Michael Jackson's Dad to be Deposed

[Vici]

Did you see the list of names on the case?

Who are...
JACKSON NONA PARIS LOLA ANKHESENAMUN
JACKSON PRINCE MICHAEL MALACHI JET

Scroll down and look at the long list of names.

JACKSON NONA PARIS LOLA ANKHESENAMUN.. she claims she was MJs secret wife and the kids babymama and want them to live with her. When MJ passed, she went to court and asked "that all my husband's properties, monies and assets must be transferred to me immediately" and "my husband's body must be returned to the coroner's body [sic] or the mortuary immediately."

JACKSON PRINCE MICHAEL MALACHI JET.. he claims he is MJs son and therefor wants a cut from the estate. LOL

 

[Memefan]

I personally dont trust branca (shady) and if joe have information stating how much the excutors are getting, I am going to give joe my open mindnesss. and see what elses he have to say. I dont trust the excutors business associates, (sony etc) and we are not on the same page.

Joe has the same court documents Ivy previously posted. Open-mindness...??

There is no argument to beamed, you cannot not go wrong quoting court document...regardless of what Joe & Oxman say.

 

[mjscarousal]

You dont know how michael took care of business if joe said michael gave the money for him to katherine, then katheine and joe would know that, not you, who are you to judge?

Are you comprehending anything I say?


Obviously if anything was to ever seriously happen to Joe Im pretty sure the Estate and the family will take care of that being that he is Michaels father. Some things dont have to be said. However, asking for an allowance when you clearly have enough money to live your life and do what you want is very selfish and especially since his only doing it now that Michael has passed which is taking the advantage of an opportunity to get money. Im not judging anybody this is solely based off of the ACTIONS of Joe.. and Im tired of fans sugar coating the Jackson Family behavior. I agree we shouldnt bash them but I be lying if I didnt say there behavior so far since Michaels passing has been very disturbing.

 

[Naturelle]

How does the word Depose relate to this?

I dont see how it can be made any clearer.-_-

 

[blueocean]

Joe has the same court documents Ivy previously posted. Open-mindness...??

There is no argument to beamed, you cannot not go wrong quoting court document...regardless of what Joe & Oxman say.

I see that some fans are not understanding they way I am looking at this, this document is the executor asking to get 10% from business deals, and not about wants in the will, the will already stated what there fees will be for being the executors of the estate not for getting fees from business deals, I also herd some fans say the executors did not want there fees from This is it, branca gave his fees from This is it to the ziffren law firm that he is a partner of mcclain gave his fees from This is it to his recording studio and marvins room so these excutors profitted from the movie aswell. (shady)

 

[yaazgurl]

not true according to the documents we have seen. I wonder where this "fee" thing is coming from and what Oxman is using as a source (or he's simply misinformed). this is the documents

http://www.radaronline.com/sites/default/files/Michael Jackson Probate 1-22z_0.pdf

page 6, item 13 - "compensated in a total amount equal to 10% of the gross entertainment related income"

and that's all. It says whatever they are getting (either compensation or fee - whatever you'd like to call it) would total to 10%.

But I remember them going into court asking for more which I don't agree with. They knew when they agreed to be executors that Michael's estate would be massive.

 

[Naturelle]

Michael went out of his way to let the world know he loved his father, he forgave his father. It is honorable to take care of your family, especially your MOM and DAD regardless of how you were treated.!!!!!!!

Why should anyone, especially OUTSIDERS begrudge michael's dad getting an allowance from his son's BILLION dollar estate.?

I never take JOE'S side on anything. I often wish he would shut up and lay low. The man deserves an allowance.!! The executors know this is the right thing to do. If joe stops challenging the estate every which way, and accepts MJ'S will the executors would be more than generous.

I agree. I'm sure Randall would be pleased also, then he can get a check too.

 

[Naturelle]

just so that you know: court documents about the probate of the estate are public. (and that's how these websites report all these news)

go : http://www.lasuperiorcourt.org/CivilCaseSummary/index.asp

enter BP117321 for case number and search.

Great Ivy. Thank you for putting the FACT's out for those who do not understand.:flowers: Now, maybe we can move on?

