dam2040;4231571 said:
The 'being forced to watch it' is a terrible point. Fans deserve to see Michael's work in the highest quality possible. Not edited versions, the originals, as Michael worked on them.
Oh, the "fans deserve" argument. Fans deserve nothing. Fans are not entitled to anything.
What fans Fans need to do, is double check their egos & if their individual opinion is really the most important one (a small hint: It isn't!!!). Fans need to get rid of their spoiled & childish wanting behavior. It's ridiculous. Really.
I would also love to have ALL the stuff, in the best quality & as quickly as possible. BUT that's NOT how it works.
There is simply a big difference between
a) the "highest possible quality" nowadays &
b) "the originals as Michael worked one on them"
If you want b) then have a go & enjoy the material as it was released originally. It's everywhere to get.
If you want a) you have to patiently wait for the products to arrive & take them in their state as they are. They are NOT worked on by MJ & therefore not in their original state. Because the original state is the low quality, low resulution, low whatever standard from the 1980’s & 90’s...
I read the article about the guy who mixed & mastered the new Thriller audio mix.
I suggest everyone search it & read it. I think it was done in the best possible way. There are always concessions that have to be made, one way or the other.
DuranDuran;4231575 said:
From what I've read few people had problems with it. The only complaints I've seen outside of this site is that it's being shown very few places outside of the USA and some said they didn't want to see the Clock movie.
Anyway, a lot of people today watch TV shows & movies on a phone, tablet, or a PC/laptop with cheap computer speakers. The screen on a phone is too small for picture quality to make that much of a difference. It's like an audiophile complaining about Beats headphones not being high quality. Most of the general public is listening to MP3s or Youtube videos with compressed sound, so headphones that cost $5000 would be pretty useless for these sources. Even the average person who has an actual TV has a cheap one from Wal-Mart and many of the TV channels broadcast in low quality, most are not HD. So who are these fans you're talking about? Probably a small percentage of people like the audiophile audience.
100 % agree.
Even most commenters on here probably think watching youtube videos in HD & listening to audio on notebook speakers is quality standard...