[ Pretrial Discussion Closed ] AEG files summary judgment motion to dismiss Katherine's lawsuit

[elusive moonwalker]

Re: [General Discussion] AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine's lawsu

I think we should be careful about posting speculative tabloid stories. theres enough crap flying around without adfing to it

 

[ivy]

Re: [General Discussion] AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine's lawsu

Ivy, isn't that AEG's emails that were successfully sealed for them by the Court of Appeals?

I remember you saying they received a temporary seal for their emails.

Question please because it is confusing: why would the Court of Appeals unseal the medical records if no party (plaintiffs, defendants, estate as 3rd party) requested it?

Let me try this again

During the discovery phase there have been sealing / protective order about many stuff - these included Michael's medical records, AEG's emails, many business dealings and even many depositions.

When the superior court judge decided on the summary judgment motion and allowed the negligent hiring claim to move forward to trial, she unsealed / removed many protective orders that are present.

The reason was to make it easier on the court. As the case would go to trial and these will be used as evidence removing the seals / protective order made it easier for the court. Otherwise she might have been required to close the courtroom to media & public.

AEG immediately objected to her unsealing, Judge said we have a busy schedule I can only hear your arguments at July 2013.

AEG at that time filed their appeal at the appeals court still redacting and sealing information. Appeals court have said "why are you filing them like this? the lower court has lifted the seal / protective order, file them unsealed".

At that time both AEG and MJ Estate have filed oppositions to the unsealing and appeal court said "fine, the sealing can continue temporarily but you need to give us a really good reason why to continue this or make it permanently".

So as you can see many stuff - which includes Michael's medical records, AEG emails, social security numbers of dancers and musicians and some depositions - are still conditionally under seal - which means a temporary seal.

Tuesday the judge will consider which ones of these to unseal and I can imagine that she would unseal many of them as they will be used as evidence during the trial and will become part of public record, and like I said it would make it easier for everyone involved. According to what media is reporting, it seems like she would only keep the medical records sealed. We will see how she will handle those remaining sealed medical records during trial. She can either allow them to become public if/when they are used at trial - and the unused ones stay sealed. Or she can close the courtroom (to media and public) and keep every medical record private.

 

[ivy]

Re: [General Discussion] AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine's lawsu

Let me give some answers as well

- We have seen the initial witness list , more witnesses - like Michael's bodyguards etc. - can be added later on.
- AEG's evidence exhibit list was numbered, so it's hard to see what they will present as evidence. That's wait and see.
- Stacy Brown article I wouldn't pay much attention because
---- as he also states judge have excluded paternity / maternity talk
---- AEG filed no opposition to it - which show they had no intention to use such arguments
---- again as Stacy Brown said legally whether the kids are biologically Michael's or not makes absolutely no difference
---- so Stacy Brown is just speculating and making up stuff.

 

[Tygger]

Re: [General Discussion] AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine's lawsu

Ivy, thank you for explaining the courts' point of view because that was confusing for me.

I believe AEG was protesting the unsealing of their emails over the unsealing of the medical records. It is more important for the plaintiffs and the estate to keep those records sealed than it is to the defendants.

I hope the judge will keep every medical record private regardless of ease. Unfortunately, the trial will not be televised so the judge may not see the benefit in it. The autopsy picture would have not been made public if it (and other similar evidence in the criminal trial) was sealed.

The defendants' lawyers did use the word alleged in regards to Michael's daughter so I think the plaintiffs' warded against those types of arguments effectively with their unchallenged motion.

 

[jamba]

Re: [General Discussion] AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine's lawsu

This has to do with the fact that MJ was wealthy. I doubt his family would go after him if he was not. As Latoya once said "follow the money."

Good point. If he had been broke and talentless, it would be a different story.

 

[marebear]

Re: [General Discussion] AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine's lawsu

I hope nothing embarrassing gets shown of Michael. The only thing I think they could show is the O2 press conference because they say Michael was drunk or something. He didn't look that way to me. No way did Michael got to rehearsals drunk. I just hate this. I just hate all of it. I shouldn't say this but it's like you feel they are getting Michael from Forest Lawn and so people can pole and mock him and shredding his dignity all over again. Sorry to sound rude but it's so sickening to me.

 

[Victory22]

Re: [General Discussion] AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine's lawsu

MJ's videos to be shown in court to show evidence of addiction problems
London, Apr 14 (ANI): As his family continues their 26 billion-pound court case against concert firm AEG, lawyers for the company will show film of Michael Jackson apparently drunk or under the influence of drugs in a bid to prove that he had long-standing addiction problems.

