Michael - The Great Album Debate

I had Internet silence leading up to release, only got Phone calls from fans I know to tell me all about Faking News Etc, I went to a shop in town bought the album went home and put the CD in the CD Player. As soon as track 3 came on I left the house, I have not returned to this day! No one in our town goes near the house but legend has it, a large Herd of Goats has amassed around the premises, warning off anyone!

Last year an amateur film crew went to the property to film and investigate, they were never seen again, the footage found suggests they were attacked and beaten to death by some fat guy in a deputy uniform wielding a PVC Pipe!

My Driveway 10/12/2013


naldoandshirlgoestozoobic15.jpg


#TrueStory

My god I laughed way too much at that.
 
As someone else said in this thread, it really does make me sad to read Youtube comments for the three Cascio tracks... People everywhere saying "hurr durr this is Michael" and giving the most idiotic excuses and reasons. That just makes me so sad. This is such a ****ing big deal and no one cares, no one will ever find out, no one will ever reveal this. It makes me sick frankly thinking how they got away with this. I wish there was more I could do about it.
 
Well, if Michael was involved in the composition and production of these tracks, as an artist or a DJ, but lead vocals were by someone else wouldn't it still be "Michael Jackson"? They coulda went with "Michael Jackson - Breaking News (feat. Jason Malachi)" like "Daft Punk - Get Lucky (feat. Pharrell Williams)" However, in DJ-produced songs lead vocals aren't always credited as feature artists. Like One More Time by Daft Punk doesn't say "ft. Romanthony" or Wake Me Up by Avicii doesn't credit Aloe Blacc. The fraud only comes when they CREDIT the lead vocals TO Michael Jackson.

lolol if we all got trolled by MJ himself, I remember Jason hinting something similar on this forum back in 2008.
 
My god I laughed way too much at that.

Yeah, so funny. Now, if only you guys could get PROOF, after four years. Emails, testimony, scientific comparisons, SOMETHING. You know, instead of funny .gifs. Because right now, those three songs are official Michael Jackson songs on iTunes. Some of the people who buy Xscape will probably add to their cart a copy of "Michael". So, how about some proof?
 
I have all the Cascio tracks, but I'm just not sure if it is Michael. I do like the songs, but they just don't feel like something he would have sang.
 
Yeah, so funny. Now, if only you guys could get PROOF, after four years. Emails, testimony, scientific comparisons, SOMETHING. You know, instead of funny .gifs. Because right now, those three songs are official Michael Jackson songs on iTunes. Some of the people who buy Xscape will probably add to their cart a copy of "Michael". So, how about some proof?

Well, eddie destroyed the proofs, didn't he? Broken computer, erased files from his hard disk, not a single picture or video of Michael Jackson while "recording" those songs under the pretext that MJ didn't like that (cough, cough).

Eddie's non-explanation of the odditiy of the voice, Jason Malachi's been mute ever since, and there is not a single name of the forensics who sort of analysed the voice.

The first thing you do in a research is to give, get or inform names on a study that has been done. No study is taken seriously without a single name. Hence, the forensic thing is just a bunch of lies as they did not provide a single name.

If I want to do a serious research and write a report on those three tracks, who should I credit for the analysis of the voice?
 
As someone else said in this thread, it really does make me sad to read Youtube comments for the three Cascio tracks... People everywhere saying "hurr durr this is Michael" and giving the most idiotic excuses and reasons.

11-13 years old girls and Justin Bieber fans.
 
I don't see how it's a bad album. The 7 tracks, that are definitely Michael, are up there with some of his best.

Yes, I'm a bit reluctant to like the Cascio tracks. But what if, like someone else said, Michael played the ultimate joke on us? If there is a possibility that some, or all, of those songs are Michael, then I'm going to consider them Michael Jackson songs. Even the horrendous Breaking News.
 
Yeah, so funny. Now, if only you guys could get PROOF, after four years. Emails, testimony, scientific comparisons, SOMETHING. You know, instead of funny .gifs. Because right now, those three songs are official Michael Jackson songs on iTunes. Some of the people who buy Xscape will probably add to their cart a copy of "Michael". So, how about some proof?

