Michael - The Great Album Debate

I'm so excited!! And I just can't hide it!!! I'm about to lose control and I think I like it!! :wild: :wild: :wild:
 
So you don't find it surprising that a thread with a non-present discussion gets over 10,000 views in one day?

no. Tohme lawsuit averages 20,000 a day, even the boring lawsuit file had 5,000 hits to it. This thread hasn't shown over 10 people viewing it. currently there's only 3 guests. this section now shows 9 people viewing it, trials and tribulations has 60 people viewing it. and it also depends on how many times you have refreshed it. I alone have been in this thread 15-20 times today. so it's not that surprising if someone is googling for Cascio and coming to this thread.

furthermore contentwise I don't see any reason to be happy. Assume that I have found this thread and wanted to look to the latest discussion. What do I see? Dumb and Dumber. What did you achieve with that in regards to Cascio songs?
 
Dont forget my contribution SpongeBob :)
I think that's why they really all came in anyway. They were googling Sponge Bob


Maybe we should stay on topic so our lurkers will take this debate serious.
 
Why are you getting so excited over the view numbers?

If anyone is reading the most recent discussion they are seeing Chuck Norris, Bruce Lee and Dumb and Dumber and we aren't seeing anyone registering to be part of the "discussion" which is non -present.

Who's getting excited? I was merely observing the change from yesterday? By the way, the increase in views of the thread doesn't mean that people are viewing the last posts with Chuck Norris and Bruce Lee. There are many more pages with much more interesting info than that. Google it and you'll find it out. It's not my fault if believers avoid my questions.

Although I don't see it as any kind of competition and I don't know why you are comparing this thread's views to Thome's lawsuit views at all, we'll see if Thome's lawsuit will have as many views as this one one year later.
 
So you don't find it surprising that a thread with a non-present discussion gets over 10,000 views in one day?

Of course not, it's completely normal to have 10 000 views in one day, it happens to all the threads.

I'm so excited!! And I just can't hide it!!! I'm about to lose control and I think I like it!! :wild: :wild: :wild:
 
to show 10,00 is not that much as some tend to think. btw - I at least visited / refreshed 10 times since my last post.
 
And to be honest if you want to be taken seriously the last five pages are a bit of an embarrassment to your cause.

That's what I was trying to say :) The goal was to educate the public who might not know about the issue with this songs and make this a common knowledge. If I'm new and found this thread through google, I'll read the first and the last pages, I wouldn't spend time reading 1600+ pages. And if I was interested in discussion about these songs but came and saw off topic talk I wouldn't bother to participate.
 
to show 10,00 is not that much as some tend to think. btw - I at least visited / refreshed 10 times since my last post.

Gaz wanted to reach a million views. I suggested to make the thread visible. It got 10 000 views in one day (including your 10 refreshes), but my proposition sucks I guess. Let's hide it back and keep on pressing F5 from dusk till dawn.
 
Keep it on topic guys or you run the risk of this thread being closed.

And to be honest if you want to be taken seriously the last five pages are a bit of an embarrassment to your cause.

I asked a few questions on topic, but they were ignored. There is no agenda or cause other than share views as they come along. If you wanna close the thread, well it's your decision, not anyone else's.

That's what I was trying to say :) The goal was to educate the public who might not know about the issue with this songs and make this a common knowledge. If I'm new and found this thread through google, I'll read the first and the last pages, I wouldn't spend time reading 1600+ pages. And if I was interested in discussion about these songs but came and saw off topic talk I wouldn't bother to participate.

Umm, if you were new and googled the info you were interested in you wouldn't be directed to this particular last page, but to the keywords of the posts in any of the pages in this thread, be it page 300, 500 or 1000. What's this all of a sudden concern to get back on topic when the topic itself is contained within the 1600 pages?
 
What's this all of a sudden concern to get back on topic when the topic itself is contained within the 1600 pages?

Well technically all of our threads have to be on topic. We kinda relaxed on this one as we had little moderation on this thread. However if this thread will be accessible to everyone and can affect anyone's opinion about MJJC , I think that the thread has to be on topic and free of any possible defamation and insults towards the parties.

It's one thing that our members understand how this thread works, it's another a random person finds this thread and then finds a picture of monkey balls on the last page.

Anyway I said what I wanted to say.
 
And that is your appreciation for me wanting to give you guys a voice,

Nice one.

Don't misunderstand Gaz, we are all MJ's fans and come here for MJ, not for the Cascios, not for Malachi, not for anyone else. If you say in your own post that if we don't keep going this thread on topic and that there is a risk of closing it, what options do we have left?

By the way, aren't you glad to see more views?
 
Well technically all of our threads have to be on topic. We kinda relaxed on this one as we had little moderation on this thread. However if this thread will be accessible to everyone and can affect anyone's opinion about MJJC , I think that the thread has to be on topic and free of any possible defamation and insults towards the parties.

It's one thing that our members understand how this thread works, it's another a random person finds this thread and then finds a picture of monkey balls on the last page.

Anyway I said what I wanted to say.

