Open General discussion - Katherine Jackson vs AEG

Status
Not open for further replies.
Putnam asked her about her decision to sue AEG Live in September 2010. She said she didn't discuss with her children or her grandchildren before filing the lawsuit.

"This was your decision alone," Putnam asked.

She said it was.

So not only Katherine denied involvement of some siblings - such as Randy who publicly took credit for this lawsuit- but she also testified that she didn't talk with her grandchildren - which would mean Prince, Paris and Blanket...
 
Passy001, I appreciate your response but, it is your opinion as I have mine. No one knows but Michael what he would have done when posed with the proposition of two shows a week as per AEG and this expert. It is a projection. I did not say anyone in this thread was dismissive of Michael’s thoughts so I do not appreciate others in this thread saying that I am being dismissive. It is ironic the person labeled as dismissive supports the plaintiffs in this trial.

Do you feel it is dismissive to say that Michael “does not make sense” because he brought a motor home for his mother when that is what he did? It is monies “thrown away” in your opinion, but, obviously not a waste to Michael.

Ivy, when did Randy publicly take credit for the filing of this lawsuit?
 
Putnam asked her about her decision to sue AEG Live in September 2010. She said she didn't discuss with her children or her grandchildren before filing the lawsuit.

"This was your decision alone," Putnam asked.

She said it was.

So not only Katherine denied involvement of some siblings - such as Randy who publicly took credit for this lawsuit- but she also testified that she didn't talk with her grandchildren - which would mean Prince, Paris and Blanket...

Agreed. Randy pretty much admited on twitter they are behind this. And I'm not surprised they didn't bother asking MJ's kids if they want to be involved in this mess.
 
Tygger;3871749 said:
Ivy, when did Randy publicly take credit for the filing of this lawsuit?

after TII movie release

Randy Jackson ‏@randyjackson8 4 Nov 09
Underneath all the excitement & pandemonium, a murder hasn’t been solved. This family will not forget that, because I won’t let them.

Randy Jackson ‏@randyjackson8 31 Jan 10
Let me be clear, when I said "My family" I meant my brothers, sisters & parents.

Murray's charging

Randy Jackson ‏@randyjackson8 7 Feb 10
I will attend tomorrow's proceedings but make no mistake, I will not rest until ALL parties involved are brought to justice.

Randy Jackson ‏@randyjackson8 8 Feb 10
Sitting in court & I'm sad. Those profiting most from my bro’s death: AEG, Randy Phillips, Kenny Ortega, Estate Executors r nowhere in sight

Randy Jackson ‏@randyjackson8 17 Feb 10
Ok Can’t say 2much. WHY WHY WHY r LAPD & DA ignoring evidence that goes beyond Dr. Murray? Wondering who they r protecting. Hmmm. Talk to me

sometime later

Randy Jackson ‏@randyjackson8 16 May 10
Let me be clear, there is an investigation pending…. I keep my cards close to my chest.

Randy Jackson ‏@randyjackson8 16 May 10
Keep in mind, the evildoers are reading my tweets too… But, I will not stop until justice is served. It goes way beyond Murray.

shortly before lawsuit being filed

Randy Jackson ‏@randyjackson8 31 Aug 10
I know its been a long time since I've tweeted. But that does not mean that things are not happening...

Randy Jackson ‏@randyjackson8 31 Aug 10
You will understand what that means shortly.


then the lawsuit is filed, the same day

Randy Jackson ‏@randyjackson8 15 Sep 10
Today was a good day.

Randy Jackson ‏@randyjackson8 15 Sep 10
Last year I promised that I would not rest until the truth is exposed about what happened to my brothers passing. May he rest in peace.

Randy Jackson ‏@randyjackson8 15 Sep 10
I am doing my best to keep that promise. On this day my family has filed a wrongful death lawsuit against AEG. I am proud of my family.

after Ortega was dismissed

Randy Jackson ‏@randyjackson8 2 Feb 11
However, The Jackson Family as a WHOLE does NOT extend any sort of an apology to Kenny Ortega

Randy Jackson ‏@randyjackson8 2 Feb 11
In their obsession to get the show out, it appears Kenny & AEG didn’t care about my brother’s health & they didn’t inform the family

Randy Jackson ‏@randyjackson8 2 Feb 11
... at times driving my brother to tears.

Randy Jackson ‏@randyjackson8 2 Feb 11
Michael would still be here had they informed his family of the situation. More facts will come out.


----------------

so no, I don't believe this lawsuit wasn't discussed with Randy.
 
