Taj Jackson tweets about fans talking about Katherine

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's amazing how comfortable the Jacksons feel with the safety behind a computer on twitter...........


I don't remember this dude complaining about the press in 2005!!!!


Also, Michael paid for this guys education........but where was he when Michael needed help???????


And if he is such a tough guy, then why doesn't he protect Paris from all the haters on Twitter????
 
I am not advocating people be rude to Taj, but we cannot take responsibility for the rude actions of people on twitter. Taj has followers and he enjoyed them following him. Now some who are MJ fans decided to send him tweets he does not like. These people did not tweet on behalf of specific groups, e.g., MJJC, so it is not our responsibility to monitor their language. They are all adults and should know how to conduct themselves. Telling them they were rude will only make them fight back.
 
The busybodies invest so much time and energy malicious meddling in MJ'S family lives, they can't see the white elephant in the room. And please don't call it love.
 
Ok I don't have my glasses on. What is the white elephant in the room?
 
Umm..with all due respect, some JACKSON'S themselves aimed to destroy MJ too! Does Jermaines Word to the Bad, and that slanderous book he keeps denying he was writing, and LaToya's T.V. mess, back then, and even to this day, ring a bell? If we're going to speak TRUTH, speak ALL of it, not just parts that we want. I'm just saying...

Totally agree with you. Especially the bold

Im not okay what the Jacksons are doing either but fans go too far sometimes.
 
You know...whatever the Jackson family butt kissers make it. I have my guesses, but I'd drop IQ points arguing with them with logic than their BS. Also, didn't you know that the Jackson's are always victims...everyone is out to get them, when their own worst enemy is themselves...

Ok I don't have my glasses on. What is the white elephant in the room?
 
Is the white elephant in my room, your room Annie, all the people on the site rooms? Or is it just one white elephant in the room of the poster?
 
BINGO!! Common sense...thank you my friend!

I don't recall seeing him at ANY court hearing either, and he was a GROWN man in 2005! Their feeling of grandeur and self-importance would be laughable if it wasn't so pathetic.

It's amazing how comfortable the Jacksons feel with the safety behind a computer on twitter...........


I don't remember this dude complaining about the press in 2005!!!!


Also, Michael paid for this guys education........but where was he when Michael needed help???????


And if he is such a tough guy, then why doesn't he protect Paris from all the haters on Twitter????
 
It ain't in my room Petra and I got 20/20 vision...apparently it's only in the room of that poster as he/she probaably has those rose-tinted glasses on and can't see the forest for the trees...you know?

On another note, we're meddling busy bodies you know?
My answer:Check my life, I have one outside of the Jackson's, maybe that person should too...at work now lol

Is the white elephant in my room, your room Annie, all the people on the site rooms? Or is it just one white elephant in the room of the poster?
 
I think that Taj is now regreting starting that rant, because he did not like how that reporter worded the report above. You see Taj, that is why it is important to think before you speak. Why do you think your uncle did not like to talk to the press, because he knew they edit things to mislead others. Now next time you do not like what your followers say to you on twitter, block them, and speak to grandma.
 
You are mistaken. We love our country above all else.

This is what you ACTUALLY said. I'm happy for you that you love your country, but that makes absolutely no sense in this thread!

Michael "loved his family the most?" Is that what you meant to say? Yes, in a sense. He loved his CHILDREN the most, and now there seems to be a very unfortunate situation going on . . . . . . . i.e. the contract with Howard Mann that promises to "produce" the children for various interviews, with payment to Katherine for those, and also the appearance of the children recently in Gary, Indiana, where Paris was helping Joe peddle his perfume line, and so on, and so on. I highly, SERIOUSLY doubt Michael would have approved of this. As a father, he kept them OUT of the public eye, for very good reasons.
 
I agree that we shouldn't be bombarding the Jacksons twitter pages with tweets insulting Katherine. I can understand where Taj is coming from in a sense. That's his grandmother, and naturally, he's going to get defensive when she is attacked. I think the problem is, some of us believing in the notion that being insulting and loud will make people hear us better. They don't. They just block you out. I've learned that too.

Exactly! Once people start screaming and yelling, the message stops to go across. I would not listen to any stranger who insult my family publicly. Periold. So, I understand where Taj is coming from.