But the Jackson family, who are claiming AEG is responsible for the Thriller star's "wrongful death", will play their own home videos, the Sun reported.

They will show the pop legend playing with his kids and portraying him as a normal and happy family man.

The videos and films are listed in hundreds of exhibits both sides want to put before the sensational trial, which could last up to four months.

"This is no-holds-barred stuff and will be the biggest insight yet into Jackson's life. Effectively he is giving evidence from beyond the grave for both sides. It's an extraordinary turn of events," a source said.

The Jacksons claim that AEG, who were organising a series of 50 concerts by the star at London's O2 Arena, were negligent in hiring Conrad Murray, the doctor who was with Jackson, when he died of a drug overdose in 2009.

They say Murray, currently serving four years for manslaughter for his involvement in Jackson's death, already had 286,000 pounds of lost court cases against him.

Both sides want to call nearly 100 witnesses in the Los Angeles trial, including the star's former staff and bodyguards. (ANI)

http://www.newstrackindia.com/newsd...t-to-show-evidence-of-addiction-problems.html

If the Jackson's are going to show vids of Michael playing with his kids and being a normal dad why have they gone on every talk show and spoke in every tabloid calling Michael an addict? They can't have it both ways. All AEG has to do is show their interviews and they are done.

 

[Petrarose]

Re: [General Discussion] AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine's lawsu

If the Jackson's are going to show vids of Michael playing with his kids and being a normal dad why have they gone on every talk show and spoke in every tabloid calling Michael an addict? They can't have it both ways. All AEG has to do is show their interviews and they are done.

EXACTLY!!! They were the ones who started going down the drug road. The foolish thing is that they have their own experts talking about drugs, so when AEG shows drug evidence how are they going to show their own videos of Michael being a regular dad. That same video will attack their own drug evidence. This whole thing has gone beyond the scope of foolishness now, so maybe this tabloid story is not true.

Another thing is why can't this man be drunk? Now every little unsteady gait will be called into question? They might use the Mexican deposition. Michael can't even smoke a joint when presidents, lawyers, teachers, athletes, stars, college students, etc., have smoked joints at one time or another.

 

[8701girl]

Re: [General Discussion] AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine's lawsu

If the Jackson's are going to show vids of Michael playing with his kids and being a normal dad why have they gone on every talk show and spoke in every tabloid calling Michael an addict? They can't have it both ways. All AEG has to do is show their interviews and they are done.

Yep the jacksons have got no one to blame but themselves for this

 

[passy001]

Re: [General Discussion] AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine's lawsu

I hope nothing embarrassing gets shown of Michael. The only thing I think they could show is the O2 press conference because they say Michael was drunk or something. He didn't look that way to me. No way did Michael got to rehearsals drunk. I just hate this. I just hate all of it. I shouldn't say this but it's like you feel they are getting Michael from Forest Lawn and so people can pole and mock him and shredding his dignity all over again. Sorry to sound rude but it's so sickening to me.

Maybe MJ did this on purpose because he was very nervous. I know a lot of people who drink before making a public speech or doing a presentation in an attempt to shake up nerves. I do that myself sometimes. so there is nothing uncommon about that. but AEG and the Jacksons are going to spin this negatively.

 

[Annita]

Re: [General Discussion] AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine's lawsu

From my understanding AGE doesn`t want to show the O2 Press-conference. They wanted it cexclude. The KJ-Lawyers wants to show it in connection with the E-Mails from Philipps where he said Michael was drunk as evidence AEG knew Michael was addicted and can`t do the shows.


Updated info from Ivy about the AEG-motions

AEG

excluded in part - allowed in part - Motion 1 - AEG's financial position

excluded (motion granted) - Motion 2 - Gongaware & Segal's personal relationship

excluded in part - allowed in part - Motion 3 - Irrelevant interactions between AEG and Michael

excluded (motion granted) - Motion 4 - Hypothetical evidence of TII cancellation or postponement

excluded in part - allowed in part - Motion 5 - Murray's character as it pertains to his personal life

Reference to strip clubs or clubs are excluded. Debt - child support, credit cards and so on- is allowed.

deferred - Motion 6 - Speculative Damages

allowed (motion denied)- Motion 7 - Michael being drunk before 02 Press conference

 

[Bubs]

Re: [General Discussion] AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine's lawsu

I don`t think the story is true. BTW there are no bodyguards on the witness-list from from my knowledge.