 

[ivy]

I also herd some fans say the executors did not want there fees from This is it, branca gave his fees from This is it to the ziffren law firm that he is a partner of mcclain gave his fees from This is it to his recording studio and marvins room so these excutors profitted from the movie aswell. (shady)

wrong wrong wrong. They gave their shares from TII to AEG to cover the production costs for TII.

see the official court document

http://www.radaronline.com/sites/default/files/Michael Jackson Probate 1-22z_0.pdf

Page 6 Item 13

Executors ask for 10% in total excluding (3) receipts from Sony Pictures in connection with the motion picture This Is It to the extent applied to satisfy the debt owed to AEG.

Furthermore Branca says to send his 5% share to his firm and that his share will also cover the cost of the legal services that his firm provides and his firm would not charge additional money for legal services.

Similarly McClain says that as he's getting 5% share from the estate he'll provide his studio and producer services without any additional cost.

If you take the time to read the document (just read page 6 item 13) you'll see that there's nothing shady, they are providing free services and they are not asking for anything extra than the 10% total they get.

 

[blueocean]

wrong wrong wrong. They gave their shares from TII to AEG to cover the production costs for TII.

see the official court document

http://www.radaronline.com/sites/default/files/Michael Jackson Probate 1-22z_0.pdf

Page 6 Item 13

Executors ask for 10% in total excluding (3) receipts from Sony Pictures in connection with the motion picture This Is It to the extent applied to satisfy the debt owed to AEG.

Furthermore Branca says to send his 5% share to his firm and that his share will also cover the cost of the legal services that his firm provides and his firm would not charge additional money for legal services.

Similarly McClain says that as he's getting 5% share from the estate he'll provide his studio and producer services without any additional cost.

If you take the time to read the document (just read page 6 item 13) you'll see that there's nothing shady, they are providing free services and they are not asking for anything extra than the 10% total they get.

This part is in the document posted read page 6 line 28 and page 7 it reads receipt's from sony pictures in connection with the motion picture This is it, to the extent applied to satisfy the debt owed to aeg mr branca's share of compensation will be paid to the ziffren firm the compensation wil also cover and include general entertainment legal services performed by the ziffren firm, excluding trademark, copy right litigation finance corporate, real estate production legal work for film an tv production, guild/union labor work bankruptcy and tax matters, this is the firm branca is a partner with

 

[blueocean]

wrong wrong wrong. They gave their shares from TII to AEG to cover the production costs for TII.

see the official court document

http://www.radaronline.com/sites/default/files/Michael Jackson Probate 1-22z_0.pdf

Page 6 Item 13

Executors ask for 10% in total excluding (3) receipts from Sony Pictures in connection with the motion picture This Is It to the extent applied to satisfy the debt owed to AEG.

Furthermore Branca says to send his 5% share to his firm and that his share will also cover the cost of the legal services that his firm provides and his firm would not charge additional money for legal services.

Similarly McClain says that as he's getting 5% share from the estate he'll provide his studio and producer services without any additional cost.

If you take the time to read the document (just read page 6 item 13) you'll see that there's nothing shady, they are providing free services and they are not asking for anything extra than the 10% total they get.

branca did not take the money personally but he gave it to this law firm who he is partner's with how smart is he? mcclain also gave his share to his own recording company, and then again mcclain waved his right to producer fees for creating mixing and mastering new albums as well as unreleased song, mcclain not as greedy as branca page 7

 

[ivy]

^^
I'm reading what you are saying and I know his legal firm. You are misunderstanding what it says.

Branca just wants his share (not from TII , all of his 5%) to be sent to his law firm, what's the problem with that? It's like saying "send my check to my home or to my work address" or "make the check payable to me or my company".. It's just a choice , there's nothing smart or shady about it.

Branca (and his firm) also waives his/their legal fee for the entertainment legal services that they provide- "this fee will also cover and include general entertainment legal services provided by the Ziffren firm". So Branca too waives his legal fees and provides free service- so he's not greedy either.

btw - I really do not understand why do you keep arguing (or trying to misrepresent) facts. It's in the official court documents and at least myself have the minimum required legal education to read and understand these types of documents.

 

[blueocean]

^^
I'm reading what you are saying and I know his legal firm. You are misunderstanding what it says.

