I bet my life that's not MJ
MJalen;3359775 said:I bet my life that's not MJ
AndreyZidane™;3359792 said:I'm willing to take that risk too.
Pentum;3359845 said:Neh, joining MJalen and Andrey.
Arklove;3359874 said:^^ same here....I bet my life because I AM 100% sure it's not him...
AndreyZidane™;3359909 said:*group hug*
Christian Hug :naughty:
I'm 100% sure it's him.
I was on your side not long ago, but when you realise that ''Michael's'' voice is obviously different on every Cascio song/leak, but not on any other new song/leak which is not related to Cascio... Maybe he was just trying new sound.There's nothing wrong with that, unless it happens to sound like cheesy Jason Malachi.
trying something different does not mean trying to be a water-down version of himself...
I watched tii over the weekend, the man's voice was clear as crystal. He never lost his singing ability.
C'MON!!! NEW CASCIO LEAK AND WE ARE QUESTIONING VOCALS AGAIN!!! DON'T BE BLIND!!!
In all fairness as once controversy took its place in our minds every song coming from Cascio's will be subject to questioning. None of us can accept them automatically. This will be especially true if you made up your mind that the previous Cascio songs are not Michael, nothing coming from them would sound like Michael. Humans generally do not maintain conflicting opinions about the same subject (such as 100% believing one song from the same source to be Michael and another one not to be Michael).
and someone pm
I feel 100% sure that it is Michael, but I would not bet my life on something that I have no evidence on. You don't know that it is not Michael singing. If you have hard evidence of someone else singing the song exactly like it appears on the album, that's evidence. Lame comparison videos are not evidence.
Nothing's wrong. Everyone's confused.MJalen, my comment wasn't serious. I don't know 100% that it's Michael. I said it because others were saying "100% not Michael".
I do have serious doubts.
AndreyZidane™;3360100 said:Well, we do have various comparisons and a hard dose of common sense, maybe not evidance but still... what do you got? What "evidance" or attempt at evidance do you have that could make you believe it's "100% him singing". Not only are you not making any sort of sense whatsoever when saying that, there's no common sense in that, but you too don't have such a thing as "evidance" that you request to non-believers when asked to justify why you believe it's "100% him".