Katherine has 1 former bg Bill Whitfield listed as possible witness.

 

[MJ*PP]

Re: [General Discussion] AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine's lawsu

^ are they damn serious? They really are willing to do anything for the love of money dont they?! Like thinking" ow yea he's dead already what is the worst thing that can happen after that". I cannot believe this is whats in their mind.
She is friggin selling her child to the devils while he's dead.

 

[ivy]

Re: [General Discussion] AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine's lawsu

I believe AEG was protesting the unsealing of their emails over the unsealing of the medical records. It is more important for the plaintiffs and the estate to keep those records sealed than it is to the defendants.

I can tell you that with almost 99% certainty that AEG's emails will become public. The last AEG was only asking to redact email addresses and contact info and social security numbers of 3rd parties (ex : dancers and musicians were also added to the cancellation insurance). Given the law calls for redaction of sensitive info (ex: social security numbers) and that there's a chance of harassment (ex: fans emailing people), the judge will most probably allow the redaction in the emails but unseal them all.

I hope the judge will keep every medical record private regardless of ease. Unfortunately, the trial will not be televised so the judge may not see the benefit in it. The autopsy picture would have not been made public if it (and other similar evidence in the criminal trial) was sealed.

It's really 50-50. Privileged medical records are probably one of the reasons why she did not allow cameras in the courtroom. I would think we would get more information Tuesday but honestly I wouldn't be surprised if she lets medical information get public if and when they are used as evidence during trial

The defendants' lawyers did use the word alleged in regards to Michael's daughter so I think the plaintiffs' warded against those types of arguments effectively with their unchallenged motion.

correct me if I'm wrong but I believe they said "alleged relationship". That doesn't mean paternity. She's asking non-economic damages based on loss of love, guidance and so on and that's the relationship that they called "alleged". If they could prove the relationship wasn't that dependent on Michael it would have mean less damages. Furthermore motions to exclude were filed 4 days (March 14) before the motion to depose Paris was filed (March 18) so I don't think the "alleged" on the motion that was filed 4 days later was the reason for motion 4 day earlier.

 

[PrɛttyღBµʈʈɇrƒℓу]

Re: [General Discussion] AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine's lawsu

I'm in favor that the documents that support the most delicate subjects remain private. However, in this case, everything can be delicate. The problem is how this information will be used by the public. But I think that case can elucidate many issues and I find it positive.

 

[jamba]

Re: [General Discussion] AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine's lawsu

The US is in need of a very serious reform of the press. It has nothing to do with freedom of the press. I doubt it would be legal here, and freedom of the press is respected. This is disgusting.

Agree. I just went to my local supermarket and there it was in the checkout lane--a photo of MJ deceased--I guess an autopsy photo. Isn't there a way to collectively write to Nat'l Enquierer and the supermarket chains about this? How is it appropriate for the general public, for children, this type of cover? As an MJ fan, I am revolted at it but even a nonfan could and should be repelled to see a deceased person on the cover as they go through the checkout. I am going to speak to the store manager about this but maybe there's more than can be done as a group--input?? ideas?

 

[xosweetseducingsighsxo]

Re: [General Discussion] AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine's lawsu

If some of the Jacksons TRULY cared for Michael, then instead of wasting time and trying to point fingers, and moving from on person to the next, then they would have been settled this. But AEG can't blame Michael either. Michael only wanted to sleep, and I'm pretty sure he didn't want to die the way he did. This is like really ridiculous. And something is really telling me that what they have those kids saying isn't true. It just sounds so..... Weird.

 

[Petrarose]

Re: [General Discussion] AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine's lawsu

From my understanding AGE doesn`t want to show the O2 Press-conference. They wanted it cexclude. The KJ-Lawyers wants to show it in connection with the E-Mails from Philipps where he said Michael was drunk as evidence AEG knew Michael was addicted and can`t do the shows.

^^But what I do not understand is how is showing a person drunk before a show equal to the person being an addict? Further, that video does not show a drunk person, unless someone first implants into your mind that the person you are about to see is drunk. Then, how are they going to link up that e-mail to the negligent hiring. It seems to me that after the judge threw out most of the allegations, both sides did not revisit their witness list and evidence and throw out want was no longer applicable. It is all this extraneous speculations that is causing this trial to run into months.

 

[Tygger]

Ivy, I understand, as you said, the plaintiffs’ lawyer requested there would be no paternity discussion motion before the defendants' lawyers filed the March 18th document. The defendants did not challenge it but, was there a choice? It would not be wise to challenge the children’s paternity or Joe and Katherine’s marriage discord; neither have anything to do with the possible negligent hiring of the doctor.