Some of the people who bought Xscape would also have bought the Cascio songs that were on Xscape if we didn't make such a stink about those 3 fake songs on Michael, so we'll just keep chattering on about this how we will, we might not have Emails, but Testimony "we" do have and scientific comparisons can be done tomorrow, but are too expensive. Throw the "cascio case" in front of a judge or any sensible citizen and its a joke. There is NO PROOF to suggest MJ ever sung these songs, except for fans who can't tell the difference between a Llama and a Goat when listening in, there is tons of viable evidence to show how this thing was constructed and why it was constructed its just not worth writing about it all here online to satisfy a few fans who still pop in here to say MJ sung those songs, its being held back for the right release.

About the "PROOF" of "Smoking Gun"

2 scenarios.

1. MJ went to Cascios and recorded, spent all this time there, but yet they have nothing, not one picture, audio outtake with his voice, no video to even show MJ entered that Basement.

2. They recorded with an Impersonator and purposely hid what they did, and this is before any suspicion. We didn't know what they were doing, how could we find that smoking gun? Jason malachi doesn't have the fans that can locate him, no one gives a shit about Eddie and Porte.

So you tell me which of the 2 scenarios above should provide the smoking gun? Trusting MJ fans who thought Eddie was legit before release and had no reason to track movements etc, or the guy who produced 12 remarkable/impossible songs out of his ass, which MJ recorded in a couple weeks in his BASEMENT? xD

Oh BTW Kreen, this is a Forum, and as you say "PROOF", so if you like opinions backed up with Proof, okay its your turn to speak now, please sway my opinion and provide me with some Proof for your argument
, I'd be happy to change my mind about these songs then. The stage is yours.
 
Last edited:
Some of the people who bought Xscape would also have bought the Cascio songs that were on Xscape if we didn't make such a stink about those 3 fake songs on Michael, so we'll just keep chattering on about this how we will, we might not have Emails, but Testimony "we" do have and scientific comparisons can be done tomorrow, but are too expensive. Throw the "cascio case" in front of a judge or any sensible citizen and its a joke. There is NO PROOF to suggest MJ ever sung these songs, except for fans who can't tell the difference between a Llama and a Goat when listening in, there is tons of viable evidence to show how this thing was constructed and why it was constructed its just not worth writing about it all here online to satisfy a few fans who still pop in here to say MJ sung those songs, its being held back for the right release.

About the "PROOF" of "Smoking Gun"

2 scenarios.

1. MJ went to Cascios and recorded, spent all this time there, but yet they have nothing, not one picture, audio outtake with his voice, no video to even show MJ entered that Basement.

2. They recorded with an Impersonator and purposely hid what they did, and this is before any suspicion. We didn't know what they were doing, how could we find that smoking gun? Jason malachi doesn't have the fans that can locate him, no one gives a shit about Eddie and Porte.

So you tell me which of the 2 scenarios above should provide the smoking gun? Trusting MJ fans who thought Eddie was legit before release and had no reason to track movements etc, or the guy who produced 12 remarkable/impossible songs out of his ass, which MJ recorded in a couple weeks in his BASEMENT? xD

Oh BTW Kreen, this is a Forum, and as you say "PROOF", so if you like opinions backed up with Proof, okay its your turn to speak now, please sway my opinion and provide me with some Proof for your argument
, I'd be happy to change my mind about these songs then. The stage is yours.

Don't forget to add to option number 1: "MJ recorded the vocals in the shower and through a PVC tube. He also changed his voice on purpose to sound different. Also these were rough demo vocals, one take only. Also, they were heavily modified vocals to correct the pitch. Also, Eddie Cascio was there, pressing buttons". That's what you HAVE to believe if you think those songs as MJ, given as all of these were officially stated reasons.
 
Don't forget to add to option number 1: "MJ recorded the vocals in the shower and through a PVC tube. He also changed his voice on purpose to sound different. Also these were rough demo vocals, one take only. Also, they were heavily modified vocals to correct the pitch. Also, Eddie Cascio was there, pressing buttons". That's what you HAVE to believe if you think those songs as MJ, given as all of these were officially stated reasons.