Branca just wants his share (not from TII , all of his 5%) to be sent to his law firm, what's the problem with that? It's like saying "send my check to my home or to my work address" or "make the check payable to me or my company".. It's just a choice , there's nothing smart or shady about it.

Branca (and his firm) also waives his/their legal fee for the entertainment legal services that they provide- "this fee will also cover and include general entertainment legal services provided by the Ziffren firm". So Branca too waives his legal fees and provides free service- so he's not greedy either.

btw - I really do not understand why do you keep arguing (or trying to misrepresent) facts. It's in the official court documents and at least myself have the minimum required legal education to read and understand these types of document.

What's wrong with it he is clever, page 7 states he gave his compensation to his/firm

 

[blueocean]

^^
I'm reading what you are saying and I know his legal firm. You are misunderstanding what it says.

Branca just wants his share (not from TII , all of his 5%) to be sent to his law firm, what's the problem with that? It's like saying "send my check to my home or to my work address" or "make the check payable to me or my company".. It's just a choice , there's nothing smart or shady about it.

Branca (and his firm) also waives his/their legal fee for the entertainment legal services that they provide- "this fee will also cover and include general entertainment legal services provided by the Ziffren firm". So Branca too waives his legal fees and provides free service- so he's not greedy either.

btw - I really do not understand why do you keep arguing (or trying to misrepresent) facts. It's in the official court documents and at least myself have the minimum required legal education to read and understand these types of documents.

I am not mispresenting whats on page 7

 

[Memefan]

I am not mispresenting whats on page 7

You don't even know when you are misrepresenting facts...EVEN after Ivy expelling the legal terms????


There is no hope.

Thank you Ivy for posting the links here...legal court documents to back up our statements. Now, I wish joe, Oxman & Randy would do the same.

 

[Dangerous Incorporated]

MURRAY-Involuntary manslaughter,3 attnies,Chernoff,Flanagan&Low JOE JACKSON-Contesting Will,BILLIONS at stake&wrongful death,ONE attny,Oxman

 

[ivy]

^^
this I agree. putting everything you believe, support etc. aside, for all these lawsuits of Joe there are much more qualified lawyers than Oxman.

 

[electrickeyez]

I imagine a living Michael would happily give his father $10-$15k a month. Joe is asking for $180k a year, which at least right now, is nothing to the estate.

MJ was paying the idiot doc that killed him $150k each month.

I say get him to sign something that says he'll shut up and stop going to the press and promoting his own shady crap while using his deceased son's name. That alone is worth $15k a month.

The law is the law, and the estate doesn't have to give Joe a single cent. I think they're being smart here though.

 

[virginia_woolf]

JACKSON PRINCE MICHAEL MALACHI JET.. he claims he is MJs son and therefor wants a cut from the estate. LOL

I've just read a thread about him on lipstickalley.com and people there actually believe he is Michael's son :bugeyed

 

[mjscarousal]

^^^ People will believe anything... but who fault is that? ding ding the FAMILY.

 

[AngieJ]

^^^ People will believe anything... but who fault is that? ding ding the FAMILY.

Why do you say it's the family's fault? Because they don't shoot the rumors down?

 

[blankyluvdoodoo]

Why do you say it's the family's fault? Because they don't shoot the rumors down?

don't u remember what joe said about omer bhatti that he is indeed Michaels son .they help to spread more rumors about every thing regarding Michael.

 

[AngieJ]

don't u remember what joe said about omer bhatti that he is indeed Michaels son .they help to spread more rumors about every thing regarding Michael.

Oh yeah. And I do see on that same board, alot of fans saying because the family has embraced Omer, he is indeed MJ's son too.

 

[mjscarousal]

Why do you say it's the family's fault? Because they don't shoot the rumors down?

Joe Jackson and other members of the family openly said Michael had another son... they helped spread the rumors... thats where it came from.

 

[Moulin Rouge]

JACKSON PRINCE MICHAEL MALACHI JET.. he claims he is MJs son and therefor wants a cut from the estate. LOL

From what I remember this man doesn't want a cut of the estate just a DNA test. I do not believe michael is is father but apparently he has been told his whole life michael is, it is suspicious that he waits until michael passes to make these claims.