Latest on MJJC

Michael Jackson v. Wade Robson, a new trial to be held

8701girl said:
Its gonna be ''2005'' all over again and this time it will be even more hell cuz mj aint here to defend himself
Click to expand...
I'm not sure about that. 1. I think a lot of people (no matter what they think of MJ) don't think it's right to sue a dead person (or his estate) for money. 2. The media spectacle won't be of the same gratitude since they don't have MJ to chase around and debate about what he is wearing, how his jail cell will look like etc. I'm not saying it will be easy, but I don't believe it will be as hysterical as it was back in 2005. Also I'm not hearing much about the case being brought up again by the media. I also have hope that this can turn into a good thing and might clear MJ once and for all - but maybe I'm being too optimistic on that one.
 
Last edited:
Oldtimer said:
Somebody very infuluencial as always been behind this someone very wealthy, how do you get a sundance premier,? Someone was out to destroy.
Click to expand...
Glanni said:
Oprah Winfrey
Click to expand...
I would have said Harvey Weinstein, myself. Let's not forget that there was a documentary about the accusations against him at that Sundance that very same year, and the media said next to nothing about it.
 
librariangirl:) said:
I'm not sure about that. 1. I think a lot of people (no matter what they think of MJ) don't think it's right to sue a dead person (or his estate) for money. 2. The media spectacle won't be of the same gratitude since they don't have MJ to chase around and debate about what he is wearing, how his jail cell will look like etc. I'm not saying it will be easy, but I don't believe it will be as hysterical as it was back in 2005. Also I'm not hearing much about the case being brought up again by the media. I also have hope that this can turn into a good thing and might clear MJ once and for all - but maybe I'm being too optimistic on that one.
Click to expand...
True but but still but god knws how the jury will think
 
This case wont be nearly as large as 05, that 05 trial will remain to be the trial of the century. There wont be media entities waiting to get Michael coming in and out of court or building the story of where he would be in prison etc.. IF this case gets streamed, mainstream media will give it even less attention.. -> They wouldn't be able to manipulate perspective the same way.
 
8701girl said:
my bet it will be jury trial
Click to expand...
I don't know anything about civil cases so I have no idea whether a jury trial is better or worse than a judge-only one. I can see problems with both. I don't even know who gets to decide. I mean, I assume it's the judge who makes that decision.
 
zinniabooklover said:
I don't know anything about civil cases so I have no idea whether a jury trial is better or worse than a judge-only one. I can see problems with both. I don't even know who gets to decide. I mean, I assume it's the judge who makes that decision.
Click to expand...
Yeh i think it will be up to the judge
 
Last edited:
i dont get this burden of proof. if wade gets cross examined and the lies will be presented to the jury, then they know he lied and then "burden of proof is much lower" doesnt apply in my opinion. If Wade didnt lie and everything would be plausible, then I would understand it but in this case the jury WILL see all the lies and then its pretty clear to me that he should lose the trial.
 
Here I was hoping that the Estate could convince the judges otherwise, but I guess not... fuck.

I'm... actually not as torn up about this as I thought I would be? Maybe it just hasn't set in yet... but what do we all do now?
 
Yeah. I knew it. Since this is about the companies, I hope the people with Michael’s companies will have their own attorneys. Anyway, the estate was never going to convince these judges that the outcome should be different. If I remember correctly, there was a judge actually arguing with the estate’s attorney, saying that the company should’ve sent a chaperone with Michael when he was around children. These two guys have officials in their pockets all the way. It’s sickening that they can say whatever they want about Michael and officials who should be fair just eat this garbage up, hence why this mess is where it is now IMO. Like I said before, LN should have tanked their cases for good due to potential jury tampering. But of course it wouldn’t. Because after all, there seems to be a separate set of rules just for a certain man named Michael Jackson.
 
Last edited:
These people can't hurt Michael Jackson anymore, because Michael is now part of God's Heavenly Choir.;)
Just remember to not let them suck up psychic energy from you worrying about this "so called" trail.:unsure:
 
Kingofpop4ever8000 said:
Yeah. I knew it. Since this is about the companies, I hope the people with Michael’s companies will have their own attorneys. Anyway, the estate was never going to convince these judges that the outcome should be different. If I remember correctly, there was a judge actually arguing with the estate’s attorney, saying that the company should’ve sent a chaperone with Michael when he was around children. These two guys have officials in their pockets all the way. It’s sickening that they can say whatever they want about Michael and officials who should be fair just eat this garbage up, hence why this mess is where it is now IMO. Like I said before, LN should have tanked their cases for good due to potential jury tampering. But of course it wouldn’t. Because after all, there seems to be a separate set of rules just for a certain man named Michael Jackson.
Click to expand...
Regardless of the outcome, Wade should be charged for lying under oath. That needs to happen, he broke the law.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top