CBSLA Reporter

Edward Lawrence ?@EdwardLawrence 2m
When AEG Attorneys started the cross Katherine Jackson turned to judge saying this was too much & she needed a break. Recessed until Mon
 
so no, I don't believe this lawsuit wasn't discussed with Randy.

You posted angry tweets from Randy and he had every right to be angry if that is how he felt. However, NONE of the tweets show him publicly taking credit for the filing of this lawsuit as you previously posted.

Of course he may have had the conversation with his mother but, that is not what you previously posted. It was his mother's decision to file and she said it was her sole decision.

Spin it however anyone would like, Randy did not take credit for this lawsuit. He tweeted his frustration and eventually his support of the suit.
 
However, none of the tweets show him publicly taking credit for the filing of this lawsuit as you previously posted.

don't you realize that's your opinion and I'm entitled to have my opinion? To me saying "I promise" and "I'm doing my best to keep my promise" is taking credit for it. ( promise: to declare solemnly that one will follow a particular course of action) If you don't agree fine but please refrain from trying to push your opinion as facts.

Of course he may have had the conversation with his mother

so you are saying Katherine is lying when she said "she didn't discuss with her children or her grandchildren before filing the lawsuit."

even if you don't think Randy took credit for it, his tweets clearly show he had discussions and knowledge about this lawsuit before it was filed.
 
ivy;3871799 said:
after TII movie release

Randy Jackson ‏@randyjackson8 4 Nov 09
Underneath all the excitement & pandemonium, a murder hasn’t been solved. This family will not forget that, because I won’t let them.

Randy Jackson ‏@randyjackson8 31 Jan 10
Let me be clear, when I said "My family" I meant my brothers, sisters & parents.

Murray's charging

Randy Jackson ‏@randyjackson8 7 Feb 10
I will attend tomorrow's proceedings but make no mistake, I will not rest until ALL parties involved are brought to justice.

Randy Jackson ‏@randyjackson8 8 Feb 10
Sitting in court & I'm sad. Those profiting most from my bro’s death: AEG, Randy Phillips, Kenny Ortega, Estate Executors r nowhere in sight

Randy Jackson ‏@randyjackson8 17 Feb 10
Ok Can’t say 2much. WHY WHY WHY r LAPD & DA ignoring evidence that goes beyond Dr. Murray? Wondering who they r protecting. Hmmm. Talk to me

sometime later

Randy Jackson ‏@randyjackson8 16 May 10
Let me be clear, there is an investigation pending…. I keep my cards close to my chest.

Randy Jackson ‏@randyjackson8 16 May 10
Keep in mind, the evildoers are reading my tweets too… But, I will not stop until justice is served. It goes way beyond Murray.

shortly before lawsuit being filed

Randy Jackson ‏@randyjackson8 31 Aug 10
I know its been a long time since I've tweeted. But that does not mean that things are not happening...

Randy Jackson ‏@randyjackson8 31 Aug 10
You will understand what that means shortly.


then the lawsuit is filed, the same day

Randy Jackson ‏@randyjackson8 15 Sep 10
Today was a good day.

Randy Jackson ‏@randyjackson8 15 Sep 10
Last year I promised that I would not rest until the truth is exposed about what happened to my brothers passing. May he rest in peace.

Randy Jackson ‏@randyjackson8 15 Sep 10
I am doing my best to keep that promise. On this day my family has filed a wrongful death lawsuit against AEG. I am proud of my family.

after Ortega was dismissed

Randy Jackson ‏@randyjackson8 2 Feb 11
However, The Jackson Family as a WHOLE does NOT extend any sort of an apology to Kenny Ortega

Randy Jackson ‏@randyjackson8 2 Feb 11
In their obsession to get the show out, it appears Kenny & AEG didn’t care about my brother’s health & they didn’t inform the family

Randy Jackson ‏@randyjackson8 2 Feb 11
... at times driving my brother to tears.

Randy Jackson ‏@randyjackson8 2 Feb 11
Michael would still be here had they informed his family of the situation. More facts will come out.


----------------

so no, I don't believe this lawsuit wasn't discussed with Randy.


What I don't understand is why does Katherine have to lie in such a trivial matter? She could say: "yes, I discussed it with my children and we decided that I file this lawsuit". I just don't get it why she has to lie under oath when it's not even necessary.
 
CBSLA Reporter

Edward Lawrence ?@EdwardLawrence 2m
When AEG Attorneys started the cross Katherine Jackson turned to judge saying this was too much & she needed a break. Recessed until Mon

no surprise :smilerolleyes: how many times she will repeat this ? alot , every time she feels trapped she would say it's too much and she needs a break.
 