We can sit back and put on rose-coloured glasses and pretend that what we're seeing isn't really happening but what will that do? The only way we can be considered "real" and "true" fans in Taj's eyes is to deny and close our eyes to what's "real" and "true"? To sit back in ignorant bliss and continue to work as ATM machines and hand over our money? I think most of us are over that stage. It's at the point now where the Jacksons are doing things that we just can't close our eyes to. No matter how hard we try. Those who have attempted to remain loyal to them have been limited in their defense, coming up with nothing more than "they are Michael's family, he loved them, so leave them alone. You should feel shame and guilt for hating them." Not much of an argument when you have a thread full of fans discussing the amount of times they've used him for their own gain, used his children for their own gain, made statements that would be used in trial against Michael, and said that Joe and they are the estate and are therefore entitled to Michael's wealth. They also feel entitled to us, Michael's fans. Michael may have loved them, but I'd think he'd be pretty disappointed in their actions since his death. I believe that what they're doing goes against everything he stood for.

Who said fans have to sit back, put on rose-colored glasses and be in ignorant bliss? Being angry and frustrated won't change anything for the better. Although fans don't intend to, some are spreading hatred through name calling. Instead of fixating on the Jacksons, whose behavior we cannot change, we shall focus our energy on matters we may be able to make an impact, like flagging offensive youtube video clips, writing to the media demanding them to stop using the racial term "Ja*ko", supporting worthy projects like Joe Vogel's upcoming book on Michael's music, etc...

The Jacksons may be clueless. But, they are not the real predators. People in the media, like Nancy Grace and Diane Dimon, are.
 
^^^Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha, Autumn, if you only know how I am cracking up at my computer right now. This country thing is killing me. I really do love coming to this forum!!! Now we have a white elephant too, which is also killing me.
 
White Elephant:

A burdensome possession; creating more trouble than it is worth.


Exactly what has a "White Elephant" got to do with the topic of the thread????
 
^^^Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha, Autumn, if you only know how I am cracking up at my computer right now. This country thing is killing me. I really do love coming to this forum!!! Now we have a white elephant too, which is also killing me.

There is a white elephant in Brazil? :doh: Maybe so? I'm sure Brazil is a wonderful country, whether or not it has a population of white elephants -- that no one can see? Or maybe we have entered the Twilight Zone where posts are appearing differently to different people, or something like that? :woohoo:(In which case, we should probably put on our tin-foil helmets?). Sorry for digression, but. . . . . .:D
 
I'm sorry, but the fact that you said FANS should be doing all this is completely ironic. The Jackson's are his FAMILY, as some love to point out, so why the hell should the FANS have to defend and fight for MJ in the media, and for them to stop referring to MJ as "Jack-o" when a "REAL" family should be doing this crap themselves...PRIORITY'S are a helleva thing...Tell that to the Jackson's who have sat up on tv shows and heard the interviewer refer to MJ as "Jack-o" and actually laughed and smiled with them. Furthermore, the Jackson's are predators just like those people you mentioned. In fact, they are the worst predators, as this man was their family member, and yet, they still hang him out to be flogged, disrespect him and his parenting abilities, and exploit his children. IMO, they have done more harm to MJ than Dimond, etc. How do you think it felt for this man to know that his family only thought of his as a cash register, and only stood by him, when there was something in it for them?

Who said fans have to sit back, put on rose-colored glasses and be in ignorant bliss? Being angry and frustrated won't change anything for the better. Although fans don't intend to, some are spreading hatred through name calling. Instead of fixating on the Jacksons, whose behavior we cannot change, we shall focus our energy on matters we may be able to make an impact, like flagging offensive youtube video clips, writing to the media demanding them to stop using the racial term "Ja*ko", supporting worthy projects like Joe Vogel's upcoming book on Michael's music, etc...

The Jacksons may be clueless. But, they are not the real predators. People in the media, like Nancy Grace and Diane Dimon, are.
 
White Elephant:




Exactly what has a "White Elephant" got to do with the topic of the thread????

I don't know ^^ but it is cracking me up!!!!!

