Hot topic What unreleased demos and remixes do you think will be on Thriller 40 Disc 2?

Status
Not open for further replies.
CPr7bcT.jpg
Wow
 
  • Haha
Reactions: MJ5
I can't wait to hear What A Lovely Way To Go, I've always been intrigued by the songs in the 1993 deposition that haven't been released yet

I hope one day we'll hear Michael McKellar, I always loved Mike's reaction when he's asked about that one
 
I can't wait to hear What A Lovely Way To Go, I've always been intrigued by the songs in the 1993 deposition that haven't been released yet

I hope one day we'll hear Michael McKellar, I always loved Mike's reaction when he's asked about that one
U did not see his reaction about tomboy ??? In same deposition
 
Korgnox you clearly have this already, this looks like to me a AA single. Is this potentially the first single? If so I think they should release this and nothing else for a while! To quote Michael we want to let it *simmer*!
 
Got The Hots was not disappointing at all. I can't get that song on any physical media as it stands so I will be happy that I can buy it when THriller 40 releases.
It was disappointing to me in the sense that it had already been released, albeit in a limited capacity.

But I agree with you. Even though I am not the biggest fan of Got The Hots, it is a good thing that it is getting released on Thriller 40, which would make it accessible for everyone.
 
they are releasing unreleased tracks! great job guys!
I don't know if you're serious. So they release 2 or 3 demos every five years and ask us to pay 25 $ for them, and we're supposed to be satisfied?

They could be putting out BOX SETS of unreleased stuff, demos, outtakes, alternate takes, live recordings, etc. Look at what the Elvis estate has been doing for decades now.

I make no apologies about being demanding. The Estate has made it clear they're in the business of making money. Fine. I'm in the business of getting value for my money. We'll see how many truly unreleased songs are on this in the end, but they're still asking us to buy -- AGAIN -- songs we already have ten copies of so that we can hear a couple of demos when they could, if they wanted, release a dozen such demos and outtakes every year.
 
Got The Hots was not disappointing at all. I can't get that song on any physical media as it stands so I will be happy that I can buy it when THriller 40 releases.
I personally am very dissapointed with the inclusion of Got The Hots, as it could have easily been released on the digital version as part of the "bonus" tracks on Disc 3, and then everyone would win, people that wanted the song to be available on streaming, and fans that wanted new content on Disc 2.
just what i think, that's all
 
Last edited:
I don't know if you're serious. So they release 2 or 3 demos every five years and ask us to pay 25 $ for them, and we're supposed to be satisfied?

They could be putting out BOX SETS of unreleased stuff, demos, outtakes, alternate takes, live recordings, etc. Look at what the Elvis estate has been doing for decades now.

I make no apologies about being demanding. The Estate has made it clear they're in the business of making money. Fine. I'm in the business of getting value for my money. We'll see how many truly unreleased songs are on this in the end, but they're still asking us to buy -- AGAIN -- songs we already have ten copies of so that we can hear a couple of demos when they could, if they wanted, release a dozen such demos and outtakes every year.
Translation: “They don’t give me everything I want, and that makes them bad. Look at what this other estate does, even though they’re two totally different companies and have totally different resources! I could point at the actual BS they’re guilty of, but why do that? Give me more.”

Come on now.
 
Looks like the 2010 Mark Ronson version was to be called ‘Lovely Way’ instead of ‘What a Lovely Way to Go’.

See link

‘“It’s in the vein of Elton John‘s ‘Goodbye Yellow Brick Road’ and John Lennon‘s ‘Imagine’,” he added.’

“It’s a really beautiful song called Lovely Way. I don’t know if it’s made the album but I hope he would dig it if he was here.”
 
Wonder if it's possible MJ says both lonely and lovely in the song, would explain the title confusion (unlikely but just thinking out loud, lol)
 
Wonder if it's possible MJ says both lonely and lovely in the song, would explain the title confusion (unlikely but just thinking out loud, lol)
Alternate theory: MJ had some pretty sloppy handwriting. Perhaps the lawyers in the 1993 deposition who combed through his unreleased material thought the cassettes/notes they saw said “lonely” instead of “lovely”? I think it’s pretty plausible for them to mistake a quickly written V for an N.
 
Alternate theory: MJ had some pretty sloppy handwriting. Perhaps the lawyers in the 1993 deposition who combed through his unreleased material thought the cassettes/notes they saw said “lonely” instead of “lovely”? I think it’s pretty plausible for them to mistake a quickly written V for an N.
Possibly. And MJ didn't bother to correct the lawyer. His mind was probably too busy trying to remember all of the tracks anyways.
 
Translation: “They don’t give me everything I want, and that makes them bad. Look at what this other estate does, even though they’re two totally different companies and have totally different resources! I could point at the actual BS they’re guilty of, but why do that? Give me more.”

Come on now.
Yes, « give me more » is my policy when it comes to the MJ Estate, just like it is theirs when it comes to fans. They’re in it for the money, I’m in it for the content.
 
Alternate theory: MJ had some pretty sloppy handwriting. Perhaps the lawyers in the 1993 deposition who combed through his unreleased material thought the cassettes/notes they saw said “lonely” instead of “lovely”? I think it’s pretty plausible for them to mistake a quickly written V for an N.

Yeah I think that's possible, would make sense.
 
Alternate theory: MJ had some pretty sloppy handwriting. Perhaps the lawyers in the 1993 deposition who combed through his unreleased material thought the cassettes/notes they saw said “lonely” instead of “lovely”? I think it’s pretty plausible for them to mistake a quickly written V for an N.
I’m choosing to believe this until proven otherwise.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top