Questions please:

You mentioned, in reference to Stacy Brown’s article, that the children are legally seen as Michael’s. Is there no legal argument for paternity in the civil trial (including damages determination)? If not, why did the judge not say there was no legal reason for the plaintiffs’ paternity motion? If there is no legal reason, why did the defendants bother responding with no challenge?

Moreover, she is seeking extensive damages, based in part, on her alleged relationship with the decedent and on gifts and services he allegedly provide to her.

The world knows Michael was a great father who was with his children almost constantly. What chance will the defendant’s lawyers have to prove their relationships were alleged?

 

[Bubs]

Re: [General Discussion] AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine's lawsu

this trial has already attracted low life's speaking as Michaels 'friends', every headline regarding this trial is negative toward Michael, AEG will portray him as a druggie who would deceive in order to get what he wants and KJ will portray him as a well known druggie and that everybody knew it so should AEG. See the pattern? Perhaps in terms of his legacy regarding music won't be negatively affected but his character/personality sure as hell will be.

I agree with you. The only ones that are getting dragged through the mud on media, are MJ and PPB. I'm astonished that press concentrates on MJ and kids, but nothing on Katherine and siblings. I would have thought that at least this would have waken up media curiosity:
15. Was Katherine Jackson's negligence or wrongful conduct a substantial factor in causing Michael Jackson's death?

If I were a journalist, I would be like a hawk trying to find out where that came from.


After Michael's passing, it took long time to media to concentrate on MJ's contribution to music industry, and there were more articles about his music than other things, but now we are back to square 1, and back to tabloid stories. It will take long time to this die down, and God knows what else is going to come up, and how it will effect on MJ. I fear that there is going to be another generation that will learn that MJ was just a drug addict (again this comes from family) and that would be the only lesson they learn about Michael, just like around 2003 people were feed of garbage via media.

 

[elusive moonwalker]

Re: [General Discussion] AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine's lawsu

The family are giving the media what they want. all the dirt they couldnt get from the trial. Why would the media bite the hand that feeds it. they hate mj and only care about writing crap about him. So no doubt they love the family for that and for helping to destroy what was left of his reputation pre allegations. now the publi will see him not only a weirdo abuser who wanted to be white hes also a druggie and a alcoholic aswell

 

[LastTear]

Re: [General Discussion] AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine's lawsu

@Bubs You are absolutely right, 'back at square one' is exactly how it feels. I had hoped the media had moved past it, now its as bad as ever and at the end of this trial many people will believe that Michael was entirely responsible for his death.

 

[Bubs]

Re: [General Discussion] AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine's lawsu

It is well and truly sick that once they are in firing line in media,family members are fast to issue statements of untrue news, but if PPB or Mj is in the receiving end, they are silent, deadly silent. They have nerve to say they want justice for MJ, but what they call justice is green with these signs $$$$$$$ on them.

 

[ivy]

Ivy, I understand, as you said, the plaintiffs’ lawyer requested there would be no paternity discussion motion before the defendants' lawyers filed the March 18th document. The defendants did not challenge it but, was there a choice? It would not be wise to challenge the children’s paternity or Joe and Katherine’s marriage discord; neither have anything to do with the possible negligent hiring of the doctor.

Questions please:

You mentioned, in reference to Stacy Brown’s article, that the children are legally seen as Michael’s. Is there no legal argument for paternity in the civil trial (including damages determination)? If not, why did the judge not say there was no legal reason for the plaintiffs’ paternity motion? If there is no legal reason, why did the defendants bother responding with no challenge?



The world knows Michael was a great father who was with his children almost constantly. What chance will the defendant’s lawyers have to prove their relationships were alleged?

First of all the motion wasn't limited to paternity, it included maternity as well so overall it was about biological parents. So don't fall the media spin that it's just about paternity.

the only "logical" reason I can come up with such motion by Katherine's side is that Debbie Rowe was deposed. Now keep in mind that we haven't seen her deposition at all. Assuming she was asked about her relationship and birth of the kids, KJ's lawyers might have filed that motion.

However as AEG filed non opposition all of this is moot. They don't have any intention to mention any paternity / maternity.

