[ Pretrial Discussion Closed ] AEG files summary judgment motion to dismiss Katherine's lawsuit

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine Jackson lawsuit

oh a little tidbit. I was looking over the documents that Katherine's lawyers have filed to get the judge order Murray to sit for deposition.

Katherine's lawyers have deposed Murray's bodyguard (starting from June 26 to the time he got arrested). Apparently Murray's bodyguard has said Murray mentioned that he was owed money from AEG and Murray was frustrated that AEG did not pay him the money owed to him for his services to Michael.

This is one of the reasons Katherine's lawyers say Murray has relevant information - probably to establish an employee-employer relationship.

What amuses me is that Murray is expecting to be paid for his services after he killed Michael. Not that he accepts any blame.

That should say something to people who thinks AEG paid CM to kill MJ. If they hired CM, they would've paid him to keep him quiet.

CM is well and truly some sort of psycho if he thinks he should get paid what he did:angry:
 
Re: AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine Jackson lawsuit

Murray had a bodyguard???
 
Re: AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine Jackson lawsuit

It breaks my heart, when I read how most of those folks WERE concerned for Michael. The only problem was they were showing that concern to Conrad Murray. Conrad Murray the very person who was making Michael sick.

No way Murray would have suggested to Michael that he have a blood test. His secret "MIGHT" have been exposed.

(Thanks ivy.)

I agree they were concerned, esp. Ortega, and so true that they expressed their concern to the killer and that was the wrong person, although I think it did somewhat get CM's attention for a minute or 2. Maybe they should have told him he was not going on the tour b/c he wasn't taking good enough care of his patient, that might have made an impression. CM did not take the whole thing seriously enough that MJ really was not doing well physically--at that point a real doctor who cared about his patient would have done a complete re-evaluation of his 'treatment." MJ really died of a completely inappropriate and unmonitored treatment for insomnia. His bottom line issue was insomnia.
 
Re: AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine Jackson lawsuit

So...strange that people use this Michael Jackson fan website to take the legal side of AEG, a multi-national billionaire, corporation made up of unknown people of unknown moral character.
"Just saying..."

I take no side but Michael Jackson's side and what I see with this ridiculous lawsuit is Michael's family going after the "corporation" with the big $$$ while not giving a damn about the damagess it would cause to blame the wrong people and release sealed, private docs about Michael's health condition. Their claims are rather pathetic and either way the trial turns, it will not find Michael the justice he deserves. Even if you believe Murray is just the fall guy I don't see how this lawsuit is going to reveal the truth. I do however see how it's a Jackson family's attempt to get money out of this sad situation. Nothing strange about not supporting this lawsuit as MJ fans or MJ board simply because this lawsuit is NOT pro-MJ or pro-justice but pro-money that WILL NOT go to Michael's children exclusively anyway.
 
Re: AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine Jackson lawsuit

His bottom line issue was insomnia.

Insomnia and I bet AEG knew nothing about Michael suffering from severe insomnia.

If they had enough sense to suggest a psychologist, I'm sure if they knew about the insomnia, they would have SUGGESTED that "maybe" Michael should consult with a proper sleep specialist. They certainly would not have just instructed Murray to pump Michael fill of diprovan in order to combat his sleep issues.

AEG: Dr. Murray, Michael is having trouble sleeping, we think you should pump him fill of Diprovan everynight. Yeah, that should do the trick.
 
Re: AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine Jackson lawsuit

Why would the family getting a depo from the B.G be of any use. murray said himself he worked for mj but was being paid by AEG. the B.G has nothing that would help them
 
Re: AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine Jackson lawsuit

BHills.jpg


:perrin:




Papa Joe was soooooooooo happy and smiling on this day. He was sure it would do great business and make extra money. And Katherine? I really see a big worry on her face with her son. And Michael surrounded by snakes (as always).... The family of Michael disgusts me. :puke: None of them cared about Michael. :( I'm so sorry for you Michael. You did not deserve this. :cry: *big sigh*
 
Re: AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine Jackson lawsuit

:perrin:




Papa Joe was soooooooooo happy and smiling on this day. He was sure it would do great business and make extra money. And Katherine? I really see a big worry on her face with her son. And Michael surrounded by snakes (as always).... The family of Michael disgusts me. :puke: None of them cared about Michael. :( I'm so sorry for you Michael. You did not deserve this. :cry: *big sigh*


Yep Papa Joe brought Katherine to get her to convince MJ to allow Joe and Leonard Rowe in on the deal.. Joe was so delighted because he thought he was going to get paid.. He along with Katherine didn't give a damn about MJ's well being or his health
 
Re: AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine Jackson lawsuit

It breaks my heart, when I read how most of those folks WERE concerned for Michael. The only problem was they were showing that concern to Conrad Murray. Conrad Murray the very person who was making Michael sick.