Then I suggest you to start cleaning the 1600 pages, because they're all accessible regardless of what's on the last page.
 
I just wondered, if any believer could answer:

given the fact that Michael loved what he did, recording music, songs, etc, if Michael had the time to record 12 songs (= a whole album) in a matter of months in a friend's home studio, how many dozens of songs (= albums) did he record in his/a professional studio in a matter of years?

Ok, in order to get a lil bit back on topic, I'll reply to Bumpers unanswered question. I'm not a believer (and no 100% doubter), but one could argue this way (doesn't mean that this is my opinion):

MJ didn't record 12 whole songs in this short time and neary completed them. He just did it similar to his known recording habits: Trying out some tunes, looking for new material and ideas. What he actually did record are very rough ideas in an early state which he might or might not wanted to complete later.
Just the way he did it very often with his songs: Start to write/record if he/other people get nice ideas, pause for some months or years if he's not satisfied with them and maybe return to finish them.

Eddie just said this material was so good and in a nearly finished state for promition. Who would buy songs in their earliest state of completion?



So: MJ recorded hundreds of songs/ideas in his professional studio with most of them unfinished, so it's reasonable to say that he started with 12 new ones in those months at the Cascios.
 
The whole point of this thread is the cascio debate so yes people do come here just for that however looking at the last few pages no one is doing the real debate justice infact I think you have let down the remaining 1600 pages and those who posted including yourself.

And no I'm not glad, to me it was more important for outsiders to read the debate rather than thread view numbers.

Well ok, I don't know what kind of change you had expected in only one day, but I guess I have nothing more to add, nor to propose. I'll erase my last posts with Spongebob, Chuck Norris and Bruce Lee. My proposition and my posts are probably lame I guess. Sorry Gary, but as much as I tried to infuse positivity and smile into this thread when it was let down by many, it backfires to me as if everything we discussed and posted summed up to a funny trivial picture of monkey's balls that I jokingly had posted a year ago.

I also tried to help MJJC as much as I could with reporting some dangerous ads like Scientology that appeared on MJJC banner generated by Google, helped Ginvid with her public letter against Aaron's ill promotion tarnishing MJ, translated some parts of the Murray trial into Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian languages and invested my precious time, professionally and personally, in trying to understand what happened to those Cascio tracks by sharing my views and also learning from others. I am not saying this to have any kind of thanks in return, but just to say that I was there for Michael as much as I could in any way I could despite my busy life, family life, two kids and a huge number of things that I have to deal with. I was suggesting some kind of boost when yesterday you were talking about number of views. But today it's another story: "Thome's lawsuit average is 20,000 views" and "I am not happy about 10,000 views". Well, fine, although I am getting allergic to anything and anyone that has to do with supporting the Cascios (the source of the problem) and Branca (the one who allowed the spreading of the problem), I guess my work is done here.

Bye all, if some of you want to stay in touch with me, add me as a friend on facebook BUMPER SNIPPET. In case there are other Bumper Snippets, here's my avatar on fb for the moment:

157113_100003584230986_257047905_n.jpg
 
Last edited:
Ok, in order to get a lil bit back on topic, I'll reply to Bumpers unanswered question. I'm not a believer (and no 100% doubter), but one could argue this way (doesn't mean that this is my opinion):

MJ didn't record 12 whole songs in this short time and neary completed them. He just did it similar to his known recording habits: Trying out some tunes, looking for new material and ideas. What he actually did record are very rough ideas in an early state which he might or might not wanted to complete later.
Just the way he did it very often with his songs: Start to write/record if he/other people get nice ideas, pause for some months or years if he's not satisfied with them and maybe return to finish them.

Eddie just said this material was so good and in a nearly finished state for promition. Who would buy songs in their earliest state of completion?



So: MJ recorded hundreds of songs/ideas in his professional studio with most of them unfinished, so it's reasonable to say that he started with 12 new ones in those months at the Cascios.

And just a quick reply to this argument: then MJ has indeed hundreds of recorded songs in similar state, which eventually means that they could be released. But apprently it's not the case.

Bye
 
Interesting this is the only thread that people feel like they need to leave the whole forum when you disagree with them in regard to some issue.

Perhaps it's indeed the time to close this thread for good , if it's creating the need to leave the forum.
 
Interesting this is the only thread that people feel like they need to leave the whole forum when you disagree with them in regard to some issue.

Perhaps it's indeed the time to close this thread for good , if it's creating the need to leave the forum.

But at the same time Ivy, no-one truly leaves this for good unless they've been banned. Everyone comes back eventually, and surely that is a testament to the gravity that the issue at hand represents, and ergo the gravity of this thread.
 
Please don't ever close this thread this is the way I found MJJC and it has thought me a lot about Michael Jackson and his music and so much more.


I find this thread to be the most intresting one on MJJC and even though there are not many viewers anymore it has many loyal members that keep coming back here daily.
 
Please don't ever close this thread this is the way I found MJJC and it has thought me a lot about Michael Jackson and his music and so much more.


