything on the sh*tty, heavily edited Bucharest show...

:yes:
 
Michael made such an improvement in the Dangerous era.

He has always in my opinion become better with age.

Bad Tour I think is like the prototype of Dangerous Tour, and History Tour is the perfection of Dangerous Tour.
 
I really dont understand how people can choose Bucharest over Yokohama...Yokohama is 10000% better show. Music, singing, dancing, improvisation...everything is better.
 
Bucharest '92. The concert was mind-blowing, everything was perfect and the public energy awesome! If the public is great, you do your best!! That's what he did!
 
Both! Yokohama because - 100 % live. Bucharest, dancing is much better.
 
I have only seen Bucharest not Yokohama. Would like to see yokohama th judge. But I feel the energy in Romania. However, they could of shown less of the fans and more of Michael..
 
yokohama all the way..
hot yummy delicious...
oh and and he sounds good too... :)
intro to RWY (his confidence is contagious!)
WDAN night glitter suit

hmmm - sorry honey, no movie tonight! I think I wanna ROCK!
 
Last edited:
Yokohama for pure "liveness" but Dangerous for the polished editing.... quality of Yoko is a bit grainy but love it for it's look and feel...
 
honestly cant pick between the two, they are both great. but i purely picked 1992 cus i was 1year old!! :p
 
I never saw the full Yokohama show but his adrenaline was through the roof from what I was able to watch and I want to see the whole thing so bad
, I own the bucharest dvd and he delivered, that is his best Billie Jean performance ever and at the end of human nature when he did the miming it was perfection.

I can't make a choice.
 
Bad tour!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
michaelsson said:
I think pple are missing the whole point of the thread. its not about the bad tour vs the dangerous tour. its about 2 particular shows from each tour. Yokohoma was a great show but bucharest is better. IT had the better setlist, the crowd was booming, the lighting was better, the dancing was better. the entrance killed it. i mean seriously just cuz yokohoma was apart of the tour that shook the earth doesnt mean it was a better show lol, but to each its own
Click to expand...


Damn right!
 
Yokohoma, simply because it's the Bad tour. And Bad tour basically dominates everything :giggle:
 
In my opinion the Dangerous tour beats the first leg of the Bad Tour hands down
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top