Thanks Autumn, sometimes I need these little bursts of laughter.
 
Thanks Autumn, sometimes I need these little bursts of laughter.

As do I. Sometimes, survival depends on just that (I see we've added "rose-colored glasses" to the mix, which brings up interesting visuals of white, Brazilian elephants with.. . .rose-colored glasses. Never mind. OK to ignore me, now. .. . )
 
So my magical dart found it's targets eh,? I say message receive. And Jacksons apologist...... is old and tired. Hit me with something new. I know you can do better.
 
So my magical dart found it's targets eh,? I say message receive. And Jacksons apologist...... is old and tired. Hit me with something new. I know you can do better.

You know, some people here are really trying to calm things down. It would be nice to easy with the ironic and provocative attitude. You are not helping you know.
 
Annie of course they are predators. They are simply at a different level than the HLN 4. They all have a prey and that is Michael Jackson and his children. A difference is that they attempt to disguise their predatory behavior in a familial way, e.g., they put the children in a contract for a tribute, but could say we want to let the children honor their dad, my son, and give them closure. In that way their predatory behavior is cloaked and people think they are doing this for the children's benefit only. Many would not see through this guise. It is easier seen through the behavior of people like Dimond who blatantly say they don't believe in Michael's innocence and use and exploit him for ratings.

Yes, people want us to not be critical of abusive behavior if it is done by a Jackson member, while at the same time taking on all the responsibilities family members should undertake, e.g., keeping his legacy going. There are more fans out there buying Michael products and engaging in actions to keep his legacy alive than the number of Jacksons combined, so we definitely have a responsibility to be critical of any abuse on their part in relation to Michael.

They cannot have it their own way. You want my money, then you have to listen to me, period.
 
Sorry but Yall are twisting .. REALLY
Im disturbed myself by the tone and what some are saying here.

Myself I would prefer MJ would be defended with dignity not by name calling and personal insults. Throwing stones
doesnt help resolve our issues it just demeens the work some try to do in the MJ community to defend Michael.
The uneccessary hate, insults and personal attacks causes the media to group all fans together as crazed rabid
MJ fans and they dont take our concerns serious becuase of that . Please Be part of the solution not the problem
 
Exactly! I'll say it again, these people are a horse of a completely and diabolical new breed and color. I've NEVER seen any other celebirty family bind their young grandchildren to a lifetime contract of servitude, nor have I EVER seen a contract where Lisa Marie Presley, for example, was listed under "Terms and Conditions", like a cheap pair of socks. The next step they have, is to list these kids on E-bay under an "Auction" for "Watch Mj's children in their daily lives"...I'm repulsed by them quite frankly, and Truth be told, MJ was too, as the man said as much before, and kept his and his children's distance, as he knew all to well, from his own up-bringing, who and what these people he called "Family" were. That's why he created for himself and his children, "Second Families, and Families of Love". Now if that don't tell you something, you're lacking in intellectual ability. They can't game me, as game recognizes game, and I have their number, ten-fold.

Annie of course they are predators. They are simply at a different level than the HLN 4. They all have a prey and that is Michael Jackson and his children. A difference is that they attempt to disguise their predatory behavior in a familial way, e.g., they put the children in a contract for a tribute, but could say we want to let the children honor their dad, my son, and give them closure. In that way their predatory behavior is cloaked and people think they are doing this for the children's benefit only. Many would not see through this guise. It is easier seen through the behavior of people like Dimond who blatantly say they don't believe in Michael's innocence and use and exploit him for ratings.

Yes, people want us to not be critical of abusive behavior if it is done by a Jackson member, while at the same time taking on all the responsibilities family members should undertake, e.g., keeping his legacy going. There are more fans out there buying Michael products and engaging in actions to keep his legacy alive than the number of Jacksons combined, so we definitely have a responsibility to be critical of any abuse on their part in relation to Michael.

They cannot have it their own way. You want my money, then you have to listen to me, period.
 
I'm sorry, but the fact that you said FANS should be doing all this is completely ironic.

What so ironic about it? Fans stayed up all night to flag and report youtube clips. Fans make donations to charity in Michael's name. Fans (Seven and Deborah Ffrench, for instance) who tirelessly research, write and spread the truth. Why? Becasue of ultimate love, admiration and respect.