No way Murray would have suggested to Michael that he have a blood test. His secret "MIGHT" have been exposed.

(Thanks ivy.)


This is the part that hurts me the most also. It's clear these people did care about Michael's health and they wanted to help him. The only problem was the person they thought would help them care for Michael was the one who was hurting him.
 
Re: AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine Jackson lawsuit

The only 2 people who knew what was going on was Michael and Murray. Nobody suspected Murray. He was the doctor that kept saying everything was fine. When he was the problem. I think it's obvious that people were concerned and felt something wasn't right but they had no clue it was Murray and his treatments causing Michael to be sick or different in how he seemed. I think people were shocked it was Murray and shocked that he was giving Michael propofol at home. I remember many doctors on tv never heard of that happening or think of doing that. The Jacksons should blame Murray because he was risking Michael's life night after night and it all went wrong June 25.

I am not siding with AEG at all but during Murray's trial nothing was shown that made them responsible for what happened to Michael. Jacksons are looking for the money because their mother can't take care of them forever and Michael won't be either. If the Jacksons had anything real or reliable I would be open to it but they don't. They have to find out things about Michael from others because they hardly had a relationship with him. They saw or talked to him once in a blue moon it seemed. To me they don't know much about anything. They keep up the close family picture when the truth was they were not as close as they used to be but they will never acknowledge that publically anyways. They have this showbusiness mentality that they can't turn off.
 
Last edited:
Re: AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine Jackson lawsuit

They keep up the close family picture when the truth was they were not as close as they used to be

Michael said it best " TIGHT MY ASS!" lol
 
Re: AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine Jackson lawsuit

Katherine is adding even more lawyers to her team

02/28/2013 Ex-Parte Application ( granting pro hac vice Alinor Sterling )
Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner

02/28/2013 Ex-Parte Application ( granting pro hac vice carey reilly )
Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner

02/28/2013 Order ( order pro hac vice carey reilly )
Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner

02/28/2013 Order (order pro hac vice alinor sterling )
Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner

02/27/2013 Order
Filed by Judge

02/27/2013 Order
Filed by Judge

02/27/2013 Order
Filed by Judge
 
Re: AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine Jackson lawsuit

^^ :doh: Yeah, that should help her case.
haven't they heard the saying too many cooks soil the broth?

Do I smell desperation on Katherine's side?

Alinor Sterling
Alinor works on complex cases, both in the trial court and on appeal. She is tireless in her efforts to expand and develop the law so that an injured client will recover. Often her cases involve actions against multiple corporate defendants on behalf of an injured individual or family. She has represented clients injured by defective products, as well as by the carelessness of corporations and individuals. She has worked on behalf of clients injured on vacation and while traveling overseas, cases that are often made difficult by the fact that the client was injured far from home.

Carey Reilly has been instrumental in many of the firm's courtroom and appellate successes. Carey has had numerous courtroom victories in cases concerning medical malpractice, negligence and aviation.
 
Re: AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine Jackson lawsuit

Or as what we say in the uk (and prob everywhere else( an ambulance chaser. estate paying for these lawyers are they!?
 
Re: AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine Jackson lawsuit

Katherine is adding even more lawyers to her team

02/28/2013 Ex-Parte Application ( granting pro hac vice Alinor Sterling )
Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner

02/28/2013 Ex-Parte Application ( granting pro hac vice carey reilly )
Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner

02/28/2013 Order ( order pro hac vice carey reilly )
Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner

02/28/2013 Order (order pro hac vice alinor sterling )
Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner

02/27/2013 Order
Filed by Judge

02/27/2013 Order
Filed by Judge

02/27/2013 Order
Filed by Judge

Funny you would think that fewer points to the lawsuit would mean fewer lawyers! What are the chances that these new lawyers will need an extension to get acquainted with the case?
 
