Latest on MJJC

What's better? Yokohama 1987 or Bucharest 1992?

What's better? Yokohama or Bucharest?

  • Yokohama, 1987

    Votes: 158 46.2%

  • Bucharest, 1992

    Votes: 184 53.8%
  • Total voters
    342
i know we all love the bad tour but i mean seriously yokohama was boring in comparison to bucharest. just because bucharest wasnt all live that makes the yokohama show better? lol. wrong! the better show all around from staging,lighting,performance wise,and crowd interacton is def bucharest. it runs circles around yokohoma. i mean compare the entrances of each show lol. yes yokohoma was all live, and a great show. but bucharest has the better setlist, better tricks and better costumes and a better crowd and michaels energy was on fire! and his performing was just breath-taking and that moonwalk on billie jean was sumthin vicious!
 
BUCHAREST DANGEROUS TOUR 1992 FTW!!! :)

Bad Tour 1987 concerts weren't very good when compared to second leg. I tend to look at Billie Jean performances especially, and he often improves performances as it goes from one leg to another. He only started the hopping move (backup yells "Hoo! Hoo!") in the second leg.

But I actually like the HIStory Tour Second Leg most of all, because even though it was lipsynched, his dancing was so amazing during the second leg. In the first leg he had the flu and was too aggressive with moves and often ended up doing "sticky" moonwalks. Best HIStory Tour would be Gothenburg!!!
 
Yokohama = 100% amazing live vocals, and Mike was BAD :]
Bucharest= His vocals weren't in great shape as in for example London or Munich, but compared to Yokohama the dancing were bettr. I voted for Yokohama.
 
never seen the full footage but the audio of yokahama is excellent. always playing it in my car. the facts its live and sounds great beats anything else
 
Yokohama 87! The energy is great and Michael sings 100% live. That's what I love most.
 
I actully like the Bad Tour over the Dangerous tour, But if i had to chosse between yokohama and bucharest i would have to say bucharest definitley. I mean comeone the set list, the dancing, the lights! man bucharest is really a great concert overall..
 
bucharest for me, mj at his peak and the show was unbelievable from start to finish but yokohama is a very plain one compared but for rawness its amazing
 
As much as I dig Bad tour as a whole including the Yokohama show, I gotta go with the Bucharest show. IMO, he was fantastic in both, but Bucharest had the crowd reaction. Crowd is a big part of any show. Plus, I feel like the Man In The Mirror finale...alone could make me choose Bucharest over Yokohama, easily.
 
That's a tough choice for me, but in the end I'd have to say Yokohama 1987. All of the performances from the Bad Tour was top notch.:)
 
I think pple are missing the whole point of the thread. its not about the bad tour vs the dangerous tour. its about 2 particular shows from each tour. Yokohoma was a great show but bucharest is better. IT had the better setlist, the crowd was booming, the lighting was better, the dancing was better. the entrance killed it. i mean seriously just cuz yokohoma was apart of the tour that shook the earth doesnt mean it was a better show lol, but to each its own
 
Last edited:
Bucharest had a better lineup in terms of songs, dancers, band members, everything was in order, the lighting, the videos, everything was just perfect, it was the perfect concert!
 
michaelsson said:
I think pple are missing the whole point of the thread. its not about the bad tour vs the dangerous tour. its about 2 particular shows from each tour. Yokohoma was a great show but bucharest is better. IT had the better setlist, the crowd was booming, the lighting was better, the dancing was better. the entrance killed it. i mean seriously just cuz yokohoma was apart of the tour that shook the earth doesnt mean it was a better show lol, but to each its own
Click to expand...

I agree. It's not about Dangerous vs Bad Tour 'cause in that case i'd say "Bad" all the way, but when you compare these two particular shows, there's just no competition as far as i'm concerned. The Bucharest show absolutely blows Yokohama away. Yokohama was pretty boring compared to the Bucharest show actually. Bucharest was just a much more entertaining show and held my attention the entire time. I never felt bored, not even once like I did during a few times when I was watching Yokohama. The crowd was dead as hell too lol, which didn't help. Yeah i'm all for live singing, but all things considered, it was just not better than the Dangerous performance. No way. I'm glad it's winning!

Bucharest for the win! lol
 
It is so difficult to answer. lol! I love all tours. Each has a different style and Michael was a state of mind different and special in each one. But the Bad Tour will always be my favorite tour that was then that I became a fan and started to know who was Michael Jackson. Will always be my favorite. :)​
 
Bad Tour for me. More live singing and more energy.

With that said, I think "This Is It" will best all three of the past world tours. That's my hope and prediction.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top