To answer some questions :

If not, why did the judge not say there was no legal reason for the plaintiffs’ paternity motion? If there is no legal reason, why did the defendants bother responding with no challenge?

well normally just because it's irrelevant to the issue at hand doesn't mean one side can't bring it up. For example Judge Pastor had ruled Michael's finances were irrelevant at the criminal trial and Murray's lawyer still tried to ask questions about that.

second the judge did not make any decision. as the motion was not opposed it got excluded automatically. There was no need for the judge to evaluate it or write a legal opinion.

The world knows Michael was a great father who was with his children almost constantly. What chance will the defendant’s lawyers have to prove their relationships were alleged?

here comes the constantly part. If the kids were mainly taken care by nannies then like I said there could have been an argument for reduced non economic damages.

Anyway regardless of why , this is a moot discussion.

The facts are these : it's anyone's guess why KJ's lawyers filed that motion. AEG had non-opposition and it's excluded. That's that.

 

[ivy]

voicemail on the link



Secret Michael Jackson Voicemail: King Of Pop Caught On Tape ‘Shopping For Drugs’ Just Seven Weeks Before His Death
Posted on Apr 16, 2013 @ 3:45AM | By Dylan Howard and Jen Heger


A slurring Michael Jackson made a frantic call to an aide of Dr. Arnold Klein just seven weeks before his death in a desperate attempt to reach a doctor.

This previously unheard voicemail, obtained exclusively by RadarOnline.com, shows the Thriller singer couldn’t properly utter a short sentence on May 3, 2009 at around 11:06 a.m.

Jackson — sounding almost unrecognizable from his voice of a generation — begged Jason Pfeiffer, who worked for the singer’s Beverly Hills, Calif. dermatologist Dr. Klein, to call him back.

“It’s Michael. Err, I can’t find Klein,” said Jackson, who later died on June 25 at the age of 50.

“Um, I have a problem in the groin area, and I don’t want to say this on the phone… inflamed area there, um, on a private… I don’t want to say this on the phone. Get him to call me please.”

After a brief pause, the legendary King of Pop murmured: “Thank you. Right away. Bye bye.”


RadarOnline.com can reveal Pfeiffer has met with lawyers for AEG and is prepared to testify in support of the concert promoter which is preparing to defend itself against the Jackson family, who has filed a $40 billion wrongful death suit.

“Michael Jackson had a death wish,” Pfeiffer, 39, told us, in an exclusive interview.

“I don’t think any one person and certainly not anyone at AEG could stop that.

“No-one realized he was getting drugs from all these different places, and it was inevitable something was going to go wrong.

“I have deep sympathy of his children and family, but Michael was manipulative and overpowering when it came to getting what he wanted.

“I just wish I’d shaken some sense into him and saved his life, because he had so much to offer.”

According to Pfeiffer, this voicemail is one of many “out of it” calls the drugged up Beat It singer made weeks before his demise, in which he shopped for drugs and begged for treatment — even though Murray was in charge of him in his final months alive.

On one occasion, Jackson even pleaded with Klein’s assistant for Propofol — the powerful anesthetic which killed him– telling him: “I do it all the time to sleep.”

Pfeiffer was originally asked to be a defense witness in Dr. Conrad Murray’s involuntary manslaughter trial, but Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Michael Pastor ruled him out, finding what happened in Klein’s office was irrelevant.

But in the Jackson’s civil trial against AEG, however, such testimony is expected to be introduced, which could make Pfeiffer and his claims relevant to the case.

AEG’s lawyers plan to use Jackson’s drug use history in their defense, arguing it showed Jackson was responsible for his own death.

Prince, 16, Paris, 15 and Blanket, 10, along with their grandmother, Katherine, claim “negligent” AEG bosses coaxed Dr. Murray into making Jackson perform, even though he was physically unstable.

“My role (as Klein’s clinic manager) was to monitor Michael after he had Demerol,” the ex-clinic manager told RadarOnline.com.

“He actually spent hours just lying on couches out flat or trying to sleep.

“The main reason he came into the surgery so often, was to get a fix of Demerol during his procedures. He begged everyone to give him it.

“He complained he couldn’t sleep because his mind was racing constantly.

“By the end, it became like a fix for Michael; getting face fillers and botox surgery was an easy way of getting Demerol.”

Pfeiffer said he’s aware of instances where Jackson faked medical issues so that he could receive Demerol, a painkiller.

“Michael was an addict,” he said.

“He always asked Klein to give him four times the regular amount even if it was for squeezing a spot or putting botox into his skin. Michael felt he was immune to normal volumes and begged for extra quantities.

“Sometimes some of our patients were groggy after shots, but never like Michael.”