Re: AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine Jackson lawsuit

Seems to me it's just more people that the estate will have to pay for - at Michael's expense for a character assassination!
 
Re: AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine Jackson lawsuit

Do I smell desperation on Katherine's side?

Alinor Sterling
Alinor works on complex cases, both in the trial court and on appeal.

Carey Reilly has been instrumental in many of the firm's courtroom and appellate successes.

I agree Bubs. Does Mother's team see some sort of writing on the wall? I don't know, but the addition of Sterling and Reilly does seem very interesting.

They both are noted for appeal/appellate work.

So now my questions become: Are they afraid they are going to lose and are already preparing for a possible appeal. OR, just in case the Judge does eliminate two more claims, they are preparing to appeal that ruling.

Bottomline, I can smell the desperation a mile away!
 
Re: AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine Jackson lawsuit

I wouldn't be surprised if they appealed judge's order about summary judgment.

I wonder what those 2/27 orders are about. Hopefully the online system will have those tonight.
 
Re: AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine Jackson lawsuit

I am 120% sure the estate will pay the legal bill of this. in other words, Michael jackson pay those parasites for tarnishing his name and invading his privacy. a football team of lawyers now :busted: the jacksons really want to suck the esate dry, don't they? how much dollars have been wasted for this stupid lawsuit? it's clear the jacksons have the very weak case, they most likely know that themselves, but they wont give up because it's still the 'win win' situation for them even they lose. it was michael's name being badtalked, it was michael's privacy being invaded, it was michael's money being wasted. who cares? as long as they have the 1% of chance to win this AEG jackpot. if they lose, they can make a round on tv interviews, sell stories to tabloids, in name of "justice". you know media love sensationalism and conspiracy stories especially when it put michael in bad light. after all, that's the jackson's only expertise.
I don't give a shit of who wins. in my eyes, both parties are equally guilty of stressing Michael and used him to bring them big money. it's just the jacksons are so shameless in this whole situation consider they are the so called family. no matter what outcome of the lawsuit, Michael jackson is the only loser in this.
 
Last edited:
Re: AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine Jackson lawsuit

^ Totally agree. Except about the weak case - as far as i can see there is no case. Just absolutely nothing to link aeg with the administration of propofol. I'm beyond furious at all the costs mounting up for this case - if they are going to be met by mj's estate. I thought at first and was hoping that this was a nowin no fee, but i just can't imagine all these lawyers spending time on what they know must be a no-hope case without payment.

I'm wondering if there is a major dismissal of all or most of the causes in this lawsuit whether the judge will order the jackson side to pay aeg's costs?
 
Re: AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine Jackson lawsuit

Katherine is not bright.. why is she blaming AEG for her son's death when she was right there with MJ and she knew he was going to embark on these tour dates. She claimed she was very concerned about all the dates because MJ had not performed in years but was she concerned about his health? did Katherine even know of MJ's medical issues ( lupus) did she even care? If she was so worried about all the dates why didn't she step up and do something? did she even question why MJ was seeing Klein or Murray?
 
Re: AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine Jackson lawsuit

^ Totally agree. Except about the weak case - as far as i can see there is no case. Just absolutely nothing to link aeg with the administration of propofol. I'm beyond furious at all the costs mounting up for this case - if they are going to be met by mj's estate. I thought at first and was hoping that this was a nowin no fee, but i just can't imagine all these lawyers spending time on what they know must be a no-hope case without payment.

I'm wondering if there is a major dismissal of all or most of the causes in this lawsuit whether the judge will order the jackson side to pay aeg's costs?

Yeah, but you know where that will come from. smh
 
Re: AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine Jackson lawsuit

Katherine is not bright.. why is she blaming AEG for her son's death when she was right there with MJ and she knew he was going to embark on these tour dates.

To be honest, I don't even believe Ms. Katherine has much input in this case. In my opinion, her name may be on the file folder, but Randy Jackson is the one pulling the strings. I certainly don't see Mother taking meetings with ALL of these attorneys and keeping up with all that is going on in this case thus far.

I have a feeling Randy wouldn't be pursuing this case, if he were either in Michael's will, or running the Michael Jackson Estate himself.

This is Randy's LAST attempt to possibly get himself some type of a payday. In my opinion, of course.
 