All Eddie needed to do was bring the PVC Pipe for DNA Testing!!!!! oh also the whole one take thing is bull, we concrete proof, the vocals were recorded properly in several takes, we also had proof Eddie probably didn't push buttons as he had no idea how to run protools xD
 
I don't see how it's a bad album. The 7 tracks, that are definitely Michael, are up there with some of his best.

Yes, I'm a bit reluctant to like the Cascio tracks. But what if, like someone else said, Michael played the ultimate joke on us? If there is a possibility that some, or all, of those songs are Michael, then I'm going to consider them Michael Jackson songs. Even the horrendous Breaking News.

The two, well three if you count the JT Mix, released songs for the upcoming Xscape album already blows all 7 of those songs out of the water. Sooo, yeah...
 
Haha, no. Not even close to some of his best. What a crazy statement.

I have a right to my opinion, same as you. It doesn't make me crazy.

I've been a Michael Jackson fan since the 80's, and I think some of the songs on "Michael" were better than the last three (Invincible, Blood, and HIStory.) Does that make me a non-fan?

I wasn't talking about the Cascio tracks. Those definitely aren't as good. But, are you seriously going to stand there and say "Best Of Joy" isn't brilliant? Or "Hollywood Tonight"?
 
I have a right to my opinion, same as you. It doesn't make me crazy.

I've been a Michael Jackson fan since the 80's, and I think some of the songs on "Michael" were better than the last three (Invincible, Blood, and HIStory.) Does that make me a non-fan?

I wasn't talking about the Cascio tracks. Those definitely aren't as good. But, are you seriously going to stand there and say "Best Of Joy" isn't brilliant? Or "Hollywood Tonight"?

They're good songs, yes they are. But among his best? We're talking about songs like 'Billie Jean' here, Man In The Mirror, Smooth Criminal, DSTYGE, The Way You Make Me Feel, Black Or White etc. etc... Songs that have gained worldwide recognition and acclaim. Nothing on 'Michael' comes even close to Michael Jackson's best work.
 
Well what about scenario#3 I still think it's possible the whole thing was a music production project like Daft Punk, and the idea was to have other lead singers - featured artists, instead of Michael. ie. Michael produced/wrote these tracks (along with Eddie and James) but they weren't meant to have him singing the lead vocals. In the end, Michael Jackson is still the artist attributed to these songs.

It's nothing new, MJ doesn't sing in Bumper Snippet for example!
 
They're good songs, yes they are. But among his best? We're talking about songs like 'Billie Jean' here, Man In The Mirror, Smooth Criminal, DSTYGE, The Way You Make Me Feel, Black Or White etc. etc... Songs that have gained worldwide recognition and acclaim. Nothing on 'Michael' comes even close to Michael Jackson's best work.

I like "Best Of Joy" more than all of those songs.

Of course, you are talking about personal preference. I could care less what hits the charts. As long as I like it, it can flop the hell out, and I'll still like it.
 
[this is in reply to Birchey's post]

Well, regarding scenario 1, e.g. the absence of proof. Why are there no pictures of MJ recording those songs? Why no outtakes?

The thing is, we do know MJ was in that basement studio AT LEAST to record some lines for the Thriller 25 project. So either they DO have pictures/video of MJ in that basement studio, but it would prove nothing, since those might just be from the Thriller 25 project, and not indicate he ever recorded those 12 additional songs. Or they DON’T have any pictures/video of MJ in that basement, which still doesn’t prove he never did record with them, since we know he really did, at least for the Thriller 25 tidbits.

The other thing is that, at the height of the controvery, Eddie did register with the US Copyright Office something called « MJinstudio » or something of the sort, and it is visual material. We’ve just never seen it.