The Jackson's are his FAMILY, as some love to point out, so why the hell should the FANS have to defend and fight for MJ in the media, and for them to stop referring to MJ as "Jack-o" when a "REAL" family should be doing this crap themselves...PRIORITY'S are a helleva thing...Tell that to the Jackson's who have sat up on tv shows and heard the interviewer refer to MJ as "Jack-o" and actually laughed and smiled with them.

Does it matter what the Jacksons do or don't do? Their lack-of-action probably makes it more necessary for us to focus our energy on the real priorities - defending Michael against misinformation from the media.

Again and again, your harsh words will not change the way they behave. Your frustration and anger do not lead to anywhere. Face it. None of us here has any say in the Jacksons' family matters.


Furthermore, the Jackson's are predators just like those people you mentioned. In fact, they are the worst predators, as this man was their family member, and yet, they still hang him out to be flogged, disrespect him and his parenting abilities, and exploit his children. IMO, they have done more harm to MJ than Dimond, etc. How do you think it felt for this man to know that his family only thought of his as a cash register, and only stood by him, when there was something in it for them?

Dimon, Grace, Bashir, Drew Pinsky intentionally twist facts for ratings. They are the one who stabbed Michael in the back.

Sneddon was the one who brought the bogus charges against Michael.

If you think the above mentioned individuals are better for Michael than the Jacksons, then I don't know what to say.

None of us like the family's actions. But, don't make it sound like the the family is abusing the children. There is absolutely no evidence of any abuse. You can go to the California DFCS and cite all of your observations (the children showing up on interviews, Paris has a twitter account and posing with a bottle of wacky perfum) and see how far you can get. Is it frustrating to see the children getting so much spotlight? Yes. But, again and again, what can we do? Like it or not, Katherine Jackson is the children's guardian. For that reason alone, I'll send her my prayers.

I'm not defening the Jacksons here. Honestly, they don't need my defense for none of the harsh words here carries any impact on them. I'm just saying we should think about the consequence of our actions. Criticism that borders personal attacks on Taj's public twitter does not help; acutally, those posts hinder the good work done by many people.
 
Mari do you mean that country means parents or father and mother?
 
Does the "Yall" include everyone? I have to disagree, as I'm going by what Taj said himself, and what I saw/see, and I'm calling it like I see it, noone else. It was an insult to many MJ fans when he himself questioned their loyalty, etc. You shouldn't dish out an insult, on the sly, if you can't take an insult back.

It's NOT throwing a stone, when you're telling the TRUTH. If that is the case, then stone me, cause I'm going to tell the TRUTH, not some altered version of reality in which, one spins around with fairies and pixie dust, thinking, and faking that everything is a-o.k. Telling the TRUTH will help MJ, as some of his own family has been lieing in the Media, etc. So, if the FANS aren't going to tell the TRUTH, the Jackson family will continue to tell these lies they've been peddling since 2009. I'm for TRUTH. If you're a liar, you're a liar, and you should be called on it.

The Jackons family is also a part of the problem with the Media thinking ALL MJ fans are crazy. Have we NOT had LaToya further these conspiracy claims, encouraging unstable MJ fans even more into believing that MJ was assassinated, and that Murray is the "Fall Guy"? Her foolishness, helps push that fringe even more.

Sorry but Yall are twisting .. REALLY
Im disturbed myself by the tone and what some are saying here.

Myself I would prefer MJ would be defended with dignity not by name calling and personal insults. Throwing stones
doesnt help resolve our issues it just demeens the work some try to do in the MJ community to defend Michael.
The uneccessary hate, insults and personal attacks causes the media to group all fans together as crazed rabid
MJ fans and they dont take our concerns serious becuase of that . Please Be part of the solution not the problem
 
You obviously didn't catch the irony in my post. I'll say it again, it shouldn't be the FANS responsibility to do what the Jackson family should be doing. Nor did you understand my point. I care nothing about the Jackson's, ONLY MJ. Let's be clear about that. I voice my opinions on their actions, and inactions, as they are the ones fame-whoring for the cameras and money. Oh my dear, but MJ fans DO have a say...ask the Jackson's whose MONEY they want? They want MJ fans money, and without the fans, they ARE nothing, as evidenced by their desperation to cling onto and hawk ANYTHING MJ, including his children.