Last edited:
What I don't understand is why does Katherine have to lie in such a trivial matter? She could say: "yes, I discussed it with my children and we decided that I file this lawsuit". I just don't get it why she has to lie under oath when it's not even necessary.

simple

allowed(motion denied)- Motion 4 - Michael's siblings have or had financial problems

- Gifts from Michael Jackson to his siblings are relevant to the issue of Jackson's damages and for the purposes of cross examination/impeachment of siblings.
- However presentation of the siblings entire finances is irrelevant and presents undue consumption of time.

combined with

allowed (motion denied)- Motion 8 - KJ did not file a suit against Murray

- AEG is precluded from pointing out that Murray is not a defendant in the lawsuit (see reason cited at motion 7 above)
- However AEG is allowed to present a comparative fault defense and verdict form.
- AEG is permitted to question Katherine Jackson as to her motive (financial) for filing the lawsuit.

because AEG might try to say the siblings were getting gifts / monetary support from Michael hence they are involved in this lawsuit and this lawsuit is financial motivated
 
she already said the decision not to seek money from murray was financially motivated . Trust me she will ask for a lot of breaks because she knows she is not saying the truth
 
she already said the decision not to seek money from murray was financially motivated . Trust me she will ask for a lot of breaks because she knows she is not saying the truth

I personally expect AEG trying to portray this lawsuit as an extortion attempt - Putnam already said it to media.
 
All Mrs. Jackson has to say is, I decided to sue CM Boss AEG. And keep saying I don't Remember. It worked for RP, I am sure it will work for Mrs. Jackson.
 
All Mrs. Jackson has to say is, I decided to sue CM Boss AEG. And keep saying I don't Remember. It worked for RP, I am sure it will work for Mrs. Jackson.

Dont know if it worked, depends what the jury think about it.
 
ivy;3871856 said:
don't you realize that's your opinion and I'm entitled to have my opinion? To me saying "I promise" and "I'm doing my best to keep my promise" is taking credit for it. ( promise: to declare solemnly that one will follow a particular course of action) If you don't agree fine but please refrain from trying to push your opinion as facts.

Ivy, you said Randy publicly took credit for the lawsuit and the tweets you posted did not support that. If you are interpreting those tweets to mean that, it is your choice but, he did NOT publicly take credit for the lawsuit in those tweets. That is not my opinion that is fact in black and white as per the tweets.

so you are saying Katherine is lying when she said "she didn't discuss with her children or her grandchildren before filing the lawsuit."

Re-read the sentence: “Of course he MAY have had the conversation with his mother…” Let me continue with this below.

even if you don't think Randy took credit for it, his tweets clearly show he had discussions and knowledge about this lawsuit before it was filed.

Again, your post clearly stated he took credit publicly for the lawsuit and the tweets you posted did NOT support that. You are now saying that is your opinion/interpretation of the tweets. If Katherine testified she did not have the conversation with her children before filing then that is what she meant.

Maybe the defense will use these tweets and this interpretation in court Monday to impeach her if at all possible. The defense will then have to suggest that her children discussed this case with her and she was an active participant in that discussion. Note: if someone has a conversation without another’s participation, it is monologue, not a dialogue and that will mean she did not have the discussion before filing.

I wish the defense luck with that. Guess we will see what happens Monday!
 
Tygger;3871963 said:
Note: if someone has a conversation without another’s participation, it is monologue, not a dialogue and that will mean she did not have the discussion before filing.

:) splendid !
 
Did someone call Michael a freak?

Sometimes I feel sorry for Katherine and other times she makes me mad. It has to be hard to lose a child and now she's in court and has to testify & probably she's tired of having to go to court every day. But she also is going through this trial for the wrong reasons. She knew Michael had problems, she heard it from her own sons but Michael denied it. Now she says nobody got Michael a doctor, why she's blaming someone else? They tried to get him help, the emails showed that. And what did Michael tell KO? "I'm fine". Almost the same answer Katherine got from Michael. She was the mother and didn't go any further, what did she expect from bus associates. To drag Michael by the ear to another doc & tell him that this will be the doc you will be seeing from now on? Sometimes it's hard for me to understand her ways. she's either blinded by her motherly emotions or she's blinded by money.

It can be true that she got tired by the time of the cross, but we'll see if she will keep getting tired. I would like if they ask her about what Joe said of her not wanting to invade Michael's privacy.
 
Tygger;3871544 said:
Gerryevans, Serendipity, I believe the concept of the two shows a week is truly being overanalyzed here because both are projections by the expert based on AEG’s emails and documents. The projection by the expert indeed matched the projection by AEG when some were saying 260 shows were too much without realizing it is the same calculation used to get to AEG’s 186 shows. The only difference was the amount of time the tour would last and the monies amount..