As for the absence of outtakes, I don’t know. The idea that Eddie ever said that he had lost/deleted all of those outtakes is just hearsay from one of MJ’s nephews. We don’t know if Eddie ever said that, or even if he did, he might have just been messing with the guy’s head. If anything, again, it’s fair to think he must have SOME audio of MJ in that studio : Michael did record some stuff for Thriller 25 with him, and it’s hard to imagine that, in all of the years Eddie had a studio, including the few weeks MJ spent with them in 2007, Eddie wouldn’t have SOME SORT of audio of MJ.

As for scenario 2, that to me is another puzzling difficulty. You could walk up to Jason Cupeta’s house right now if you wanted. Same thing with Eddie, or at least his parents’ home. You and me could go out right now and have lunch at his father’s restaurant in New Jersey. All of those addresses are public. So that is part of what is difficult to understand about the « hoax theory » : how could all of those regular people, from regular walks of life, and who didn’t even know each other before hand, how could they all have managed not to spill the beans, if only inadvertently, over 4 years. Eddie, James, Jason, their wives/girlfriends, their buddies in clubs : nobody has leaked a single email, nobody has been caught on a cellphone, drunkenly boasting that « they fooled those idiots at Sony, man ».

So you have two « absences ». You have the absence of any evidence that would prove it is indeed MJ on the songs : no video, not outtakes, no pictures. But you ALSO have the even more puzzling absence of incriminating evidence of the hoax, which shouldn’t be so hard to come by.

I guess the main questions to answer now are the following :

1- What is it exactly that Eddie Cascio registered with the Copyright Office 48 hours after MJ’s death? Jason Malachi’s voice, already? But he didn’t know MJ was going to die, so why would he have an impersonator singing those songs already? Or maybe he did register audio material with MJ’s voice on it. But is it what eventually appeared on the album?

2- Why did the Jacksons not pursue any legal action regarding those songs, when we know that they believe they are fake, and that they don’t like the Estate, and even think they’re illegitimate? Why was Prince Jackson not brought before a judge to say, “I was there with my dad in that summer in 2007, and I don’t recall him ever mentioning he was recordings new songs with Eddie Cascio”. How hard is it to prove someone didn’t actually record 12 songs in a studio, when you live with them?

3- What of those forensic tests that were supposedly done? Unless one believes that the Estate/Sony purposely and knowingly released 3 fake songs (which I don’t believe at all), one must assume that they really did do what the Estate’s statement says they did : they hired a couple of « music forensic experts » and got some tests done. And they must have been satisfied with the results. But what were the results?

So what can be done about all of this? Aside from the illegal (hacking into Eddie/Jason’s computers, stalking them to get some incriminating statements from them), what could be done, it seems to me, is :

1- Contact the people listed in the Estate’s statement as having confirmed the Cascio singer is MJ and ask them if it is still their opinions now. I see Damien Shields is in contact with Brad Buxer and Michael Prince. What do they think now? Is it MJ or not?

2- Raise money and hire a lawyer. I refuse to believe that millions of MJ fans can’t raise enough money to get something going.

3- Get some scientific comparisons done on our part. And publish those results.

4- With the backing of a lawyer or of an expert’s opinion, pressure the Estate into giving more information about the songs.

If there are 3 fake MJ songs on iTunes right now and the Estate knows it, no more product from them should be bought until that mistake is fixed. A boycott of the sort, especially when they’re promoting a new product like Xscape, might be just noisy enough for them to be forced to finally settle this one way or another.

It would have been perfect if, in the lead up to the release of Xscape – meaning right now – we could have come up with a forensic comparison disproving the songs are authentic. It would have made an impact.
 
Forget all these scenarios and such, the Cascio songs don't have Michael vocals on them, we've been presented no proof to assume otherwise. While the fans, have come about with a boatload of circumstantial evidence, like Vocal comparisons, the comparisons of certain vocal ticks, the awareness of Michael's previous "demo's" or "Pre-Edits" and what they possess, his clapping, feet stomping, his mumbling of certain lyrics, and how none of that is present throughout any of the Cascio songs. Among many other things, the fact that they simply won't be releasing any more of the Cascio records, all of that goes with the strong belief that Michael had little to nothing to do with these songs.