If you believe Michael's own family didn't stab him in the back, you're living in a parallel universe. Check Latoya, Jermaine, Katherine, and the rest of them, who tried to belittle him, by claiming that he would be NOTHING without the J5, when in reality, they would have been NOTHING without HIM. He was the CHOSEN ONE, BY GOD, NOT them. Their cuts, cut the deepest, as they were the ones, he (MJ) expected, or would expect to have his back above all else, and they haven't and don't.

Where did I say, Sneddon, Dimond, etc. were better for MJ? You need to go back and re-read my post slowly, as I said no such thing.


Abuse can be emotional and psychological. If you don't believe Blanket is troubled emotionally and psychologically by these interviews and appearances he's being pushed into, you need to look again. That childs face, and eyes says it ALL.
And NO, the children are NOT just getting spotlight, they're being EXPLOITED, and that's a horse of a different color. If you don't believe EXPLOITATION is abusive, ask MJ...oops, you can't, because he's deceased. Even before his death, MJ lamented on what the "spotlight and exploitation" of him as a child did to him, and he considered it abuse, and that IS abuse!

What so ironic about it? Fans stayed up all night to flag and report youtube clips. Fans make donations to charity in Michael's name. Fans (Seven and Deborah Ffrench, for instance) who tirelessly research, write and spread the truth. Why? Becasue of ultimate love, admiration and respect.



Does it matter what the Jacksons do or don't do? Their lack-of-action probably makes it more necessary for us to focus our energy on the real priorities - defending Michael against misinformation from the media.

Again and again, your harsh words will not change the way they behave. Your frustration and anger do not lead to anywhere. Face it. None of us here has any say in the Jacksons' family matters.




Dimon, Grace, Bashir, Drew Pinsky intentionally twist facts for ratings. They are the one who stabbed Michael in the back.

Sneddon was the one who brought the bogus charges against Michael.

If you think the above mentioned individuals are better for Michael than the Jacksons, then I don't know what to say.

None of us like the family's actions. But, don't make it sound like the the family is abusing the children. There is absolutely no evidence of any abuse. You can go to the California DFCS and cite all of your observations (the children showing up on interviews, Paris has a twitter account and posing with a bottle of wacky perfum) and see how far you can get. Is it frustrating to see the children getting so much spotlight? Yes. But, again and again, what can we do? Like it or not, Katherine Jackson is the children's guardian. For that reason alone, I'll send her my prayers.

I'm not defening the Jacksons here. Honestly, they don't need my defense for none of the harsh words here carries any impact on them. I'm just saying we should think about the consequence of our actions. Criticism that borders personal attacks on Taj's public twitter does not help; acutally, those posts hinder the good work done by many people.
 
Yes, people want us to not be critical of abusive behavior if it is done by a Jackson member, while at the same time taking on all the responsibilities family members should undertake, e.g., keeping his legacy going. There are more fans out there buying Michael products and engaging in actions to keep his legacy alive than the number of Jacksons combined, so we definitely have a responsibility to be critical of any abuse on their part in relation to Michael.

They cannot have it their own way. You want my money, then you have to listen to me, period.

Since when being critical means making assumptions and namecalling? Look at the posts in this thread and the tribute thread and don't tell me people have not made unnecessary demeaning remarks. We defend Michael, we spread his legacy, etc. because of our love and respect. It's not our responsibility, but we still do it because of love, not because of getting leverage on the Jackson's behavior. Fans who only enjoy his mucis and do not do any of the above are still fans. You can be the biggest Michael Jackson advocate. You can write a book on Michael's arts and humanitarian efforts, but you still will not change the way the family behaves.

In fact, the family can have their own way. They don't need to listen to us. Of course, they want your money, but last time I check, they don't point a gun at your head and ask for your money. You have every right to not spend your money on them. You can walk away from their tacky products. They will find other consuemrs. See how the tribute may still carry on; despite the tremendous fans' outcry. See how Breaking News is still on the album; despite the overwhelming initial negative reaction.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top