Overanalyzed? This is a civil suit and monies are only second in importance to the verdict, if favorable to the plaintiff. Of course the figures are going to be analyzed and analyzed, especially when they are the base for determining hundreds of millions in a judgment.

And if you view AEG culpable in MJ's death in getting him to do 50 shows, I'm surprised you use their figures to give merit to this expert's projections. AEG's expectations factored into killing him according to this suit, and these projections are even worse.
 
Did someone call Michael a freak?

Sometimes I feel sorry for Katherine and other times she makes me mad. It has to be hard to lose a child and now she's in court and has to testify & probably she's tired of having to go to court every day. But she also is going through this trial for the wrong reasons. She knew Michael had problems, she heard it from her own sons but Michael denied it. Now she says nobody got Michael a doctor, why she's blaming someone else? They tried to get him help, the emails showed that. And what did Michael tell KO? "I'm fine". Almost the same answer Katherine got from Michael. She was the mother and didn't go any further, what did she expect from bus associates. To drag Michael by the ear to another doc & tell him that this will be the doc you will be seeing from now on? Sometimes it's hard for me to understand her ways. she's either blinded by her motherly emotions or she's blinded by money.

It can be true that she got tired by the time of the cross, but we'll see if she will keep getting tired. I would like if they ask her about what Joe said of her not wanting to invade Michael's privacy.

No, Katherine said Michael was not a freak. She didn't like the things people are saying about Michael. I have to say that even though I don't like this trial just reading what she was saying about Michael, I can't help but get emotional. I do believe she loved Michael. She talks about him in the present tense. Never "was" but Michael "is" I noticed.
 
Tygger;3871749 said:
Passy001, I appreciate your response but, it is your opinion as I have mine. No one knows but Michael what he would have done when posed with the proposition of two shows a week as per AEG and this expert. It is a projection.

Then please stop posting your opinion as facts. You are the one stubbornly pushing the idea that MJ could do 260 shows.


Tygger;3871749 said:
I did not say anyone in this thread was dismissive of Michael’s thoughts so I do not appreciate others in this thread saying that I am being dismissive. It is ironic the person labeled as dismissive supports the plaintiffs in this trial.

But your posts were dismissive of MJ's thoughts. You can be dismissive of MJ thoughts while supporting the plaintiff. the two are not mutually exclusive.

Tygger;3871749 said:
Do you feel it is dismissive to say that Michael “does not make sense” because he brought a motor home for his mother when that is what he did? It is monies “thrown away” in your opinion, but, obviously not a waste to Michael.

please go back and read my post again. I clearly stated that "It does not make sense", meaning your post in response to my post. anyways the argument was that MJ used the thriller 25 royalties to fund the purchase of the motor home. that was your opinion, and you conveniently cited Sullivan in support of that opinion. On the other hand I was opposed to such opinion as mere speculation given the severe financial constraints MJ was facing.
 
I find it odd that katherine says she didnt discuss bout making this case go to court with MJ3 and her children cuz especially since MJ3 are named in the case. Wouldnt she need the kids permission if they wanted to put their names for the case?
 
I thought Katherine’s testimony was very heartfelt and I am looking forward to her continued testimony on Monday. I learned more about Michael and the bond he shared with his children and mother.

Gerryevans, the jury will determine the damages. They may most likely find a “middle ground” between the figures projected by AEG and the expert. Maybe they will choose one or the other. I do not know. It is not me using AEG’s figures to give merit to the expert; it is the expert using AEG’s projections as per their emails and documents to arrive at his projections.

Just to clarify, I believe AEG negligently hired the doctor who caused Michael’s death which is why I would like to see a favorable verdict for the plaintiffs in this trial. I do not believe “getting him” to do the 50 shows cause his death but, it did put pressure on the doctor to get Michael to rehearsals for those 50 shows.

Passy001, the expert said Michael could do 260 shows and AEG said Michael could do 186. Both projections equate to two shows per week. Those are the facts, not my opinion. Again, they are projections. No one knows if Michael would agree to doing two shows a week for an extended period of time or not. We cannot look to past, public comments by Michael (or private) to definitively say he would or would not. If you prefer to use testimony and evidence, his daughter and son said their father told them he was doing a world wide tour and AEG's emails show they were planning it.

You will have to show me where I was dismissive of Michael thoughts so I can speak to it but, I am unsure what purpose it will serve in the thread. I read your previous posts quite clearly. You suggested that it did not “make sense” that Michael would pay for a motor home for his mother from his Thriller25 royalties. You suggested the only way Michael could afford the motor home would be to irresponsibly use his AEG advance that was solely for business purposes.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top