I do have conviction however I'm also humble. I just don't go around and say "I'm right and you are all wrong" or belittle people by naming their posts "excuses or nonsense" or comment about their hearing or act like I'm perfect without error. I think I'm a bigger person for acknowledging "they have a valid point", they raise "interesting points" and what they argue is "possibility" even though I strongly disagree with their opinions. I'm in a place in my life that I can say "I don't agree with you but I respect you" and mean it.*
well Porte doesn't sound like Michael and I don't think that he's trying to sound like Michael.*
*
see below*
*
just read what you wrote above quote- you have a bias about a song not being 100% Michael. Technically speaking 51% means lead vocals, almost equal distribution of vocals (around 50%) means duet, less than 50% means "featuring", however you do not consider such as "MJ songs" as it doesn't satisfy your requirements.*
Assume this was a lawsuit (won't be a perfect example) and the judge said "if the vocals account to 51% you must conclude that he sang the lead". Now you might believe a lead vocal needs to be 80-90% - and that's fine. However a non biased determination would require putting your personal belief aside and comparing it to 51%.*
again this is not about counting percentages and showing one side to be correct or not. My point is solely based on bias. Even though samhabib liked to deny the human nature - all of us are biased in every subject due to our beliefs and personal experiences. But the question is can we put our bias aside? For example in law a jury isn't a group of non-biased people , it's a group of people that can put their bias, beliefs, opinions aside and can decide based on a written set of rules and directions.
uke:
