Billie Jean 78;3763305 said:
Ok, I agree on this one that the word credibility in these days is overused and even abused. How about "common sense" than?
Fair enough, but the organisation that gave Michael the award in 2006 could at least have made it a little clearer how they got that number, maybe publish a specification of the sales per country of per album.
Plus... how is it possible that Thriller USA is still listed as having sold 29M ? I'm quite sure the 29M number has been mentioned before Michael's passing (officially by the RIAA) and we know that in 2009 allone he sold lots of Thriller albums.
common sense is overrated and overused and abused, too. That's where people start getting into comparing themselves to each other and getting personal, if it doesn't 'sound right' to somebody. and getting the last word. and..ultimately..just not wanting to give Michael Jackson his due as the greatest most far reaching, selling impacting artist, in the farthest corners of the world, which really puts them right there with those who want to 'put him in his place', like media. Denial is a huge river. Michael is sales king. Guiness has done enough research. 40 mill and hundred mill are secure with MJ. Frankly it's easier to believe because it's hard to believe a black male artist would just have something like this handed to him...even today. He must have really did it for it to be true.
Besides..soo many people work with the Guinness Book. They all have come to a general concensus about Michael's numbers. It's hard to get any two people to agree. So, it's meaning something true for them all to come together and agree that 40 and 100 mill are true for Michael.
Finally, it's one thing to say one is 'objective' and 'neutral'..until one tries extra extra hard to make repeat posts trying extra hard to deny that Michael reached these numbers, on a Michael fansite. ultimately, that person is not objective or neutral anymore, unless they're willing to settle with posting, once. They are non neutral and non supportive of Michael, after they become extra repetitious with what we have already seen them say, many times.
But let's talk common sense. How big is the world? There are at least seven billion in it. How long has Michael had a career? 39 years. How many is one hundred million? Only one third of the United States, which is really small in comparison to the rest of the world. What in blazes makes you think he can't reach one hundred million in a world of seven billion in thirty nine years? Are you really trying to discount the people in the far reaches of the world that you want to say don't exist and don't like Michael Jackson? Do you want to deny the older woman in Turkey who said she didn't know Michael's name but knew he 'screamed and grabbed himself'? Are you (you, being whoever, in general)really denying there are more like this woman, outside of markets officially counted, who somehow bought MJ's music over a long long stretch of thirty nine years? Do you agree that that is a longgg time? Do you agree that it's plenty of time to reach 100 million? Especially if a whole lot of Thriller is sold in 2009? Even before then, because thirty nine years is a longgg time?
If a person wants to think 'average' thinking, then they would close their eyes. And if they heard that a person with a high voice of a boy that looked like a tall boy, whose skin would go from dark to really light, would be successful, and you were honest with yourself, you would say 'no'.
Also, if you were in the time before the light bulb was invented and somebody told you the light bulb would be invented, and if you were asked if it would be invented and you were honest with yourself, you would say 'no'.
And if you were asked if this man who seemed like a boy, whose skin turned magically from dark to light, would sell one hundred million copies of records, and you were honest with yourself, you would say 'no'.