And Pfeiffer recounted how on June 14 — just 11 days before his death — Jackson begged him to procure Propofol, even though he was being treated by Dr. Murray.

“Around 7 p.m. Michael called me sounding harassed and flustered; he barely had time to say hello before he just asked for Propofol,” he said.

“He asked me if he knew anyone that could supply him with that.

“Michael said, ‘I do it all the time to sleep, and I wake up feeling refreshed. I have to be up for tomorrow.’

“When I said I couldn’t help, Michael just shut me down and slammed the phone down on me.

“His voice sounded slurred and tired; I thought he was exhausted due to his rehearsals. On reflection it must have been drugs and I guess Dr. Murray didn’t get him enough.”

Pfeiffer said he never saw Dr. Klein administer intravenous drugs to Jackson, nor did he ever give him Propofol. Indeed, Dr. Klein has long insisted he personally tried several times to prevent other doctors from administering Propofol to Jackson to aid his sleep.

And even though Dr. Murray was charged with looking after Jackson for $150,000 a month from May, Pfeiffer said he never saw the cardiologist by his side.

“Dr. Murray never came along on any of his trips to Klein’s clinic,” said Pfeiffer, who previously claimed he and Jackson had a gay love affair.

“He obviously wasn’t looking after him 24 hours a day, seven days a week and Michael never mentioned him.

“I spoke to him once when he rang to make an appointment for Michael.

“At first I thought he was a joke caller, but then Michael grabbed the phone, and said: ’Hey Jason this is Michael that was Dr Conrad. I want to come in.’

“So Dr. Murray knew what Michael was doing and must have had an idea about what he was doing to himself.”

Speaking after listening to the recording, attorney Tom Mesereau, who successfully defended Jackson in the 2005 molestation trial, characterized the voicemail as an “interesting development” on the eve of the wrongful death suit.

“I don’t know the circumstances surrounding how, when or where this voicemail was recorded, the only person that could answer that would be his physician, Dr. Arnold Klein,” Mesereau told RadarOnline.com.

“I don’t know if he was under the influence of anything when this message was left, but it’s certainly an interesting development.

“AEG should have been more careful in the hiring and supervision of Dr. Conrad Murray.

“AEG was aware the Michael had substance abuse issues in the past. I believe that AEG is going to try and sully and dirty up Michael’s name with drug abuse allegations.

“As for whether Dr. Klein should testify, we will have to see how the trial unfolds. Either side could call Klein, he would be a compelling witness who could have very valuable information.”

PHOTOS: Paris Jackson Shows Off Edgy New ‘Do While Cheerleading

Attorneys and a judge are currently selecting a panel of 12 jurors and several alternates to hear the case.

http://radaronline.com/exclusives/2...rugs-seven-weeks-before-death-jason-pfeiffer/

 

[Justthefacts]

Re: [General Discussion] AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine's lawsu

So Michael calling his doctor to tell him about a medical problem oh that is so strange. And where oh where is he asking for drugs during this voicemail maybe I missed it? And every time Mez opens his mouth I lose a little bit of respect forhim

 

[The Brown Gangsta]

Re: [General Discussion] AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine's lawsu

I didn't listen to the voicemail but the quotes sound like he might have had some side effects from klien's treatment (maybe the botox shots to the groin) and wanted to see his treating doctor about it, which is what most patients are encouraged to do...doesn't mean he's shopping for anything.

 

[Justthefacts]

Re: [General Discussion] AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine's lawsu

Yes he is telling his doctor about a problem I mean damn

 

[LastTear]

Re: [General Discussion] AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine's lawsu

He said in that other interview I posted that he had a recording, obviously wanting to attracted the highest bidder. Maybe it's my ears but it doesn't sound like Michael to me.

 

[Bubs]

Re: [General Discussion] AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine's lawsu

Thank you's to Katherine and cubs. We knew that all sort of creepy crawlers will come out of woodworks when trial gets under the way, and they all have more crap top throw over Michael.

I'm getting tired of TMezz. What AEG has got to do this creep giving interviews to every other tabloid? An interesting development he says! How? Jason the creep has nothing to with AEG.
Does he thinks that AEG pays those creeps to come out and sell stuff about MJ?
If that is the case, he should check who in the family sells stuff of MJ and kids.

He said in that other interview I posted that he had a recording, obviously wanting to attracted the highest bidder. Maybe it's my ears but it doesn't sound like Michael to me.

It didn't sound like MJ to me. I wouldn't be surprised that he made this up and tabloids will run with it whether true or not, it's not the first time they do such a thing.