I have a hard time even thinking Michael wrote such simple, blatantly obvious that they've been borrowed, lyrics. Why would Michael write a bunch of bad rehashes of songs he's already done? I just can't comprehend that.

Whatever the case, like they say in "TDCAU", "we've had enough of this garbage. We know the truth." Simply put.
 
Forget all these scenarios and such, the Cascio songs don't have Michael vocals on them, we've been presented no proof to assume otherwise. While the fans, have come about with a boatload of circumstantial evidence, like Vocal comparisons, the comparisons of certain vocal ticks, the awareness of Michael's previous "demo's" or "Pre-Edits" and what they possess, his clapping, feet stomping, his mumbling of certain lyrics, and how none of that is present throughout any of the Cascio songs. Among many other things, the fact that they simply won't be releasing any more of the Cascio records, all of that goes with the strong belief that Michael had little to nothing to do with these songs.

I have a hard time even thinking Michael wrote such simple, blatantly obvious that they've been borrowed, lyrics. Why would Michael write a bunch of bad rehashes of songs he's already done? I just can't comprehend that.

Whatever the case, like they say in "TDCAU", "we've had enough of this garbage. We know the truth." Simply put.

Actually, we don't know the truth, which is why this issue remains so interesting to so many of us. We have suspicions, and maybe our suspicions are well founded, but there is for now no proof, and no corrective action has been taken. There is no closure, and even if there was a hoax, there are still so many unresolved questions. Like one you pointed out : was MJ involved AT ALL in the songs? Could it be he wrote some but didn't sing them? That alone would be interesting to know.

By the way, Brad Buxer is listed as co-writer with MJ of a song called "Monster". Do we know FOR SURE that this song has nothing to do with the Cascio "Monster"?
 
I have a hard time even thinking Michael wrote such simple, blatantly obvious that they've been borrowed, lyrics. Why would Michael write a bunch of bad rehashes of songs he's already done? I just can't comprehend that.

I just gotta add to this : songwriters often "rewrite" old songs into new ones. It could be argued MJ himself wanted "Cry" to be the new "MITM", or "Threatened" to be a new "Thriller". People of the World is basically Heal the World, Price of Fame is Billie Jean, Get on the Floor is a rewrite of one of the songs on Triumph (slips my mind at the moment).

In any event, it's safe to assume that most if not all of the Cascio songs already existed in the summer of 2007.
 
Well what about scenario#3 I still think it's possible the whole thing was a music production project like Daft Punk, and the idea was to have other lead singers - featured artists, instead of Michael. ie. Michael produced/wrote these tracks (along with Eddie and James) but they weren't meant to have him singing the lead vocals. In the end, Michael Jackson is still the artist attributed to these songs.

It's nothing new, MJ doesn't sing in Bumper Snippet for example!

That's true, MJ doesn't sing in me. If he sang in me I would know it.
 
kreen;3996975 said:
[this is in reply to Birchey's post]

Well, regarding scenario 1, e.g. the absence of proof. Why are there no pictures of MJ recording those songs? Why no outtakes?

The thing is, we do know MJ was in that basement studio AT LEAST to record some lines for the Thriller 25 project. So either they DO have pictures/video of MJ in that basement studio, but it would prove nothing, since those might just be from the Thriller 25 project, and not indicate he ever recorded those 12 additional songs. Or they DON’T have any pictures/video of MJ in that basement, which still doesn’t prove he never did record with them, since we know he really did, at least for the Thriller 25 tidbits.

The other thing is that, at the height of the controvery, Eddie did register with the US Copyright Office something called « MJinstudio » or something of the sort, and it is visual material. We’ve just never seen it.

The Cascios had a ready Studio upstairs in their house. They may have used that for recording Thriller 25, would make sense rather than a "makeshift" Studio that wasn't even built according to this guy........
"I knew that Michael was helping [Eddie Cascio] build a studio at his house and that he was writing some songs for Jackson. I thought it was great that Jackson was helping him.” ― Lenny Armuth (Eddie Cascio's college soccer coach).

