Dr.Feelgood
Proud Member
........I am pretty sure I and plenty of other fans who were there can vouch for the fact Michael was in the studio...
There exists a video of him recording there.
There exists a video of him recording there.
........I am pretty sure I and plenty of other fans who were there can vouch for the fact Michael was in the studio...
There exists a video of him recording there.
Wow.. the defensiveness of some of you people is sometimes astonishing! How about not wanting to see Michael embarras himself!?Well I suppose everyone sees what they want to see. Of course, you have nothing to worry about. If anyone will be embarrassed or have their reputation tarnished, it will be MJ -- not YOU.
Of course, unless these things embarrass YOU as a FAN. And if that's the case, then you are far too invested in someone who you don't even know.
For 15 mins of a music wannabe $7M is pocket change for the Prince to throw.http://www.stalbansreview.co.uk/uk_nationa...h_s_own_songs_/
Jackson 'to sing sheikh's own songs'
© Press Association 2008
"Mr Thanki promised the judge that a recording of the song would be played in court during the trial. "It shows the quality of Sheikh Abdulla's song writing skills and that of Mr Jackson's voice," he told the judge. "
Um... COMBINED Rights agreement (CRA) .... The Prince combined with Michael??? Having signed an agreement is not in Michael's favour, his lawyer will need to show proof he was under duress when he signed this and probably the amount the prince sued for probably will whittle down to half or less.He claims he and Jackson entered into a "combined rights agreement" (CRA) under which the troubled superstar was committed to a recording contract, the production of an autobiography and a musical stage play.But Jackson is contesting the claim, insisting there was no valid agreement and that the sheikh's case is based on "mistake, misrepresentation and undue influence". In his pleaded defence, Jackson says the payments he received were "gifts" and that no project was ever finalised.
The hearing continues.
Once the judge is done hearing the case I think he will take into consideration that MJ had gone through a very exhausting trial. It's widely known that he did. But it also seems like there's going to be some sort of a settlement....like the judge is going to want them to meet each other half way or something.
then have media black out for a couple of weeks thats all i do.
The more I think to those 7 milions the more the sum seem bogus....
u can find on the first page.omg a million pages. can someone plz be kind enough to give me the headlines here? when the trial started and when will it be over ? did michael appear via video message ? can we see that video or read the transcript of it ? what happens if michael loses ? what happens if michael wins ? thank u in advance
monday is the first day of hearing."At the start of a court hearing set for up to 12 days, the judge heard that an application would be made for Jackson to give evidence via video link from Los Angeles."
The fact that the prince was pushing his musical works and dreams onto Michael DURING the trial, and had Michael record a new song for him ONE DAY after the trial ended, ..........
OMG!! HOW RUDE!
He wannet to use Michael to make him famous!!!!!!!! cant believe it!!!!!!
BASTARD!! How could he!??! after all the hell he's been through!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
}oh dear lord you help!!!!!!!!!!
What about that Guy Holmes fella? (Dude on the right)
Found an old articile about the alleged venture with 2seas Records..
U.K. record executive Guy Holmes has been tapped as CEO of the Two Seas label and will also be tasked with managing Jackson's other business interests."[/I][/B]
Will he be testifying?
^ thank you. but will we see that video or read the transcript ? has the video been shown to the court yet ? sorry for asking so much question that have probably been answered a million times already i just dont have the time to go through all these pages. maybe all the articles should be gathered on the first page for our convenience
holmes gave an interview around the time the suit was filed where he mentiond mj and the deal falling apart. u would think he might testfy if he was there when agreements were madeYep, I was also wondering if we would be hearing from Mr. Holmes. I mean, first Holmes was down with the "project," then he completely disappeared, never to be heard from again.
I wonder what happened to his participation in this "project," and why he decided to leave.
thanks for mentioingme that, i thought :heart:Michael's shot a testimony video and that i have missed.the judge hasnt agreed that mj will give video evidence yet. nothing has happened. all that happened yesterday was the princes lawyer started to outlay their case.