Re: AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine Jackson lawsuit

Let them bring out the lawyers they want. it still won't make a difference. the case will be tossed, and everyone will go home empty handed.
 
Re: AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine Jackson lawsuit

murrary didn't keep medical records on Michael, because he knew what he was doning was wrong. He should have gone to prison for 4yrs not jail.
 
Re: AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine Jackson lawsuit

Jail time is much is harder time than prison. Prisons you have more freedom. You can buy your own TV , visit the library, gym and weight room, music room, educational classes. ect. You can roam free out of your cells .. etc etc. depending on what level you are in.
 
Re: AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine Jackson lawsuit

Randy Phillips and Paul Gongaware of AEG Live, who are being sued by Katherine Jackson, had a history of working with Michael Jackson in the past.

Paul Gongaware testified during Conrad Murray's trial that he was brought in during the HIStory tour, because the tour was losing money. It doesn't sound like Michael Jackson's partnership with the Saudi Arabian Prince was benefiting him. The reason why I say this, besides Paul Gongaware's testimony, is because of a lawsuit that Michael was in in 2002 with Myung Ho Lee. Myung Ho Lee 'Lee, who has an MBA from George Washington University and a law degree from the University of Chicago, handled business affairs that included arranging loans, setting up investment deals and advising Jackson on career matters starting in 1997.'

In 1998, Lee arranged a loan with Bank of America for Michael for $140 million, because Michael had gone through the $90 million where he sold 50% of his Beatles Catalog to Sony, which was in 1995.

Since both LA Gear and Pepsi had pulled their sponsorship with Michael because of the 1993 child molestation allegations brought on by the Chandler's, Michael had to sponsor business arrangements on his own and he was swiftly going through millions out of his own pocket, including paying employees for his albums and video's.

Randy Phillips testified during Murray's trial that he had worked with Michael on LA Gear.

AEG Live was doing their best to help Michael Jackson preparing his London dates, in 2009. Production costs were nearing $40 million and there was a meeting about this shortly before Michael died. Michael Bearden did an Interview where he talked about this meeting and Michael was talking to him about the Three Stooges.

So in my final analysis, both Paul Gongaware and Randy Phillips had worked with Michael in the past. Michael knew what the bottom line was about and when the London Concerts were in production, I thought AEG Live was fair with Michael.

I think that they were worried, including Kenny Ortega, if Michael was fit. This was not a hidden secret. Deadlines did have to be met and Michael knew this. He was a savvy business man. This is why AEG Live wanted to work with Michael because he was still loved by the world and knew he would sell tickets and boy did he. Michael Jackson beat out Prince's record of 21 nights in London. That was the old Michael always wanting to break records, especially Guinness World Records.

Michael was in good shape, he was fit. Did he become exhausted during production of the 02 Arena 50 sold out Shows, no doubt about it. It's the nature of the Industry coming up with a Show that is spectacular and Michael Jackson was nothing short of spectacular. Murray was negligent and that's the bottom line!

L.A. Gear's $20-Million Poster Boy September 24, 1989

One morning, Michael Jackson awoke and decided he was tired of wearing his black loafers.

That's the real story behind the eccentric pop superstar's $20 million contract with L.A. Gear, which is being billed as the largest corporate endorsement deal in show biz history.So far, media coverage has focused on Jackson's bizarre behavior at last week's press conference ("Protect me," he whispered to a top L.A. Gear exec. "Don't let them ask me any questions."), the fog 'n flood-light filled conference's price tag ($50,000) and Jackson's creative input into his new shoe (he'll help design the "Unstoppable" line of footwear).

But Jackson's L.A. Gear signing isn't a typical bottom-line corporate endorsement, said Randy Phillips, a prominent rock manager who served as one of the deal's key middlemen. The ball started rolling when RockBill's Jay Coleman got a phone call from Jackson's attorney, John Branca. Since RockBill is the industry's top corporate-sponsorship brokerage firm, this was no ordinary phone call.

"John said that Michael was thinking of wearing sneakers instead of his black loafers when he made his new videos for his upcoming greatest-hits album," said Phillips, who co-manages Rod Stewart and the Bangles. "It was obvious that the switch to sneakers was a pretty radical image change for Michael. So I told Jay not to go anywhere till I had a chance to talk to (L.A. Gear chairman) Robert Greenberg, who's a good friend."