The registered materail of "MJ in the studio" was a Photograph, it says so on the registration, the only photograph ANYONE has seen from Eddie is the one he showed on Oprah, now under the pressure he was not only after the album release but before from people MJ had worked with, he produced nothing else. The photo is nothing like a studio, a couple of bits of foam on the wall which would have done nothing to the sonics, Why settle for this when they had a ready studio setup upstairs?

kreen;3996975 said:
As for the absence of outtakes, I don’t know. The idea that Eddie ever said that he had lost/deleted all of those outtakes is just hearsay from one of MJ’s nephews. We don’t know if Eddie ever said that, or even if he did, he might have just been messing with the guy’s head. If anything, again, it’s fair to think he must have SOME audio of MJ in that studio : Michael did record some stuff for Thriller 25 with him, and it’s hard to imagine that, in all of the years Eddie had a studio, including the few weeks MJ spent with them in 2007, Eddie wouldn’t have SOME SORT of audio of MJ.

Eddie did claim it, everyone in "that meeting" can confirm that, I can't say much more right now but Eddie fell flat on his face when presenting a "broken" hard drive to them.

kreen;3996975 said:
As for scenario 2, that to me is another puzzling difficulty. You could walk up to Jason Cupeta’s house right now if you wanted. Same thing with Eddie, or at least his parents’ home. You and me could go out right now and have lunch at his father’s restaurant in New Jersey. All of those addresses are public. So that is part of what is difficult to understand about the « hoax theory » : how could all of those regular people, from regular walks of life, and who didn’t even know each other before hand, how could they all have managed not to spill the beans, if only inadvertently, over 4 years. Eddie, James, Jason, their wives/girlfriends, their buddies in clubs : nobody has leaked a single email, nobody has been caught on a cellphone, drunkenly boasting that « they fooled those idiots at Sony, man ».

Eddie knew of Jason Malachi, the TMZ news about the Mamacita track being MJ broke whilst MJ was at Eddies house, being that MJ was computer illiterate and somehow managed to receive this news points to Eddie or a Cascio family member being the guy who found it on TMZ. Either way they knew of it. hows that? Malachi an MJ vocal "impersonator" and Eddie finds out about him whilst he and MJ are supposed to be recording this stuff? Plus the tracks were done on a Laptop, and probably taken back and fourth from Stewart Brawleys studio for safe keeping by Eddie.

kreen;3996975 said:
So you have two « absences ». You have the absence of any evidence that would prove it is indeed MJ on the songs : no video, not outtakes, no pictures. But you ALSO have the even more puzzling absence of incriminating evidence of the hoax, which shouldn’t be so hard to come by.

I guess the main questions to answer now are the following :

1- What is it exactly that Eddie Cascio registered with the Copyright Office 48 hours after MJ’s death? Jason Malachi’s voice, already? But he didn’t know MJ was going to die, so why would he have an impersonator singing those songs already? Or maybe he did register audio material with MJ’s voice on it. But is it what eventually appeared on the album?

He registered a series of Songs he wrote for Michael, lets look at this again...................."and that he was writing some songs for Jackson. I thought it was great that Jackson was helping him.” ― Lenny Armuth (Eddie Cascio's college soccer coach).

kreen;3996975 said:
2- Why did the Jacksons not pursue any legal action regarding those songs, when we know that they believe they are fake, and that they don’t like the Estate, and even think they’re illegitimate? Why was Prince Jackson not brought before a judge to say, “I was there with my dad in that summer in 2007, and I don’t recall him ever mentioning he was recordings new songs with Eddie Cascio”. How hard is it to prove someone didn’t actually record 12 songs in a studio, when you live with them?

Because it wasn't their place too, it was for the Estate too, and we know what bully tactics Branca can push on people and we know Branca was a massive supporter of this. The kids have spoken, I know what they have said about the issue and I know what they will do once they have the Estate.

kreen;3996975 said:
3- What of those forensic tests that were supposedly done? Unless one believes that the Estate/Sony purposely and knowingly released 3 fake songs (which I don’t believe at all), one must assume that they really did do what the Estate’s statement says they did : they hired a couple of « music forensic experts » and got some tests done. And they must have been satisfied with the results. But what were the results?