I find this thread to be the most intresting one on MJJC and even though there are not many viewers anymore it has many loyal members that keep coming back here daily.

I really don't see the incessant need to close this thread....Like any other thread in this forum, when the topic dies down, and people don't post anymore, it just dies down, it's not then CLOSED....We've all learned a lot, contributed a lot, had a lot of fun, and made great friends...I don't see how any of THAT can be a bad thing...The off-topic posts were to blow off some steam, have fun, smile and laugh a little, and it's better than arguing or fighting...We all need a break sometimes from the inevitable drama of this thread....Obviously we've exhausted this topic, not much more to say at this time, but it's been a hot one for over a year now, and still going strong....That's saying SOMETHING....If more leaks happen, or more Cascio songs are released, we'll see it ignited again, although it's still pretty popular lol.....But to close it, no I don't think that's the answer...
 
I think when we get to page 1700 it'll be a good place to wrap this thread up and put a close to this debate.

AHAHA if i had a dollar for every time you've said "i think this thread can be closed once we hit ___ number of pages" i'd be rich!! what was your original goal-point? i think it was like 800 or something ;)


I made the pic for a Pajama tribute Video to MJ with all his Pajama pics and this is 1 of the 2 songs I used in it :lol:

hang on hang on, back it up. there's an mj pajama tribute video!?! does this still exist somewhere i could see it? that's pretty sweeeet.

let's just never close the thread. leave it up as a lasting testament to the 'michael' album and how the fans felt (and continue to feel) about it.
 
No, Spongebob or monkeyballs aren't the topic, but it's more fun to see than fans intruding in Michael's childrens lives, watching this girl's every move on twitter. Or fans who seem exactly to know what kind of disgusting person Lisa Marie Presley was and I can go on and on....insults to people in Michael's life fly around freely in other threads. But of course, that's people's opinions, and they have a right to that...:smilerolleyes:

This thread is more than silly pics. If someone is interested in this topic, I'm sure they will find the posts that are interesting to them and hopefully join the debate and/or use the information they can find on here.

It's quite an accomplishment that this thread is still alive, because there is no new information for months now. Everybody involved has their lips sealed. Like Arklove said, it will be ignited again when new songs are released for example (let's not hope so) or new info comes to light.

Why can't this thread stay open? Can't it just 'simmer' for a while?....:wink:
 
Last edited:
And just a quick reply to this argument: then MJ has indeed hundreds of recorded songs in similar state, which eventually means that they could be released. But apprently it's not the case.

Bye

Could easily be that there are much more songs in similar state to the Cascio ones. Why weren't they released instead of Cascios? Maybe for the same reasons they chose the C-songs to appear on the last album instead of completely former unknown songs like DYKWYCA or STTR: They seemed to have more mainstream-appeal and are younger.



And I hope you won't leave this thread/MJJC forever, Bumper. I've been a lurker here for quite a long time and like your discussions with some other members. Still one of the most interesting threads here.
 
We should give this topic more booty :)

[youtube]7UZkWODcvc8[/youtube]

No but seriously, I don't see how this topic will be reignited anytime soon. Unless 'new' Cascio material comes out of the blue (preferably via leaks and not on any upcoming MJ albums) then I don't see how the discussion will restart.

I chose to believe they're fake, but for the sake of the MJ fan community, I certainly hope no more Cascio tracks get an official release. I don't care if they get leaked either. If they do get leaked, people who want to hear them can look them up and come here and talk about them or whatever. But I personally wouldn't want any of them to be featured on any upcoming MJ album.
 
Could easily be that there are much more songs in similar state to the Cascio ones. Why weren't they released instead of Cascios? Maybe for the same reasons they chose the C-songs to appear on the last album instead of completely former unknown songs like DYKWYCA or STTR: They seemed to have more mainstream-appeal and are younger.



And I hope you won't leave this thread/MJJC forever, Bumper. I've been a lurker here for quite a long time and like your discussions with some other members. Still one of the most interesting threads here.
A good song is timeless?

And if they have more mainstream-appeal, then the reason for that is probably that they finished them in 2010 with 2010 musictechniques. That can be done with any other song, I think. It's not perse because of the lyrics or the melody.

When I first heard Breaking News, I thought it was written long before 2007, so not recently.
 
We can all agree that Bumper is more than his jokes and he put a lot of effort in this thread, anyone affirming the contrary just want to belittle him.

Now closing the thread for good is not the answer to anything. Will only cause a huge resentment against the board, it’s easy to predict that.


ADKIc3mAnX;3601389 said:
Please don't ever close this thread this is the way I found MJJC and it has thought me a lot about Michael Jackson and his music and so much more.


I find this thread to be the most intresting one on MJJC and even though there are not many viewers anymore it has many loyal members that keep coming back here daily.

Finally something we can agree on :D
 
We can all agree that Bumper is more than his jokes and he put a lot of effort in this thread, anyone affirming the contrary just want to belittle him.

nobody did such thing btw. We were generally talking about the off topic talk coming from multiple people and Bumper decided to take it personally.
 
Back
Top