Though L.A. Gear is one of America's fast-growing companies (its sales are expected to top $1 billion this year) it had been eager to establish a corporate link with a brand-name pop superstar as a weapon in its high-stakes battle with athletic-shoe rivals Nike and Reebok. With Jackson suddenly available, L.A. Gear sprang into action, sending Phillips and L.A. Gear exec Sandy Saemann to meet with Jackson while he was recording one of the three new songs that will appear on his hits collection.

"The L.A. Gear guys were desperate to get involved, no matter what the cost, with someone of Michael's stature," said Phillips, who said he received a "healthy" pre-negotiated fee for his role in the deal. "We spent two hours with him in the studio, showing him L.A. Gear ads and telling him about the shoe business. He was the opposite of what I expected--he was very warm and conversational, and asked very sharp questions about marketing and promotion."

After financial agreements were made, Jackson was also granted unprecedented involvement in the design of his L.A. Gear products. "He's really into it--he's going to be at the factory, with his sleeves rolled up, working on everything," says Phillips.

So why is the Gloved One, who after all, is being hired as a corporate spokesman, so shy about meeting the press that he fled the mike after mumbling for 10 seconds? "Michael may have only said two sentences, but he spoke more at our press conference than he did at Pepsi's press conference--or when he visited the White House, for that matter," said Phillips. "What's important is that he's enthusiastic about the product. He came to the press conference \o7 wearing \f7 L.A. Gear's hottest shoes. You didn't see him ever drinking a Pepsi at their press conference."Still, Jackson has complete freedom from any corporate interference in his work. When Pepsi came under fire from religious groups over Madonna's controversial video this spring, it backed out of its endorsement deal with the pop starlet. That won't happen with Jackson. "L.A. Gear has nothing to say about the songs or videos he makes," Phillips says. "We're prepared to live with anything he does."

Unlike Pepsi, which debuted its Madonna ad before her new single came out, L.A. Gear has no plans to release any Jackson commercials before his hits collection, which isn't due till spring of next year--at the earliest. "We're not going to scoop his album," Phillips says. "The spots we use, which will probably feature segments of his new songs and clips from his videos, will not air till after the album is released."

The bottom line remains: is an oddball pop star who has sworn off concert touring and who's creative peak may be at least five years behind him really worth the $20 million?

"Absolutely," insists Phillips. "L.A. Gear's stock has gone up almost 10 points since the day before the press conference. (On Wednesday, the firm's stock was at 73, up from 64 the day before the Jackson announcement) And you have to give Michael Jackson credit for a huge part of that swing. We think he's going to make a big difference."


http://articles.latimes.com/1989-09-24/entertainment/ca-218_1_press-conference
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,59544,00.html
 
Re: AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine Jackson lawsuit

I checked the online system - no order yet.

and this

Anthony McCartney ?@mccartneyAP
No final order yet. RT @Ivy_4MJ: Any updates on Katherine Jacksn - AEG lawsuit? Did the judge finalized her order about summary judgment?
 
Re: AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine Jackson lawsuit

Why would the family getting a depo from the B.G be of any use. murray said himself he worked for mj but was being paid by AEG. the B.G has nothing that would help them

They are fishing the waters for anything they can use.

I wonder if the Estate will at some point draw the line in the number of lawyers the family has working on this? Is it 7 or more than 7 now? Isn't this more lawyers than Michael had in his 2005 trial???
 
Re: AEG files their summary judgment motion asking to dismiss Katherine Jackson lawsuit

How can Katherine claim negligence on the part of AEG--she herself was urging MJ to do more shows with his brothers, so she obviously thought he was well enough to do 50 shows and then more shows after that (and Jermaine told the Guardian recently that they were going to do another 50 shows with MJ after he finished TII). So the family must have thought he was in great shape, so why would AEG think any different if she didn't notice a problem?

How could AEG have foreseen the craziness and laziness of Murray's treatments? Murray was saying "MJ is fine," MJ was saying, "I'm fine. Don't worry."

I wish AEG had looked into it more carefully of course as far as Murray's treatment, why he was there in the first place, and why MJ was ill that day shortly before he died, but it was Murray's lying about his condition that misled them into a false complacecy.

The other point is that if Murray had had the proper equipment and had known what he was doing, if he had cared enough to actually pay attention, MJ would be alive.

I guess we will eventually see from the Estate accounting how much all this is costing??
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top