There were no tests done, the statement released was a lie from the first sentence to the last, proof of this will come in due course.See during my course case, once my Lawyer read that statement by Weitzman first thing he said was "Who are these experts" if they are not named the document does not matter, simple as.

kreen;3996975 said:
So what can be done about all of this? Aside from the illegal (hacking into Eddie/Jason’s computers, stalking them to get some incriminating statements from them), what could be done, it seems to me, is :

1- Contact the people listed in the Estate’s statement as having confirmed the Cascio singer is MJ and ask them if it is still their opinions now. I see Damien Shields is in contact with Brad Buxer and Michael Prince. What do they think now? Is it MJ or not?

2- Raise money and hire a lawyer. I refuse to believe that millions of MJ fans can’t raise enough money to get something going.

3- Get some scientific comparisons done on our part. And publish those results.

4- With the backing of a lawyer or of an expert’s opinion, pressure the Estate into giving more information about the songs.

All been looked into, a couple of avenues are open but hopefully in time (its always time, I know) but this stuff will come out. You'll find out if MP and Brad have spoke on the case very soon I hope.

kreen;3996975 said:
If there are 3 fake MJ songs on iTunes right now and the Estate knows it, no more product from them should be bought until that mistake is fixed. A boycott of the sort, especially when they’re promoting a new product like Xscape, might be just noisy enough for them to be forced to finally settle this one way or another.

It would have been perfect if, in the lead up to the release of Xscape – meaning right now – we could have come up with a forensic comparison disproving the songs are authentic. It would have made an impact.

See, if we didn't make the noise we did, if we didn't keep this background buzz, so the folks from Sony and Angelikson who lurk in this thread (want Angeliksons username they used in 2010/2011?) didn't see that5 they can't get away with it again, we might well have seen Burn Tonight, Water and Soldier Boy on Xscape!

But as for evidence or witness testimony we have at the time these events were going on in 2007 I come back to this one last time.

"I knew that Michael was helping [Eddie Cascio] build a studio at his house and that he was writing some songs for Jackson. I thought it was great that Jackson was helping him.” ― Lenny Armuth (Eddie Cascio's college soccer coach).

Eddie wrote Michael songs, Michael passed before ever touching them, Eddie knew of Malachi and knew he had already fooled TMZ and alot of the world. Stewart Brawley was blacklisted by Michael as he leaked Xscape, Michael never wanted to work with him again, but he had the vocals they needed to "complete" their fakery and was hired by Angelikson, not the estate or sony, this trio worked together to **** over anyone they could for profit, no morals, no nothing.
 
Last edited:
I just gotta add to this : songwriters often "rewrite" old songs into new ones. It could be argued MJ himself wanted "Cry" to be the new "MITM", or "Threatened" to be a new "Thriller". People of the World is basically Heal the World, Price of Fame is Billie Jean, Get on the Floor is a rewrite of one of the songs on Triumph (slips my mind at the moment).

In any event, it's safe to assume that most if not all of the Cascio songs already existed in the summer of 2007.


With this argument being used before, I'll use the same explanation given to it. Out of all the songs that Michael wrote, that he then used lyrics from to turn into other songs, or songs with similar themes, not once have their lyrics ever been so simple and such an obvious attempt at trying to capitalize on his own past successes. Not once.
 
By the way, Brad Buxer is listed as co-writer with MJ of a song called "Monster". Do we know FOR SURE that this song has nothing to do with the Cascio "Monster"?

Completely different song, no similarities at all.
 
With this argument being used before, I'll use the same explanation given to it. Out of all the songs that Michael wrote, that he then used lyrics from to turn into other songs, or songs with similar themes, not once have their lyrics ever been so simple and such an obvious attempt at trying to capitalize on his own past successes. Not once.

Fits perfectly with the last couple of my sentences above, how better to write songs for MJ than to try emulating his own style of writing?
 
My belief is actually either those vocals are Michael, under a weird autotune, or they are partially Michael, and an imitator was used to finish up the parts that weren't done.
 
Back
Top